Management of inflammatory rheumatic conditions in the elderly.

The number of elderly people with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases is increasing. This heterogeneous and comorbid population is at particular risk of cardiovascular, neoplastic, infectious and iatrogenic complications. The development of biotherapies has paved the way for innovative therapeutic strategies, which are associated with toxicities. In this review, we have focused on the scientific and therapeutic changes impacting the management of elderly patients affected by RA, SpA or PsA. A multidimensional health assessment resulting in an integrated therapeutic strategy was identified as a major research direction for improving the management of elderly patients.

Characteristics of spontaneous coagulase-negative staphylococcal spondylodiscitis: a retrospective comparative study versus Staphylococcus aureus spondylodiscitis.

BACKGROUND: Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are increasingly implicated in recent patient series of spondylodiscitis, but there are no series of CoNS-spondylodiscitis available. The objective of this study was to compare the characteristics of patients with spontaneous CoNS-spondylodiscitis with those patients with Staphylococcus aureus (SA) spondylodiscitis. METHODS: This was a retrospective single center study involving 147 spontaneous infectious spondylodiscitis cases observed between 2000 and 2015. The 26 cases of CoNS-spondylodiscitis (15 confirmed) were compared with 30 cases of SA-spondylodiscitis. CoNS infection was considered confirmed if the same CoNS was isolated in at least two samples at two different times. RESULT: Patients with CoNS-spondylodiscitis were older (70 vs. 61 years of age; p = 0.01), had associated cancer more often (15% vs. 0%; p = 0.04) and had a longer diagnostic delay (>15 days in 88% vs. 60%; p = 0.01); experienced fever less often (19% vs. 50%; p = 0.01), and had lower white blood cell (7.6 vs. 9.9G/L; p = 0.01) and polymorphonuclear leucocyte counts (5.6 vs. 7.5G/L; p = 0.04). Patients with CoNS spondylodiscitis had less pronounced inflammatory syndrome (erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]: 62 vs. 81 mm at 1 h; p = 0.03; CRP: 60 vs. 147 mg/L; p = 0.0003) and less common (ESR < 30 mm: 23% vs. 0%; p = 0.01; CRP < 10 mg/L: 23% vs. 0%; p = 0.005) in comparison with patients with SA infection. The infection entry site was most often an intravascular catheter (20% vs. 3%; p = 0.008). The level of positive percutaneous needle biopsies was comparable between CoNS and SA. Two patients who died both had SA infections. CONCLUSION: CoNS-spondylodiscitis involved at least 10% of spontaneous spondylodiscitis cases and was more common in elderly patients, afflicted by comorbidities, and its presentation was less virulent than that of those with SA-spondylodiscitis.

Prevalence and risk factors of low bone mineral density in spondyloarthritis and prevalence of vertebral fractures.

BACKGROUND: Investigate the prevalence and risk factors of low bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis as well as investigating the prevalence of vertebral fractures. METHODS: Patients underwent BMD measurements with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the anterior-posterior lumbar spine, lateral spine and hip. We screened for vertebral fractures using vertebral fracture assessment, and then checked for syndesmophytes on the VFA images. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients (41,6% female) took part in the study with a mean age of 44 ± 14 years and disease duration 10.2 ± 10.6 years. According to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, 48,3% of patients displayed osteopenia and 6,7% osteoporosis. In the subgroup of women who underwent measurement at all sites including the lateral spine, the prevalence of osteopenia was 39.3% in the anterior-posterior spine, 32.1% in the lateral spine, and 64.3% with all sites together. VFA led to the diagnosis of at least one vertebral fracture in 6.2% of patients. On VFA, syndesmophytes were found in 24.3% of patients. The variables associated in multivariate analyses with low BMD in different measurement sites were low body mass index (BMI), a high physician's global assessment score, a high Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) score and female gender. CONCLUSION: Our study found a high prevalence (around 50%) of low BMD in SpA. Conversely, the prevalence of osteoporosis (6.7% according to WHO criteria) and vertebral fractures (6.2%) was lower than generally reported in the literature. While lateral spine BMD measurement did little to improve the detection of osteopenia in women, the sample size was not large enough to enable us to draw definite conclusions.

Performance of Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST) to detect fibromyalgia syndrome in rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST) self-questionnaire for the detection of FM associated with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. METHODS: This cross-sectional, French single-centre study was carried out between September 2014 and April 2015 in all patients who consulted for RA, SpA or CTD. Diagnosis of FM was based on ACR 90 criteria and rheumatologist opinion. RESULTS: The self-questionnaire was completed by 605 patients (279 RA, 271 SpA, 57 CTD). It detected 143 concomitant FMs (24.4%). When assessed against ACR 90 criteria, FiRST had a sensitivity of 74.5%, a specificity of 80.4%, a positive predictive value of 26.6% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.1%. Specificity was lower in the CTD group (RA: 84.4%, SpA: 80.2%, CTD: 59.6%) (P = 0.001). When assessed against the rheumatologist's opinion, FiRST had a sensitivity of 75.8%, a specificity of 85.1%, a positive predictive value of 48.3% and an NPV of 95%. Sensitivity was lower in the SpA group than in the CTD group (66% vs 94.4%) (P = 0.004). Performance varied according to self-questionnaire items. CONCLUSION: Although it performs less well in inflammatory rheumatic disease, FiRST's opinion is close to that of the rheumatologist. It can be used by the rheumatologist in clinical practice for patients facing an apparent treatment failure and to rule out a potential FM diagnosis which could interfere with the treatment response.

Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in rheumatoid arthritis and association with disease activity and cardiovascular risk factors: data from the COMEDRA study.

OBJECTIVES: The relationship between vitamin D and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) activity remains controversial. RA is a cardiovascular risk factor. A low level of vitamin D may increase blood pressure (BP) and decrease HDL-cholesterol. We aimed to determine the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in RA patients compared to controls, and also to investigate the relationship between vitamin D and RA activity, and between vitamin D and cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: Patients in the COMEDRA study with established inactive RA (1987 ACR criteria) were matched with subjects from the NUTRINET-SANTE cohort (age, gender, latitude, sampling season). Vitamin D deficiency was defined as <10 ng/mL, and insufficiency as 10 to 29.9 ng/mL. RESULTS: Eight hundred and ninety-four RA patients were analysed, of which 861 were matched with controls. The prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency was lower in RA patients than in controls: 480 (55.8%) vs. 508 (59%) and 31 (3.6%) vs. 45 (5.23%), respectively; p=0.04. There was an inverse correlation between vitamin D levels and RA activity assessed by DAS28-CRP (p=0.01), SDAI (p<0.001) and CDAI (p=0.001), but not DAS28-ESR after adjustment for age, gender, inclusion season, body mass index (BMI), vitamin D supplementation, disease duration, RF or anti-CCP status and RA treatments. Vitamin D levels were inversely correlated with BMI (p<0.001), but not with BP, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol or blood glucose. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that vitamin D is inversely correlated with RA activity and BMI, but not with other cardiovascular risk factors.

Psoriatic arthritis treated by anti-TNFs: a monocentric trial of 102 cases in Auvergne, France.

OBJECTIVES: While several registries have already evaluated the retention of anti-TNF therapy in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), they sometimes reach divergent conclusions. Our study therefore sought to assess therapeutic retention rates and predictive factors of response in a patient cohort from Auvergne, France, followed up in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Medical records of all PsA patients treated from 2002 to May 2015 were analysed. PsA diagnosis was established based on the CASPAR criteria. RESULTS: In total, 102 patients were analysed, comprising 62 men (44.6±12.6 years) and 40 women (37.8±13.4). Mean PsA evolution was 2.7 years (0.8-11.2). The most common forms were peripheral (47/102, 45.1%) and mixed (46/102, 46.1%) PsA. The anti-TNF treatment initiated was etanercept in 47 cases (45.2%), adalimumab in 29 (27.9%), infliximab in 20 (19.2%), and golimumab in six [5.8%]. In 28 cases (27.4%), anti-TNF was associated with methotrexate (MTX). Overall, the median duration of anti-TNF retention was 76.5 months. The hazard ratios (HR) for treatment cessation did not significantly differ between the etanercept and monoclonal antibody groups (HR=1.35[0.96-1.93], p=0.08). After 5 years, approximately 30.8% of etanercept patients and 68.8% of monoclonal antibody patients (adalimumab 71.2%; infliximab 67.2%) were still being treated. Combining with MTX did not prolong the overall retention rate (HR=0.85[0.37-1.96], p=0.71). Tobacco use was predictive of discontinuation (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates good anti-TNF treatment retention in PsA patients, as well as confirming the deleterious effect of smoking while providing no argument in favour of combined treatment with MTX to improve maintenance.

Variations in the metabolome in response to disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) therapies are able to control rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity and limit structural damage. Yet no predictive factor of response to anti-TNF has been identified. Metabolomic profile is known to vary in response to different inflammatory rheumatisms so determining it could substantially improve diagnosis and, consequently, prognosis. The aim of this study was to use mass spectrometry to determine whether there is variation in the metabolome in patients treated with anti-TNF and whether any particular metabolomic profile can serve as a predictor of therapeutic response. METHODS: Blood samples were analyzed in 140 patients with active RA before initiation of anti-TNF treatment and after 6 months of Anti-TNF treatment (100 good responders and 40 non-responders). Plasma was deproteinized, extracted and analyzed by reverse-phase chromatography-QToF mass spectrometry. Extracted and normalized ions were tested by univariate and ANOVA analysis followed by partial least-squares regression-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). Orthogonal Signal Correction (OSC) was also used to filter data from unwanted non-related effects. Disease activity scores (DAS 28) obtained at 6 months were correlated with metabolome variation findings to identify a metabolite that is predictive of therapeutic response to anti-TNF. RESULTS: After 6 months of anti-TNF therapy, 100 patients rated as good responders and 40 patients as non-responders according to EULAR criteria. Metabolomic investigations suggested two different metabolic fingerprints splitting the good-responders group and the non-responders group, without differences in anti-TNF therapies. Univariate analysis revealed 24 significant ions in positive mode (p < 0.05) and 31 significant ions in negative mode (p < 0.05). Once intersected with PLS results, only 35 ions remained. Carbohydrate derivates emerged as strong candidate determinants of therapeutic response. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study describing metabolic profiling in response to anti-TNF treatments using plasma samples. The study highlighted two different metabolic profiles splitting good responders from non-responders.

Abatacept for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Special Focus on the Elderly.

Targeted therapies have been developed for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for whom prior treatment with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs has failed. The numerous different signaling pathways now targeted by various classes of monoclonal antibodies and small molecule inhibitors may complicate treatment decisions. Abatacept selectively modulates a co-stimulatory signal necessary for T-cell activation. Thus, abatacept is effective in biologic-naive patients and in those for whom biologic therapy has failed. Emerging evidence indicates different benefits depending on patient and disease characteristics. In RA, the clinical goal should be clinical and radiographic remission to prevent structural damage and functional impairment. Nevertheless, the management of elderly patients with RA is often less aggressive, and the treat-to-target strategy is less respected in this age category than in the treatment of RA in younger patients. However, abatacept treatment in elderly patients is as effective and well-tolerated as in younger patients. This review summarizes recently published data on pharmacological properties; clinical and biological data on efficacy, drug retention, and safety, focusing on age; and evidence-based criteria for choosing abatacept or an alternative targeted therapy.

Retention rates of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab as first-line biotherapy agent for rheumatoid arthritis patients in daily practice - Auvergne experience.

OBJECTIVE: To compare, in real-life conditions, the retention rates of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment (etanercept [ETN], adalimumab [ADA] and infliximab [IFX]) initiated as first-line biotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to evaluate, in case of failure, the switch to another anti-TNF or a non-anti-TNF biological. METHODS: Monocentric retrospective cohort including all patients with RA starting a first anti-TNF between 2001 and 2015. RESULTS: Among the 346 patients analyzed, 201 received ETN, 82 ADA and 63 IFX. The first anti-TNF was interrupted in 151 cases. The retention rates were 82.8%, 67.6%, 46.5%, 28.1% and 22.5% at 1, 2, 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively, with a median retention duration of 52.8 (18.9-136.2) months (ETN: 59.3 [19.1-NA), ADA: 79.9 [19.3-136.2] and IFX: 37.2 [17.5-134.5], P = 0.49). The predictive factors of discontinuation were active RA (Disease Activity Score of 28 joints - C-reactive protein [DAS28-CRP] hazards ratio [HR]: 1.22 [1.03-1.45]), inflammatory syndrome (erythrocyte sedimentation rate HR: 1.01 [1.0-1.02]; CRP HR: 1.00 [1.00-1.01]), absence of methotrexate treatment (HR: 0.60 [0.43-0.83]), and corticosteroid use (HR: 1.91 [1.31-2.78]). The patients who switched to another anti-TNF treatment had an inferior retention than those who switched to a non-anti-TNF treatment (HR: 0.39 [0.17-0.87], P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In real life, there was no difference in retention among the three anti-TNF agents, and 25% of patients continued them at 15 years. After failure of an anti-TNF, the switch to a non-anti-TNF biotherapy showed better retention.

Retention rates of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab as first- or second-line biotherapies for spondyloarthritis patients in daily practice in Auvergne (France).

OBJECTIVE: To compare, in real-life settings, the retention rates of initial anti-tumor-necrosis factor (TNF) treatments (etanercept [ETN], adalimumab [ADA] and infliximab [IFX]) used as first-line biotherapy for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), and evaluate treatment switches to another anti-TNF inhibitor in the event of treatment failure. METHODS: We analyzed the medical records of all SpA patients (Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Working Group axial criteria) treated with ETN, IFX or ADA between 2001 and February 2015. Drug retention rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by means of the Cox extended model. Sub-analyses were performed according to discontinuation reasons. RESULTS: Of the 249 SpA patients analyzed (135 radiographic cases, 114 non-radiographic), 102 received ETN, 62 ADA, and 85 IFX. In total, 103 discontinued treatment. The retention rates of IFX, ADA and ETN were 67%, 59% and 56% after 3 years; 62%, 42% and 47% after 5 years; 55%, 42% and 24% after 8 years; 53%, 42% and 12% after 10 years, respectively. In multivariate analyses, the predictive factors for retention were: low BASDAI score (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.02 [1.01-1.04]), high C-reactive protein levels (HR: 0.98 [0.97-0.99]), concomitant disease-modifying therapy (HR: 0.4 [0.21-0.75]), and radiographic SpA (HR: 1.5 [1.0-2.52]). In total, 61 patients switched to another anti-TNF therapy. No difference was observed among the three anti-TNF therapies regarding median retention duration, although the retention rate proved higher for treatment switches from one monoclonal antibody to another. CONCLUSION: The retention rate in SpA patients proved high, with retention for IFX superior to that of ETN.

The changing face of septic arthritis complicating rheumatoid arthritis in the era of biotherapies. Retrospective single-center study over 35years.

OBJECTIVES: To see whether the frequency and features of septic arthritis (SA) complicating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have changed over the last 35years. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included all patients hospitalized at the rheumatology department for SA bacteriologically documented by synovial fluid and/or blood culture samples. The periods 1979-2002 (before biotherapies) and 2003-2013 (the era of biotherapies) were compared. RESULTS: Between 1979 and 2013, 64/514 (12.5%) SA presented with a RA - 21/157 (13.4%) in the 2003-2013 period and 43/357 (12.0%) in the 1979-2002 period. Over the past decade, median age of RA SA patients increased (61 vs. 68 years; P<0.02) and predominant gender became males (52% vs. 40%). The features of the RA remained unchanged: history (18 vs. 16years), rheumatoid factor (95% vs. 87%), and corticosteroids (91% vs. 81%). Over the last decade 24% (vs. 0; P<0.003) of the patients received a biologic DMARD: etanercept (n=2), adalimumab (n=1), rituximab (n=1), tocilizumab (n=1). Proportion of polyarticular infection had decreased strongly (9.5% vs. 37%; P<0.02). Proportion of Staphyloccus aureus infections remained stable, but there was a higher incidence of MRSA infections (31 vs. 6%; P<0.05). Blood cultures less often tested positive (29% vs. 47%; NS). Case fatality rate had fallen slightly in RA SA (5% vs. 9%; NS), but not in non-RA SA cases (7% vs. 6%; NS). CONCLUSION: This study brings reassuring findings - in the era of biotherapies, the rate of septic arthritis amongst patients with RA has not increased, and the most severe septic polyarticular forms are on the decline.

Frequency of concomitant fibromyalgia in rheumatic diseases: Monocentric study of 691 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a confounding factor for diagnosing and assessing rheumatic disease activity. This study sought to assess the extent of this syndrome in rheumatism patients at a French rheumatology department. METHOD: This monocentric epidemiological study enrolled all patients consulting due to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), or connective tissue disease (CTD). FM diagnosis was confirmed or excluded according to the rheumatologist opinion and the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. RESULTS: We enrolled 691 patients, including 451 women (65.3%), with a mean age of 55.8 years (18-93). Of the enrolled patients, 325 presented with RA, 298 SpA [59 psoriatic arthritis (PsA), 137 ankylosing spondylitis (AS), 64 non-radiographic SpA (nr-SpA), and 38 peripheral SpA], and 71 CTD. The rheumatologist established FM diagnosis in 97 patients (14%), while 55 (8%) fulfilled the 1990 ACR criteria. The frequency of FM was lower in RA patients (4.9% by 1990 ACR criteria; 7.7% by expert opinion) compared to SpA (11.1% by 1990 ACR, p < 0.05; 17.5% by expert opinion, p < 0.003) and CTD (11.3% by 1990 ACR, non-significant; 28.2% by expert opinion, p < 0.001). In the SpA subgroups, FM was more common in the nr-SpA than in PsA or AS (23.9%, 9.6%, and 6.4%, by 1990 ACR, p = 0.001; 37.3%, 13.5%, and 7.2%, by expert opinion, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: FM-like symptoms are commonly associated with rheumatic diseases. The frequency of FM is particularly high in non-radiographic axial SpA, thus raising questions about the specificity of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria.

Monitoring of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)/cytomegalovirus (CMV)/varicella-zoster virus (VZV) load in patients receiving tocilizumab for rheumatoid arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: IL-6 is involved in viral immunosurveillance. We studied the effect of tocilizumab (TCZ) on the evolution in viral load (VL) for the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: EBV, CMV and VZV loads were prospectively determined in whole blood of 22 RA patients at TCZ initiation and during treatment follow-up. A difference of 0.5 log10 or of threefold copies/mL between two VL was considered significant. RESULTS: There were 20 (91%) women, (mean age of 57.8±11.2 years, mean disease duration 11.3±9.7 years) with 16 (73%) seropositive and 16 (73%) erosive patients. TCZ was administered alone for 8 patients (36.7%) or in combination with methotrexate for 11 patients (50%). At baseline, the EBV VL was positive in 8 patients with a mean VL value of 1777.2±3518.3 (3.5±0.4 log10) copies/mL. Only one patient had a positive CMV VL with 2337 copies/mL (3.4 log10). The VZV VL was negative in all patients. After 9.2±4.8 months, EBV VL became negative in 6 of 8 patients (P=0.01) and did not significantly vary in the remaining 2 patients. CMV VL became also negative. No VL (EBV, CMV, VZV) became positive. A positive EBV VL did not correlate with disease activity or with inflammatory biomarkers (ESR and CRP). CONCLUSION: TCZ does not seem to increase the VL of EBV, CMV or VZV. Studies involving larger patient populations are necessary.

Prevalence of Renal Impairment in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From a Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and associations of renal dysfunction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: COMEDRA is a French nationwide cross-sectional multicenter study on comorbidities in RA. Renal function was assessed from the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. RA characteristics and risk factors for renal impairment were collected. Two logistic regression models, 1 with and 1 without the Framingham Risk Score, were constructed from variables that were significantly associated with an eGFR of <60 ml/minute/1.73 m(2) or were clinically relevant. RESULTS: Of the 970 recruited patients, 931 were analyzed (women 79.6%, mean age 57.8 years, disease duration 11.1 years, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-ESR] 3.1). A total of 82 patients (8.8%) had an eGFR <60 ml/minute/1.73 m(2) and 9% had proteinuria. In univariate analysis, renal impairment was associated with age (P < 0.001), history of hypertension (P < 0.001), high systolic blood pressure (P = 0.03), and the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) equation (P = 0.002), but not with sex, disease duration, disease activity (as assessed by DAS28-ESR), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use, disease severity (erosions, joint replacement), or RA medications. Multivariate analysis models showed that age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.03-1.09]) and hypertension (OR 2.5 [95% CI 1.5-4.3]) were associated with renal impairment. A second model showed that the SCORE equation (OR 1.33 [95% CI 1.06-1.67]) was associated with renal impairment. CONCLUSION: Renal impairment is relatively common in RA and is associated with cardiovascular risk factors such as age, hypertension, and the SCORE equation but not with disease activity or severity.

Overview of biologic treatments in the elderly.

As life expectancies rise, the number of elderly people with inflammatory rheumatic diseases will continue to grow. Treatment of this frail population, whose clinical features differ from those of younger subjects, poses new challenges to healthcare systems. However, this issue is rarely addressed in the current literature. Thanks to their targeted mechanism of action, biologics represent one of the major therapeutic advances of the last 15 years, but their use in the elderly has been slow in developing. Published data, derived mainly from cohorts, focus on the use of TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis and show that these treatments are effective and generally well tolerated. Nevertheless, the risk of infection and cancer, particularly skin and lymphoid malignancies, must not be neglected. The use of these biologics as second-line treatment improves patient outcomes and comfort, while reducing consumption of the widely used and more deleterious drugs such as glucocorticoids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Additional studies on biologics, focusing on the longer term and in indications apart from anti-TNF therapies in rheumatoid arthritis should help overcome some of the reluctance and promote the rational use of these drugs in the elderly.

Application of the European Society of Cardiology, Adult Treatment Panel III and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for cardiovascular risk management in a French cohort of rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have greater rates of cardiovascular mortality and RA is an independent cardiovascular risk factor. For the management of cholesterol, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) developed new guidelines for the general population. None of the European or American guidelines are specific to RA. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommends applying a coefficient to cardiovascular risk equations based on the characteristics of RA. Our objective was to compare the three different sets of guidelines for the eligibility of statin therapy in RA-specific population with very high risk of cardiovascular disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We calculated the proportion of patients eligible for statins according to the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP-III) and the ACC/AHA in a French cohort of statin-naïve RA patients at least 40 years age. Of the 547 women and 130 men analyzed, statins would be recommended for 9.1% of the women and 26.4% of the men, 15.6% of the women and 53.1% of the men, 38.8% of the women and 78.5% of the men, according to the ESC, ATP-III and ACC/AHA guidelines respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In RA patients, as has been observed in the general population, discordance in risk assessment and cholesterol treatment was observed between the three sets of guidelines. The use of the new ACC/AHA guidelines would expand the eligibility for statins and may be applied to RA population a condition at very high risk of cardiovascular disease.

The SAPHO syndrome: a single-center study of 41 adult patients.

OBJECTIVE: The SAPHO syndrome (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, osteitis) is a rare disease and only a few series have been published about it. We describe the experience of a rheumatology department with a focus on the therapeutic aspects. METHODS: All cases of SAPHO fulfilling the Benhamou criteria and seen between 1992 and 2013 in our unit were retrospectively included. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (11 men and 30 women) were included. The average age was 45 years (20-80 yrs) at the time of diagnosis. Nineteen patients had palmoplantar pustulosis, 3 had psoriasis vulgaris, 3 had severe acne, and 15 had no dermatological involvement. Bone symptoms involved mainly the anterior chest wall (n = 28, 68%), followed by the spine (n = 16, 39%) and sacroiliac joints (n = 12, 29%). Four patients had peripheral osteitis and 2 had mandibular osteitis. Ten patients had peripheral arthritis affecting mainly the knees and wrists. None of the 36 patients tested was HLA-B27-positive. At least a partial response was achieved with colchicine, methotrexate, or sulfasalazine in 0/6, 2/4, and 1/6 of patients, respectively. Antibiotic therapy (azithromycin, n = 7; doxycycline, n = 2) was effective in 2/9 patients. Pamidronate was prescribed in 26 patients with bone involvement and 18/22 patients evaluable at 6 months responded to this therapy. Two patients were treated with tumor necrosis factor blockers: 1 with infliximab and 1 with adalimumab, followed by etanercept. CONCLUSION: Based on our experience, SAPHO can be diagnosed in the elderly. It was not associated with HLA-B27. Soft tissue involvement was common and the bisphosphonates were generally effective on bone involvement.

Assessment of the risk factors for impending fractures following radiotherapy for long bone metastases using CT scan-based virtual simulation: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy for long bone metastases (RTLB) can be complicated by fractures, which considerably increase morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to analyze the risk factors for impending fractures following radiotherapy for long bone metastases (RTLB) using CT scan-based virtual simulation. METHODS: Forty-seven (47) patients were treated with RTLB (18 lung, 11 breast, 10 prostate and 8 other cancers) for a period of 18 months. Two doctors analyzed the CT images prior to radiation therapy. The impending fractures were then monitored and the correlation between bone scan parameters and fracture occurrence was analyzed. RESULTS: The male gender ratio was 0.57 and the mean age 62.8 (33-93) years. The average size of the metastatic lesions was 32 (8-87) x 2 (6-81) x 52 (7-408) mm with cortical involvement (CI) in 66% of cases. The site was in the upper third of the bone in 92% of cases (28 femoral, 17 humeral and two tibial). Ten fractures occurred: two during RTLB, seven after one month and one after 6.6 months. The fractured lesions measured 48 (17-87) x 34 (12-66) x 76 (38-408) mm. The predictive parameters for fracture were osteolytic (39% vs. 10%; p=0.02) and permeative lesions (42% vs. 0%; p<0.0005), a Mirels score ≥9 (42% vs. 0%; p<0.0005), circumferential CI ≥30% (71% vs. 0%, p < 0.00001), CI ≥45 mm in height (67% vs. 0%, p<0.00001) and CI in thickness =100% (40% vs. 0%; p=0.0008). In the multivariate analysis, circumferential CI ≥30% was the only predictive parameter for fracture (p=0.00035; OR=62; CI 95%: 6.5-595). Overall survival was 91% and 40% at one month and twelve months respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic primary fixation surgery should always be considered when the circumferential CI ≥30%.

Should non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs be used continuously in ankylosing spondylitis?

OBJECTIVE: The 2010 update of ASAS/EULAR recommendations for managing ankylosing spondylitis (AS) specify that continuous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment should be preferred in patients with persistently active, symptomatic disease. Here, our objective was to assess whether continuous NSAID therapy improves disease control and influences radiographic progression compared to on-demand therapy. We also assessed the safety profiles of both regimens. METHODS: We performed a review by searching the PubMed and Embase databases using two MeSH term combinations to compare continuous and on-demand NSAID therapy in terms of disease control, radiographic progression, and safety. RESULTS: The only study evaluating the impact of continuous NSAID therapy on disease control showed no significant difference with on-demand therapy. In four studies, continuous treatment was associated with slower radiographic progression, as assessed in three studies using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (m-SASSS). Three studies compared the safety of continuous and on-demand celecoxib, two in osteoarthritis and one in AS, and found no significant differences regarding the usual side effects of Cox-2 inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Several studies showed slower radiographic progression with continuous NSAID therapy in AS. No studies demonstrated superiority of continuous NSAID therapy regarding symptom control. Continuous NSAID therapy (at least with Cox-2 inhibitors) does not modify safety compared to on-demand therapy.

Three-decade trends in the distribution of organisms causing septic arthritis in native joints: single-center study of 374 cases.

OBJECTIVE: A rise in the incidence of septic arthritis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been reported in several parts of the world. Here, our objective was to look for changes over the last 30years in the distribution and antibiotic susceptibility profiles of organisms responsible for septic arthritis. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of all cases of septic arthritis documented by joint specimens and/or blood cultures between 1979 and 2008. Prosthetic joint infections were excluded. RESULTS: We enrolled 374 patients, of whom 127, 136, and 111 were included during each decade, respectively. We detected no significant time trends in the proportions of staphylococci (67%, 65%, and 64%), streptococci (14%, 21%, and 17%), or Gram-negative rods (7%, 10%, and 14%). Tuberculosis was more common during the earliest decade (1979-1988, n=10, 4, 2%; P<0.05). No significant changes occurred in the proportions of methicillin-resistant staphylococci or MRSA (13%, 11%, 15%). Age and prevalence of risk factors for infection increased over time. CONCLUSION: The distribution and susceptibility of organisms causing septic arthritis has changed little over time. Our findings do not support the use of broader-spectrum antibiotics when empirical treatment is deemed necessary at our center.