RESUMO
Objective: To share a single institutional experience with clinical research on COVID-related olfactory dysfunction (OD). Data Source/Method: Narrative review of published original data and ongoing clinical trials on COVID-related OD at Washington University from 2020 to 2023. Results: There were three new diagnostic-/patient-reported outcome measures developed and tested. We report five clinical trials of interventions for COVID-related olfactory disorders: combined Visual-Olfactory Training (VOLT) with patient-preferred scents versus standard olfactory training (VOLT trial), oral gabapentin versus placebo (Gabapentin for the Relief of Acquired Chemosensory Experience trial), nasal theophylline irrigations versus placebo (Smell Changes and Efficacy of Nasal Theophylline trial), stellate ganglion block (single-arm), and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) versus lifestyle intervention (MBSR trial). Conclusions: Initial intervention trials for COVID-related OD have shown potential for improving subjective and objective olfactory outcomes. However, there remains no gold standard treatment that definitively outperforms placebo in controlled trials. Therefore, continued investigation of novel therapeutic strategies for COVID-related OD is necessary to maximize olfactory outcomes for affected patients.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience with chimeric flaps and to assess the surgical outcomes and postoperative complications associated with chimeric flaps compared to multiple flaps. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: Patients undergoing chimeric and multiple simultaneous free tissue transfer between June 2016 and October 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome of interest was the complication rate. Major complications required takeback to the operating room, hospital readmission, or transfer to the intensive care unit. Minor complications were managed conservatively. Secondary outcomes included operative time, length of hospitalization, and flap survival. SETTING: Academic tertiary care center. RESULTS: Our analysis included 113 patients (chimeric n = 38, multiple n = 75). We found no significant difference in operative times or minor complications. Chimeric flaps were associated with a shorter length of hospitalization. The major complication rate was higher for chimeric flaps (42.1% vs 22.7%, P = .03), but each cohort only had 1 instance of total flap loss. CONCLUSION: The complexity of large head and neck defects poses a reconstructive challenge for microvascular surgeons. Our findings suggest that chimeric and multiple flaps both produce acceptable complication rates when used appropriately. Differences in complication rates may reflect differences in utilization. The chimeric flap remains a valuable option for those with prior radiation or radical resection, but it remains unclear the degree to which they lessen the inherent risk of postoperative complications within this population. Each technique must be weighed in context of the patient's reconstructive profile and the institution's surgical capabilities to optimize long-term outcomes.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of balloon sinus dilation (BSD) compared to functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) or medical management for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). METHODS: A qualified medical librarian conducted a literature search for relevant publications that evaluate efficacy of BSD. Studies were assessed independently by 2 reviewers for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. RESULTS: From 315 abstracts reviewed, 18 studies were included in qualitative review, and 7 were included in meta-analysis. Quantitative analysis included 4 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 3 cohort studies comparing baseline and post-operative Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-20 scores in BSD and FESS. A meta-analysis restricted to the studies reporting SD for changes from baseline (2 RCTs, 1 cohort) showed the pooled difference in means to be 0.435, less than a clinically meaningful difference of 0.8. A separate sensitivity analysis of the studies including 4 additional studies with imputed values of SD for changes from baseline showed the pooled difference of means to be 0.237 assuming the highest level of correlation (Corr .8) between the pre- and post-intervention scores. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited high-quality evidence that assesses the efficacy of BSD versus FESS in the management of CRS patients. To better inform CRS management, future studies should compare BSD with endoscopic sinus surgery, hybrid procedures, and/or medical management alone using validated objective and patient-reported outcome measures.
Assuntos
Seios Paranasais , Rinite , Sinusite , Humanos , Dilatação , Rinite/cirurgia , Seios Paranasais/cirurgia , Sinusite/cirurgia , Cateterismo/métodos , Endoscopia/métodos , Doença Crônica , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe the experience of two tertiary academic centers with multiple, simultaneous free flaps for complex head and neck defect reconstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing multiple, simultaneous free flaps from 2017 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients (64.8% male, median age 61 years) were identified and underwent 143 free flaps. The leading surgical indication was squamous cell carcinoma (n = 48, 67.6%). Defect sites included oral cavity, maxilla, pharynx, parotid, skull base, and scalp. The most common free flap combinations were fibula (FFF) with anterolateral thigh flap (n = 33, 46.5%), radial forearm (RFFF) with scapula (n = 11, 15.5%), and RFFF with FFF (n = 10, 14.1%). Median operative time was 12 h. Median length of hospitalization was 10 days. At last follow-up (median 6 months), 141 flaps (98.6%) survived without partial nor complete flap failure. CONCLUSION: Multiple, simultaneous free flaps are a rare, yet reliable option for head and neck reconstruction in select patients with defects involving several tissue types, multiple functional areas, or large volumes.
Assuntos
Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , BocaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To compare taste changes after transoral robotic surgery (TORS) to taste changes in healthy controls. METHODS: Oropharyngeal cancer patients receiving TORS and healthy controls were recruited. Participants underwent posterolateral and whole-mouth psychophysical taste testing (identification, intensity, and hedonics) at baseline and at 2 weeks postoperatively (patients) or follow-up (controls). Surgeons reported suspension time and glossopharyngeal nerve injury (GNI) based on the identification and sacrifice of the nerve. A Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of taste symptoms was completed at each session ("My sense of taste bothers me" on a 5-point scale from Never [1] to Always [5]). A taste disorder (TD) was a CGI of 3 (Sometimes) or worse. Within-subject changes in CGI and psychophysical scores were computed. "Worsened taste" was a CGI increase by ≥1 point at follow-up. RESULTS: Of 69 participants, most (33/37 tumor, 31/32 controls) had normal baseline taste (CGI < 3). 14/33 (42%) TORS patients and no controls developed new TDs at follow-up. More smokers (7/9) had worsened taste than nonsmokers (19/60, difference = 46% [95% CI 16%-76%]). More patients without GNI (6/22) than with GNI (0/15) had postoperative phantogeusia (difference = 27% [95% CI 9-45%]). Tumor-ipsilateral taste identification (TI) decreased more in patients (-11.3%) than controls (0.8%, difference = 12.2% [95% CI 5.0-19.3%]). Suspension time was not associated with worsened taste symptoms or psychophysical changes. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported taste changes after TORS are frequent. Compared to healthy controls, TORS patients have decreased tumor-ipsilateral TI. Suspension time and GNI are unlikely to cause symptomatic TDs. Further investigations of the etiology and long-term symptom burden of TORS-associated TDs will aid in the management of oropharyngeal cancer patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 (non-randomized controlled cohort study) Laryngoscope, 133:3520-3528, 2023.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patologia , Boca/patologia , Distúrbios do Paladar/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether deintensification of adjuvant therapy reduces ototoxicity among patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single academic center. METHODS: The ototoxicity rate among adult patients with HPV-related OPSCC enrolled in the Minimalist Trial (MINT), a prospective phase 2 trial of surgery followed by risk-adjusted deintensified adjuvant therapy (42 Gy radiation given alone or with a single 100 mg/m2 dose of cisplatin), was compared to that among a historical cohort treated with standard adjuvant therapy (60-66 Gy radiation with up to three 100 mg/m2 doses of cisplatin). Ototoxicity was defined as Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 ≥ Grade 2. Mixed model analysis was performed to investigate the association between deintensified adjuvant therapy and treatment-related hearing loss. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (58 ears) were analyzed in the MINT cohort, and 27 patients (54 ears) in the historical cohort. The ototoxicity rate was 5% (n = 3/58 ears) in the MINT cohort and 46% (n = 25/54 ears) in the historical cohort (difference, 41%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 27%-56%). Patients in the MINT cohort demonstrated a 95% decrease in risk of ototoxicity compared to those in the historical cohort (adjusted odds ratio: 0.05, 95% CI = 0.01-0.31). Differences in estimated marginal mean threshold shifts were statistically and clinically significant at frequencies ≥ 3 kHz. CONCLUSION: The deintensified adjuvant therapy given in MINT led to less ototoxicity than standard adjuvant therapy among patients with HPV-related OPSCC.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Ototoxicidade , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Adulto , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Papillomavirus Humano , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patologia , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/terapia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , AudiçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To provide an up-to-date review of honey's effectiveness and potential applications in otorhinolaryngology. METHODS: A literature search of the online databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted. RESULTS: Sixty-three studies were identified within head and neck surgery (n = 23, 36%); pediatric otolaryngology (n = 18, 29%); rhinology, sinus, and skull base surgery (n = 11, 17%); otology (n = 6, 10%), facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (n = 3, 5%); and laryngology (n = 2, 3%). Studies included 6 meta-analyses, 44 randomized control trials, 5 case reports, and 8 animal models or in vitro studies. Of 55 clinical studies, 50 reported Level 1 evidence (prospective randomized control trials), and 5 reported Level 4 evidence (case series). The evidence level by subspecialty was: head and neck surgery (Level 1 n = 23), pediatrics (Level 1 n = 18), rhinology (Level 1 n = 7, level 4 n = 1), otology (Level 1 n = 1, Level 4 n = 3), facial plastics and reconstructive surgery (Level 4 n = 1), and laryngology (Level 1 n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Honey can be used for a variety of otolaryngology conditions. The highest quality meta-analyses support oral honey for prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in cancer patients, cough associated with upper respiratory infection in children, and pain control after tonsillectomy. Further research will likely justify broader applications.
