Adjuvant imatinib in high-risk resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Merely delaying the inevitable?

INTRODUCTION: Patients with high-risk resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) receiving adjuvant imatinib have improved recurrence-free survival (RFS), however whether a complete cytocidal effect exists is unknown. We investigated this using a normalized recurrence timeline measured from end of oncologic treatment (EOOT), defined as the later of resection or end of adjuvant therapy. METHODS: We reviewed patients with resected high-risk GIST at our cancer center from 2003 to 2018. RFS (measured from resection and EOOT), overall survival (OS), and time to imatinib resistance (TTIR) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. The performance of the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) GIST nomogram was assessed. RESULTS: We identified 86 patients with high-risk GIST with a median 106 months of postsurgical follow-up. One-third (n = 29; 34%) did not receive adjuvant imatinib, while 57 (66%) did for a median of 3 years. The MSK nomogram-predicted 5-year RFS for patients receiving adjuvant imatinib was similar to those who did not (29% vs. 31%, p = 0.64). When RFS was measured from EOOT, the MSK-predicted RFS was independently associated with EOOT RFS (hazard ratio 0.22, p = 0.02), while adjuvant imatinib receipt and duration were not. Neither receipt nor duration of adjuvant imatinib were associated with TTIR or OS (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with adjuvant imatinib delays, but does not clearly impact ultimate recurrence, TTIR, or OS, suggesting many patients with high-risk GIST may receive adjuvant imatinib unnecessarily. Additional studies are needed to establish the benefit of adjuvant therapy versus initiating therapy at first radiographic recurrence.

Care at high-volume centers is associated with improved outcomes for patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A population-level analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Primary resection and debulking of liver metastases have been associated with improved survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). The treatment patterns and outcomes differences between low-volume (LV) institutions and high-volume (HV) institutions remains unstudied. METHODS: A statewide cancer registry was queried for patients with nonfunctional PNET from 1997 to 2018. LV institutions were defined as treating <5 newly diagnosed patients with PNET per year, while HV institutions treated ≥5. RESULTS: We identified 647 patients: 393 with locoregional (n = 236 HV care, n = 157 LV care) and 254 with metastatic disease (n = 116 HV care, n = 138 LV care). Patients with HV care had improved disease-specific survival (DSS) compared to patients with LV care for both locoregional (median 63 vs. 32 months, p < 0.001) and metastatic disease (median 25 vs. 12 months, p < 0.001). In patients with metastatic disease, primary resection (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55, p = 0.003) and HV institution (HR: 0.63, p = 0.002) were independently associated with improved DSS. Furthermore, diagnosis at a HV center was independently associated with higher odds of receiving primary site surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 2.59, p = 0.01) and metastasectomy (OR: 2.51, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Care at HV centers is associated with improved DSS in PNET. We recommend referral of all patients with PNETs to HV centers.

Neoadjuvant therapy does not impact the biliary microbiome in patients with pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) often impinges on the biliary tree and obstruction necessitates stent placement increasing the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs). We sought to explore the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on the biliary microbiome and SSI risk in patients undergoing resection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 346 patients with PDAC who underwent resection at our institution from 2008 to 2021. Univariate and multivariate methods were utilized for analysis. RESULTS: Biliary stenting rates were similar between groups but resulted in increased bile culture positivity (97% vs. 15%, p < 0.001). Culture positivity did not differ between upfront resection or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) (77% vs. 80%, p = 0.60). NAC-alone versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy did not impact biliary positivity (80% vs. 79%, p = 0.91), nor did 5-fluorouracil versus gemcitabine-based regimens (73% vs. 85%, p = 0.19). While biliary stenting increased incisional SSI risk (odds ratios [OR]: 3.87, p = 0.001), NAC did not (OR: 0.83, p = 0.54). Upfront resection, NAC, and chemoradiotherapy were not associated with biliary organism-specific changes or antibiotic resistance patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Biliary stenting is the greatest predictor for positive biliary cultures and SSIs in resected PDAC patients. Neither NAC nor radiotherapy impact bile culture positivity, speciation, rates, or antibiotic resistance patterns, and perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis should not differ.

Perioperative Telemedicine Utilization Among Geriatric Patients Being Evaluated for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction and Hernia Repair.

