Parental perception of a picture-based chronic asthma care management tool in an urban pediatric emergency department.

BACKGROUND: National asthma guidelines recommend use of an asthma action plan (AAP) as part of chronic asthma care. Unfortunately, AAPs have not been tailored for use in acute care settings, where many patients at risk for poor chronic asthma care are seen, including those who are non-English-speaking or have low literacy levels. We previously developed a picture-based medication plan (PBMP), a unique type of AAP for use in an ambulatory setting and designed to increase patient use and understanding. However, little is known about how parents seeking emergency department (ED) asthma care would perceive the PBMP. OBJECTIVE: To assess parental attitudes toward an asthma PBMP in the largest pediatric ED in Los Angeles County. METHODS: We surveyed a consecutive sample of English- or Spanish-speaking parents of children 2-17 years seeking ED asthma care. Parents used a 5-point Likert scale for various statements regarding their perceptions of the PBMP. Responses were analyzed by sociodemographics, asthma control, and health literacy using Chi-squared and t-tests. RESULTS: 90 parents provided feedback on the PBMP. The majority of parents endorsed the PBMP. Endorsement was 20%-30% higher among Spanish-speaking parents and those who did not complete high-school compared to English-speaking parents and parents with a high school education or higher (p < 0.05 for both comparisons). CONCLUSION: Spanish-speaking parents and parents with less than a high-school education overwhelmingly endorsed the PBMP. It may be useful to consider incorporating the PBMP as part of patient-centered chronic asthma care strategies for populations seen in ED settings.

Incidence and viral aetiologies of acute respiratory illnesses (ARIs) in the United States: a population-based study.

We conducted prospective, community-wide surveillance for acute respiratory illnesses (ARIs) in Rochester, NY and Marshfield, WI during a 3-month period in winter 2011. We estimated the incidence of ARIs in each community, tested for viruses, and determined the proportion of ARIs associated with healthcare visits. We used a rolling cross-sectional design to sample participants, conducted telephone interviews to assess ARI symptoms (defined as a current illness with feverishness or cough within the past 7 days), collected nasal/throat swabs to identify viruses, and extracted healthcare utilization from outpatient/inpatient records. Of 6492 individuals, 321 reported an ARI within 7 days (4·9% total, 5·7% in Rochester, 4·4% in Marshfield); swabs were collected from 208 subjects. The cumulative ARI incidence for the entire 3-month period was 52% in Rochester [95% confidence interval (CI) 42-63] and 35% in Marshfield (95% CI 28-42). A specific virus was identified in 39% of specimens: human coronavirus (13% of samples), rhinovirus (12%), RSV (7%), influenza virus (4%), human metapneumovirus (4%), and adenovirus (1%). Only 39/200 (20%) had a healthcare visit (2/9 individuals with influenza). ARI incidence was ~5% per week during winter.

Association between school racial/ethnic composition during adolescence and adult health.

OBJECTIVES: School racial/ethnic segregation in U.S. schoolsDifferences in school racial/ethnic composition may increase health disparities by concentrating educational opportunities that confer long-term health benefits in schools serving predominantly wwhite students. For racial minority students, high concentrations of white students may increase exposure to racismis also associated with psychologicstress, which may ultimately reduceing the long-term health benefits from educational opportunities. Meanwhile associations of racial/ethnic academic tacking within schools and health have been mixed. We sought to test whether: 1) differences in racial/ethnic composition between schools and, 2) racial/ethnic distribution of students in academic tracks within schools are associated with long-term health benefits or risks for white, Black and Latinx students. METHODS: We analyzed the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (12,438 participants, collected 1994-2008), to test whether the school-level segregation (percent of non-Latinx white students at participants' school during adolescence) was associated with adult health outcomes at ages 18-26 & 24-32, controlling for contextual factorscomparing Black, Latinx, and white students, and controlling for contextualf factors. A secondary analysis explored whether racial/ethnic cohorting across levels of English courses was associated with each health outcome. RESULTS: Attending a school with a higher percent of white students was associated with higher adult depression scores, substance abuse, and worse self-rated health for black Black students; lower depression scores, better self-rated health, and alcohol abuse for white students; and no health differences for Latinx students. Greater within school racial/ethnic cohorting across English courses was associated with increased odds of alcohol abuse for white students; decreased odds of alcohol abuse for Black and Latinx students; and decreased odds of drug abuse for Black students. CONCLUSION: Among Bblack youth, attending a school with a higher percentage of white students is associated with worse behavioral health in adulthood. Understanding the potential impacts of school racial/ethnic composition on health is critical to designing policies that maximize access to opportunity and health.Education policies should comprehensively address school quality and racism to maximize adult health.

