Antibody-drug conjugates: Smart chemotherapy delivery across tumor histologies.

As distinct cancer biomarkers have been discovered in recent years, a need to reclassify tumors by more than their histology has been proposed, and therapies are now tailored to treat cancers based on specific molecular aberrations and immunologic markers. In fact, multiple histology-agnostic therapies are currently adopted in clinical practice for treating patients regardless of their tumor site of origin. In parallel with this new model for drug development, in the past few years, several novel antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been approved to treat solid tumors, benefiting from engineering improvements in the conjugation process and the introduction of novel linkers and payloads. With the recognition that numerous surface targets are expressed across various cancer histologies, alongside the remarkable activity of modern ADCs, this drug class has been increasingly evaluated as suitable for a histology-agnostic expansion of indication. For illustration, the anti-HER2 ADC trastuzumab deruxtecan has demonstrated compelling activity in HER2-overexpressing breast, gastric, colorectal, and lung cancer. Examples of additional novel and potentially histology-agnostic ADC targets include trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) and nectin-4, among others. In the current review article, the authors summarize the current approvals of ADCs by the US Food and Drug Administration focusing on solid tumors and discuss the challenges and opportunities posed by the multihistological expansion of ADCs.

Clinical characterization, prognostic, and predictive values of HER2-low in patients with early breast cancer in the PALLAS trial (ABCSG-42/AFT-05/BIG-14-13/PrE0109).

BACKGROUND: Bidirectional crosstalk between HER2 and estrogen receptor (ER) pathways may influence outcomes and the efficacy of endocrine therapy (ET). Low HER2 expression levels (HER2-low) have emerged as a predictive biomarker in patients with breast cancer (BC). METHODS: PALLAS is an open, international, phase 3 study evaluating the addition of palbociclib for 2 years to adjuvant ET in patients with stage II-III ER-positive/HER2-negative BC. To assess the impact of HER2 expression on patient outcomes in the phase III PALLAS trial, we analyzed (1) the association between rate of HER2-low with demographic and clinicopathological parameters, (2) the prognostic value of HER2-low status on invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS) and (3) HER2 expression's value as a predictive biomarker of response to palbociclib. HER2-low was defined as HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1 + or IHC 2 + with negative in situ hybridization (ISH). All pathologic evaluation was performed locally. Prognostic and predictive power of HER2 were assessed with Cox models. RESULTS: From the original PALLAS intention-to-treat population (N = 5753), 5304 patients (92.2%) were included in this analysis. Among these, 2254 patients (42.5%) were classified as having HER2 IHC 0 (HER2-0), and 3050 (57.5%) as having HER2-low disease (1838 with IHC 1 + and 1212 with IHC 2 +). Median follow-up was 59.8 months. HER2-low prevalence varied significantly across 21 participating countries (range 16.7% to 75.6%; p < 0.001) and was more frequent in patients enrolled in North America (63.1%) than in Europe (53.4%) or other regions (53.4%) (p < 0.001). HER2 status was not significantly associated with iDFS in a multivariable Cox model (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.81 - 1.06). No significant interaction was observed between treatment arm and HER2 status for iDFS (p = 0.43). Similar results were obtained for DRFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, prospective, global patient cohort, no differences were observed in clinical parameters, prognosis, or differential benefit from palbociclib between HER2-0 and HER2-low tumors. Significant geographic variability was observed in the prevalence of HER2-low status, suggesting a high degree of variation in pathologic assessment of HER2 expression without impact on outcomes.

Evaluation of the Geographical Accessibility of Genome-Matched Clinical Trials on a National Experience.

