RESUMO
RESEARCH QUESTION: What patient populations and outcomes are depicted on IVF videos on the short-form video-sharing application 'TikTok'? DESIGN: This cross-sectional study investigated the 100 most-viewed videos utilizing the #IVF hashtag on TikTok. Only videos in English or Spanish were included in the analysis. An automated web-scraping platform was used to extract information from these videos. Standardized video coding was used to evaluate the featured subject(s), phase of care and IVF outcomes from the videos. RESULTS: Videos meeting the inclusion criteria (n=93) had 731 million views, 91 million likes and 893,000 shares. Patients' personal stories about IVF are over-represented relative to videos created by healthcare professionals. #IVF videos popular on TikTok disproportionately depict same-sex couples (38.1%), gestational carriers (14.0%), multiple gestations (60.0%) and live births (89.3%) relative to real-world data. Among the videos making scientific claims (n=16), nearly all were moderately to highly accurate (93.8%). Most videos had a positive (55.9%) or neutral (5.5%) tone towards IVF. CONCLUSIONS: Popular #IVF videos on TikTok contribute to public discourse about infertility, and highlight demographics that have traditionally been under-represented in health care. Videos rarely focused on health education or made informational claims, with low scores on measures of quality of information and actionability. This gap represents an opportunity for health providers and educators to create more engaging and educational content to reach patients considering IVF.
Assuntos
Mídias Sociais , Humanos , Gravidez , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Escolaridade , Emoções , Fertilização in vitroRESUMO
One-half of women in the United States use Medicaid during pregnancy. Women living in states that did not expand Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) are at risk of losing coverage post partum. We analyzed Medicaid claims and vital statistics for the state of North Carolina for the period 2011 to 2017. North Carolina did not expand Medicaid but did alter Medicaid enrollment to meet ACA requirements. After implementation, enrollment in full Medicaid during pregnancy almost doubled, and enrollment in Medicaid for pregnant women decreased. Full Medicaid offers more comprehensive coverage and does not expire at 60 days post partum, allowing for access to crucial preventive health services including contraception and primary care.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Período Pós-Parto , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , North Carolina , Gravidez , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/economia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Objectives To determine whether expanding Emergency Medicaid to cover prenatal care in Oregon affected maternal health outcomes for unauthorized immigrants. Methods This study takes place in Oregon from 2003 to 2015 and includes all Emergency Medicaid and Medicaid claims for women aged 12-51 with a pregnancy related claim. To isolate the effect of expanding access to prenatal care, we utilized a difference-in-differences approach that exploits the staggered rollout of the prenatal care program. The primary outcome was a composite measure of severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Additional outcomes include adequacy of prenatal care, detection of pregnancy complications and birth outcomes. Results A total of 213,746 pregnancies were included, with 35,182 covered by Emergency Medicaid, 12,510 covered by Emergency Medicaid Plus (with prenatal care), and 166,054 covered by standard Medicaid. Emergency Medicaid Plus coverage did not affect severe maternal morbidity (all pregnancies 0.05%, CI - 0.29; 0.39; high-risk pregnancies 2.20%, CI - 0.47; 4.88). The program did reduce inadequate care among all pregnancies (- 31.75%, 95% CI - 34.47; - 29.02) and among high risk pregnancies (- 38.60%, CI - 44.17; - 33.02) and increased diagnosis of gestational diabetes (6.24%, CI 4.36; 8.13; high risk pregnancies 10.48%, CI 5.87; 15.08), and poor fetal growth (7.37%, CI 5.69; 9.05; high risk pregnancies 5.34%, CI 1.00; 9.68). The program also increased diagnosis of pre-existing diabetes mellitus (all pregnancies 2.93%, CI 2.16; 3.69), hypertensive diseases of pregnancy (all pregnancies 1.28%, CI 0.52; 2.04) and a history of preterm birth (all pregnancies 0.87%, CI 0.27; 1.47). Conclusions for Practice Oregon's prenatal care expansion program produced positive effects for unauthorized immigrant women and their children.
Assuntos
Emigrantes e Imigrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oregon , Gravidez , Governo Estadual , Estados UnidosAssuntos
Aborto Induzido , Neoplasias , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Neoplasias/terapiaAssuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Coração Auxiliar , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgiaAssuntos
Aborto Induzido , Aborto Espontâneo , Mídias Sociais , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , ComunicaçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe Oregon pharmacy practices in provision of hormonal contraception (HC) and evaluate if pharmacists' motivation to prescribe changed after 6 and 12 months of experience. METHODS: Pharmacists practicing in Oregon who underwent the mandatory HC training were eligible to take this survey. The survey was launched 6 months after policy implementation; pharmacists who responded to the initial survey were eligible to be queried again at 12 months. Survey responses were anonymous, but pharmacists received a unique identifier so that responses could be linked between the 2 surveys. The survey consisted of pharmacy and pharmacist demographics and questions exploring attitudes toward prescribing HC and prescribing practices (e.g., cost, time needed for visit) and volume estimates. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze responses as well as the differences in key outcomes between 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 732 pharmacists were eligible to take the survey; 121 pharmacists responded to the 6-month survey (16.5% response rate), and 62 completed the 12-month survey (52% response rate). A large increase in the distribution of pharmacists prescribing HC by zip code occurred between 6 and 12 months: 19% and 63%, respectively. At both 6 and 12 months, almost one-half of all pharmacists were billing insurance for the visit, and the average visit took less than 30 minutes. The top 3 motivators for providing HC did not change over time and included increasing access, reducing unintended pregnancy, and increasing pharmacist scope of practice. CONCLUSION: One year after program implementation, pharmacist prescribing of HC continues to increase and is distributed widely across the state. A geographically diverse sample of Oregon pharmacists began prescribing of hormonal contraception within 12 months of Oregon's implementation of the new pharmacist provision policy. Their experience and the success of the program provide a roadmap for pharmacist participation to increase access to hormonal contraception.