Lead poisoning risk determination in an urban population through the use of a standardized questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended using a five-item questionnaire at every regular office visit for all children 6 to 72 months of age to identify those at risk of high-dose exposure to lead. OBJECTIVE: To determine how well the questionnaire identifies children with elevated lead levels. RESEARCH DESIGN: Comparison of results of the questionnaire, which is intended to identify children as being low-risk or high-risk for lead poisoning, with children's blood lead levels. SETTING: A pediatric continuity clinic located in a major teaching hospital in Rochester, NY. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of 476 children aged 6 to 72 months without a prior history of lead poisoning who were seen in the clinic in July and August 1992, and (for those aged < 36 months) or 12 months (for those aged 36 to 72 months). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fingerstick lead samples were obtained from all children, and those > or = 15 micrograms/dL (0.72 mumol/L) were confirmed by subsequent venous lead determinations. Twenty-eight percent had blood lead levels > or = 10 micrograms/dL (0.48 mumol/L), 8% had levels > or = 15 micrograms/dL (0.72 mumol/L), and 5% had lead levels > or = 20 micrograms/dL (0.96 mumol/L). According to responses on the questionnaire, 44% were initially classified as low-risk, and 43% were high-risk. In 13% risk could not be determined because one or more items on the questionnaire had not been answered or were answered equivocally, whereas all other items were answered "No." Children for whom risk could not be determined were presumed to be at high risk and were added to that category, resulting in 56% of the study population so designated. The questionnaire was moderately effective in identifying children with elevated lead levels. Seventy percent of children having lead levels > or = 10 micrograms/dL (0.48 mumol/L) and 82% of children having lead levels > or = 15 micrograms/dL (0.72 mumol/L) had been classified as high-risk by the questionnaire. Children classified as low-risk were very unlikely to have elevated lead levels. Eighty-one percent of low-risk children had lead levels < 10 ug/dL, and 97% had lead levels < 15 ul/dL. An abbreviated questionnaire using only the first three items from the CDC questionnaire had almost identical effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical setting, in which children are largely urban, poor, and have a moderate to high risk of developing elevated lead levels, the CDC risk assessment questionnaire is effective in identifying children with elevated lead burdens. However, an abbreviated version of the questionnaire may be as effective as the complete questionnaire. Additional questions should be added to the questionnaire to improve its overall sensitivity, and the questionnaire should be tested in other settings to see if it is effective with children having different environmental exposures to lead.

Improving influenza vaccination rates in children with asthma: a test of a computerized reminder system and an analysis of factors predicting vaccination compliance.

Fewer than 10% of children with moderate or severe asthma receive an annual influenza vaccination despite their heightened susceptibility to severe infections and recommendations by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee that all such children be vaccinated annually. Patient, provider, and system factors leading to this poor vaccination rate are not well understood. This study tested the effectiveness of a computerized reminder system in improving influenza vaccination rates in children with asthma and examined patient barriers to vaccination at one pediatric clinic in an urban teaching hospital. A computer database identified 124 children with moderate or severe asthma. Patients were randomly assigned either to study group (n = 63), who were sent a personalized letter reminder about the need for an influenza vaccination, or to a control group (n = 61), who received no reminder. Study group mothers were interviewed 2 months after the letter was sent to assess factors associated with receipt of vaccination, including demographic features, parental worry about asthma and vaccine side effects, the four dimensions of the Health Belief Model, and health locus of control beliefs. Nineteen study group patients (30%) received an influenza vaccination, compared with only 4 control patients (7%) (P < .01). Forty-three mothers of children in the study group were interviewed; 14 (33%) of these children had received the vaccination. Of the characteristics investigated, two significantly correlated with vaccination compliance: high levels of parental worry about asthma (positively correlated: odds ratio = 23.3, P < .01) and high levels of parental worry about vaccine side effects (negatively correlated: odds ratio = 0.087, P = .025).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Inadequate therapy for asthma among children in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Childhood asthma morbidity and mortality are increasing despite improvements in asthma therapy. We hypothesized that a substantial number of children with moderate to severe asthma are not taking the maintenance medications recommended by national guidelines. The objective of this study was to describe medication use among US children with asthma and determine risk factors for inadequate therapy. METHODS: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III 1988-1994 provided cross-sectional, parent-reported data for children 2 months to 16 years of age. Analysis focused on children with moderate to severe asthma (defined as having any hospitalization for wheezing, >/=2 acute visits for wheezing, or >/=3 episodes of wheezing over the past year). We defined these children as adequately treated if they had taken a maintenance medication (inhaled corticosteroid, cromolyn, or theophylline) during the past month. Demographic variables were analyzed for independent associations with inadequacy of therapy. The statistical analysis used SUDAAN software to account for the complex sampling design. RESULTS: A total of 1025 children (9.4%) had physician-diagnosed asthma. Of those with moderate to severe asthma (n = 524), only 26% had taken a maintenance medication during the past month. Even among children with 2 or more hospitalizations over the previous year, only 32% had taken maintenance medications. In a logistic regression analysis, factors significantly associated with inadequate therapy included: age

Is an emergency department visit a marker for undervaccination and missed vaccination opportunities among children who have access to primary care?

The purpose of this study was to determine: (1) whether preschool-age patients who utilize the emergency department (ED) are undervaccinated compared with patients having the same primary care provider and (2) whether reducing missed vaccination opportunities in the primary care office can potentially reduce the differences in undervaccination between the groups. This retrospective cohort study involved two groups: 583 ED patients, aged 4 to 48 months, who had primary care providers; and 583 control subjects randomly selected from primary care sites and matched according to date of birth and primary care site. The major outcome variable was the point prevalence of undervaccination, defined as more than 60 days past due for a vaccine at the time of the ED visit, and for control subjects, at the time of their matched patient's ED visit. Demographic variables, vaccination history, presence of chronic illness, and office utilization history were abstracted from office charts. The mean age of all patients was 20.0 months. Emergency department patients were more likely to be boys (61% vs 50%) and had more chronic illness, but did not differ racially from those in the control group. Primary care sites included a hospital-based clinic (n = 137), neighborhood health centers (n = 172), and private practices (n = 274). The undervaccination rates by primary provider type were for (1) hospital clinic ED patients 21.1%, control subjects 19.7%; (2) neighborhood health center ED patients 29.1%, control subjects 22.7%; and (3) private practice ED patients 26.6%, control subjects 14.9%. Overall, the odds ratio of ED patients' being undervaccinated compared with control subjects was 1.8 (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.5).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Immunization practices of pediatricians and family physicians in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To assess current practices and attitudes among pediatricians and family physicians across the United States regarding immunizations. DESIGN: Survey of a random sample of pediatricians and family physicians. SUBJECTS: Fellows of the American Academy of Pediatrics (N = 746) and American Academy of Family Medicine (N = 429). SURVEY TOPICS: General immunization practices (eg, types of visits during which vaccinations are provided, mechanisms to identify undervaccinated children); and opinions about perceived barriers to immunizations, acceptance of alternative sites for immunizations, and possible immunization requirements for Medicaid and The Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). RESULTS: Pediatricians and family physicians (combined) reported the following: immunizing children during acute illness visits (28%), follow-up visits (90%), and chronic illness visits (77%); using computer or reminder files to identify undervaccinated children (13%); and simultaneously administering four vaccines (diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, oral poliovaccine, measles, mumps, and rubella and Haemophilus influenzae type b) to an eligible 18-month-old child (66%). Physicians perceived the following as barriers to immunizations: missed preventive visits (40%), vaccine costs (24%), lack of insurance coverage (24%), inability to track undervaccinated patients (22%), incomplete immunization records (12%), and missed vaccination opportunities (12%). Physicians agreed with offering vaccinations during hospitalizations (51%) or emergency department visits (30%), and with immunization requirements for continued eligibility for Medicaid (66%) or WIC (64%). Pediatricians were more likely to vaccinate during chronic illness and follow-up visits, and were more likely to use systems to track undervaccinated children (P < .05); however, most immunization practices and attitudes of pediatricians and family physicians were similar. Physicians who graduated from medical school more recently and those in high-risk urban practices were more likely to vaccinate during acute illness visits, provide simultaneous vaccinations, and favor vaccinations in hospital settings. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination rates might be improved by closer adherence to current immunization guidelines regarding vaccinations during all encounters and simultaneous vaccinations, by developing systems to identify undervaccinated children, and by reducing patient costs for vaccinations. Current immunization practices fall short of the immunization guidelines; changes in individual practice styles will be required to conform with these standards.

Blood lead screening practices among US pediatricians.

OBJECTIVE: In 1991, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) decreased the blood lead level of concern to 10 micrograms/dL (0.48 mumol/L) and recommended universal screening. Because these guidelines continue to provoke controversy, we conducted a study to: 1) estimate the proportion of pediatricians who are members of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) who report screening for elevated blood lead levels; 2) describe their clinical practices regarding screening for elevated blood lead levels; 3) compare attitudes of universal screeners, selective screeners, and nonscreeners; and 4) identify characteristics of pediatricians who universally screen. DESIGN: Confidential, cross-sectional survey of a nationally representative random sample of 1610 pediatricians conducted through the AAP Periodic Survey. SUBJECTS: The study included 1035 responders (64% response rate). Analysis was limited to the 734 pediatricians who provide well-child care (ie, primary-care pediatricians). RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of pediatricians reported screening all their patients aged 9 to 36 months, 39% reported screening some, and 8% reported screening none. Among those who screen, 96% use a blood lead assay. The primary risk factors for which selective screeners screen are: history of pica (94%); living in an older home with recent renovations (92%); living in an older home with peeling paint (93%); and having a sibling who had an elevated blood lead level (88%). Among primary-care pediatricians, 73% agree that blood lead levels > or = 10 micrograms/dL should be considered elevated, and 16% disagree. However, 89% of primary-care pediatricians believe that epidemiologic studies should be performed to determine which communities have high proportions of children with elevated blood lead levels, and 34% of primary-care pediatricians believe that the costs of screening exceed the benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Three years after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued new guidelines for the management of elevated blood lead levels, a slight majority of primary-care pediatricians in the United States who are members of the AAP report that they universally screen their appropriately aged patients, while most of the remaining pediatricians report screening high-risk patients. Many pediatricians may want additional guidance about circumstances under which selective screening should be considered.

Increase in admission threshold explains stable asthma hospitalization rates.

BACKGROUND: Asthma morbidity and mortality has increased substantially in recent years, but asthma hospitalization rates among many geographic and sociodemographic groups have remained stable. Observations on asthma hospitalization rates and severity of acute episodes might provide valuable insight into the functioning of the health care system during this period of health care reform. OBJECTIVE: To analyze changes between 1991 and 1995 in childhood asthma hospitalization rates and severity of acute episodes. DESIGN AND METHODS: All 29 329 hospitalizations, including 2028 for asthma, for the 198 893 children (<19 years of age) in Monroe County (Rochester), New York, were studied during this 5-year period. Severity was determined by hospital record review on a 22% random sample. Using the worst oxygen saturation (SaO(2)) during the first 24 hours of hospitalization as the primary index of severity, episodes were categorized as mild (0 to >/=95), moderate (90 to 94), or severe (<90). RESULTS: Hospitalization rates are expressed as hospitalizations per 1000 child-years. The overall asthma hospitalization rate was 2.04 (95% confidence interval, 1.95-2.13). The overall annual asthma hospitalization rate remained relatively stable from 1991 (1.90) to 1995 (2.31), whereas the hospitalization rates for severe asthma rose 270%-from 0.57 to 1.55-during this period. Simultaneously, the hospitalization rates for mild asthma decreased from 0.26 to 0.12. As a proportion of all asthma hospitalizations between 1991 and 1995, severe episodes increased from 31.5% to 60.4%; conversely, mild episodes decreased from 14.1% to 4.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Severity increased significantly among children hospitalized for asthma while the overall asthma hospitalization rate remained stable. It seems that the health care system in this community has responded to an increase in severity of asthma by raising the severity threshold for admission.

Missed opportunities for childhood vaccinations in office practices and the effect on vaccination status.

To determine the rate of childhood under-vaccination, rate and types of missed opportunities (MOs) for vaccinations, and the contribution of MOs to the undervaccination of preschool-age children, the authors conducted a retrospective medical chart review in seven primary care settings in the Rochester, NY, area: a hospital clinic, a neighborhood health center, a group-model health maintenance organization, an urban group practice, a suburban group practice, a rural health center, and a rural private practice. The random sample included 1124 children having birth dates between March 15, 1988, and September 15, 1989. The main outcome measures were cumulative undervaccination rate, defined as the proportion of patients from each practice who were ever > 60 days past-due for a vaccination by 12, 18, or 24 months of age; undervaccination time, defined as the median number of months during which children were undervaccinated; number of MOs; visit types and conditions associated with the MOs; and the duration of undervaccination time attributable to MOs. The cumulative undervaccination rate by 12 months was at least 20% in each practice except for the suburban practice, where it was 4%. The frequency of MOs varied from a high of 1.8 MO per patient per year at the rural private practice to a low of 0.3 MO per patient per year at the suburban practice. More than one quarter of MOs occurred during either health supervision or follow-up visits in all practices. In 28% of visits during which an MO occurred, patients had no fever or acute illness.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Missed opportunities for influenza vaccination among children with asthma.

Influenza vaccination is recommended for children with moderate to severe asthma. However, most children with asthma are not vaccinated, in part because many do not make an office visit during the vaccination time period. We studied 247 urban children with asthma to determine the maximum number that could have been vaccinated during a medical visit to a clinic or emergency department. One hundred thirty-nine patients (56%) had at least one visit during the study period. Sixty-five patients (26%) received the influenza vaccination; 74 patients (30%) did not receive the vaccination despite being seen in the clinic or emergency department. One-half of the missed vaccination opportunities at the clinic occurred during nonacute visits. Influenza vaccination rates could be substantially improved by efforts to increase primary care visits during the vaccination time period and to minimize missed vaccination opportunities.

Immunization status and birth order.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an association exists between immunization status and birth order. DESIGN: Medical record review of immunization dates for matched siblings. SETTING: Pediatric clinic at a university medical center. SUBJECTS: A total of 892 children (446 sibling pairs of firstborn and secondborn children) born between 1983 and 1991 who received regular pediatric care at the clinic. OUTCOME MEASURES: Median ages at which firstborn children and their secondborn siblings had been immunized with the initial four doses of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (DTP1, DTP2, DTP3, and DPT4) and the initial dose of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine; point prevalences of firstborn and secondborn children up-to-date with all immunizations at each month of life to 2 years of age. RESULTS: Between 5 and 12 months of life, the percentage of secondborn children who were fully immunized was significantly lower than the percentage of fully immunized firstborn children (P values ranging from < .0001 to < .05). Firstborn children were much more likely than their secondborn siblings to have been immunized on time with DTP2 (z = 3.80, P = .0001) and DTP3 (z = 3.31, P = .0009). Overall, DTP2 immunizations were given at median ages 10 days later, and DTP3 immunizations, 20 days later to secondborn children than to their firstborn siblings. In addition, late immunization of a firstborn child was found to increase the risk that a secondborn sibling would also be immunized late. CONCLUSIONS: Secondborn children are likely to be immunized later than firstborn children. Secondborn children with an older sibling who was immunized late are at particular risk for delayed immunizations.