Introduction: Perioperative telemedicine services have increasingly been utilized for ambulatory care, although concerns exist regarding the feasibility of virtual consultations for older patients. We sought to review telemedicine encounters for geriatric patients evaluated at a hernia repair and abdominal wall reconstruction center. Methods: A retrospective review of telemedicine encounters between May 2020 and May 2021 was performed. Patient characteristics and encounter-specific outcomes were compared among geriatric (older than65 years old) and nongeriatric patients. Clinical care plans for encounters were reviewed to determine potential downstream care utilization. Patient-derived benefits related to time saved in travel time was calculated using geo-mapping. Outcomes for postoperative encounters were assessed to determine if complication rates differed between geriatric and nongeriatric populations. Results: A total of 313 telemedicine encounters (geriatric: 41.9%) were conducted among 251 patients. Reviewing preoperative factors for hernia care, geriatric patients presented with higher rates of recurrent or incisional hernias (87.9% vs. 70.7%, p < 0.01). Potential travel time was longer for geriatric patients (104 min vs. 42 min, p = 0.03) in the preoperative setting. No differences in clinical care plans were found. Only 8.6% of preoperative encounters resulted in recommendations for supplemental in-person evaluation. Operative plans were coordinated for 42.5% of all preoperative telemedicine encounters. There was no difference in complication rate between geriatric and nongeriatric patients (p > 0.05) in the postoperative setting, with no complications directly attributable to telemedicine-based care. Conclusions: Telemedicine-based evaluations appear to function well among geriatric patients seeking hernia repair and abdominal wall reconstruction. Clinical care plans rendered following telemedicine-based encounters are appropriate with a low rate of supplemental in-person evaluations. Telemedicine use resulted in significantly more time saved in commuting to and from clinic for geriatric patients.

Disparities in pancreatic cancer care and research in Native Americans: Righting a history of wrongs.

Disparities in pancreatic cancer incidence and outcomes exist in Native American populations. These disparities are multifactorial, difficult to quantify, and are influenced by historical, socioeconomic, and health care structural factors. The objective of this article was to assess these factors and offer a call to action to overcome them. The authors reviewed published data on pancreatic cancer in Native American populations with a focus on disparities in incidence, outcomes, and research efforts. The historical context of the interactions between Native Americans and the United States health care system was also analyzed to form actionable items to build trust and collaboration. The incidence of pancreatic cancer in Native Americans is higher than that in the general US population and has the worst survival of any major racial or ethnic group. These outcomes are influenced by a patient population with often poor access to high-quality cancer care, historical trauma potentially leading to reduced care utilization, and a lack of research focused on etiologies and comorbid conditions that contribute to these disparities. A collaborative effort between nontribal and tribal leaders and cancer centers is key to addressing disparities in pancreatic cancer outcomes and research. More population-level studies are needed to better understand the incidence, etiologies, and comorbid conditions of pancreatic cancer in Native Americans. Finally, a concerted, focused effort should be undertaken between nontribal and tribal entities to increase the access of Native Americans to high-quality care for pancreatic cancer and other lethal malignancies.

Ten-Year Survivorship in Patients with Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Patients developing metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (mGIST) have heterogenous disease biology and oncologic outcomes; prognostic factors are incompletely characterized. We sought to evaluate predictors of 10-year metastatic survivorship in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. METHODS: We reviewed patients with mGIST treated at our Comprehensive Cancer Center from 2003 to 2019, including only patients with either mortality or 10 years of follow-up. Ten-year survivorship was evaluated with logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 109 patients with a median age of 57 years at mGIST diagnosis. Synchronous disease was present in 57% (n = 62) of patients; liver (n = 48, 44%), peritoneum (n = 40, 37%), and liver + peritoneum (n = 18, 17%) were the most common sites. Forty-six (42%) patients were 10-year mGIST survivors. Following mGIST diagnosis, radiographic progression occurred within 2 years in 53% (n = 58) of patients, 2-5 years in 16% (n = 17), and 5-10 years in 16% (n = 17), with median survival of 32, 76, and 173 months, respectively. Seventeen (16%) patients had not progressed by 10 years. Fifty-two (47%) patients underwent metastasectomy, which was associated with improved progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.63, p = 0.04). In patients experiencing progression, factors independently associated with 10-year survivorship were age (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, p = 0.03) and time to progression (OR 1.71/year, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ten-year survivorship is achievable in mGIST in the era of TKIs and is associated with younger age and longer time to first progression, while metastasectomy is associated with longer time to first progression. The role of metastasectomy in the management of patients with disease progression receiving TKI therapy merits further study.

