Retrospective Cohort Studies in Craniofacial Outcomes Research: An Epidemiologist's Approach to Mitigating Bias.

Retrospective cohort studies, defined as a follow-up study in which outcome occurred prior to study onset, are common in craniofacial outcomes research and will continue to be prevalent given the increasing availability of secondary datasets and inherent prospective study limitations. However, if available data are not adequately measured, or necessary variables are absent, retrospective cohort studies can be particularly prone to bias. This brief communication aims to highlight the primary sources of bias, including measurement error, selection bias, and confounding. Each source is clearly defined, examples pertinent to craniofacial outcomes are provided, and mitigation strategies are discussed.

Eyeing Risks: A Critical Analysis of the Use of Periorbital Steroids in Fronto-orbital Advancement.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes associated with two techniques of periorbital steroid administration in bilateral fronto-orbital advancement (FOA). DESIGN: Multi-institutional retrospective chart review. SETTING: Two high volume, tertiary US craniofacial centers. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent FOA between 2012 and 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided into three cohorts based on method of steroid administration. Groups GEL and INJ represent those who received steroids in the form of triamcinolone soaked gelfoam or direct injection of dilute triamcinolone to the frontal/periorbital region, respectively. Group NON did not receive any periorbital steroids. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Peri-operative outcomes including hospital length of stay and complications were evaluated based on method of periorbital steroid administration. Variables predictive of infectious complications were assessed using stepwise logistic regression. RESULTS: Four hundred and twelve patients were included in our sample (INJ:249, GEL:87, NON:76). Patients in the INJ group had a higher ASA class (P < .001) while patients in the NON group were significantly more likely to be syndromic (P < .001) and have multisuture craniosynostosis (P < .001). Rate of infectious complications for each cohort were NON: 2.6%, INJ: 4.4%, and GEL: 10.3%. There was no significant difference between groups in hospital length of stay (P = .654) or rate of post-operative infectious complications (P = .061). Increased ASA class (P = .021), increased length of stay (P = .016), and increased intraoperative narcotics (P = .011) were independent predictors of infectious complications. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a dose-dependent relationship between periorbital steroids and rate of postoperative infections, with key contributions from ASA class, hospital length of stay, and dose of intraoperative narcotics.

Current Trends in Orthognathic Surgery.

Orthognathic surgery has evolved significantly over the past century. Osteotomies of the midface and mandible are contemporaneously used to perform independent or coordinated movements to address functional and aesthetic problems. Specific advances in the past twenty years include increasing fidelity with computer-assisted planning, the use of patient-specific fixation, expanding indications for management of upper airway obstruction, and shifts in orthodontic-surgical paradigms. This review article serves to highlight the contemporary practice of orthognathic surgery.

Gender-Affirming Facial Surgery: Lower Third of the Face.

This article is intended to give the reader an overview of facial gender-affirming procedures applicable to the lower face and neck. A review of facial analysis in the context of masculine versus feminine facial features and the contributions of both soft tissue and bone to this anatomy is provided. The use of systematic facial evaluation and patient-driven concerns as a guide for presurgical planning is reviewed. Detailed descriptions of the unique surgical interventions to feminize the soft tissues and the skeletal framework of the lower face and neck are provided.

Head and Neck Vascular Anomalies in Children.

Craniomaxillofacial vascular anomalies encompass a diverse and complex set of pathologies that may have a profound impact on pediatric patients. They are subdivided into vascular tumors and vascular malformations depending on biological properties, clinical course, and distribution patterns. Given the complexity and potential for leading to significant functional morbidity and esthetic concerns, a multidisciplinary approach is generally necessary to optimize patient outcomes. This article reviews the etiology, clinical course, diagnosis, and current management practices related to vascular anomalies in the head and neck.

Benign Non-Odontogenic Pathology in Children.

This article provides a comprehensive overview of benign non-odontogenic pathologies. Bone-derived lesions like osteoma, osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma, and osteochondroma are discussed in detail, emphasizing their radiographic features, locations, and treatment strategies. Cartilage-derived lesions such as chondroma, chondroblastoma, and chondromyxoid fibroma are also examined, noting their typical presentation and management approaches. The article then delves into fibroconnective tissue lesions. Mesenchymal and vascular lesions are detailed regarding their clinical and radiographic characteristics and treatment options. Lastly, nerve-derived lesions like schwannoma and neurofibroma are covered, providing insights into their association with diseases like neurofibromatosis and preferred management strategies.

Conceptual Principles in Pediatric Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction.

Pediatric craniomaxillofacial reconstruction must be approached through the lens of growth and durability. A systematic approach of matching defects to donor tissue drives the selection of autologous reconstructive technique. The menu of available methods for reconstruction can be organized in a manner similar to adults, with special considerations for growth and development. Reconstructive surgeons have the opprtunity to promote and maintain young patients' sense of identity during psychosocial development.

Does surgical sequencing influence the accuracy of maxillary positioning in bimaxillary cleft orthognathic surgery?

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the sequence of osteotomies influences the accuracy of maxillary positioning in patients with cleft palate ± cleft lip undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery (OGS). METHODS: This was a prospective study of patients with Veau 2-4 clefts who underwent bimaxillary OGS at tertiary-care children's hospital over a 3-year period. The primary predictor variable was the sequence of osteotomies (maxilla-first versus mandible-first). The primary outcome of interest was the concordance between the planned and achieved maxillary position, as assessed using linear and angular measurements. Secondary study predictors were demographic and surgical variables. Differences between groups were compared using non-parametric independent samples tests for continuous measures (data reported as median and interquartile range, IQR) and chi-squared tests for categorical measures. For all analyses, p≤ 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Subjects who underwent maxilla-first (n=15) and mandible-first (n=16) operations were comparable with regard to age, gender, cleft type, skeletal classification, segmental maxillary osteotomy, and magnitude of maxillary movement (p ≥ 0.09). The planned sagittal and vertical positions of the maxilla were similarly accurate between the two groups (p ≥ 0.68). Angular accuracy was also comparable (p ≥ 0.56) between the study groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with CP ± CL undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery, use of mandible-first sequencing, when compared to maxilla-first sequencing, does not impact accuracy of maxillary positioning in the immediate post-operative period in well-selected patients.