Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Dermatol ; 37(10): 888-93, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20860739

RESUMO

Pigmentary complication by contact immunotherapy (CI) for alopecia areata (AA) has been reported but its pathophysiology remains unknown. To characterize pigmentary complication by CI and its pathophysiology, we examined the incidence of hyperpigmentation in 186 consecutive patients treated with CI using diphenylcyclopropenone. From clinical data of AA totalis (AAT) or universalis (AAU) patients (n = 78), we studied the correlations between this complication and age, sex, atopic background, duration and treatment responsiveness, duration of CI, final concentration of diphenylcyclopropenone and administration of anti-histamines by χ(2)-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. Additionally, the histopathology of pigmentation was studied. As a result, 11 (5.91%) of the 186 patients had hyperpigmentation in this series. All of them had AAT or AAU, suggesting that the pigmentation is apt to occur in severe AA. When the AAT or AAU patients with (n = 11) and without hyperpigmentation (n = 67) were compared, those with pigmentation showed poorer responsiveness to CI (P < 0.05) but no significant tendency for other factors. Histopathologically, skin specimens showed lichenoid or vacuolar interface dermatitis with necrotic keratinocytes and dermal melanophages, consistent with pigmented contact dermatitis (PCD). Together, pigmentary complication by CI corresponds to PCD from therapeutic sensitizer, representing clinical indicator of poor responsiveness.


Assuntos
Alopecia em Áreas/terapia , Ciclopropanos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite de Contato/etiologia , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Hiperpigmentação/induzido quimicamente , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperpigmentação/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Dermatol ; 36(6): 323-7, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19500180

RESUMO

To study the effect of fexofenadine on extensive alopecia areata (AA), we evaluated retrospectively 121 patients with AA having alopecia in more than 50% of the scalp and followed them for at least 6 months. Patients were treated by immunotherapy using diphenylcyclopropenone or squaric acid dibutylester with or without oral fexofenadine. The regrowth score was estimated as decrease of Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score. In AA with atopic background (atopic AA), the mean regrowth score of the fexofenadine group was 1.333 (n = 33) and that of the control 0.471 (n = 34). The fexofenadine group showed significantly better regrowth than control by Mann-Whitney's U-test (P = 0.00213). In non-atopic AA, the mean regrowth score of the fexofenadine group was 1.303 (n = 33) and that of the control 1.048 (n = 21). There was no significant difference by Mann-Whitney's U-test (P = 0.872). Together, fexofenadine is a helpful reagent in the treatment extensive atopic AA with contact immunotherapy.


Assuntos
Alopecia em Áreas/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Hipersensibilidade/complicações , Imunoterapia , Terfenadina/análogos & derivados , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Alopecia em Áreas/imunologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Ciclobutanos/uso terapêutico , Ciclopropanos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terfenadina/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Craniofac Surg ; 17(3): 497-505, 2006 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16770188

RESUMO

Eleven patients with syndromic craniosynostosis were treated with gradual distraction fronto-orbital advancement using "floating forehead." The frontal and supraorbital area was cut and remolded. Bony orbits were widened in three patients. Frontal bone was let floating on the dura and fixed loosely with absorbable threads to remolded supraorbital bone. A pair of distracters with hinge plates (A.V.D. system, Bear Medic Corp, Tokyo, Japan) was fixed between the temporal area and supraorbital bone. Distraction was begun 5 to 7 days after the surgery, and 1.8 to 3.2 cm advancement was obtained. Distracters were taken off after 3 to 7 weeks of consolidation periods. Although no major complication was encountered, some minor complications related to the devices were experienced.


Assuntos
Craniossinostoses/cirurgia , Testa/cirurgia , Osso Frontal/cirurgia , Órbita/cirurgia , Osteogênese por Distração/métodos , Implantes Absorvíveis , Placas Ósseas , Dura-Máter , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Fixadores Internos , Ácido Láctico , Masculino , Osteotomia , Poliésteres , Polímeros , Osso Esfenoide/cirurgia , Telas Cirúrgicas , Suturas , Síndrome , Osso Temporal/cirurgia , Titânio
4.
J Anesth ; 18(4): 237-40, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15549464

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of laryngotracheal application of different doses of lidocaine spray on postoperative sore throat and hoarseness, we evaluated the incidence and severity of these complications in 168 ASA I-III patients aged 15-92 years in a placebo-controlled study. METHODS: After induction of anesthesia with propofol, ketamine, fentanyl, and vecuronium, the laryngotracheal area was sprayed immediately before intubation with lidocaine spray either 5 times (L5 group, n = 47) or 10 times (L10 group, n = 48) or with normal saline 1 ml (placebo group, n = 51). Postoperative sore throat and hoarseness were evaluated immediately after surgery and on the day after surgery. RESULTS: The incidence of sore throat was significantly higher in the L10 group than in the placebo group on both the day of and the day after surgery. The severity of sore throat was significantly higher in the L5 and L10 groups than in the placebo group on the day of surgery. On the day after surgery, the severity of sore throat remained significantly higher in the L10 group than in the placebo group. Although the incidence and severity of sore throat increased in a dose-dependent manner, these were not significantly different between the L5 and L10 groups. In addition, the incidence and severity of hoarseness did not differ at all among the three groups. CONCLUSION: We recommend that applications of lidocaine spray to the laryngotracheal area should be avoided to help eliminate unnecessary postoperative sore throat, thereby leading to improvement in patient satisfaction.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Rouquidão/etiologia , Intubação Intratraqueal , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Lidocaína/efeitos adversos , Faringite/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Intravenosa , Feminino , Rouquidão/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Faringite/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA