Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 63
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 2024 Jan 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38272276

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: No endoscopic scoring system has been established for immune-mediated colitis (IMC). This study aimed to establish such a system for IMC and explore its utility in guiding future selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) use compared to clinical symptoms. METHODS: This retrospective, international, 14-center study included 674 patients who developed IMC after immunotherapy and underwent endoscopic evaluation. Ten endoscopic features were selected by group consensus and assigned 1 point each to calculate an IMC endoscopic score (IMCES). IMCES cutoffs were chosen to maximize specificity for SIT use. This specificity was compared between IMCESs, and clinical symptoms were graded according to a standardized instrument. RESULTS: A total of 309 (45.8%) patients received SIT. IMCES specificity for SIT use was 82.8% with a cutoff of 4. The inclusion of ulceration as a mandatory criterion resulted in higher specificity (85.0% for a cutoff of 4). In comparison, the specificity of a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 3 was 74.6%, and the specificity of clinical symptom grading was much lower at 27.4% and 12.3%, respectively. Early endoscopy was associated with timely SIT use (P < .001; r = 0.4084). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest multicenter study to devise an endoscopic scoring system to guide IMC management. An IMCES cutoff of 4 has a higher specificity for SIT use than clinical symptoms, supporting early endoscopic evaluation for IMC.

2.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 21(4): 878-890, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36270617

RESUMO

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized management of advanced malignancies. However, their use is frequently complicated by immune related adverse events (irAEs), immune checkpoint inhibitor enterocolitis (IMEC) being the most common toxicity. IMEC is a distinct form of bowel inflammation that is highly reminiscent of idiopathic inflammatory bowel disorders (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and microscopic colitis). In this review, we highlight the similarities and differences in the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, evaluation, and management of these overlapping immune inflammatory bowel disorders. IMEC is an inflammatory bowel disease-like irAE that occurs as an outcome of disruption of intestinal immune surveillance and gut dysbiosis. Clinical and endoscopic presentation of both entities is strikingly similar, which often guides management. Though well established in inflammatory bowel disease, little is known about the long term outcomes of IMEC.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Doença de Crohn , Enterocolite , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/patologia
3.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 118(9): 1679-1683, 2023 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37216614

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis (IMC) is commonly managed with steroids and biologics. We evaluated the efficacy of ustekinumab (UST) in treating IMC refractory to steroids plus infliximab and/or vedolizumab. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were treated with UST for IMC refractory to steroids plus infliximab (57.9%) and/or vedolizumab (94.7%). Most of them had grade ≥3 diarrhea (84.2%), and colitis with ulceration was present in 42.1%. Thirteen patients (68.4%) attained clinical remission with UST, and mean fecal calprotectin levels dropped significantly after treatment (629 ± 101.5 mcg/mg to 92.0 ± 21.7 mcg/mg, P = 0.0004). DISCUSSION: UST is a promising therapy for the treatment of refractory IMC.


Assuntos
Colite , Humanos , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Colite/tratamento farmacológico , Ustekinumab/uso terapêutico , Interleucina-12/uso terapêutico
4.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 25(10): 255-259, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37845557

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer care and work primarily by blocking CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4), and/or PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1), and/or PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1), thereby providing highly efficacious anti-tumor activity. However, this unmitigated immune response can also trigger immune related adverse events (irAEs) in multiple organs, with pancreatic irAEs (now referred to as type 3 Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) being infrequent. RECENT FINDINGS: Type 3 AIP is a drug-induced, immune mediated progressive inflammatory disease of the pancreas that may have variable clinical presentations viz., an asymptomatic pancreatic enzyme elevation, incidental imaging evidence of pancreatitis, painful pancreatitis, or any combination of these subtypes. Management is largely supportive with intravenous fluid hydration, pain control and holding the inciting medication. Steroids have not been shown to demonstrate a clear benefit in acute management. A rapid development pancreatic atrophy is observed on imaging as early as 1 year post initial injury. Type 3 AIP is a chronic inflammatory disease of the pancreas that though predominantly asymptomatic and mild in severity can lead to rapid organ volume loss regardless of type of clinical presentation and despite steroid therapy.