Disparities in Electronic Screening for Cancer-Related Psychosocial Distress May Promote Systemic Barriers to Quality Oncologic Care.

BACKGROUND: Screening for cancer-related psychosocial distress is an integral yet laborious component of quality oncologic care. Automated preappointment screening through online patient portals (Portal, MyChart) is efficient compared with paper-based screening, but unstudied. We hypothesized that patient access to and engagement with EHR-based screening would positively correlate with factors associated with digital literacy (eg, age, socioeconomic status). METHODS: Screening-eligible oncology patients seen at our Comprehensive Cancer Center from 2014 through 2019 were identified. Patients with active Portals were offered distress screening. Portal and screening participation were analyzed via multivariable logistic regression. Household income in US dollars and educational attainment were estimated utilizing zip code and census data. RESULTS: Of 17,982 patients, 10,279 (57%) had active Portals and were offered distress screening. On multivariable analysis, older age (odds ratio [OR], 0.97/year; P<.001); male gender (OR, 0.89; P<.001); Black (OR, 0.47; P<.001), Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (OR, 1.54; P=.007), and Native American/Alaskan Native race (OR, 0.67; P=.04); Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 0.76; P<.001); and Medicare (OR, 0.59; P<.001), Veteran's Affairs/military (OR, 0.09; P<.01), Medicaid (OR, 0.34; P<.001), or no insurance coverage (OR, 0.57; P<.001) were independently associated with lower odds of being offered distress screening; increasing income (OR, 1.05/$10,000; P<.001) and educational attainment (OR, 1.03/percent likelihood of bachelor's degree or higher; P<.001) were independently associated with higher odds. In patients offered electronic screening, participation rate was 36.6% (n=3,758). Higher educational attainment (OR, 1.01; P=.03) was independently associated with participation, whereas Black race (OR, 0.58; P=.004), Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 0.68; P=.01), non-English primary language (OR, 0.67; P=.03), and Medicaid insurance (OR, 0.78; P<.001) were independently associated with nonparticipation. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic portal-based screening for cancer-related psychosocial distress leads to underscreening of vulnerable populations. At institutions using electronic distress screening workflows, supplemental screening for patients unable or unwilling to engage with electronic screening is recommended to ensure efficient yet equal-opportunity distress screening.

Characterizing 30-Day Postoperative Acute Care Visits: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Collaborative Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Many postoperative acute care visits (PACVs) are likely more appropriately addressed in lower acuity settings; however, the frequency and nature of PACVs are not currently tracked by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), and the overall burden to emergency departments and urgent care centers is unknown. METHODS: NSQIP collaborative data were augmented to prospectively capture 30-d PACVs for 1 y starting October 2018 across all NSQIP specialties, including visit reason and disposition. Data were analyzed using binomial logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 9933 patients were identified; 12.0% (n = 1193) presented to an acute care setting over 1413 visits, most commonly for surgical pain (15.4%) in the absence of an identified complication. Visits most commonly resulted in discharge (n = 817, 68.5%) or admission (n = 343, 24.3%). Variables independently associated with visits resulting in discharge included age (odds ratio [OR] 0.99 per year, P < 0.001), increasing comorbidities (1-2 [OR 1.55, P < 0.001]; 3-4 [OR 2.51, P < 0.001]; 5+ [OR 2.79 P < 0.001]), operative duration (OR 1.08 per hour, P = 0.001), and nonelective (OR 1.20, P = 0.01) or urologic (OR 1.46, P = 0.01) procedures. CONCLUSIONS: PACVs are an overlooked burden on emergency medicine providers and healthcare systems; most do not require admission and could be potentially triaged outside of the acute care setting with improved perioperative care infrastructure. Younger patients, those with multiple comorbidities, and those undergoing nonelective procedures deserve special attention when designing initiatives to address postoperative acute care utilization. Data regarding PACVs can be routinely collected with minor modifications to current NSQIP workflows.

Hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy combined with systemic therapy for patients with advanced colorectal liver metastases: Outcomes in a newly established program.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with colorectal cancer. Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy has been demonstrated to improve survival in patients with resected CRLM and to facilitate conversion of technically unresectable disease. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2018, n = 22 HAI pumps were placed for CRLM. All patients received systemic chemotherapy concurrently with HAI floxuridine/dexamethasone. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: HAI pumps were placed in seven patients with completely resected CRLM and 15 patients with unresectable disease. Twenty-one patients received HAI floxuridine with a median of 5 total HAI cycles (interquartile range: 4-7). Biliary sclerosis was the most common HAI-related complication (n = 5, 24%). Of the 13 patients treated to convert unresectable CRLM, 3 (23%) underwent hepatic resection with curative intent after a median of 7 HAI cycles (range: 4-10). For all HAI patients, the mean OS was 26.7 months from CRLM diagnosis, while the median PFS and hepatic PFS from pump placement were 9 and 13 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Concomitant HAI and systemic therapy can be utilized at multidisciplinary programs for patients with advanced CRLM, both in the adjuvant setting and to facilitate conversion of unresectable disease.

Surgical timing after preoperative chemotherapy is associated with oncologic outcomes in resectable colorectal liver metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative chemotherapy (POC) is often employed for patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). The time to resection (TTR) following the end of chemotherapy may impact oncologic outcomes; this phenomenon has not been studied in CRLM. METHODS: We queried our institutional cancer database for patients with resected CRLM after POC from 2003 to 2019. TTR was calculated from date of last cytotoxic chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to analyze recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We identified n = 187 patients. One hundred twenty-four (66%) patients had a TTR of <2 months, while 63 (33%) had a TTR of ≥2 months. Median follow-up was 36 months. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with TTR ≥ 2 months had shorter RFS (median 11 vs. 17 months, p = 0.002) and OS (median 44 vs. 62 months, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, TTR ≥ 2 months was independently associated with worse RFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-2.22, p = 0.02) and OS (HR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.11-2.77, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: TTR ≥ 2 months following POC is independently associated with worse oncologic outcomes in patients with resectable CRLM. We therefore recommend consideration for hepatic resection of CRLM within this window whenever feasible.

Intensive care unit observation after pancreatectomy: Treating the patient or the surgeon?

BACKGROUND: Routine intensive care unit admission (ICUA) is commonplace following pancreatectomy, particularly pancreaticoduodenectomy. The value of this practice in avoiding failure-to-rescue is poorly studied. METHODS: We queried our institutional National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database for patients undergoing pancreatectomy from 2013 to 2020. Postoperative dispositions, ICU courses, and hospital cost data in United States Dollars (USD) were captured. Data were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Six-hundred-thirty-seven patients were identified; 404 (63%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Postoperatively, 398 (99%) pancreaticoduodenectomies and 110 (47%) distal pancreatectomies had ICUA; two-thirds (n = 318, 63%) did not require immediate postoperative ICU-level interventions at ICUA. Of these, 17 (5.3%) subsequently required ICU-level interventions during initial ICUA, most commonly antiarrhythmic infusion (n = 12). Thirty-day and 90-day mortality in patients requiring immediate ICU-level interventions was 5% (n = 10) and 8% (n = 16) versus 0.3% (n = 1) and 1.2% (n = 4) in those without, respectively. Hospital length of stay was significantly longer with initial ICU-level interventions (median 11 vs. 9 days, p < 0.001), as were total ICU costs (mean 8683 vs. 14611 USD, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: At high-volume pancreas centers, patients without immediate postoperative ICU-level interventions are very low risk for failure-to-rescue. Ward admission with a low threshold for care escalation presents a significant opportunity for cost-savings and un-burdening ICUs.

Psychosocial distress is dynamic across the spectrum of cancer care and requires longitudinal screening for patient-centered care.

