Repair of pars interarticularis defect by segmental wire fixation in young athletes with spondylolysis.

BACKGROUND: Although segmental wire fixation has been successful in the treatment of nonathletes with spondylolysis, no information exists on the results of this type of surgery in athletes. PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of surgical repair of pars interarticularis defect by segmental wire fixation in young athletes with lumbar spondylolysis. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2000, 20 athletes (6 women and 14 men; average age, 23.7) with lumbar spondylolysis were treated surgically with this technique. They were actively engaged in sports such as baseball, tennis, and golf. Nineteen athletes had one level of spondylolysis and one athlete had two levels. The level of spondylolysis was L4 in 2 athletes and L5 in 19. The average follow-up period was 3.5 years (range, 1.3 to 8.6). Surgical outcome was evaluated by radiographic examination, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, preoperative and postoperative sports activity levels and intensities, and the presence of complications. RESULTS: Bony fusion at the site of spondylolysis was obtained in all cases, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score was increased significantly after surgery (preoperatively, 21.2 +/- 3.9; postoperatively, maximum 27.7 +/- 1.0; recovery rate, 80.4%). All of the patients returned to their sports activities, although at varying degrees. No severe complications were noted. CONCLUSION: We recommend this technique in cases of lumbar spondylolysis in athletes who hope to resume their sports activities.

Surgical treatment with spinal instrumentation for pyogenic spondylodiscitis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a report of five cases.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) spondylodiscitis is reported to be far more difficult than that of non-MRSA spondylodiscitis. At present, there seems to be no standard protocol for the treatment of MRSA spondylodiscitis cases in which conservative management has failed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1998 and 2001, five patients (aged 48-73 years; average: 63.8 years; SD: 9.9) with MRSA spondylodiscitis were treated surgically after conservative treatment had failed. Posterior spinal instrumentation was performed for all five patients, three of whom also underwent anterior debridement and bone graft. All the patients had neurological deficits and severe pain. To assess the invasiveness of the operation, we evaluated operating time, blood loss, and complications. Pain (verbal rating scale; VRS), neurological status (Frankel type), activities of daily living (ADL) (the Barthel index), WBC, CRP, and ESR in the preoperative, postoperative and final follow-up periods were used to evaluate the surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Although we encountered several postoperative complications including deep wound infections, at the final follow-up visit, the neurological deficits, activities of daily living, Barthel index, and VRS had improved in all the patients. Changes in WBC, CRP, and ESR revealed suppression of infection in all patients. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment for MRSA spondylodiscitis with posterior spinal instrumentation provided patients with satisfactory final outcomes.