BACKGROUND: Molecular-driven oncology allows oncologists to identify treatments that match a cancer's genomic profile. Clinical trials are promoted as an effective modality to deliver a molecularly matched treatment. We explore the role of geographical accessibility in Italy, and its impact on patient access to clinical trials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed molecular data from a single-institutional case series of patients receiving next-generation sequencing testing between March 2019 and July 2020. Actionable alterations were defined as the ones with at least one matched treatment on Clinicaltrials.gov at the time of genomic report signature. We then calculated the hypothetical distance to travel to reach the nearest assigned clinical trial. RESULTS: We identified 159 patients eligible for analysis. One hundred and one could be potentially assigned to a clinical trial in Italy, and the median distance that patients needed to travel to reach the closest location with a suitable clinical trial was 76 km (interquartile range = 127.46 km). Geographical distribution of clinical trials in Italy found to be heterogeneous, with Milan and Naples being the areas with a higher concentration. We then found that the probability of having a clinical trial close to a patient's hometown increased over time, according to registered studies between 2015 and 2020. CONCLUSIONS: The median distance to be travelled to the nearest trial was generally acceptable for patients, and trials availability is increasing. Nevertheless, many areas are still lacking trials, so efforts are required to increase and homogenize the possibilities to be enrolled in clinical trials for Italian patients with cancer.

Baseline Tumor Size as Prognostic Index in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Receiving Experimental Targeted Agents.

BACKGROUND: Baseline tumor size (BTS) has been associated with outcomes in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy. However, the prognostic impact of BTS on patients receiving targeted therapies (TTs) remains undetermined. METHODS: We reviewed data of patients with advanced solid tumors consecutively treated within early-phase clinical trials at our institution from 01/2014 to 04/2021. Treatments were categorized as immunotherapy-based or TT-based (biomarker-matched or not). BTS was calculated as the sum of RECIST1.1 baseline target lesions. RESULTS: A total of 444 patients were eligible; the median BTS was 69 mm (IQR 40-100). OS was significantly longer for patients with BTS lower versus higher than the median (16.6 vs. 8.2 months, P < .001), including among those receiving immunotherapy (12 vs. 7.5 months, P = .005). Among patients receiving TT, lower BTS was associated with longer PFS (4.7 vs. 3.1 months, P = .002) and OS (20.5 vs. 9.9 months, P < .001) as compared to high BTS. However, such association was only significant among patients receiving biomarker-matched TT, with longer PFS (6.2 vs. 3.3 months, P < .001) and OS (21.2 vs. 6.7 months, P < .001) in the low-BTS subgroup, despite a similar ORR (28% vs. 22%, P = .57). BTS was not prognostic among patients receiving unmatched TT, with similar PFS (3.7 vs. 4.4 months, P = .30), OS (19.3 vs. 11.8 months, P = .20), and ORR (33% vs. 28%, P = .78) in the 2 BTS groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed that BTS was independently associated with PFS (P = .03) and OS (P < .001) but not with ORR (P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: Higher BTS is associated with worse survival outcomes among patients receiving biomarker-matched, but not biomarker-unmatched TT.

Immunotherapy for Early-Stage Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Is Earlier Better?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this narrative review, we discuss the optimal timing of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in early triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the landscape of predictive biomarkers for the use of immunotherapy, and the mounting literature suggesting a benefit for an early use of ICI. RECENT FINDINGS: TNBC is associated with a poor prognosis relative to other breast cancer subtypes, and until recently, the treatment of TNBC was limited to cytotoxic chemotherapy. In 2021, the immune-checkpoint inhibitor, pembrolizumab, was approved in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk early stage TNBC. This approval changed the treatment paradigm of early TNBC concomitantly raised several challenges in clinical practice, pertaining to patient selection, toxicity management, and post-neoadjuvant treatment, among others. The introduction of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has transformed the treatment landscape for early TNBC. However, several challenges, including patient selection, toxicity management, and the identification of predictive biomarkers, need to be addressed. Future research should focus on refining the timing and duration of immunotherapy, optimizing the chemotherapy partner, and exploring novel predictive biomarkers of response or toxicity.

Adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab for node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer: final 10-year analysis of the open-label, single-arm, phase 2 APT trial.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to report on long-term outcomes of patients with small, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab and to establish potential biomarkers to predict prognosis. METHODS: In this open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, patients aged 18 years or older, with small (≤3 cm), node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, were recruited from 16 institutions in 13 cities in the USA. Eligible patients were given intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) with intravenous trastuzumab (loading dose of 4 mg/kg, subsequent doses 2 mg/kg) weekly for 12 weeks, followed by trastuzumab (weekly at 2 mg/kg or once every 3 weeks at 6 mg/kg) for 40 weeks to complete a full year of trastuzumab. The primary endpoint was 3-year invasive disease-free survival. Here, we report 10-year survival outcomes, assessed in all participants who received protocol-defined treatment, with exploratory analyses using the HER2DX genomic tool. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00542451, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between Oct 29, 2007, and Sept 3, 2010, 410 patients were enrolled and 406 were given adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab and included in the analysis. Mean age at enrolment was 55 years (SD 10·5), 405 (99·8%) of 406 patients were female and one (0·2%) was male, 350 (86·2%) were White, 28 (6·9%) were Black or African American, and 272 (67·0%) had hormone receptor-positive disease. After a median follow-up of 10·8 years (IQR 7·1-11·4), among 406 patients included in the analysis population, we observed 31 invasive disease-free survival events, of which six (19·4%) were locoregional ipsilateral recurrences, nine (29·0%) were new contralateral breast cancers, six (19·4%) were distant recurrences, and ten (32·3%) were all-cause deaths. 10-year invasive disease-free survival was 91·3% (95% CI 88·3-94·4), 10-year recurrence-free interval was 96·3% (95% CI 94·3-98·3), 10-year overall survival was 94·3% (95% CI 91·8-96·8), and 10-year breast cancer-specific survival was 98·8% (95% CI 97·6-100). HER2DX risk score as a continuous variable was significantly associated with invasive disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] per 10-unit increment 1·24 [95% CI 1·00-1·52]; p=0·047) and recurrence-free interval (1·45 [1·09-1·93]; p=0·011). INTERPRETATION: Adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab is a reasonable treatment standard for patients with small, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer. The HER2DX genomic tool might help to refine the prognosis for this population. FUNDING: Genentech.

Nodal positivity and systemic therapy among patients with clinical T1-T2N0 human epidermal growth factor receptor-positive breast cancer: Results from two international cohorts.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for patients with small human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumors is based on nodal status. The authors' objective was to evaluate pathologic nodal disease (pathologic lymph node-positive [pN-positive] and pathologic lymph node-positive after preoperative systemic therapy [ypN-positive]) rates in patients who had clinical T1-T2 (cT1-cT2)N0M0, HER2-positive breast cancer treated with upfront surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: Two databases were queried for patients who had cT1-cT2N0M0, HER2-positive breast cancer: (1) the Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (DF/BCC) from February 2015 to October 2020 and (2) the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona and the Hospital Clinico of Valencia (HCB/HCV) from January 2012 to September 2021. The pN-positive/ypN-positive and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) rates were compared between patients who underwent upfront surgery versus those who received NAC. RESULTS: Among 579 patients from the DF/BCC database, 368 underwent upfront surgery, and 211 received NAC; the rates of nodal positivity were 19.8% and 12.8%, respectively (p = .021). The pN-positive rates increased by tumor size (p < .001), reaching 25% for those with cT1c tumors. The ypN-positive rates did not correlate with tumor size. NAC was associated with decreased nodal positivity (odds ratio, 0.411; 95% confidence interval, 0.202-0.838), but the ALND rates were similar (22 of 368 patients [6.0%] who underwent upfront surgery vs. 18 of 211 patients [8.5%] who received NAC; p = .173). Among 292 patients from the HCB/HCV database, 119 underwent upfront surgery, and 173 received NAC; the rates of nodal positivity were 21% and 10.4%, respectively (p = .012). The pN-positive rates increased with tumor size (p = .011). The ALND rates were equivalent by treatment strategy (23 of 119 patients [19.3%] who underwent upfront surgery vs. 24 of 173 patients [13.9%] who received NAC; p = .213). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who had cT1-cT2N0M0, HER2-positive breast cancer, approximately 20% who underwent upfront surgery were pN-positive, and the rate reached 25% for those with cT1c tumors. Given the opportunity for tailored therapy among lymph node-positive, HER2-positive patients, these data provide rationale for future analyses investigating the utility of routine axillary imaging in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Opportunities and Challenges for a Histology-Agnostic Utilization of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review delves into the prospects and challenges offered by a potential pan-histological utilization of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with advanced solid tumors. RECENT FINDINGS: The HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) T-DXd has shown broad activity across cancer types, with current indications for patients with biomarker-selected breast, gastric, and non-small-cell lung cancer and relevant activity observed in multiple histology-specific trials. Moreover, two recently reported phase 2 trials (DESTINY-Pantumor02 and HERALD) have supported the potential for a pan-cancer utilization of this ADC in patients with advanced cancers expressing HER2 or with HER2 amplifications. By improving the delivery of cytotoxic chemotherapy, ADCs have allowed for meaningful clinical advantages in broad populations of cancer patients, often leading to survival advantages over conventional chemotherapy. Notably, the broad spectrum of activity of certain ADCs has led to the hypothesis of a histology-agnostic utilization based on detecting specific biomarkers, similar to what is already established for certain targeted treatments and immunotherapy. To date, T-DXd has shown the broadest activity across cancer types, with current approvals in breast, gastric, and lung cancer, and relevant antitumor activity observed in a multiplicity of additional cancer types. The optimization of the drug dose, identification of predictive biomarkers, and clarification of mechanisms of resistance will be critical steps in view of a pan-histological expansion in the use of T-DXd.

