Is Circular Fibrin Sealing of Low Rectal Anastomosis Able to Prevent Leakage in 21-Day Follow-up? Randomized Experimental Trial in Pigs.

Purpose. Clinically apparent anastomotic leakage (AL) after low anterior rectal resection (LAR; <7 cm from anal verge) using circular double-stapled anastomosis without defunctioning stoma is up to 37.5%. However, it is unclear whether there is reduction of LAR after 21 postoperative days without defunctioning stoma but with extraluminal anastomotic application of fibrin sealant. Methods. Forty-eight-week-old pigs underwent LAR and circular double-stapled anastomosis in end-to-end technique (descendo-rectostomy). Animals were randomized into therapy and control group (cg). Therapy group (n = 20) received additional extraluminal circular anastomotic application of fibrin sealant. Objective was to assess incidence of clinically apparent and nonclinically apparent leakage through the 21st postoperative day. Remaining animals were sacrificed on the 21st day, and anastomotic region was analyzed. In case of earlier diagnosed AL, animals were sacrificed. Results. In cg, we observed clinically and nonclinically AL in 20% (n = 4). No animal was identified with a nonclinical-apparent leakage in this group, and all 4 animals with leakages presented clinical signs. In the therapy group, no animal (0/20) developed clinically apparent leakage signs. There were no leakages in this group, but 3 animals had ulcerative lesions without leak and without clinical signs. These lesions were observed intraluminally at crossing of staple lines after 21 days. In one of these animals, incomplete leakage was observed, blocked by fibrin sealant. Conclusion. In circular stapled colorectal anastomosis, circular fibrin glue sealant successfully protected anastomotic intraluminal wall defects at crossing of staple lines, reducing leakage rate from 20% to 0% (cg vs therapy group) after 21 postoperative days.

How many parathyroid glands can be identified during thyroidectomy?: Evidence-based data for medical experts.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to provide guidance for medical experts regarding malpractice claims on permanent hypoparathyroidism by analyzing the number of parathyroid glands (PGs) identified during thyroidectomy and the clinical outcome. METHODS: Parathyroid findings were documented in a standardized protocol for 357 patients undergoing thyroidectomy and treated by a single specialized surgeon. The resected thyroid was routinely dissected for accidentally removed PGs with consecutive autotransplantation and the pathological report also described unintentionally resected PGs. Follow-up was performed for 6 months. RESULTS: The mean number of identified PGs was 2.28. No PGs were found in 20 (5.6%), one in 56 (15.7%), two in 126 (35.3%), three in 114 (31.9%), and four in 41 (11.5%) cases. One patient (0.28%) had manifest permanent hypoparathyroidism, while ten patients (2.8%) had latent permanent hypoparathyroidism (hypocalcemia and normoparathyroidism). The risk factors identified for postoperative hypoparathyroidism were an increasing number of visualized PGs, autotransplantation, central neck dissection, and PGs in the histopathological work-up. For permanent hypoparathyroidism, PGs in the histology examination and neck dissection were significant, but the number of identified PGs was not. CONCLUSION: Even an experienced surgeon is not always able to find all four PGs during thyroidectomy and occasionally identifies none. Rather than focusing on identifying a minimum number of PGs, it is more important not to miss them in risky positions. A documented awareness of PGs, i. e., knowledge of variable parathyroid positions and their saving, is a prerequisite for surgical quality and to protect surgeons from claims.