Assuntos
Pancreatite Autoimune , Neoplasias , Pancreatite , Humanos , Pancreatite Autoimune/tratamento farmacológico , Pancreatite Autoimune/patologia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Pâncreas/patologia , Pancreatite/induzido quimicamente , Pancreatite/diagnóstico , Pancreatite/terapia
5.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol ; 38(5): 516-520, 2022 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35881977

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Type 3 auto-immune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare immune-related adverse event (irAE) because of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy employed in the management of advanced malignancies. The evaluation and management of this disease entity is not well documented in the literature. We summarize the available information on the clinical profile, diagnosis, and treatment of this disorder. RECENT FINDINGS: ICI-pancreatic injury (ICI-PI) is a form of AIP, recently termed type 3 AIP, which may present as an asymptomatic lipase elevation or clinical pancreatitis, that is, abdominal pain and elevated lipase. CT findings of pancreatitis may be absent in some cases. Diagnosis is based on a temporal relationship to ICI exposure and the absence of other cause of pancreatitis. Combination ICIs increase the risk of type 3 AIP compared with ICI monotherapy. Though corticosteroids are used for ICIP, their role and benefit remain unclear to date. Holding immunotherapy carries the risk of progression of underlying cancer. SUMMARY: ICI-PI is a unique form of AIP (type 3) with a distinct disease profile. The majority of patients with ICIPI are asymptomatic and steroid therapy has unclear benefits.


Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes , Pancreatite Autoimune , Neoplasias , Pancreatite , Doenças Autoimunes/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Autoimunes/diagnóstico , Doenças Autoimunes/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Lipase , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Pancreatite/induzido quimicamente , Pancreatite/diagnóstico , Pancreatite/terapia
6.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol ; 37(1): 52-58, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33105251

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), the bulk of which is located in the ileo-colonic region comprises the lymphoid cells of the gastrointestinal tract and confers specific immunological responses. Repetitive antigenic stimulation of these cells predispose to a monoclonal proliferation of this tissue and the eventual development of lymphoma. The gastrointestinal tract is the most commonly involved site of extranodal lymphomas. This review will focus primarily on lymphomas of the ileo-colonic region (defined as the terminal ileum, the colon, and the rectum). We will discuss the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and presentation as well as current practices in diagnosis and management. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite the majority of the GALT to be located in the ileo-colonic region of the gut, the lymphomas in this location are relatively rare. However, the overall annual incidence of ileo-colonic lymphomas is steadily increasing. This entity has a varied spectrum of clinical presentations. Ileo-colonoscopy with adequate targeted biopsies can serve as a gold standard for definitive diagnosis. Ileo-colonic lymphomas may be managed with chemotherapy alone while surgery is reserved for highly aggressive tumors or clinical emergencies. Radiation is not a preferred adjuvant treatment for lymphomas in this location of the gut. Adequate endoscopic surveillance measures and tools to potentially prevent recurrence and improve the overall prognosis of this disease are lacking. SUMMARY: Ileo-colonic lymphomas are rare and can present with varied symptoms and signs. Endoscopy with adequate sampling can aid in making a definitive diagnosis. Chemotherapy can be highly effective in management while surgery is indicated for emergency presentations. Adequate endoscopic surveillance tools are lacking, yet imperative to prevent recurrence and improve prognosis.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Neoplasias Intestinais , Linfoma , Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo/terapia , Colonoscopia , Humanos , Íleo , Neoplasias Intestinais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Intestinais/terapia , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Linfoma/terapia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia
7.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 19(8): 896-904, 2021 06 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34102607

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have provided practice-changing outcomes in treating many cancers, ICI-related gastrointestinal toxicity can limit their use. Upper gastrointestinal toxicity is not common nor as well described as lower gastrointestinal toxicity. We aimed to characterize the clinical presentation, endoscopic and histologic features, treatment response, and outcomes of ICI-related esophagitis. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in whom esophagitis developed after receiving ICIs from June 2011 through January 2020. We included patients with endoscopic evidence of esophagitis and excluded those with other obvious causes of esophagitis. A chi-square test was used to assess associations between categorical variables. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences between continuous variables. RESULTS: Of 657 consecutive patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) during or within 6 months of completing ICI-based therapy, 21 (3%) had esophagitis deemed to be from ICIs. Of these patients, 1 (5%) received an inhibitor of CTLA-4 alone, 15 (71%) received anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 monotherapy, and 5 (24%) received a combination of these. Median time from ICI initiation to onset of esophagitis was 4 months. Upon evaluation with EGD, only 3 patients (14%) had isolated esophageal involvement; 18 (86%) had concurrent involvement of the stomach, duodenum, or both. Most patients (67%) were treated with proton pump inhibitors, and 4 (19%) received steroids (prednisone or budesonide). The mortality rate was 38% (median follow-up, 15 months). CONCLUSIONS: Esophagitis associated with ICI use is rare. The diagnosis is one of exclusion because its clinical presentation appears similar to that of inflammation resulting from other causes. It often occurs in conjunction with other upper gastrointestinal toxicity. Symptoms are mild and respond well to nonimmunosuppressive treatment, with few severe complications.


Assuntos
Esofagite , Neoplasias , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório , Esofagite/induzido quimicamente , Esofagite/diagnóstico , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 19(12): 1415-1424, 2021 08 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34348238

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy predisposes patients to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Data are limited regarding the incidence, management, and outcomes of one such irAE: mucositis. In this study, we evaluated the clinical characteristics, disease course, treatment, and outcomes of ICI-mediated mucositis. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study of patients who received ICI therapy and developed oral mucositis at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from January 2009 to September 2019. Inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years, a diagnosis of oral mucositis and/or stomatitis based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, and therapy using CTLA-4 or PD-1/L1 inhibitors alone or combined with other agents. RESULTS: We identified 152 patients with a mean age of 60 years, 51% of whom were men. Of the sample patients, 73% had stage IV cancer, with melanoma the most common (28%). Median time from ICI initiation to mucositis was 91 days. The most common clinical presentation of mucositis was odynophagia and/or oral pain (89%), 91% developed CTCAE grade 1-2 mucositis, and 78% received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy. Compared with anti-PD-1/L1-based therapy, anti-CTLA-4-based therapy was more frequently associated with earlier onset of mucositis (73 vs 96 days; P=.077) and a lower rate of symptom resolution (76% vs 92%; P=.029); 24% of patients required immunosuppressive therapy, which was associated with longer symptom duration (84 vs 34 days; P=.002) and higher mucositis recurrence rate (61% vs 32%; P=.006). ICI interruption was associated with worse survival (P=.037). Mucositis recurrence, immunosuppressant use, and presence of other irAEs did not affect survival. CONCLUSIONS: For ICI-mediated mucositis, a diagnosis of exclusion has not been well recognized and is understudied. Although the clinical symptoms of mucositis are mostly mild, approximately 25% of patients require immunosuppression. Mucositis recurrence can occur in approximately 39% patients. Our results showed that ICI interruption compromises overall survival.


Assuntos
Melanoma , Estomatite , Adolescente , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Incidência , Masculino , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estomatite/induzido quimicamente , Estomatite/epidemiologia
9.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1342: 331-337, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34972972

RESUMO

The advent of immune checkpoint blockade and its application in the management of advanced malignancies has revolutionized cancer therapies, outcomes, and survival. As beneficial as these class of drugs have been proven to be, their use is not devoid of complications, viz., immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is the second most frequently affected organ system, and toxicities may vary in severity from mild disease to aggressive life-threatening clinical presentations. Timely diagnosis that incorporates clinical, biochemical, imaging, endoscopic, and histologic evaluation is imperative for efficacious management of this disease process to ensure good outcomes. Management varies depending on severity and can comprise supportive care in milder disease patterns as well as vigorous immunosuppression in aggressive cases.