HER2-Low Breast Cancer: a New Subtype?

OPINION STATEMENT: Breast cancer (BC) guidelines subdivide the disease into three main groups, namely hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative, HER2-positive, and triple-negative BC (TNBC). The natural history of the HER2-positive subtype has changed since the introduction of HER-targeted therapies, which demonstrated benefit only in case of HER2 overexpression (IHC, score 3+) or gene amplification. Such observation may depend on direct drug inhibition of HER2 downstream signaling, which is needed for survival and proliferation in HER2-addicted BC. Clinically focused categories cannot comprehensively describe biology, as almost half of the currently defined HER2-negative BCs show some degree of IHC expression and have been recently renamed as HER2-low. Why? As technological breakthroughs enable the synthesis of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), target antigens may be viewed not only as a biological switch to be turned on-off by targeted drugs but also as an anchor for ADC docking and tethering. As trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has already proven in the clinical trial DESTINY-Breast04, even fewer HER2 available receptors on cancer cells may be sufficient for a clinical benefit. So, for HR-negative HER2-low subtype (~40% of TNBCs), though only 58 patients had been enrolled in DESTINY-Breast04, the observed benefit, together with the dismal prognosis of TNBC, warrants the use of T-DXd. Notably, another topoisomerase-based ADC, sacituzumab govitecan, has already been granted approval for pretreated TNBC (ASCENT). As no head-to-head comparison has been performed, the choice relies on regulatory approvals at the time of patient assessment, critical appraisal of available evidence, and careful evaluation of possible cross-resistance with sequential use of ADCs. As for HR-positive HER2-low disease (~60% of HR-positive tumors), DESTINY-Breast04 provides solid evidence for T-DXd prioritization in either second or third treatment lines. Although the remarkable activity observed in this setting favorably compares with outcomes observed in treatment-naive patients, the ongoing DESTINY-Breast06 will clarify the role of T-DXd in this population.