PURPOSE: Screening for cancer-related psychosocial distress is recommended for patients with cancer; however, data on the long-term prevalence of distress and its natural history in survivors are scarce, preventing recommendations for screening frequency and duration. We sought to evaluate longitudinal distress in cancer patients. METHODS: We evaluated longitudinal distress screening data for patients with cancer treated or surveilled at our institution from 2010 to 2018. Anxiety, depression, insurance/financial, family, memory, and strength-related distress were separately assessed and analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to evaluate factors associated with distress subtypes. RESULTS: In 5660 patients, distress was the highest at diagnosis for anxiety, depression, financial, and overall distress. On multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with distress at diagnosis included younger age, female gender, disease site/stage, payor, and income, varying by subtype-specific analyses. Severe distress in at least one subtype persisted in over 30% of survivors surveyed through 10 years after diagnosis. Over half of patients with initially severe distress at diagnosis improved within 12 months; however, distress worsened in 20-30% of patients with moderate, low, and no initial distress, regardless of the distress subtype. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial distress in cancer survivors is a long-lasting burden with implications for quality of life and oncologic outcomes. Severe distress remains prevalent through 10 years after diagnosis in survivors receiving continued care at cancer centers and results from both persistent and new sources of distress in a variety of psychosocial domains. Longitudinal distress screening is an invaluable tool for providing comprehensive patient-centered cancer care and is recommended to detect new or recurrent distress in cancer survivors.

Complications in Distal Pancreatectomy versus Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy: A Disease Risk Score Analysis Utilizing National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Data.

INTRODUCTION: Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) was developed to improve R0 resections and lymph node harvests versus distal pancreatectomy (DP) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC); relative complication rates are understudied. METHODS: Patients undergoing distal pancreas resections from 2006 to 2020 were identified from our institutional NSQIP database, grouped by resection method, and evaluated for the following outcomes: postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), clinically relevant POPF (crPOPF), incisional surgical site infection (iSSI), organ space SSI (osSSI), and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 (CD ≥ 3) complications using logistic regression. Patients were matched 1:1 based on disease risk score. RESULTS: Two-hundred-thirty-six and 117 patients underwent DP and RAMPS, respectively. POPF, crPOPF, CD ≥ 3 complications, iSSI, and osSSIs occurred in 105 (30%), 43 (12%), 74 (21%), 34 (10%) and 52 (15%) patients, respectively. Disease risk score matching yielded 89 similar patients per group. On multivariable analysis, patients undergoing RAMPS were not significantly more likely to experience POPF (OR 0.69, P = 0.26), crPOPF (OR 0.41, P = 0.72), CD ≥ 3 complication (OR 0.78, P = 0.44), iSSI (OR 0.58, P = 0.27), or osSSI (OR 0.93, P = 0.86). Of patients with PDAC (n = 108) mean nodal harvest were 14.8 (SD 11.30) and 19.4 (SD 7.19) nodes for patients undergoing DP and RAMPS, respectively (P = 0.01). Six patients (20%) undergoing DP had positive margins versus 12 (15%) undergoing RAMPS (P = 0.56). At a median follow-up of 17 months, there was no difference in locoregional recurrence-free survival (P = 0.32) or overall survival (P = 0.92) on Kaplan-Meier analysis. CONCLUSION: RAMPS does not result in increased complications compared to DP and routine use is encouraged in pancreatic malignancies.

A National Evaluation of Surgeon Experiences in Telemedicine for the Care of Hernia and Abdominal Core Health Patients.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons are increasingly utilizing telemedicine to provide perioperative services to patients. Safety, satisfaction, and feasibility of these programs in general populations have been established, but it is unclear how telemedicine can be integrated into subspecialty care. We report results of a national survey related to telehealth practices among members of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC). METHODS: Survey responses were analyzed to determine current strategies in telemedicine utilization. Surgeon preferences, perceptions of validity, and identified barriers to implementation of telemedicine were assessed. RESULTS: Forty surgeons within the ACHQC responded, with 90% of respondents reporting use of telemedicine to deliver perioperative care to patients with hernias and abdominal core health concerns. Surgeons appeared to be more comfortable managing preoperative patients with image-confirmed diagnoses of hernias. Surgeons were universally more comfortable delivering postoperative care via telemedicine. Connectivity, patient engagement, and reimbursement were identified as potential barriers to expansion of telemedicine. Seventy-eight percent of respondents reported that they would increase telemedicine utilization if current regulations were maintained in the future. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that hernia specialists are utilizing telemedicine at a higher rate than before the COVID-19 pandemic, with surgeons reporting interest in continued use of this modality beyond the pandemic. These findings suggest that future work in telemedicine optimization may improve the quality of care that can be delivered to patients with abdominal core health concerns.

