Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Eur Radiol ; 33(10): 7025-7033, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37199796

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate compliance with the available recommendations, we assessed the current clinical practice of imaging in the evaluation of multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: An online questionnaire was emailed to all members and affiliates. Information was gathered on applied MR imaging protocols, gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) use and image analysis. We compared the survey results with the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in MS (MAGNIMS) recommendations considered as the reference standard. RESULTS: A total of 428 entries were received from 44 countries. Of these, 82% of responders were neuroradiologists. 55% performed more than ten scans per week for MS imaging. The systematic use of 3 T is rare (18%). Over 90% follow specific protocol recommendations with 3D FLAIR, T2-weighted and DWI being the most frequently used sequences. Over 50% use SWI at initial diagnosis and 3D gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging is the most used MRI sequence for pre- and post-contrast imaging. Mismatches with recommendations were identified including the use of only one sagittal T2-weighted sequence for spinal cord imaging, the systematic use of GBCA at follow-up (over 30% of institutions), a delay time shorter than 5 min after GBCA administration (25%) and an inadequate follow-up duration in pediatric acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (80%). There is scarce use of automated software to compare images or to assess atrophy (13% and 7%). The proportions do not differ significantly between academic and non-academic institutions. CONCLUSIONS: While current practice in MS imaging is rather homogeneous across Europe, our survey suggests that recommendations are only partially followed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Hurdles were identified, mainly in the areas of GBCA use, spinal cord imaging, underuse of specific MRI sequences and monitoring strategies. This work will help radiologists to identify the mismatches between their own practices and the recommendations and act upon them. KEY POINTS: • While current practice in MS imaging is rather homogeneous across Europe, our survey suggests that available recommendations are only partially followed. • Several hurdles have been identified through the survey that mainly lies in the areas of GBCA use, spinal cord imaging, underuse of specific MRI sequences and monitoring strategies.


Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla , Humanos , Criança , Esclerose Múltipla/diagnóstico , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Medula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Medula Espinal/patologia , Meios de Contraste , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
J Neuroradiol ; 49(1): 2-8, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34171314

RESUMO

The nerve plexus is susceptible to various pathological processes. In addition to clinical and electrophysiological findings, magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) may contribute to characterize plexus involvement. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was reported feasible for the nerve plexuses imaging but its value in the clinical practice remains uncertain. From 2014 to 2020, we routinely performed MRN including DTI at 3T in patients with acute or chronic plexopathy. DTI images were co-registered with conventional MRN images. MRN images including DTI were reviewed by consensus by two neuroradiologists and one neurologist. They retrospectively identified cases for whom the use of DTI had a potential impact on the diagnostic workup, seven of these clinical cases are presented here. Compared to conventional MRN, the added value of DTI consisted in: (i) improved detection of signal/morphological abnormalities of the plexus (due to removal of background structures, multiplanar reformatted views and large field of view), (ii) additional information regarding the microarchitecture of nerve fibers provided by DTI metrics, (iii) potential alternative for the use of gadolinium. This case series supports the implementation of DTI in MRN protocols.


Assuntos
Imagem de Tensor de Difusão , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Insights Imaging ; 12(1): 24, 2021 Feb 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33595746

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lung perfusion defects (PDs) have been described in COVID-19 using dual-energy computed tomography pulmonary angiography (DE-CTPA). We assessed the prevalence and characteristics of PDs in COVID-19 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) and negative CTPA. METHODS: This retrospective study included COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia groups of patients with DE-CTPA negative for PE. Two radiologists rated the presence of PD within the lung opacities and analyzed the type of lung opacities and PD pattern (i.e. homogeneous or heterogeneous). The clinical, biological, radiological characteristics including time from first symptoms and admission to DE-CTPA, oxygen requirements, CRP, D-dimer levels, duration of hospital admission and death were compared within the COVID-19 group between patients with (PD +) or without PD (PD-). RESULTS: 67 COVID-19 and 79 non-COVID-19 patients were included. PDs were more frequent in the COVID-19 than in the non-COVID-19 group (59.7% and 26.6% respectively, p < 0.001). Patterns of PDs were different, with COVID-19 patients exhibiting heterogenous PDs (38/40, 95%) whereas non-COVID-19 patients showed mostly homogeneous perfusion defects (7/21 heterogeneous PDs, 33%), p < 0.001. In COVID-19 patients, most consolidations (9/10, 90%) exhibited PDs while less than a third of consolidations (19/67, 28%) had PDs in non-COVID-19 patients. D-dimer, oxygen levels and outcome were similar between COVID-19 PD + and PD- patients; however, time between admission and DE-CTPA was longer in PD + patients (median [IQR], 1 [0-7] and 0 [0-2]; p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Unlike in bacterial pneumonia, heterogeneous PDs within lung opacities are a frequent feature of COVID-19 pneumonia in PE-suspected patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA