Biomechanical comparison of open Bankart repair vs. conjoint tendon transfer in a 10% anterior glenoid bone loss shoulder instability model.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of shoulder instability in patients with subcritical glenoid bone loss poses a difficult problem for surgeons as new evidence supports a higher failure rate when a standard arthroscopic Bankart repair is used. The purpose of this study was to compare a conjoint tendon transfer (soft-tissue Bristow) to an open Bankart repair in a cadaveric instability model of 10% glenoid bone loss. METHODS: Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested using a custom testing system that allows for a 6-degree-of-freedom positioning of the glenohumeral joint. The rotator cuff muscles were loaded to simulate physiologic muscle conditions. Four conditions were tested: (1) intact, (2) Bankart lesion with 10% bone loss, (3) conjoint tendon transfer, and (4) open Bankart repair. Range of motion, glenohumeral kinematics, and anterior-inferior translation at 60° of external rotation with 20 N, 30 N, and 40 N were measured in the scapular and coronal planes. Glenohumeral joint translational stiffness was calculated as the linear fit of the translational force-displacement curve. Force to anterior-inferior dislocation was also measured in the coronal plane. Repeated measures analysis of variance with a Bonferroni correction was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A Bankart lesion with 10% bone loss increased the range of motion in both the scapular (P = .001) and coronal planes (P = .001). The conjoint tendon transfer had a minimal effect on the range of motion (vs. intact P = .019, .002), but the Bankart repair decreased the range of motion to intact (P = .9, .4). There was a significant decrease in glenohumeral joint translational stiffness for the Bankart lesion compared with intact in the coronal plane (P = .021). The conjoint tendon transfer significantly increased stiffness in the scapular plane (P = .034), and the Bankart repair increased stiffness in the coronal plane (P = .037) compared with the Bankart lesion. The conjoint tendon transfer shifted the humeral head posteriorly at 60° and 90° of external rotation in the scapular plane. The Bankart repair shifted the head posteriorly in maximum external rotation in the coronal plane. There was no significant difference in force to dislocation between the Bankart repair (75.8 ± 6.6 N) and the conjoint tendon transfer (66.5 ± 4.4 N) (P = .151). CONCLUSION: In the setting of subcritical bone loss, both the open Bankart repair and conjoint tendon transfer are biomechanically viable options for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability; further studies are needed to extrapolate these data to the clinical setting.

Superior Capsule Reconstruction With Fascia Lata Allograft Has Initial Stiffness and Ultimate Load Comparable to the Native Shoulder Superior Capsule: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of a fascia lata superior capsule reconstruction (FL-SCR) to the native superior capsule. METHODS: The native superior capsule of 8 cadaveric shoulders was tested with cyclic loading from 10 to 50 N for 30 cycles in 20° of glenohumeral abduction followed by load to failure at 60 mm/min. Following native superior capsule testing, FL-SCR was performed, which was tested as described for the native capsule. Paired t test was used for statistical analyses with P < .05 for significance. RESULTS: The stiffness for cycle 1 to 50 N was significantly higher for the native superior capsule compared to the FL-SCR (P = .001). By cycle 30, the stiffness between the two was not statistically different (P = .734). During load to failure, the initial stiffness to 2 mm for the FL-SCR and the native superior capsule was not statistically different (P = .262). The linear stiffness and yield load of the native superior capsule were significantly greater than that of the FL-SCR (94.5 vs 28.0 N/mm, P = .013; 386.9 vs 123.8 N, P = .029). There was no significant difference in ultimate load between the native superior capsule and the FL-SCR (444.9 vs 369.0 N, P = .413). CONCLUSIONS: FL-SCR has initial stiffness and ultimate load similar to the native superior capsule. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The biomechanical properties of FL allograft make it an appealing option as a graft choice for superior capsule reconstruction.

Editorial Commentary: Dermal Grafts for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears-"Bridge Over Troubled Waters".

The treatment of an irreparable rotator cuff tear is an enigma. There are so many treatment options, with different experts recommending different treatments. These include physical therapy, partial repairs, tendon transfers such as the latissimus dorsi and the lower trapezius, biceps tenotomy, tissue augmentation with allografts or autografts, balloon spacers, and finally a reverse prosthesis. It is an easy decision when the patient is physiologically old with many medical comorbidities and arthritis. It is much more difficult when the patient is younger with no arthritis. Many patients with a failed massive cuff repair do well with a supervised therapy program despite the absence of 2 tendons (the supraspinatus and infraspinatus). Nothing works well when the subscapularis and/or teres minor are irreparable. I will usually try a 3-month physical therapy program, and if this is not successful in improving pain and function, consider surgery. If I can do an adequate partial repair, where the residual defect is small enough that the humeral head does not button hole through the defect like a boutonniere deformity, that is my treatment of choice. I will only do grafts with Hamada stage 1 or 2, as stage 3 with a fixed humeral head against the acromion do not do well. I am intrigued by the balloon spacer and why the results are still adequate, even when there is no balloon present after about 1 year. I'm holding judgment on that until there are more published studies. A reverse prosthesis I use as a last resort.

Human Dermal Allograft Superior Capsule Reconstruction With Graft Length Determined at Glenohumeral Abduction Angles of 20° and 40° Decreases Joint Translation and Subacromial Pressure Without Compromising Range of Motion: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical effects of superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) graft fixation length determined at 20° and 40° of glenohumeral (GH) abduction. METHODS: Humeral translation, rotational range of motion (ROM), and subacromial contact pressure were quantified at 0°, 30°, and 60° of GH abduction in the scapular plane in 6 cadaveric shoulders for the following states: intact, massive rotator cuff tear, SCR with dermal allograft fixed at 20° of GH abduction (SCR 20), and SCR with dermal allograft fixed at 40° of GH abduction (SCR 40). Statistical analysis was conducted using a repeated-measures analysis of variance and a paired t test (P < .05). RESULTS: A massive cuff tear significantly increased total ROM compared with the intact state at 0° and 60° of abduction. SCR 20 or SCR 40 did not affect ROM. Compared with the intact state, the massive cuff tear model significantly increased superior translation by an average of 4.6 ± 0.5 mm in 9 of 12 positions (P ≤ .002). Both SCR 20 and SCR 40 reduced superior translation compared with the massive cuff tear model (P < .05); however, SCR 40 significantly decreased superior translation compared with SCR 20 at 0° of abduction (P ≤ .046). Peak subacromial pressure for the massive cuff tear model increased by an average of 486.8 ± 233.9 kPa relative to the intact state in 5 of 12 positions (P ≤ .037). SCR 20 reduced peak subacromial pressure in 2 of 12 positions (P ≤ .012), whereas SCR 40 achieved this in 6 of 12 positions (P ≤ .024). CONCLUSIONS: SCR with dermal allograft fixed at 20° or 40° of GH abduction decreases GH translation and subacromial pressure without decreasing ROM. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: With an increasing abduction angle for graft fixation, the medial-to-lateral graft length is decreased and the graft tension is effectively increased. Surgeons may increase shoulder stability without restricting ROM by fixing the graft at higher abduction angles. However, surgeons should remain cognizant of potential graft failure due to increased tension.

Superior Capsule Reconstruction Using Fascia Lata Allograft Compared With Double- and Single-Layer Dermal Allograft: A Biomechanical Study.

PURPOSE: To biomechanically characterize superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) using fascia lata allograft, double-layer dermal allograft, and single-layer dermal allograft for a clinically relevant massive irreparable rotator cuff tear involving the entire supraspinatus and 50% of the infraspinatus tendons. METHODS: Eight cadaveric specimens were tested in 0°, 30°, and 60° abduction for (1) intact, (2) massive rotator cuff tear, (3) SCR using fascia lata, (4) SCR using double-layer dermis, and (5) SCR using single-layer dermis. Superior translation and subacromial contact pressure were measured. Statistical analysis was conducted using repeated measures ANOVA or paired t test with P < .05. RESULTS: Massive rotator cuff tear significantly increased superior translation of the humeral head at all abduction angles (P < .05). At 0° abduction, all SCR conditions significantly decreased superior translation compared with the massive tear but did not restore translation (P < .05) to intact. Fascia lata and double-layer dermis SCR restored superior translation to intact at 30° and 60° of abduction, but single-layer dermis did not. Subacromial contact pressure at 0° of abduction significantly decreased with SCR with fascia lata and double-layer dermis compared with tear. At 30°, all SCR conditions significantly decreased subacromial contact pressure. Single-layer dermis graft thickness significantly decreased more than fascia lata during testing (P = .02). CONCLUSION: For SCR tensioned at 20° glenohumeral abduction, all 3 graft types may restore superior translation and subacromial contact pressure depending on the glenohumeral abduction angle; fascia lata and double-layer dermis may be more effective than single-layer dermis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: If a dermal graft is to be used for SCR, consideration should be given to doubling the graft for increased thickness and better restorative biomechanical properties, which may improve clinical outcomes following SCR.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction of the Shoulder.

For irreparable rotator cuff tears, superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has become an option for restoring glenohumeral joint stability and reversing proximal humeral migration. Signs of irreparable rotator cuff tears include pain from subacromial impingement, muscle weakness, and pseudoparalysis. In biomechanical studies, Mihata et al. showed SCR with fascia lata graft and side-to-side suturing to remaining infraspinatus tendon restored superior stability of the shoulder joint. Adding acromioplasty decreased the subacromial contact area without altering the humeral head position, superior translation, or subacromial peak contact pressure. The same research group showed that using an 8-mm thick fascia lata graft attached at 15° to 45° of shoulder abduction optimized superior stability of the shoulder joint. Adams et al. performed SCR using a dermal allograft and found that greater glenohumeral abduction angle (60°) decreased applied deltoid force. SCR can be performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus or beach chair position. Arthroscopic exploration, debridement, and infraspinatus and supraspinatus repair attempt is completed before proceeding with SCR. To restore the superior capsule of the shoulder, the graft (fascia lata autograft, dermal allograft) can be attached to the superior glenoid medially and the rotator cuff footprint on the greater tuberosity of the humerus laterally, after debriding bone to enhance healing. SCR with side-to-side suturing to the remnant rotator cuff yields promising clinical results. Using a fascia lata autograft, Mihata et al. showed a reversal of pseudoparalysis in 93% to 96% of patients and mean active elevation, external rotation, and acromiohumeral distance on radiography all improved. Using a dermal allograft and a unique graft delivery technique, Burkhart et al. reversed pseudoparalysis in 9 of 10 patients and 70% of patients had completely intact grafts. Recommendations for rehabilitation and return to activity vary, but adequate time for graft healing is recommended.

Biomechanics of tensor fascia lata allograft for superior capsular reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that in a cadaveric massive rotator cuff tear (MCT) model, a fascia lata (FL) allograft superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) would restore subacromial contact pressure and humeral head superior translation without limiting range of motion (ROM). Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare these parameters between an intact rotator cuff, MCT, and allograft FL SCR. METHODS: Eight fresh cadavers were studied using a custom shoulder testing system. ROM, superior translation, and subacromial contact pressure were measured in each of 3 states: (1) intact rotator cuff, (2) MCT, and (3) MCT with SCR. RESULTS: Total ROM was increased in the MCT state at 60° of abduction (P = .037). FL SCR did not restrict internal or external rotational ROM. Increased superior translation was observed in the MCT state at 0° and 30° of humeral abduction, with no significant difference between the intact cuff and FL SCR states. The MCT state significantly increased mean subacromial contact pressure at 0° of abduction with 30° and 60° of external rotation, and FL SCR restored this to intact levels. Peak subacromial contact pressure was increased for the MCT state at 0° of abduction with 30° and 60° of external rotation, as well as 30° of abduction with 30° of external rotation. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a tensor FL allograft preparation technique for use in SCR. After MCT, FL SCR restores ROM, superior translation, and subacromial contact pressure to the intact state.

Consensus statement on the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: a Delphi approach by the Neer Circle of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) remains controversial owing to variability in patient features and outcomes contributing to a lack of unanimity in treatment recommendations. The purpose of this study was to implement the Delphi process using experts from the Neer Circle of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons to determine areas of consensus regarding treatment options for a variety of MIRCTs. METHODS: A panel of 120 shoulder surgeons were sent a survey regarding MIRCT treatments including arthroscopic débridement and partial cuff repair, graft augmentation, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), and tendon transfer. An iterative Delphi process was then conducted with a first-round questionnaire consisting of 13 patient factors with the option for open-ended responses to identify important features influencing the treatment of MIRCTs. The second-round survey sought to determine the importance of patient factors related to the 6 included treatment options. A third-round survey asked participants to classify treatment options for 60 MIRCT patient scenarios as either preferred treatment, acceptable treatment, not acceptable/contraindicated, or unsure/no opinion. Patient scenarios were declared to achieve consensus for the preferred and not acceptable/contraindicated categories when at least 80% of the survey respondents agreed on a response, and a 90% threshold was required for the acceptable treatment category, defined by an acceptable treatment or preferred treatment response. RESULTS: Seventy-two members agreed to participate and were deemed to have the requisite expertise to contribute based on their survey responses regarding clinical practice and patient volume. There were 20 clinical scenarios that reached 90% consensus as an acceptable treatment, with RSA selected for 18 scenarios and arthroscopic débridement and/or partial repair selected for 2. RSA was selected as the singular preferred treatment option in 8 scenarios. Not acceptable/contraindicated treatment options reached consensus in 8 scenarios, of which, 4 related to SCR, 3 related to RSA, and 1 related to partial repair with graft augmentation. CONCLUSION: This Delphi process exhibited significant consensus regarding RSA as a preferred treatment strategy in older patients with pseudoparesis, an irreparable subscapularis, and dynamic instability. In addition, the process identified certain unacceptable treatments for MIRCTs such as SCR in older patients with pseudoparesis and an irreparable subscapularis or RSA in young patients with an intact or reparable subscapularis without pseudoparesis or dynamic instability. The publication of these scenarios and areas of consensus may serve as a useful guide for practitioners in the management of MIRCTs.

Decision making in treatment after a first-time anterior glenohumeral dislocation: A Delphi approach by the Neer Circle of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of patients who sustain a first-time anterior glenohumeral dislocation (FTAGD) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to find consensus among experts using a validated iterative process in the treatment of patients after an FTAGD. METHODS: The Neer Circle is an organization of shoulder experts recognized for their service to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. Consensus among 72 identified experts from this group was sought with a series of surveys using the Delphi process. The first survey used open-ended questions designed to identify patient-related features that influence treatment decisions after an FTAGD. The second survey used a Likert scale to rank each feature's impact on treatment decisions. The third survey used highly impactful features to construct 162 clinical scenarios. For each scenario, experts recommended surgery or not and reported how strongly they made their recommendation. These data were analyzed to find clinical scenarios that had >90% consensus for recommending treatment. These data were also used in univariate and multivariate mixed-effects models to identify odds ratios (ORs) for different features and to assess how combining these features influenced the probability of surgery for specific populations. RESULTS: Of the 162 scenarios, 8 (5%) achieved >90% consensus for recommending surgery. All of these scenarios treated athletes with meaningful bone loss at the end of their season. In particular, for contact athletes aged > 14 years who were at the end of the season and had apprehension and meaningful bone loss, there was >90% consensus for recommending surgery after an FTAGD, with surgeons feeling very strongly about this recommendation. Of the scenarios, 22 (14%) reached >90% consensus for recommending nonoperative treatment. All of these scenarios lacked meaningful bone loss. In particular, surgeons felt very strongly about recommending nonoperative treatment after an FTAGD for non-athletes lacking apprehension without meaningful bone loss. The presence of meaningful bone loss (OR, 6.85; 95% confidence interval, 6.24-7.52) and apprehension (OR, 5.60; 95% confidence interval, 5.03-6.25) were the strongest predictors of surgery. When these 2 features were combined, profound effects increasing the probability of surgery for different populations (active-duty military, non-athletes, noncontact athletes, and contact athletes) were noted, particularly non-athletes. CONCLUSION: Consensus for recommending treatment of the FTAGD patient was not easily achieved. Certain combinations of patient-specific factors, such as the presence of meaningful bone loss and apprehension, increased the probability of surgery after an FTAGD in all populations. Over 90% of shoulder instability experts recommend surgery after an FTAGD for contact athletes aged > 14 years at the end of the season with both apprehension and meaningful bone loss. Over 90% of experts would not perform surgery after a first dislocation in patients who are not athletes and who lack apprehension without meaningful bone loss.

Injections Prior to Rotator Cuff Repair Are Associated With Increased Rotator Cuff Revision Rates.

PURPOSE: To determine whether shoulder injections prior to rotator cuff repair (RCR) are associated with deleterious surgical outcomes. METHODS: Two large national insurance databases were used to identify a total of 22,156 patients who received ipsilateral shoulder injections prior to RCR. They were age, sex, obesity, smoking status, and comorbidity matched to a control group of patients who underwent RCR without prior injections. The 2 groups were compared regarding RCR revision rates. RESULTS: Patients who received injections prior to RCR were more likely to undergo RCR revision than matched controls (odds ratio [OR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-1.68; P < .0001). Patients who received injections closer to the time of index RCR were more likely to undergo revision (P < .0001). Patients who received a single injection prior to RCR had a higher likelihood of revision (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.10-1.43; P = .001). Patients who received 2 or more injections prior to RCR had a greater than 2-fold odds of revision (combined OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.82-2.47; P < .0001) versus the control group. CONCLUSIONS: This study strongly suggests a correlation between preoperative shoulder injections and revision RCR. There is also a frequency dependence and time dependence to this finding, with more frequent injections and with administration of injections closer to the time of surgery both independently associated with higher revision RCR rates. Presently, on the basis of this retrospective database study, orthopaedic surgeons should exercise due caution regarding shoulder injections in patients whom they are considering to be surgical candidates for RCR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Evaluating the Femoral-Side Critical Corner in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: The Effect of Outside-In Versus Inside-Out Creation of Femoral Tunnels on Graft Contact Pressure in a Synthetic Knee Model.

PURPOSE: To characterize and compare the graft contact characteristics of outside-in (OI) and inside-out (IO) femoral tunnels during single-bundle reconstruction of the anterolateral bundle of the posterior cruciate ligament in a synthetic knee model. METHODS: Femoral tunnels were separately made in 16 synthetic femora (8 OI and 8 IO). Achilles tendon allografts were fixed using suspensory fixation with a pressure sensor between the allograft and femoral tunnel. Grafts were cyclically loaded; force, contact area, contact pressure, and peak pressure at the aperture were measured. This process was repeated using the same allograft to assess the other tunnel angle in a separate specimen. RESULTS: IO specimens showed higher mean contact pressure at all loading cycles, with significance shown at 50 N (P = .02). Peak pressure was also greater in IO specimens at all loading cycles and reached statistical significance at 100 N (P = .04). IO specimens had a lower contact area at 150 N (P = .04). No statistically significant differences in force were observed between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: OI creation of the femoral tunnel for anterolateral bundle reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament resulted in decreased mean and peak contact pressures at the femoral aperture compared with IO tunnel creation at the specific trajectories and loading parameters tested in this synthetic femoral model. These biomechanical data suggest that OI creation of the femoral tunnel may help reduce in vivo graft contact pressure at the femoral aperture. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These data suggest that a tunnel drilled from OI may result in less graft pressure at the femoral aperture, which may prevent graft elongation and optimize graft survival.

Major League pitching workload after primary ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction and risk for revision surgery.

BACKGROUND: Literature has attempted to correlate pitching workload with risk of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury; however, limited data are available in evaluating workload and its relationship with the need for revision reconstruction in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers. METHODS: We identified 29 MLB pitchers who underwent primary UCL reconstruction surgery and subsequently required revision reconstruction and compared them with 121 MLB pitchers who underwent primary reconstruction but did not later require revision surgery. Games pitched, pitch counts, and innings pitched were evaluated and compared for the seasons after returning from primary reconstruction and for the last season pitched before undergoing revision surgery. RESULTS: The difference in workload between pitchers who did and did not require revision reconstruction was not statistically significant in games pitched, innings pitched, and MLB-only pitch counts. The one significant difference in workload was in total pitch counts (combined MLB and minor league), with the pitchers who required revision surgery pitching less than those who did not (primary: 1413.6 pitches vs. revision: 959.0 pitches, P = .04). In addition, pitchers who required revision surgery underwent primary reconstruction at an early age (22.9 years vs. 27.3 years, P < .001) and had less MLB experience (1.5 years vs. 5.0 years, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There is no specific number of pitches, innings, or games that place a pitcher at an increase risk for injury after primary UCL reconstruction. However, correlations of risk may be younger age and less MLB experience at the time of the primary reconstruction.