Bystander effect of antibody-drug conjugates: fact or fiction?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Summarizing the current preclinical and clinical evidence about bystander effect of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in solid tumors. RECENT FINDINGS: One of the main challenges of treating solid tumors with ADCs is the heterogeneous expression of the target antigen (Ag), which however may be overcome by the so-called bystander killing effect. This unique, but still debated, feature of certain ADCs is represented by the unintentional payload diffusion from Ag-positive tumor cells to adjacent Ag-negative tumor cells. Some pharmacological characteristics, such as a hydrophobic payload or a cleavable linker, seem to play a major role in this effect. Abundant preclinical evidence of the bystander effect has emerged, and the clinical activity of ADCs in tumors with a heterogeneous Ag expression suggests the relevance of this feature. Additional studies are required to investigate if the bystander effect is necessary for achieving a solid activity with ADCs.

New anti-HER2 agents for brain metastasis: histology-agnostic weapons?

Besides predicting responsiveness to anti-HER2 agents, HER2 aberrations are associated with a high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastasis across several cancer types, including breast, lung, gastric and colorectal cancer. In this setting, several novel anti-HER2 agents with relevant CNS activity are emerging, including tucatinib and trastuzumab deruxtecan. Both agents are already FDA-approved for treating advanced breast cancer, but are also being tested for the treatment of other HER2-driven histologies. The confirmation of their activity in other cancer types may provide histology-agnostic weapons against HER2-driven brain metastasis, possibly improving the prognosis of a wide population of cancer patients.

Systemic Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast.

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a noninvasive breast cancer (BC), whose diagnosis significatively increased with the diffusion of BC screening programs. DCIS actually represents roughly 20% of new BC diagnoses (1). About 70% of DCIS shows positivity for hormone receptor (HR), while HER2 is overexpressed in 25-30% of the cases (2,3). Concerning the systemic approach, the only one that should be considered for HR-positive DCIS is adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), according to NCCN guidelines (4). In fact, the excellent prognosis of this neoplasm does not justify the utilization of more aggressive treatment strategies, such as HER2- directed therapies or chemotherapy. Here we discuss the results of the most important clinical trials enrolling DCIS patients in the adjuvant and in the preoperative setting; in addition, we report the chemoprevention studies utilizing ET which demonstrated a reduction of the risk of DCIS development. On balance, the choice to undertake or not an adjuvant ET, which is often burdened by adverse events that could impact on the quality of life of the patients and on their adherence to the therapy, should be discussed with the patient, taking into account that no survival advantage has been demonstrated so far.

Next Generation Sequencing (NGS): A Revolutionary Technology in Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine in Cancer.

Following the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003, research in oncology has progressively focused on the sequencing of cancer genomes, with the aim of better understanding the genetic basis of oncogenesis and identifying actionable alterations. The development of next-generation-sequencing (NGS) techniques, commercially available since 2006, allowed for a cost- and time-effective sequencing of tumor DNA, leading to a "genomic era" of cancer research and treatment. NGS provided a significant step forward in Personalized Medicine (PM) by enabling the detection of somatic driver mutations, resistance mechanisms, quantification of mutational burden, germline mutations which settled the foundation of a new approach in cancer care. In this chapter we discuss the history, available techniques and applications of NGS in oncology, with a particular referral to the PM approach and the emerging role of the research field of pharmacogenomics.

The radiologist's role in detecting systemic anticancer therapy-related interstitial lung disease: an educational review.

Systemic anticancer therapies (SACTs) are the leading cause of drug-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD). As more novel SACTs become approved, the incidence of this potentially life-threatening adverse event (AE) may increase. Early detection of SACT-related ILD allows for prompt implementation of drug-specific management recommendations, improving the likelihood of AE resolution and, in some instances, widening the patient's eligibility for future cancer treatment options. ILD requires a diagnosis of exclusion through collaboration with the patient's multidisciplinary team to rule out other possible etiologies of new or worsening respiratory signs and symptoms. At Grade 1, ILD is asymptomatic, and thus the radiologist is key to detecting the AE prior to the disease severity worsening. Planned computed tomography scans should be reviewed for the presence of ILD in addition to being assessed for tumor response to treatment, and when ILD is suspected, a high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan should be requested immediately. An HRCT scan, with < 2-mm slice thickness, is the most appropriate method for detecting ILD. Multiple patterns of ILD exist, which can impact patient prognosis. The four main patterns include acute interstitial pneumonia / acute respiratory distress syndrome, organizing pneumonia, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and non-specific interstitial pneumonia; their distinct radiological features, along with rarer patterns, are discussed here. Furthermore, HRCT is essential for following the course of ILD and might help to determine the intensity of AE management and the appropriateness of re-challenging with SACT, where indicated by drug-specific prescribing information. ILD events should be monitored closely until complete resolution. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The incidence of potentially treatment-limiting and life-threatening systemic anticancer therapy-related interstitial lung disease (SACT-related ILD) events is likely increasing as more novel regimens become approved. This review provides best-practice recommendations for the early detection of SACT-related ILD by radiologists. KEY POINTS: Radiologists are crucial in detecting asymptomatic (Grade 1) ILD before severity/prognosis worsens. High-resolution computed tomography is the most appropriate method for detecting ILD. Drug-induced ILD is a diagnosis of exclusion, involving a multidisciplinary team. Familiarity with common HRCT patterns, described here, is key for prompt detection. Physicians should highlight systemic anticancer therapies (SACTs) with a known risk for interstitial lung diseases (ILD) on scan requisitions.

Heterogeneity of Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Review.

Importance: Over the past 2 decades, systemic therapy for early-stage breast cancer has gradually moved from the adjuvant to the neoadjuvant setting. Administration of systemic therapy before surgery leads to potential improvements in surgical outcomes and allows for the assessment of the pathologic response to treatment. For patients with residual disease (RD), 3 adjuvant strategies have been shown to improve outcomes: (1) adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine for ERBB2-positive disease, (2) adjuvant capecitabine for triple-negative disease, and (3) adjuvant olaparib for patients with germline BRCA variants. Furthermore, studies are testing novel drugs in the postneoadjuvant setting. Given the potential to tailor adjuvant therapy based on the response to preoperative systemic therapy, recognizing the complexities of response to neoadjuvant therapy and moving beyond the binary paradigm of RD vs experiencing a pathologic complete response is becoming increasingly necessary. Observations: Novel antibody-drug conjugates, anti-ERBB2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors are being evaluated as additional rescue options in phase 3 trials for patients with RD after neoadjuvant treatment. Concomitantly, the prognostic role of RD has been refined by the introduction of the residual cancer burden. In addition, the genomic landscape of RD has been found to be associated with long-term prognosis, as has the immune background of the disease evaluated via the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Lastly, the dynamics of circulating tumor DNA may allow for further improvement in prognostication by understanding which patients harbor detectable minimal RD. Conclusions and Relevance: Escalating adjuvant treatment has led to meaningful survival improvements among patients with breast cancer and RD after neoadjuvant therapy. Uncovering the anatomic and biological intricacies of RD will allow for increased precision in postneoadjuvant treatments, moving beyond the binary paradigm of RD vs pathologic complete response, toward more tailored rescue strategies in the adjuvant setting.

The Journey of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Lessons Learned from 40 Years of Development.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) represent one of the most rapidly expanding treatment modalities in oncology, with 11 ADCs approved by the FDA and more than 210 currently being tested in clinical trials. Spanning over 40 years, ADC clinical development has enhanced our understanding of the multifaceted mechanisms of action for this class of therapeutics. In this article, we discuss key insights into the toxicity, efficacy, stability, distribution, and fate of ADCs. Furthermore, we highlight ongoing challenges related to their clinical optimization, the development of rational sequencing strategies, and the identification of predictive biomarkers. Significance: The development and utilization of ADCs have allowed for relevant improvements in the prognosis of multiple cancer types. Concomitantly, the rise of ADCs in oncology has produced several challenges, including the prediction of their activity, their utilization in sequence, and minimization of their side effects, that still too often resemble those of the cytotoxic molecule that they carry. In this review, we retrace 40 years of development in the field of ADCs and delve deep into the mechanisms of action of these complex therapeutics and reasons behind the many achievements and failures observed in the field to date.