Assuntos
Anticoncepção/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hormônios/administração & dosagem , Assistência Farmacêutica/estatística & dados numéricos , Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Oregon , Farmácias/estatística & dados numéricos , Papel Profissional , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
This study uses American Hospital Association data to examine the volume and distribution of births in Catholic US hospitals and quantify county-level patterns of Catholic and non-Catholic hospital births.
Assuntos
Catolicismo , Parto Obstétrico , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Religiosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Parto , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Governo LocalAssuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Contracepção Reversível de Longo Prazo/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid , Cuidado Pós-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Definição da Elegibilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Oregon , Satisfação do Paciente , Imigrantes Indocumentados , Estados Unidos , Populações VulneráveisRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Pregnant beneficiaries in the two primary Medicaid eligibility categories, traditional Medicaid and pregnancy Medicaid, have differing access to care especially in the preconception and postpartum periods. Pregnancy Medicaid has higher income limits for eligibility than traditional Medicaid but only provides coverage during and for a limited time period after pregnancy. Our objective was to determine the association between type of Medicaid (traditional Medicaid and pregnancy Medicaid) on receipt of outpatient care during the perinatal period. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared outpatient visits using linked birth certificate and Medicaid claims from all Medicaid births in Oregon and South Carolina from 2014 through 2019. Pregnancy Medicaid ended 60 days postpartum during the study. Our primary outcome was average number of outpatient visits per 100 beneficiaries each month during three perinatal time points: preconceputally (three months prior to conception), prenatally (9 months prior to birthdate) and postpartum (from birth to 12 months). RESULTS: Among 105,808 Medicaid-covered births in Oregon and 141,385 births in South Carolina, pregnancy Medicaid was the most prevelant categorical eligibility. Traditional Medicaid recipients had a higher average number of preconception, prenatal and postpartum visits as compared to those in pregnancy Medicaid. DISCUSSION: In South Carolina, those using traditional Medicaid had 450% more preconception visits and 70% more postpartum visits compared with pregnancy Medicaid. In Oregon, those using traditional Medicaid had 200% more preconception visits and 29% more postpartum visits than individuals using pregnancy Medicaid. Lack of coverage in both the preconception and postpartum period deprive women of adequate opportunities to access health care or contraception. Changes to pregnancy Medicaid, including extended postpartum coverage through the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, may facilitate better continuity of care.
Assuntos
Medicaid , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Gravidez , Estados Unidos , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Período Pós-Parto , AnticoncepçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize pregnancy outcomes and the incidence of induced abortion among pregnant people with a diagnosis of malignancy. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among privately insured people aged 12 to 55 years from the fourth quarter of 2015-2020 using US claims data from Merative MarketScan Research Databases. We included pregnancies from seven states with favorable policies for private insurance coverage of abortion. RESULTS: There were 1471 of 183,685 (0.8%) pregnancies with a cancer diagnosis. Among those receiving anticancer therapy, 21.6% (95% CI: 14.4-30.4%) underwent induced abortion compared with 10.9% (95% CI: 10.8-11.1%) of pregnant patients without a cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Abortion restrictions may affect many pregnant women requiring cancer treatment in early pregnancy.
Assuntos
Aborto Induzido , Seguro Saúde , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Adolescente , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Incidência , Criança , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Neoplásicas na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Resultado da GravidezRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study used focus groups to pilot and evaluate a new nutrition label format and refine the label design. Physical activity equivalent labels present calorie information in terms of the amount of physical activity that would be required to expend the calories in a specified food item. METHODS: Three focus groups with a total of twenty participants discussed food choices and nutrition labeling. They provided information on comprehension, usability and acceptability of the label. A systematic coding process was used to apply descriptive codes to the data and to identify emerging themes and attitudes. RESULTS: Participants in all three groups were able to comprehend the label format. Discussion about label format focused on issues including gender of the depicted figure, physical fitness of the figure, preference for walking or running labels, and preference for information in miles or minutes. Feedback from earlier focus groups was used to refine the labels in an iterative process. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to calorie labels, participants shown physical activity labels asked and answered, "How does this label apply to me?" This shift toward personalized understanding may indicate that physical activity labels offer an advantage over currently available nutrition labels.