Assuntos
Gastroenteropatias , Neoplasias , Gastroenteropatias/induzido quimicamente , Gastroenteropatias/terapia , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico
10.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 19(6): 700-708, 2020 12 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33316767

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC) is a common immune-related adverse effect related to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We aimed to identify risk factors for chronic IMDC and its prognostic value in cancer outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on patients with a diagnosis of IMDC between January 2018 and October 2019 and grouped them based on disease duration into acute (≤3 months) and chronic (>3 months) categories. A logistic regression model and the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests were used for biostatistical analysis. RESULTS: In our sample of 88 patients, 43 were in the chronic group and 45 were in the acute group. Genitourinary cancer and melanoma accounted for 70% of malignancies. PD-1/L1 monotherapy (52%) was the more frequently used regimen. We showed that chronic IMDC was associated with proton pump inhibitor use (odds ratio [OR], 3.96; P=.026), long duration of IMDC symptoms (OR, 1.05; P<.001) and hospitalization (OR, 1.07; P=.043), a histologic feature of chronic active colitis (OR, 4.8; P=.025) or microscopic colitis (OR, 5.0; P=.045), and delayed introduction of selective immunosuppressive therapy (infliximab/vedolizumab; OR, 1.06; P=.047). Chronic IMDC also reflected a better cancer response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (30% vs 51%; P=.002) and was accompanied by improved overall survival (P=.035). Similarly, higher doses of selective immunosuppressive therapy were associated with better overall survival (P=.018). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic IMDC can develop among patients with a more aggressive disease course and chronic features on colon histology. It likely reflects a prolonged immune checkpoint inhibitor effect and is associated with better cancer outcome and overall survival.


Assuntos
Colite , Neoplasias , Colite/etiologia , Diarreia/complicações , Diarreia/etiologia , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
15.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 115(8): 1301-1302, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32756260
16.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol ; 31(2): 166-71, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25612261

RESUMO

PURPOSE: of review Those who suffer from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have long reported the frequent precipitation of their symptoms in relation to food ingestion and have often been convinced that certain foods were especially problematic. However, until very recently, research on the responses to food or individual dietary constituents, in IBS, has been scarce. This review addresses recent literature on diet and IBS. RECENT FINDINGS: The complexity of food-symptom interactions in IBS is being revealed in recent and ongoing research. Such studies have revealed the variable effects of fibre in IBS and the susceptibility of IBS individuals to the ingestion of poorly digested and absorbed carbohydrates. The latter has led to the widespread adoption of the low-fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) diet. Less certain is the role of another widely adopted dietary strategy, gluten restriction. Diet-microbe interactions are critical to the homeostasis of the gut microbiome in health and may well be disturbed in disease; enthusiasm continues, therefore, for the use of probiotics in IBS. SUMMARY: Food is a common precipitant of symptoms in IBS and recent research has focused on the role(s) of individual dietary constituents in IBS and on fibre, FODMAPs, gluten and probiotics, in particular. Each may have a role in certain IBS sufferers.


Assuntos
Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio/uso terapêutico , Dieta Livre de Glúten , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/dietoterapia , Óleos de Plantas/uso terapêutico , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/imunologia , Mentha piperita , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
18.
Cureus ; 16(4): e58025, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38738050

RESUMO

Neuropathic pain is a challenging condition. Despite the immense progress made in the pathophysiology and treatment of such conditions, so much work still has to be done. New frontiers previously unexplored are now objects of study with exciting results, mainly regarding neuromodulation and optogenetics. This review explores the already known pathophysiology and the clinical and surgical treatment in the light of evidence-based medicine. Additionally, new concepts and insights are discussed, presenting the hope for the development of new paradigms in the treatment of neuropathic pain.

