Racial and socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening in the United States: A systematic review.

Nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer deaths. Lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces NSCLC mortality; however, a lack of diversity in LCS studies may limit the generalizability of the results to marginalized groups who face higher risk for and worse outcomes from NSCLC. Identifying sources of inequity in the LCS pipeline is essential to reduce disparities in NSCLC outcomes. The authors searched 3 major databases for studies published from January 1, 2010 to February 27, 2020 that met the following criteria: 1) included screenees between ages 45 and 80 years who were current or former smokers, 2) written in English, 3) conducted in the United States, and 4) discussed socioeconomic and race-based LCS outcomes. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias. Of 3721 studies screened, 21 were eligible. Eligible studies were evaluated, and their findings were categorized into 3 themes related to LCS disparities faced by Black and socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals: 1) eligibility; 2) utilization, perception, and utility; and 3) postscreening behavior and care. Disparities in LCS exist along racial and socioeconomic lines. There are several steps along the LCS pipeline in which Black and socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals miss the potential benefits of LCS, resulting in increased mortality. This study identified potential sources of inequity that require further investigation. The authors recommend the implementation of prospective trials that evaluate eligibility criteria for underserved groups and the creation of interventions focused on improving utilization and follow-up care to decrease LCS disparities.

A Cohort Study of the Antitumor Efficacy and Toxicity Profile of Alpelisib for Metastatic or Locally Advanced HR+, HER2- Breast Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Alpelisib is approved in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) to treat patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) progressive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The SOLAR-1 trial demonstrated the efficacy of this oral agent and showed that, while alpelisib improves outcomes compared to placebo, it is also associated with clinically relevant adverse events (AEs). There is a pressing need for improved knowledge on the effectiveness and tolerability of this agent in real-world patient populations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with HR+, HER2- MBC treated with alpelisib and ET. We assessed the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of alpelisib in a real-world population. Deidentified patient-, tumor-, and outcome-related data, including AEs, were collected and summarized. Kaplan-Meier methods were applied for survival analyses, and stratified analyses of interest were conducted. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 76 women treated with alpelisib + ET were included in our cohort. Most had been previously treated with cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors and chemotherapy for MBC. The estimated median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.1-8.0). The median overall survival was longer among patients without prior everolimus therapy (hazard ratio, 4.28 [95% CI, 1.64-11.16]; p = 0.0012), and no significant outcome differences were observed between patients treated with different starting doses of alpelisib. Approximately 31.6% of patients permanently discontinued alpelisib due to AEs, and 32.9% had at least one dose reduction. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were hyperglycemia (21%), fatigue (13.2%), and diarrhea (10.5%). CONCLUSIONS: For progressive HR+, HER2- MBC, alpelisib + ET showed effectiveness in a real-world patient population that was comparable to published clinical trial data, regardless of starting dose. However, the effectiveness of alpelisib following previous everolimus exposure may be limited and, hence, should be a consideration to decide sequencing of therapy in these patients. Patients treated with alpelisib are at risk for clinically relevant AEs and require close monitoring.

Recall of Genomic Testing Results Among Patients with Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Genomic testing of somatic and germline DNA has transformed cancer care. However, low genetic knowledge among patients may compromise care and health outcomes. Given the rise in genomic testing, we sought to understand patients' knowledge of their genetic test results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a survey-based study with 85 patients at a comprehensive cancer center. We compared self-reported recall of (a) having had somatic/germline testing and (b) their specific somatic/germline results to the genomic test results documented in the medical record. RESULTS: Approximately 30% of patients did not recall having had testing. Of those who recalled having testing, 44% of patients with pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline mutations and 57% of patients with reported somatic alterations did not accurately recall their specific gene or variant-level results. CONCLUSION: Given significant knowledge gaps in patients' recall of genomic testing, there is a critical need to improve patient-directed education and return-of-results strategies.

A Lung Cancer Screening Education Program Impacts both Referral Rates and Provider and Medical Assistant Knowledge at Two Federally Qualified Health Centers.

BACKGROUND: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) serve minority and low-socioeconomic populations and provide care to high-risk smokers. These centers frequently experience barriers, including low provider and medical assistant (MA) knowledge around lung cancer screening (LCS). Subsequent low LCS referral rates by providers at FQHCs limit utilization of LCS in eligible, high-risk, underserved patients. METHODS: Providers and MAs from two FQHCs participated in a LCS educational session. A pre-educational survey was administered at the start of the session and a post-educational survey at the end. The intervention included a presentation with education around non-small cell lung cancer, LCS, tobacco cessation, and shared-decision making. Both surveys were used to evaluate changes in provider and MA ability to determine eligible patients for LCS. The Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yates' continuity correction was used to measure the impact. RESULTS: A total of 29 providers and 28 MAs enrolled in the study from two FQHCs. There was an improvement, P < .009 and P < .015 respectively, in provider and MA confidence in identifying patients for LCS. Additionally, one year prior to the program, 9 low-dose computed tomography (LDCTs) were ordered at one of the FQHCs and 0 at the other. After the program, over 100 LDCTs were ordered at each FQHC. CONCLUSIONS: A targeted LCS educational program improves provider and MAs' ability to identify eligible LCS patients and is associated with an increase in the number of patients referred to LDCT at FQHCs.

The Association between Polluted Neighborhoods and TP53-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Poor patients often reside in neighborhoods of lower socioeconomic status (SES) with high levels of airborne pollutants. They also have higher mortality from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than those living in wealthier communities. We investigated whether living in polluted neighborhoods is associated with somatic mutations linked with lower survival rates, i.e., TP53 mutations. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort of 478 patients with NSCLC treated at a comprehensive cancer center between 2015 and 2018, we used logistic regression to assess associations between individual demographic and clinical characteristics, including somatic TP53 mutation status and environmental risk factors of annual average particulate matter (PM2.5) levels, and neighborhood SES. RESULTS: 277 patients (58%) had somatic TP53 mutations. Of those, 45% lived in neighborhoods with "moderate" Environmental Protection Agency-defined PM2.5 exposure, compared with 39% of patients without TP53 mutations. We found significant associations between living in neighborhoods with "moderate" versus "good" PM2.5 concentrations and minority population percentage [OR, 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-1.08]. There was a significant association between presence of TP53 mutations and PM2.5 exposure (moderate versus good: OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.02-2.72) after adjusting for patient characteristics, other environmental factors, and neighborhood-level SES. CONCLUSIONS: When controlling for individual- and neighborhood-level confounders, we find that the odds of having a TP53-mutated NSCLC are increased in areas with higher PM2.5 exposure. IMPACT: The link between pollution and aggressive biology may contribute to the increased burden of adverse NSCLC outcomes in individuals living in lower SES neighborhoods.