Current Surgical Trainee Perceptions and Experiences in Telehealth.

Introduction:Broad expansion of telehealth technologies has been implemented during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic to allow for physical distancing and limitation of viral transmission within health care facilities. Although telehealth has been studied for its impact on patients, payors, and practitioners, its educational impact is largely unstudied. To better understand the trainee experience and perception of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a survey of the membership of the American College of Surgeons Resident and Associate Society (RAS).Methods:An anonymous survey was sent to members of RAS. Descriptive analysis was used to report experiences and perceptions. Chi-square analysis was used to compare cohorts with and without exposure to telehealth.Results:Of the 465 RAS respondents, 292 (62.8%) reported knowledge of telehealth technologies at their institutions. The majority of these respondents experienced a decrease in in-person clinic volume (94.4%) and an associated increase in virtual clinic volume (95.7%) related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Trainee integration into telehealth workflows increased drastically from prepandemic levels (11% vs. 54.5%, p < 0.001). Likelihood of trainee exposure to telehealth was associated with university-based training programs or larger program size. Trainees demonstrated a desire for more integration and development of curricula.Conclusions:These data serve as the first description of surgical trainee experience with, and opinion of, telehealth. Trainees recognize the importance of their integration and training in telehealth. These results should be used to guide the development of workflows and curricula that integrate trainees into telemedicine clinics.

Intraoperative autologous transfusion and oncologic outcomes in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative autologous transfusion (IAT) of salvaged blood is a common method of resuscitation during liver transplantation (LT), however concern for recurrence in recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has limited widespread adoption. METHODS: A review of patients undergoing LT for HCC between 2008 and 2018 was performed. Clinicopathologic and intraoperative characteristics associated with inferior recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were identified using Kaplan-Meier analysis and uni-/multi-variable Cox proportional hazards modeling. Propensity matching was utilized to derive clinicopathologically similar groups for subgroup analysis. RESULTS: One-hundred-eighty-six patients were identified with a median follow up of 65 months. Transplant recipients receiving IAT (n = 131, 70%) also had higher allogenic transfusions (median 5 versus 0 units, P < 0.001). There were 14 recurrences and 46 deaths, yielding an estimated 10-year RFS and OS of 89% and 67%, respectively. IAT was not associated with RFS (HR 0.89/liter, P = 0.60), or OS (HR 0.98/liter, P = 0.83) pre-matching, or with RFS (HR 0.97/liter, P = 0.92) or OS (HR 1.04/liter, P = 0.77) in the matched cohort (n = 49 per group). CONCLUSION: IAT during LT for HCC is not associated with adverse oncologic outcomes. Use of IAT should be encouraged to minimize the volume of allogenic transfusion in patients undergoing LT for HCC.

Hepatic metastases in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: oncologic outcomes with curative-intent hepatectomy, resection of treatment-resistant disease, and tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy alone.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection for metastatic GIST (mGIST) is often performed with either curative-intent or for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-resistant lesions. The efficacy of hepatectomy for treatment-resistant lesions (TRL) is uncertain. METHODS: We reviewed patients with liver-mGIST treated from 2003 to 2018. Oncologic outcomes including overall (OS), post-operative progression-free survival (PFS), and post-progression OS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: We identified n = 91 patients; 31 (34%) underwent curative-intent hepatectomy, 60 (66%) were initially managed with TKI alone, and 17 (19%) had resection of a TRL. The median follow-up for resected patients was 102 months (range 5-209 months) with 23 (25%) managed with a major hepatectomy. Patients having curative-intent hepatectomy had 72% 10-year OS following diagnosis of liver-mGIST, compared with 58% (P = 0.50) for TRL resection and 41% (P = 0.01) for non-resected patients. Curative-intent hepatectomy (HR 0.39, P = 0.03) and age (HR 1.04, P = 0.004) were independently associated with 10-year OS, but not TRL resection. TRL resection was not associated with improved post-progression OS compared to second-line TKI therapy (HR 0.61, P = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Curative-intent hepatectomy is associated with improved OS in liver-mGIST. The oncologic benefit of resecting treatment-resistant liver-mGIST compared to second-line TKI therapy alone remains unclear in the era of multi-line TKI therapy.