Assuntos
Comportamento de Escolha , Rotulagem de Alimentos , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Atividade Motora , Adulto , Ingestão de Energia , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Fast Foods , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Preferências Alimentares , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Restaurantes , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
In this study we examined the effect of physical activity based labels on the calorie content of meals selected from a sample fast food menu. Using a web-based survey, participants were randomly assigned to one of four menus which differed only in their labeling schemes (n=802): (1) a menu with no nutritional information, (2) a menu with calorie information, (3) a menu with calorie information and minutes to walk to burn those calories, or (4) a menu with calorie information and miles to walk to burn those calories. There was a significant difference in the mean number of calories ordered based on menu type (p=0.02), with an average of 1020 calories ordered from a menu with no nutritional information, 927 calories ordered from a menu with only calorie information, 916 calories ordered from a menu with both calorie information and minutes to walk to burn those calories, and 826 calories ordered from the menu with calorie information and the number of miles to walk to burn those calories. The menu with calories and the number of miles to walk to burn those calories appeared the most effective in influencing the selection of lower calorie meals (p=0.0007) when compared to the menu with no nutritional information provided. The majority of participants (82%) reported a preference for physical activity based menu labels over labels with calorie information alone and no nutritional information. Whether these labels are effective in real-life scenarios remains to be tested.
Assuntos
Ingestão de Energia , Fast Foods , Rotulagem de Alimentos , Preferências Alimentares , Refeições , Restaurantes , Caminhada , Adulto , Comportamento de Escolha , Comportamento do Consumidor , Dieta , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Valor NutritivoRESUMO
What role should telemedicine services play in a higher education landscape that increasingly embraces online education? How prominently should telemedicine feature in the suite of wraparound services that schools prioritize for vulnerable students? While many studies interrogate single-factor health issues and college success, this essay argues that significant research is needed to close knowledge gaps in understanding the relationship between telemedicine access and higher educational attainment.
Assuntos
Estudantes , Telemedicina , Humanos , Universidades , Instituições Acadêmicas , EscolaridadeRESUMO
Restrictive immigration policies may adversely affect the health of Latina mothers and their infants. We hypothesized that undocumented Latina mothers and their US born children would have worse birth outcomes and healthcare utilization following the November 2016 election. We used a controlled interrupted time series to estimate the impact of the 2016 presidential election on low birth weight (LBW), preterm birth, maternal depression, well child visit attendance, cancelled visits, and emergency department (ED) visits among infants born to Latina mothers on emergency Medicaid, a proxy for undocumented immigration status. There was a 5.8% (95% CI: -0.99%, 12.5%) increase in LBW and 4.6% (95% CI: -1.8%, 10.9%) increase in preterm births immediately after the 2016 election compared to controls. While these findings were not statistically significant at p < 0.05, the majority of our data suggest worsened birth outcomes among undocumented Latina mothers after the election, consistent with larger prior studies. There was no difference in well child or ED visits. While restrictive policies may have contributed to worse birth outcomes among undocumented Latina mothers, our findings suggest that Latino families still attend infants' scheduled visits.
Assuntos
Mães , Nascimento Prematuro , Feminino , Criança , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Humanos , Emigração e Imigração , Recém-Nascido de Baixo Peso , Hispânico ou LatinoRESUMO
We present 2 cases of patients with left ventricular assist device who underwent an induced abortion in the first and second trimester, respectively. Comprehensive counseling is critical for this patient population, and close coordination of interdisciplinary teams is required in the setting of continuing pregnancy or medically indicated abortion.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare contraceptive provision to women with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities enrolled in North Carolina Medicaid. METHODS: Our retrospective cohort study used 2019 North Carolina Medicaid claims to identify women aged 15-44 years with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities at risk for pregnancy who were continuously enrolled during 2019 or had Family Planning Medicaid with at least one claim. We calculated the proportion in each cohort who received 1) most or moderately effective contraception, 2) long-acting reversible contraception, 3) short-acting contraception, and 4) individual methods. We classified contraceptive receipt by procedure type and disaggregated across sociodemographic characteristics. Adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, and urban or rural setting, we constructed logistic regression models to estimate most or moderately effective contraceptive provision odds by intellectual and developmental disability status and by level or type of intellectual and developmental disability. We performed subanalyses to estimate co-occurrence of provision and menstrual disorders. RESULTS: Among 9,508 women with intellectual and developmental disabilities and 299,978 without, a significantly smaller proportion with intellectual and developmental disabilities received most or moderately effective contraception (30.1% vs 36.3%, P <.001). With the exception of injectable contraception, this trend was consistent across all measures and remained statistically significant after controlling for race, ethnicity, age, and urban or rural status (adjusted odds ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.72-0.79; P <.001). Among those who received most or moderately effective contraception, a significantly greater proportion of women with intellectual and developmental disabilities had co-occurring menstrual disorders (31.3% vs 24.3%, P <.001). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest disparities in contraceptive provision and potential differences in clinical indication by intellectual and developmental disability status. Future studies should investigate reasons for and barriers to contraceptive use among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.