Lead screening practices of pediatric residents.

OBJECTIVES: As part of their training, pediatric residents provide primary care services to young children, including youngsters who may have elevated blood lead levels. We set out to (1) determine the percentage of pediatric residents who screen children for elevated blood lead levels according to the guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Pediatrics; (2) assess the likelihood of lead screening by residents based on demographic and practice-setting characteristics; and (3) compare the attitudes of residents who report that they are universal screeners, selective screeners, or nonscreeners. DESIGN: Confidential, cross-sectional survey of a nationally representative sample of pediatric residents conducted as part of the American Academy of Pediatrics 28th Periodic Survey of Fellows. SUBJECTS: One hundred forty-three responding pediatric residents (51% response rate). RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of pediatric residents reported screening all patients aged 9 to 36 months for elevated blood lead levels, 21% reported screening some, and 4% reported screening none. Pediatric residents who cared for patients in urban settings were more likely to report screening patients for elevated blood lead levels than were pediatric residents who cared for patients in suburban or rural settings (100% vs 73%; P < .001) and pediatric residents in the Northeast were more likely to report screening universally than were residents in the rest of the country (93% vs 63%; P < .001). Overall, pediatric residents who reported screening patients universally were more likely to believe that the benefits of screening outweigh the costs than were residents who reported screening patients selectively (67% vs 17%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Most pediatric residents reported that they screened patients for elevated blood lead levels, either universally or selectively. Nevertheless, the screening practices of pediatric resident and their opinions concerning the relative benefits and costs of lead screening largely reflect the areas of the country and the practice settings in which they had their primary care experiences.

Profile of uninsured children in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the demographic characteristics, utilization of medical services, and health status of uninsured children compared with insured children in the United States and to assess the factors associated with lack of health insurance among children. An estimated 8 million children in the United States are uninsured. Medicaid expansions and tax credits have had little impact on the overall problem. An understanding of the characteristics of uninsured children is essential for the design of appropriate outreach and enrollment strategies, benefit packages, and health care provision arrangements for uninsured children. METHODS: Analysis of the 1988 Child Health Supplement of the National Health Interview Survey. RESULTS: Diverse groups of children in the United States lack health insurance. Residence in the South (odds ratio [OR], 2.3) and West (OR, 1.9. [corrected]) and being poor (OR, 2.2) or nearly poor (OR, 2.1) are independently associated with being uninsured. Substantial differences in both sources of care and utilization of medical services exist between uninsured and insured children. Uninsured children lack usual sources of routine care (OR, 3.1) and sick care (OR, 3.8) and also lack appropriate well-child care (OR, 1.5) compared with insured children. Neither being in fair or poor health nor emergency department use are significant independent predictors of being uninsured among children. Children who have a chronic disease, such as asthma, face difficulties of access to care and utilize substantially fewer outpatient and inpatient services. CONCLUSIONS: Universal health insurance, rather than efforts directed at specific groups, appears to be the only way to provide health insurance for all US children. Uninsured and insured children reveal marked discrepancies in access to and utilization of medical services, including preventive services, but have similar rates of chronic health conditions and limitations of activity. Uninsured children do not appear to form a population that will incur higher mean annual expenditures for medical care compared with insured children.

Is underimmunization a marker for insufficient utilization of preventive and primary care?

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the underimmunization of young children is a marker for the lack of preventive and acute primary care. SETTING: Primary care center serving an impoverished population (90% Medicaid). DESIGN: Historical cohort study (N = 1178) of children aged 12 to 30 months that determined each child's immunization status, anemia, tuberculosis, and lead screening status; and office utilization history. Screening delay was defined as missing a recommended screening by more than 3 months past the standard screening age. RESULTS: Thirty-four percent of the population were underimmunized at 12 months of age. Compared with fully immunized children, these children were at greater risk for screening delay: anemia, 38% vs 5% (risk ratio [RR], 7.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.4 to 10.4); tuberculosis, 76% vs 44% (RR, 1.7; CI, 1.6 to 1.9); and lead, 69% vs 33% (RR, 2.1; CI, 1.9 to 2.4). These RRs increased with greater immunization delay. Compared with fully immunized children, the underimmunized group made 47% fewer preventive health visits (2.5 vs 4.7 visits per infant per year, P < .001) and 43% fewer illness visits (2.5 vs 4.4, P < .001) and had 50% more missed appointments (2.1 vs 1.4, P < .001). Logistic regression, predicting anemia screening delay at 12 months of age, showed that underimmunization had an effect independent of utilization, with an odds ratio of 7.7 (CI, 5.2 to 12.0). CONCLUSION: Underimmunization was a powerful, independent marker for inadequate health supervision in this population. IMPLICATIONS: The current emphasis on immunizations has the benefit of targeting children at risk of lack of preventive and acute care. Improving immunization rates may have the potential to improve other aspects of primary care if immunization provision is not uncoupled from primary care.

Health insurance for low-income working families. Effect on the provision of immunizations to preschool-age children.

BACKGROUND: The out-of-pocket cost for immunizations is a cause for referral to public health department clinics and is associated with delayed immunization. In 1991, New York State started Child Health Plus (CHPlus), an insurance program that covers ambulatory care and immunization services for children of families earning less than 222% of the poverty level. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of CHPlus on the provision of immunizations. DESIGN: A before-and-after design was used to compare the year immediately before enrollment in CHPlus with the first year after enrollment in CHPlus. A mixed-model analysis of variance was used to control for the effects of age. SETTING: All area primary care practices (n = 164) and public health department clinics (n = 6). SUBJECTS: Children (n = 1730) younger than 6 years who were enrolled in CHPlus. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of immunization visits; types of providers (public health department clinics or primary care providers [pediatricians and family physicians]); and series-complete immunization coverage, including the diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, and pertussis vaccine, the oral poliovirus vaccine, and the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. RESULTS: The average age of the children was 37.7 months, 85% were white, 50% had been uninsured for immunizations before enrollment in CHPlus, and 16% previously received Medicaid. For infants, CHPlus decreased immunization visits to public health department clinics by 37% (from 0.14 to 0.09 visits per child, P = .009), increased immunization visits to primary care providers' offices by 15% (from 2.3 to 2.7 visits per child, P = .001), and increased immunization coverage by 7% (from 76% to 83%, P = .03). For children aged 1 to 5 years, CHPlus decreased visits to public health department clinics by 67% (from 0.06 to 0.02 visits per child, P < .001), increased visits to primary care providers' offices by 27% (from 0.46 to 0.59 visits per child, P < .001), and increased immunization coverage by 5% (from 83% to 88%, P < .001). The effects were greatest among previously uninsured children and among those with a gap in insurance coverage that was longer than 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Insurance coverage for low-income working families resulted in a shift in the provision of immunizations from the health department to primary care providers and in increased immunization coverage.

Adolescent immunization practices: a national survey of US physicians.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent immunization rates remain low. Hence, a better understanding of the factors that influence adolescent immunization is needed. OBJECTIVE: To assess the adolescent immunization practices of US physicians. DESIGN AND SETTING: A 24-item survey mailed in 1997 to a national sample of 1480 pediatricians and family physicians living in the United States, randomly selected from the American Medical Association's Master List of Physicians. PARTICIPANTS: Of 1110 physicians (75%) who responded, 761 met inclusion criteria. OUTCOME MEASURES: Immunization practices and policies, use of tracking and recall, opinions about school-based immunizations, and reasons for not providing particular immunizations to eligible adolescents. RESULTS: Seventy-nine percent of physicians reported using protocols for adolescent immunization, and 82% recommended hepatitis B immunization for all eligible adolescents. Those who did not routinely immunize adolescents often cited insufficient insurance coverage for immunizations. While 42% of physicians reported that they review the immunization status of adolescent patients at acute illness visits, only 24% immunized eligible adolescents during such visits. Twenty-one percent used immunization tracking and recall systems. Though 84% preferred that immunizations be administered at their practice, 71% of physicians considered schools, and 63% considered teen clinics to be acceptable alternative adolescent immunization sites. However, many had concerns about continuity of care for adolescents receiving immunizations in school. CONCLUSIONS: Most physicians supported adolescent immunization efforts. Barriers preventing adolescent immunization included financial barriers, record scattering, lack of tracking and recall, and missed opportunities. School-based immunization programs were acceptable to most physicians, despite concerns about continuity of care. Further research is needed to determine whether interventions that have successfully increased infant immunization rates are also effective for adolescents.

Physician and parent opinions. Are children becoming pincushions from immunizations?

OBJECTIVE: To determine parent and physician opinions regarding the administration of multiple childhood immunizations by injection. DESIGN: Confidential mailed survey to physicians and residents; interview of parents during office visits for immunizations. PARTICIPANTS: Physicians and parents from Rochester, NY. RESULTS: The survey included 215 practicing physicians and 74 residents; response rate was 82%. Of the 197 parents interviewed, 93% were mothers, 68% were white; the mean (+/- SD) age was 25.8 +/- 5.2 years, with 12.8 +/- 1.8 years of education; 59% had private insurance, and 35% had Medicaid coverage. Of the parents, 31% had strong concerns about their child receiving a single injection; an additional 10% (total, 41% vs 31%; chi 2 = 4.05, P = .04) had the same concerns about their child receiving three injections. More practicing physicians than parents had strong concerns about children 7 months old or younger receiving three injections (60% vs 41%; chi 2 = 7.71, P < or = .01). Physician concern increased further when physicians were asked about administration of four injections (80% vs 60%; chi 2 = 18.77, P < .001). Of the parents, 64% preferred one rather than two visits to have three injections administered, if their physician recommended it; 58% still preferred one visit even if four injections were needed. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians have more concerns than parents about the administration of multiple injections at a single visit. Pain for the child was the main concern of all respondents. While most physicians have strong concerns about administering three or more injections at one visit, most parents prefer this practice. Continued education and reassurance of parents and physicians is needed to address concerns about children becoming "pincushions" from immunizations.

Intent to immunize among pediatric and family medicine residents.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether contraindications to immunization are inappropriately broadened for children with a fever or a neurologic condition. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric and family medicine residents (N = 52 and 23, respectively) at the University of Rochester (NY). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. Residents rated how likely they would be to administer a diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis or measles-mumps-rubella vaccine in 17 clinical scenarios according to a rating scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always). For all scenarios, the immunization was recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics or the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee. RESULTS: In only five and three of 17 scenarios would 90% or more of the pediatric residents and family medicine residents, respectively, have administered an immunization. For diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine, pediatric residents reported a lower likelihood of vaccinating a 2-month-old child with a low fever (temperature, 38.1 degrees C) than an afebrile child (mean score, 3.0 vs 4.7; P < .01). A 2-year-old child with idiopathic epilepsy, a 2-month-old child with intraventricular hemorrhage, and a 2-month-old child who had a parent with a seizure disorder each had a lower reported likelihood to be vaccinated than a same-aged child without a neurologic condition (2.8 vs 4.5; 4.1 vs 4.7; and 4.3 vs 4.7, respectively; each P < .01). For measles-mumps-rubella, pediatric residents reported a lower likelihood of vaccinating a 15-month-old child with a low fever than an afebrile child (4.2 vs 4.9; P < .01). A child with a progressive neurologic disease had a lower reported likelihood to be vaccinated than a child without a neurologic condition (3.5 vs 4.9; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Residents reported a lower likelihood of immunizing children with a fever or neurologic condition. Such practice styles may contribute to underimmunization. Residents need to be educated regarding which medical conditions contraindicate an immunization.