Patency for autologous vein is superior to cadaveric vein in portal-mesenteric venous reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Portal venous reconstruction (PVR) is often needed during resection of hepatopancreato-biliary (HPB) malignancies. Primary repair (PR), autologous vein (AV), or cryopreserved cadaveric vein (CCV) are frequently utilized, however relative patency is not well studied. METHODS: All patients undergoing PVR between 2007-2019 at our center were identified. 3-year primary patency (PP), overall survival (OS), and survival-adjusted patency (SAP) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: One-hundred-twenty patients were identified with a median follow-up of 11 months. PR, AV, and CCV reconstruction were used in 28 (23%), 35 (29%), and 57 (48%) patients, respectively, with two (7%), four (11%), and 29 (51%) thromboses, respectively. 3-year PP was greater for both primary repair (90%) and AV (83%) compared to CCV (33%, both p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, CCV had worse 3-year PP (HR 7.89, p=0.005) and SAP (HR 2.09, p=0.02) compared to PR; AV reconstruction had equivalent oncologic and patency-related outcomes to PR (p>0.4 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Primary patency for PR and AV reconstruction is superior to CCV for PVR during resection of HPB malignancies. AV conduit should be the preferred choice of reconstruction when PR is not achievable. Surgeons should only use CCV when factors preclude PR/AV reconstruction.

Racial disparities in survival outcomes among breast cancer patients by molecular subtypes.

PURPOSE: Differences in tumor biology, genomic architecture, and health care delivery patterns contribute to the breast cancer mortality gap between White and Black patients in the US. Although this gap has been well documented in previous literature, it remains uncertain how large the actual effect size of race is for different survival outcomes and the four breast cancer subtypes. METHODS: We established a breast cancer patient cohort at the University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center. We chose five major survival outcomes to study: overall survival, recurrence-free survival, breast-cancer-specific survival, time-to-recurrence and post-recurrence survival. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratios between Black and White patients, adjusting for selected patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, and also stratified by the four breast cancer subtypes. RESULTS: The study included 2795 stage I-III breast cancer patients (54% White and 38% Black). After adjusting for selected patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, Black patients still did worse than White patients in all five survival outcomes. The racial difference was highest within the HR-/HER2+ subgroup, in both overall survival (hazard ratio = 4.00, 95% CI 1.47-10.86) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio = 3.00, 95% CI 1.36-6.60), adjusting for age at diagnosis, cancer stage, and comorbidities. There was also a significant racial disparity within the HR+/HER2- group in both overall survival and recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that racial disparity existed between White and Black breast cancer patients in terms of both survival and recurrence, and found that this disparity was largest among HR-/HER2+ and HR+/HER2- patients.

Disease-free Interval Is Associated with Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) commonly recur following curative-intent resection. Patients with recurrent GIST display heterogeneous outcomes with limited prognostic tools. We investigated factors associated with post-recurrence survival (PRS) and progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS: We performed a review of our institutional cancer registry from 2003 to 2018 for patients with GIST. Clinicopathologic and outcome data were collected. The disease-free interval (DFI) was calculated from the end of curative-intent oncologic therapy until recurrence. Outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: Overall, 254 patients underwent resection of primary, non-metastatic GIST, with 81 (32%) recurrences. The median age was 58 years and more than half of the patients with recurrence (n = 44; 54%) received adjuvant imatinib. Recurrence was most common in the liver (n = 34, 42%), peritoneum (n = 31, 38%), or liver plus peritoneum (n = 10, 12%). The median DFI was 14 months (interquartile range 2-26 months); 51 (63%) patients had a DFI ≤24 months and 30 (37%) had a DFI > 24 months. The median post-recurrence follow-up was 46 months. Compared with a DFI ≤24 months, patients with a DFI >24 months had increased 10-year PRS (77% vs. 41%, p < 0.05) and 10-year PFS (73% vs. 19%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis controlling for mutational and clinicopathologic features, a DFI >24 months was independently associated with increased PRS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.24, p < 0.01) and PFS (HR 0.18, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The DFI is independently associated with oncologic outcomes in recurrent GIST and may be useful in treatment planning. Recurrence after 24 months may signify indolent disease biology that may benefit from additional treatment, including metastasectomy.