Assuntos
Apiterapia , Mel , Otorrinolaringopatias/terapia , Animais , Tosse/terapia , Humanos , Otite/terapia , Dor Pós-Operatória/terapia , Rinite/terapia , Sinusite/terapia , Estomatite/etiologia , Estomatite/terapia , Tonsilectomia , Infecção dos Ferimentos/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Increased detection of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) has led to overtreatment of the largely indolent follicular variant (fvPTC). To guide management of non-aggressive lesions, we investigated whether race predicts PTC variant and tumor behavior. METHODS: Analysis of 258 973 patients from the National Cancer Database diagnosed with PTC in 2004-2014. Clinical and tumor information was compared by race. Multivariate logistic regression was used to predict fvPTC, extrathyroidal extension (ETE), and lymph node metastasis (LNM) of fvPTC. RESULTS: Blacks had the highest fvPTC rate (40% vs white 30%, Hispanic 26%, Asian 25%, P < .001). Blacks had higher odds of fvPTC (aOR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.28-1.37) and lower odds of ETE than whites (aOR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82-0.99) (P < .001). Hispanics and Asians had lower odds of fvPTC (aOR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.86-0.92 and aOR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.79-0.84) and higher odds of LNM and ETE than whites (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities in fvPTC incidence and behavior should be considered to optimize diagnosis and treatment planning.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Papilar, Variante Folicular/etnologia , Carcinoma Papilar, Variante Folicular/patologia , Etnicidade , Câncer Papilífero da Tireoide/patologia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/etnologia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/patologia , Adulto , Carcinoma Papilar, Variante Folicular/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Racismo , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Câncer Papilífero da Tireoide/etnologia , Câncer Papilífero da Tireoide/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/cirurgia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine opioid-prescribing patterns after endocrine surgery. To evaluate factors associated with postoperative pain and opioid use. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Academic university health system. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study sample included 209 patients who underwent total thyroidectomy, hemithyroidectomy, or parathyroidectomy by 4 surgeons between August 2015 and November 2017. Eighty-nine patients completed a phone survey about postoperative pain and opioid use. Prescription, demographic, and comorbidity data were collected retrospectively. Patient characteristics associated with opioid use, use of ≥10 opioid pills, and pain score were identified via chi-square, t test, analysis of variance, or Pearson correlation. Identified factors were further assessed with multivariable logistic and linear regression modeling. RESULTS: The median numbers of opioid pills prescribed were 20 for total thyroidectomy, 25 for hemithyroidectomy, and 20 for parathyroidectomy, and the median numbers of pills used were 1.5, 2, and 0, respectively. Of 1947 total prescribed pills, 19.7% were reported to be taken. The number of pills meeting the opioid needs of 80% of these patients was 10. In multivariable analyses, older age was associated with lower odds of opioid use (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.999; P = .04) and lower pain scores (Pearson correlation coefficient, -0.05; 95% CI, -0.10 to 0.001, P = .04). Charlson Comorbidity Index score >5 was associated with use of ≥10 pills (odds ratio, 6.62; 95% CI, 1.60-27.50; P = .01). CONCLUSION: Excess opioids are often prescribed for endocrine surgery. By using an ideal pill number and understanding predictors of postoperative pain, surgeons can more adequately treat pain and limit excess opioid prescriptions.