The biomechanical effect of shoulder remplissage combined with Bankart repair for the treatment of engaging Hill-Sachs lesions.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the biomechanical effects of the remplissage repair combined with Bankart repair for engaging Hill-Sachs lesions on range of motion (ROM), translation, and glenohumeral kinematics. METHODS: Six cadaveric shoulders were tested using a custom shoulder testing system. ROM, kinematics, and anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior glenohumeral translations were quantified at 0° and 60° glenohumeral abduction. Six conditions were tested: intact, Bankart lesion, Bankart with 40 % Hill-Sachs lesion, Bankart repair, Bankart repair with remplissage, and remplissage repair alone. RESULTS: Humeral external rotation (ER) and total range of motion increased significantly after the creation of the Bankart lesion at both 0° and 60° abduction. The Bankart repair restored ER to intact values at 0° and 60° abduction, and the addition of the remplissage repair did not significantly alter range of motion from the Bankart repair alone. AP translation increased following the creation of the Bankart and Hill-Sachs lesions and was restored with the Bankart repair; the remplissage did not alter translation from the Bankart repair alone. At maximum ER at 60° abduction, the apex of the humeral head shifted posteriorly and inferiorly with remplissage repair. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of the remplissage procedure combined with Bankart repair for treatment of large Hill-Sachs lesions had no statistically significant effect on ROM or translation, but altered the kinematics of the glenohumeral joint. Thus, by addressing the humeral bone defect following an anterior shoulder dislocation, the remplissage technique with concurrent Bankart repair may be a relatively minimally invasive option for converting engaging Hill-Sachs lesions to non-engaging and promoting shoulder stability, though further biomechanical and clinical studies are warranted.

Biomechanical comparison of the modified Bristow procedure with and without capsular repair.

PURPOSE: The Bristow procedure has become an effective surgical option for recurrent anterior instability of the shoulder; however, there is no consensus on whether a capsule repair following a Bristow procedure is necessary to restore glenohumeral stability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether capsular repair with a modified Bristow procedure affects rotational range of motion and glenohumeral stability. METHODS: Rotational range of motion, glenohumeral translation and kinematics were measured in eight cadaveric shoulders in 90° shoulder abduction in the scapular and coronal planes for four conditions: intact, 20 % bony Bankart lesion, modified Bristow without capsular repair and modified Bristow with capsular repair. RESULTS: Creation of the bony Bankart led to a significant increase in total range of motion and anterior-inferior translation compared to the intact shoulder. The modified Bristow procedure significantly decreased anterior-inferior translation compared to the bony Bankart but did not decrease total range of motion. Capsular repair decreased total range of motion in the scapular and coronal planes and altered normal glenohumeral kinematics in external rotation positions. CONCLUSION: Repairing the capsule in a Bristow procedure decreases rotational range of motion yet does not offer any added anterior-inferior translational stability. Capsular repair also significantly alters normal glenohumeral kinematics. Capsule repair with a Bristow procedure may not add additional glenohumeral stability in positions of apprehension and may potentially over constrain the joint and cause altered kinematics.

A biomechanical assessment of a novel double endobutton technique versus a coracoid cerclage sling for acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular injuries.

PURPOSE: Recently, many acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular (AC-CC) ligament reconstruction techniques address only the CC ligament. However, many of these techniques are costly, time-consuming, and require the use of allogenic grafts, making them prone to creep and failure or novel devices making them challenging for orthopaedic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of a double endobutton technique using a standard endobutton CL with those of a coracoid cerclage sling (CS) for reconstruction of the CC ligaments. METHODS: Anterior-posterior (AP) translation and superior-inferior (SI) translation were quantified for eight matched pairs of intact AC joints. One shoulder from each pair underwent a double endobutton repair, using an endobutton CL modified with an additional endobutton (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tenn) and placed through holes in the coracoid and clavicle. The contra-lateral shoulder received a coracoid sling reconstruction using an anterior tibialis tendon. Translation testing was repeated after reconstruction, followed by load-to-failure testing. Paired t tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The CS technique demonstrated a greater SI and AP translation than the double endobutton technique (p < 0.05). Additionally, the double endobutton technique had a greater stiffness (40.2 ± 11.0 vs. 20.3 ± 6.4 N/mm, p = 0.005), yield load (168.5 ± 11.0 vs. 86.8 ± 22.9 N, p = 0.002), and ultimate load (504.4 ± 199.7 vs. 213.2 ± 103.4 N, p = 0.026) when compared to the CS technique. CONCLUSION: The double endobutton technique yielded less translation about the AC joint and displayed stronger load-to-failure characteristics than the CS reconstruction. As such, this technique may be better suited to restore native AC-CC biomechanics, reduce post-operative pain, and prevent recurrent subluxation and dislocation than an allogenic graft construct. The double endobutton technique may be a suitable option for addressing AC-CC injuries.

Biomechanical effects of anterior capsular plication and rotator interval closure in simulated anterior shoulder instability.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a stepwise arthroscopic anterior plication and arthroscopic-equivalent rotator interval (RI) closure on glenohumeral range of motion, kinematics, and translation in the setting of anterior instability. METHODS: Six cadaveric shoulders were stretched to 10 % beyond maximum external rotation (ER) to create an anterior shoulder instability model. Range of motion, kinematics, and glenohumeral translations were recorded for the following conditions: (1) intact, (2) stretched, (3) after anterior capsular plication, and (4) after RI closure. RESULTS: The total range of motion after capsular stretching increased significantly in the 60° abduction position (p = 0.037). Average ER and total rotation were significantly decreased from the intact and stretched conditions by both repair conditions at 60° and 0° of glenohumeral abduction (p < 0.05), with no significant difference between plication and additional RI closure. At 0° abduction and 0° ER, glenohumeral translation decreased significantly from the stretched condition after RI closure with 10 and 15 N anterior and 10 N posterior loads (p < 0.05). At 30° ER, translation after RI closure was significantly less than both the intact and stretched conditions with 10 N anterior loads (p = 0.009; p = 0.004). These changes in translational stability were not seen with plication alone. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior capsular plication reduced glenohumeral range of motion back to the intact state, and often tighter. RI closure did not contribute significantly to the reduction in the range of motion, but had implications regarding glenohumeral translation. Caution should be taken when performing anterior plication and combined repairs to avoid overtightening. Intraoperative translations could be useful when debating RI closure in patients with unidirectional anterior glenohumeral instability.

Biomechanical comparison of the Latarjet procedure with and without a coracoid bone block.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to biomechanically evaluate the Latarjet procedure, with and without a bone block, on glenohumeral range of motion, translation, and kinematics after creation of a bony Bankart lesion. METHODS: Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested for range of motion, translation, and kinematics in 90° shoulder abduction in both the scapular and coronal planes with the following conditions: intact, Bankart lesion with 20 % glenoid bone loss, Latarjet procedure and soft tissue only conjoined tendon transfer. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in range of motion in both the scapular and coronal planes with both the Latarjet and conjoined tendon transfer compared to the intact state. The Latarjet procedure restored anterior and inferior translation in both planes. The conjoined tendon transfer restored anterior and inferior translation at lower translational loads, but not with higher loads. Both reconstructions shifted the humeral head apex posteriorly in external rotation. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in range of motion suggests that the Latarjet procedure does not initially over-constrain the joint. At higher loads, there was improved stability with the Latarjet procedure compared to the conjoint tendon transfer. Both Latarjet and conjoined tendon transfer procedures alter normal joint kinematics by shifting the humeral head apex posteriorly in external rotation.

Biomechanical evaluation of coracoid tunnel size and location for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of coracoid tunnel size and location on the biomechanical characteristics of cortical button fixation for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. METHODS: Thirteen matched pairs of cadaveric scapulae were used to determine the effects of coracoid tunnel size, and 6 matched pairs were used to determine the effects of coracoid tunnel location. For tunnel size, a 4.5-mm hole was drilled in the base of the coracoid of one scapula and a 6-mm hole was drilled in the contralateral scapula. For tunnel location, 2 holes were drilled: (1) The first group received a hole centered in the coracoid base and a hole 1.5 cm distal from the first, along the axis of the coracoid. (2) The second group received holes that were offset anteromedially from the first set of holes (base eccentric and distal eccentric). A cortical button-suture tape construct was placed through each tunnel, and constructs were then loaded to failure. RESULTS: For tunnel size specimens, load at ultimate failure was significantly greater for the 4.5-mm group compared with the 6-mm group (557.6 ± 48.5 N v 466.9 ± 42.2 N, P < .05). For tunnel location, load at ultimate failure was significantly greater for the centered-distal tunnel group compared with the eccentric-distal group (538.1 ± 70.2 N v 381.0 ± 68.6 N, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: A 4.5-mm tunnel in the coracoid provided greater strength for cortical button fixation than a 6-mm tunnel. In the distal coracoid, centered tunnels provided greater strength than eccentric tunnels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: When performing cortical button fixation at the coracoid process for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction, a 4.5-mm tunnel provides greater fixation strength than a 6-mm tunnel. The base of the coracoid is more forgiving than the distal coracoid regarding location.

