Clinico-pathological associations of serum VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 levels in patients with lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the clinico-pathological associations of serum VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 levels in patients with biopsy-proven Class III/IV±V lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS: Serum VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 levels were determined by ELISAs. Sera from patients with non-renal SLE or non-lupus chronic kidney disease (CKD), and healthy subjects served as controls. RESULTS: Seropositivity rate for VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 was 93.10% and 37.93% respectively at the time of nephritic flare, and 44.83% and 13.79% respectively at remission, with both showing higher levels during flare (P < 0.05, for both). VCAM-1 level correlated with proteinuria, serum creatinine, and anti-dsDNA antibodies, and inversely correlated with C3. VCAM-1 level also correlated with leukocyte infiltration and fibrinoid necrosis/karyorrhexis scores in active LN kidney biopsies. ICAM-1 level correlated with proteinuria, but not anti-dsDNA or C3, nor histopathological features. VCAM-1 level increased 4.5 months before renal flare, while ICAM-1 increase coincided with flare, and both decreased after treatment. ROC analysis showed that VCAM-1 distinguished active LN from healthy subjects, LN in remission, active non-renal lupus, and CKD (ROC AUC of 0.98, 0.86, 0.93 and 0.90 respectively). VCAM-1 level in combination with either proteinuria or C3 was superior in distinguishing active LN from remission compared to the measurement of individual markers. Serum ICAM-1 level distinguished active LN from healthy subjects and LN patients in remission (ROC AUC of 0.75 and 0.66 respectively), but did not distinguish between renal versus non-renal lupus. ICAM-1 level in combination with markers of endothelial cell activation (syndecan-1, hyaluronan and thrombomodulin) was superior to proteinuria, anti-dsDNA, or C3 in distinguishing active LN from quiescent disease. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest potential utility of serum VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 in clinical management. Monitoring VCAM-1 may facilitate early diagnosis of flare. Combining selected biomarkers may be advantageous in diagnosing active LN. VCAM-1 may have a pathogenic role in renal parenchymal inflammation in active LN.

Proliferation signal inhibitors in the treatment of lupus nephritis: preliminary experience.

AIM: Proliferation signal inhibitors (PSI) have demonstrated efficacy in prevention and treatment in an animal model of lupus nephritis (LN) but there are no data regarding the use of PSI in human LN. We report here our experience of using PSI treatment in seven patients with severe proliferative lupus nephritis. METHODS: This is a retrospective study on patients with proliferative lupus nephritis who had received PSI treatment. RESULTS: Seven patients were included. Two patients had concomitant membranous lupus nephropathy. The indications for PSI included mycophenolate mofetil intolerance (n = 4), history of malignancy (n = 2) and leucopoenia (n = 1). Five patients were given PSI when disease was active. Two had treatment discontinued because of acute cholecystitis and leucopoenia, respectively. In the other three patients combined steroid and PSI treatment as induction therapy led to improvements in serology, renal function and proteinuria. In two patients treated with PSI and low-dose steroid as maintenance immunosuppression, both maintained stable lupus serology, renal function and proteinuria over 18 months. Side-effects included dyslipidemia and oral ulcers. CONCLUSION: Proliferation signal inhibitors warrants further investigation as an alternative immunosuppressive treatment in lupus nephritis.

Pilot 24 month study to compare mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus in the treatment of membranous lupus nephritis with nephrotic syndrome.

AIM: This pilot study compared mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus (Tac) in the treatment of severe membranous lupus nephritis (MLN). METHOD: This was a 24 month prospective, randomized, open-label multi-centre exploratory study on Chinese patients with biopsy-proven pure Class V MLN with nephrotic syndrome. Patients were randomized to treatment with either MMF or Tac, both in combination with prednisolone and the efficacy and tolerability outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included, seven in the MMF and nine in the Tac treatment arm. At 24 months the complete response, partial response and overall response rates were 57.1% vs. 11.1% (P = 0.049), 14.3% vs. 44.4% (P = 0.197) and 71.4% vs. 55.6% (P = 0.515) in the MMF and Tac groups, respectively. The two groups had similar reduction of proteinuria and longitudinal profiles of serum albumin and creatinine levels. Serum creatinine remained stable in both groups, except in two patients who had a transient increase associated with high Tac blood levels. Adverse events in the MMF group included herpes zoster in one patient and reversible leucopenia in another, while in the Tac group four patients had severe infections and one developed new onset diabetes. No relapse occurred during the study period. CONCLUSION: Both MMF and Tac when combined with corticosteroids are effective treatment options for severe MLN.

Prospective controlled study on mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone in the treatment of membranous nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective and anecdotal data suggest that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) might be effective when given as rescue therapy for membranous nephropathy (MN). Prospective controlled data on MMF and prednisolone as primary therapy are lacking. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label study was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of MMF and prednisolone as primary treatment in MN with nephrotic syndrome. MMF and prednisolone given for 6 months was compared against a modified Ponticelli regimen in 20 patients, with follow up of 15 months. RESULTS: MMF with prednisolone and the comparative immunosuppressive regimen showed similar efficacy in proteinuria reduction, despite a lower cumulative prednisolone dose in the MMF group (3.80 +/- 0.28 vs 9.93 +/- 0.25 g, P < 0.001). Remission (composite of 'complete' and 'partial') rates were 63.6% and 66.7% in the MMF group and control group, respectively (P = 1.000). Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance remained stable during follow up. Cumulative relapse rate was 23.1% at 2 years. Chlorambucil resulted in more leucopenia compared with MMF. CONCLUSION: Data from this pilot study indicate that more than 60% of patients with MN and nephrotic syndrome respond to combined MMF and prednisolone treatment, and suggest potential benefits of MMF as being steroid-sparing and having less adverse effects compared with other commonly used cytotoxic agents.