19.
Cureus ; 16(1): e52322, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38357062

RESUMO

Background Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a chronic cardiovascular condition stemming from an infectious origin, posing a substantial health burden, particularly in economically disadvantaged regions. It starts with acute rheumatic fever (ARF), a complication following group A Streptococcus infection, leading to heart valve damage and, over time, structural heart abnormalities. RHD contributes to premature deaths, especially in low-middle-income countries. Although the incidence and prevalence have generally reduced globally due to antibiotics and improved healthcare, it remains a significant public health concern in Brazil, echoing its prevalence in many developing nations around the world. RHD stands as a poignant testament to the intersection of socio-economic disparities and healthcare challenges within Brazil's diverse population. In Brazil, despite advancements in healthcare, RHD continues to impact communities, highlighting the urgent need for enhanced prevention strategies, access to quality healthcare services, and heightened awareness to combat this preventable, yet persistent, cardiac condition. Understanding the epidemiological landscape and socio-cultural factors influencing RHD in Brazil is crucial for developing targeted interventions aimed at mitigating its burden on individuals, families, and the healthcare system at large. Thus, our study focuses on analyzing age-related mortality rates linked to ARF and chronic RHD (ARHD) in Brazil from 2000 to 2021, particularly examining gender disparities. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study employed a descriptive time-series approach, utilizing comprehensive nationwide data from Brazil spanning from 2000 to 2021 to assess trends in diverse age groups, among both sexes, enabling a detailed analysis of temporal patterns. Mortality data, extracted and categorized meticulously, were subjected to Joinpoint statistical analyses enabling comparative assessments, with average annual percent change (AAPC) and annual percent change (APC) serving as key metrics to quantify and interpret trends over the analyzed period. Results The acute RHD (ARHD)-related mortality declined over the analyzed years supported by AAPC, with higher mortality reduction in females. The age-adjusted mortality rate for "males and females" decreased from 78 to 67 deaths/100,000 from 2000 to 2021. Female mortality dropped from 85 to 69/100,000, and male mortality decreased from 73 to 63/100,000 over the same period. For ARHD, male age groups (20-29, 60-69, 70-79, 80+) showed declining mortality, while the 30-59 age group exhibited an upward. Females AAMR for chronic RHD (CRHD) decreased across all age groups, with significant reductions in the 80 years and above age group from 2000-2002 (APC: -11.94*) and steadily from 2002 onwards (APC: -1.33). Conclusions Our study revealed an overall decline in mortality rates for both acute and CRHD across both sexes. Females consistently exhibited higher mortality rates and a more pronounced reduction compared to males in both acute and CRHD. In ARHD, males experience the highest mortality in the 50-59 age group, while females have a peak in the 40-49 age group. The 60-69 age group had the highest mortality in CRHD for both sexes. Conversely, the 20-29 age group displayed the lowest mortality in CRHD, and the 80-89 age group had the lowest mortality in ARHD.

20.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(10)2024 May 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38791997

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current treatment guidelines for moderate to severe colitis (IMC) secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) recommend systemic corticosteroids as the primary therapy in conjunction with biologics, namely infliximab and/or vedolizumab. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of oral budesonide in the treatment of IMC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis at MD Anderson Cancer Center of adult cancer patients with a confirmed (based on clinical, radiographic and laboratory assessment) diagnosis of IMC between 1 January 2015 and 31 November 2022, treated with budesonide. Data collection included demographics, oncologic history, IMC-related information and outcomes up to 6 months after the last dose of ICI. RESULTS: Our sample (n = 69) comprised primarily of Caucasian (76.8%) females (55.1%). The majority of patients received combination therapy with anti-PD-1/L1 and anti-CTLA-4 (49.3%), and the most common malignancy treated was melanoma (37.6%). The median grade of diarrhea was 3 and of colitis was 2. Of the 50 patients who underwent endoscopic evaluation, a majority had non-ulcerative inflammation (64%) and active colitis on histology (78%). Budesonide was used as primary treatment at onset of IMC in 56.5% patients, as well as a bridging therapy from systemic corticosteroids in 33.3%. Less than half of the patients (44.9%) required additional therapies such as biologics or fecal microbiota transplant. Additionally, 75.3% of patients achieved full remission of IMC and 24.6% had a recurrence of IMC. ICI was resumed in 31.9% of patients and 17.4% received other forms of cancer therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide may be an effective strategy to treat and prevent the recurrence of IMC. The remission rates observed in our analysis with budesonide alone are comparable to systemic corticosteroids. Patients that require an extended duration of steroid exposure and those with moderate to severe colitis may benefit from budesonide given its lower risk of infection and complications. Furthermore, we observe that budesonide may serve as a successful bridge from systemic corticosteroids with subsequent biologic treatment. Larger prospective studies are necessary to determine the role of budesonide as well as its safety profile.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA