Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Heart J ; 63(2): 388-392, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35354757

RESUMO

CoronaVac is an inactivated coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine that was granted an emergency authorization by the World Health Organization in June 2021. We present the two cases of patients presenting with chest pain, abnormal electrocardiography, and elevated troponin consistent with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction within 24 hours after receiving the CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , COVID-19 , Vacinas Virais , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 13775, 2023 08 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37612359

RESUMO

Risk stratification based mainly on the impairment of left ventricular ejection fraction has limited performance in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM). Evidence is rapidly growing for the impact of myocardial scar identified by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) on cardiovascular events. We aim to assess the prognostic value of LGE on long-term arrhythmic and mortality outcomes in patients with NIDCM. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to January 21, 2022. Studies that included disease-specific subpopulations of NIDCM were excluded. Data were independently extracted and combined via random-effects meta-analysis using a generic inverse-variance strategy. Data from 60 studies comprising 15,217 patients were analyzed with a 3-year median follow-up. The presence of LGE was associated with major ventricular arrhythmic events (pooled OR: 3.99; 95% CI 3.08, 5.16), all-cause mortality (pooled OR: 2.14; 95% CI 1.81, 2.52), cardiovascular mortality (pooled OR 2.83; 95% CI 2.23, 3.60), and heart failure hospitalization (pooled OR: 2.53; 95% CI 1.78, 3.59). Real-world evidence suggests that the presence of LGE on CMR was a strong predictor of adverse long-term outcomes in patients with NIDCM. Scar assessment should be incorporated as a primary determinant in the patient selection criteria for primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement.


Assuntos
Cardiomiopatia Dilatada , Humanos , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/diagnóstico por imagem , Gadolínio , Cicatriz , Meios de Contraste , Volume Sistólico , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética
3.
Med Sci (Basel) ; 10(4)2022 12 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36548004

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is diagnosed in patients with ST-segment elevation with coved-type morphology in the right precordial leads, occurring spontaneously or after provocative drugs. Due to electrocardiographic (ECG) inconsistency, provocative drugs, such as sodium-channel blockers, are useful for unmasking BrS. Ajmaline is superior to flecainide and procainamide to provoke BrS. Prolonged T-peak to T-end (TpTe) is associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death in Brugada syndrome patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of T-peak to T-end interval and corrected T-peak to T-end interval for predicting the positive response of the ajmaline challenge test in suspected Brugada syndrome patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent the ajmaline test in our center were enrolled. Clinical characteristics and electrocardiographic parameters were analyzed, including TpTe, corrected TpTe, QT, corrected QT(QTc) interval, and S-wave duration, compared with the result of the ajmaline challenge test. RESULTS: The study found that TpTe and corrected TpTe interval in suspected BrS patients were not significantly associated with a positive response to the ajmaline challenge test. CONCLUSIONS: The T-peak to T-end interval and corrected T-peak to T-end interval could not predict the positive response of the ajmaline challenge test in suspected Brugada syndrome patients.


Assuntos
Ajmalina , Síndrome de Brugada , Humanos , Ajmalina/efeitos adversos , Síndrome de Brugada/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Brugada/induzido quimicamente , Flecainida , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Sódio , Procainamida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA