RESUMO
ABSTRACT: Carbon dioxide (CO2) gas is an established alternative to iodine contrast during angiography in patients with risk of postcontrast acute kidney injury and in those with history of iodine contrast allergy. Different CO2 delivery systems during angiography are reported in literature, with automated delivery system being the latest. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and learning curve of an automated CO2 injection system with controlled pressures in peripheral arterial interventions and also to study the patients' tolerance to the system.From January 2018 to October 2019 peripheral arterial interventions were performed in 40 patients (median age-78âyears, interquartile range: 69-84âyears) using an automated CO2 injection system with customized protocols, with conventional iodine contrast agent used only as a bailout option. The pain and tolerance during the CO2 angiography were evaluated with a visual analog scale at the end of each procedure. The amount of CO2, iodine contrast used, and radiation dose area product for the interventions were also systematically recorded for all procedures. These values were statistically compared in 2 groups, viz first 20 patients where a learning curve was expected vs the rest 20 patients.All procedures were successfully completed without complications. All patients tolerated the CO2 angiography with a median total pain score of 3 (interquartile range: 3-4), with no statistical difference between the groups (Pâ=â.529). The 2 groups were statistically comparable in terms of comorbidities and the type of procedures performed (Pâ=â.807). The amount of iodine contrast agent used (24.60â±â6.44âml vs 32.70â±â8.70âml, Pâ=â.006) and the radiation dose area product associated were significantly lower in the second group (2160.74â±â1181.52âµGym2 vs 1531.62â±â536.47âµGym2, Pâ=â.043).Automated CO2 angiography is technically feasible and safe for peripheral arterial interventions and is well tolerated by the patients. With the interventionalist becoming familiar with the technique, better diagnostic accuracy could be obtained using lower volumes of conventional iodine contrast agents and reduction of the radiation dose involved.
Assuntos
Angiografia/métodos , Dióxido de Carbono/administração & dosagem , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Meios de Contraste , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Compostos de Iodo , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) is a third choice of treatment for acute arterial occlusions, in addition to thrombolysis and surgical thrombectomy. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the combined treatment of PMT and local thrombolysis with thrombolysis therapy alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with acute (<14 days [n = 35]) or subacute (14-42 days [n = 34]) femoropopliteal bypass occlusions were treated with PMT combined with thrombolysis. Seventy-two patients with acute [n=40] or subacute [n = 32] femoropopliteal bypass occlusions were treated with thrombolysis alone. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) classification was used to assess the bypass occlusion. Local thrombolysis time and dosage, reopening time, time in the intensive care unit, necessary surgical re-interventions, and clinical outcome were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The TIMI scores were significantly higher in the PMT plus thrombolysis group than in the thrombolysis group (acute occlusions 1188 versus 935, p<0.001; subacute occlusions 935 versus 605, p<0.001). The total urokinase dosage, the total hours of thrombolysis, time in the intensive care unit, and total hospital stay in the acute PMT plus thrombolysis group were significantly lesser than those in the thrombolysis group. After 24h of treatment, the ankle-brachial index improved in all groups (p<0.001): in the acute and subacute PMT plus thrombolysis group to 0.63 ± 0.14 and 0.43 ± 0.08, respectively; and in the acute and subacute thrombolysis group to 0.51 ± 0.11 and 0.41 ± 0.04, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PMT combined with thrombolysis is a safe and very effective therapy for acute and subacute femoropopliteal bypass occlusions compared to treatment with thrombolysis alone.
Assuntos
Arteriopatias Oclusivas/diagnóstico , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/terapia , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/diagnóstico , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/terapia , Trombólise Mecânica/métodos , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) are characterized by the presence of hormone syndromes. Reports focusing on calcitonin-secreting PET (CTsPETs) are very rare. This study aimed to define a CTsPET-associated syndrome in regard to chemical, anatomical, and developmental aspects. METHODS: A computerized MEDLINE search was conducted under the search items: "pancreatic endocrine tumor," "calcitonin," "neuroendocrine pancreatic tumor," and "pancreas." Results of clinical, histopathological, immunohistochemical, and biochemical assessments of all patients identified with CTsPET were registered and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with CTsPET were identified. Mean serum calcitonin was elevated to the 89.2-fold of the upper reference value. Main symptoms were watery diarrhea (51.4%) and abdominal pain (35.1%). Most patients (59.5%) presented with metastatic spread at the time of diagnosis. Of all patients, 66.7% were alive after a mean follow-up of 28.9 months. Survival was higher in patients who underwent more aggressive surgical therapies independent from tumor sizes and in those with no metastases at the time of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: High calcitonin levels should always raise suspicion of medullary thyroid carcinomas. However, when thyroid examination remains without pathological findings, a CTsPET should be excluded. An aggressive surgical approach even in cases with large primary tumor sizes may lead to a longer survival.