Relative fixation strength of rabbit subscapularis repair is comparable to human supraspinatus repair at time 0.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that the rabbit subscapularis tendon may be anatomically, biomechanically, and histologically suitable to study rotator cuff pathology and repair. However, biomechanical comparisons of rotator cuff repairs in this model have not been evaluated and compared to those in human cadaveric specimens. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We quantified the biomechanical properties of the repaired rabbit subscapularis tendon after (1) single-row, (2) double-row, and (3) transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair techniques and compared the ratios of repairs to previously published data for human repairs. METHODS: Tensile testing was performed on 21 New Zealand White rabbit subscapularis tendon-humerus complexes for single-row repair, double-row repair, and transosseous-equivalent repair (n = 7 for each group). Video digitizing software was used to quantify deformation. Load elongation data were then used to quantify structural properties. We compared the ratios of rotator cuff repairs for the rabbit data to data from human supraspinatus repair studies previously performed in our laboratory. For our primary end points (linear stiffness, yield load, ultimate load, and energy absorbed to failure), with the numbers available, our statistical power to detect a clinically important difference (defined as 15%) was 85%. RESULTS: The ratios of single-row/double-row repair were 0.72, 0.73, 0.71, and 0.66 for human supraspinatus and 0.77, 0.74, 0.79, and 0.89 for rabbit subscapularis repair for linear stiffness, yield load, ultimate load, and energy absorbed to failure, respectively. The ratios of double-row/transosseous-equivalent repair were 1.0, 0.86, 0.70, and 0.41 for human supraspinatus and 1.22, 0.85, 0.76, and 0.60 for rabbit subscapularis for linear stiffness, yield load, ultimate load, and energy absorbed to failure, respectively. There were no differences comparing rabbit to human repair ratios for any parameter (p > 0.09 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Subscapularis repairs in the rabbit at Time 0 result in comparable ratios to human supraspinatus repairs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The biomechanical similarities between the different types of rotator cuff repair in the rabbit subscapularis and human supraspinatus at Time 0 provide more evidence that the rabbit subscapularis may be an appropriate model to study rotator cuff repairs.

Biomechanical analysis of the modified Bristow procedure for anterior shoulder instability: is the bone block necessary?

BACKGROUND: Anterior shoulder instability with bone loss can be treated successfully with the modified Bristow procedure. Opinions vary regarding the role of the soft-tissue sling created by the conjoined tendon after transfer. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of the modified Bristow procedure and conjoined tendon transfer on glenohumeral translation and kinematics after creating anterior instability. METHODS: Eight cadaveric shoulders were tested with a custom shoulder testing system. Range-of-motion, translation, and kinematic testing was performed in 60° of glenohumeral abduction in the scapular and coronal planes under the following conditions: intact joint, Bankart lesion with 20% glenoid bone loss, modified Bristow procedure, and soft tissue-only conjoined tendon transfer. RESULTS: A Bankart lesion with 20% bone loss resulted in significantly increased external rotation and translation compared with the intact condition (P < .05), as well as an anterior shift of the humeral head apex at all points of external rotation. Both the modified Bristow procedure and soft-tissue Bristow procedure maintained the increase in external rotation but resulted in significantly decreased translation (P < .05). There was no difference in translation between the 2 reconstructions. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in external rotation suggests that the modified Bristow procedure does not initially restrict joint motion. Translational stability can be restored in a 20% bone loss model without a bone block, suggesting the importance of the soft-tissue sling.