RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hyperoxygenation has shown promise in improving suspicious fetal heart patterns in women in labor. However, the effect of hyperoxygenation on neonatal outcomes in women in labor with pathologic fetal heart rate tracing has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of fractional inspiration of oxygen of 80% compared with fractional inspiration of oxygen of 40% on neonatal outcomes in women with pathologic fetal heart rate tracing. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized, open-label, parallel arm, outcome assessor-blinded clinical trial was conducted in a large tertiary care university hospital. Singleton parturients aged ≥18 years at term gestation in active labor (cervical dilatation of ≥6 cm) with pathologic fetal heart rate tracing were recruited in the study. Pathologic fetal heart rate tracing was defined according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2015 guidelines. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classifies fetal heart rate tracings into 3 categories (normal, suspicious, and pathologic) based on rate, variability, and deceleration. Women in the intervention arm received oxygen at 10 L/min via a nonrebreathing mask, and those in the usual care arm received oxygen at 6 L/min with a simple face mask. Oxygen supplementation was continued until cord clamping. The primary outcome measure was a 5-minute Apgar score. The secondary outcome measures were the proportion of neonatal intensive care unit admission, umbilical cord blood gas variables, level of methyl malondialdehyde in the cord blood, and mode of delivery. RESULTS: Overall, 148 women (74 women in the high fractional inspiration of oxygen arm and 74 in the low fractional inspiration of oxygen arm) with pathologic fetal heart rate tracing were analyzed. The demographic data, obstetrical profiles, and comorbidities were comparable. The median 5-minute Apgar scores were 9 (interquartile range, 8-10) in the hyperoxygenation arm and 9 (interquartile range, 8-10) in the usual care arm (P=.12). Furthermore, the rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission (9.5% vs 12.2%; P=.6) and the requirement of positive pressure ventilation (6.8% vs 8.1%; P=.75) were comparable. Concerning cord blood gas parameters, the hyperoxygenation arm had a significantly higher base deficit in the umbilical vein and lactate level in the umbilical artery. The cesarean delivery rate was significantly lower in women who received hyperoxygenation (4.1% [3/74]) than in women who received normal oxygen supplementation (25.7% [19/74]) (P=.00). In addition, umbilical vein malondialdehyde level in the umbilical vein was lower in the hyperoxygenation group (8.28±4.65 µmol/L) than in the normal oxygen supplementation group (13.44±8.34 µmol/L) (P=.00). CONCLUSION: Hyperoxygenation did not improve the neonatal Apgar score in women with pathologic fetal heart rate tracing. In addition, neonatal intensive care unit admission rate and blood gas parameters remained comparable. Therefore, the results of this trial suggest that a high fractional inspiration of oxygen supplementation confers no benefit on neonatal outcomes in women with pathologic fetal heart rate tracings and normal oxygen saturation.