Association between RAD 51 rs1801320 and susceptibility to glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive malignant primary brain tumor. Despite decades of research and the advent of new therapies, patients with glioblastoma continue to have a very poor prognosis. Radiation therapy has a major role as adjuvant treatment for glioblastoma following surgical resection. Many studies have shown that polymorphisms of genes involved in pathways of DNA repair may affect the sensitivity of the cells to treatment. Although the role of these polymorphisms has been investigated in relation to response to radiotherapy, their role as predisposing factors to glioblastoma has not been clarified yet. In the present study, we evaluated the association between polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, namely: XRCC1 rs25487, XRCC3 rs861539 and RAD51 rs1801320, with the susceptibility to develop glioblastoma. Eighty-five glioblastoma patients and 70 matched controls were recruited for this study. Data from the 1000 Genomes Project (98 Tuscans) were also downloaded and used for the association analysis. Subjects carrying RAD51 rs1801320 GC genotype showed an increased risk of glioblastoma (GC vs GG, χ(2) = 10.75; OR 3.0087; p = 0.0010). The C allele was also significantly associated to glioblastoma (χ(2) = 8.66; OR 2.5674; p = 0.0032). Moreover, RAD51 rs1801320 C allele increased the risk to develop glioblastoma also when combined to XRCC1 rs25487 G allele and XRCC3 rs861539 C allele (χ(2) = 6.558; p = 0.0053).

IRF-1 responsiveness to IFN-γ predicts different cancer immune phenotypes.

BACKGROUND: Several lines of evidence suggest a dichotomy between immune active and quiescent cancers, with the former associated with a good prognostic phenotype and better responsiveness to immunotherapy. Central to such dichotomy is the master regulator of the acute inflammatory process interferon regulatory factor (IRF)-1. However, it remains unknown whether the responsiveness of IRF-1 to cytokines is able to differentiate cancer immune phenotypes. METHODS: IRF-1 activation was measured in 15 melanoma cell lines at basal level and after treatment with IFN-γ, TNF-α and a combination of both. Microarray analysis was used to compare transcriptional patterns between cell lines characterised by high or low IRF-1 activation. RESULTS: We observed a strong positive correlation between IRF-1 activation at basal level and after IFN-γ and TNF-α treatment. Microarray demonstrated that three cell lines with low and three with high IRF-1 inducible translocation scores differed in the expression of 597 transcripts. Functional interpretation analysis showed mTOR and Wnt/ß-cathenin as the top downregulated pathways in the cell lines with low inducible IRF-1 activation, suggesting that a low IRF-1 inducibility recapitulates a cancer phenotype already described in literature characterised by poor prognosis. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the central role of IRF-1 in influencing different tumour phenotypes.

CXCR3/CCR5 pathways in metastatic melanoma patients treated with adoptive therapy and interleukin-2.

BACKGROUND: Adoptive therapy with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) induces durable complete responses (CR) in ∼20% of patients with metastatic melanoma. The recruitment of T cells through CXCR3/CCR5 chemokine ligands is critical for immune-mediated rejection. We postulated that polymorphisms and/or expression of CXCR3/CCR5 in TILs and the expression of their ligands in tumour influence the migration of TILs to tumours and tumour regression. METHODS: Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes from 142 metastatic melanoma patients enrolled in adoptive therapy trials were genotyped for CXCR3 rs2280964 and CCR5-Δ32 deletion, which encodes a protein not expressed on the cell surface. Expression of CXCR3/CCR5 in TILs and CXCR3/CCR5 and ligand genes in 113 available parental tumours was also assessed. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte data were validated by flow cytometry (N=50). RESULTS: The full gene expression/polymorphism model, which includes CXCR3 and CCR5 expression data, CCR5-Δ32 polymorphism data and their interaction, was significantly associated with both CR and overall response (OR; P=0.0009, and P=0.007, respectively). More in detail, the predicted underexpression of both CXCR3 and CCR5 according to gene expression and polymorphism data (protein prediction model, PPM) was associated with response to therapy (odds ratio=6.16 and 2.32, for CR and OR, respectively). Flow cytometric analysis confirmed the PPM. Coordinate upregulation of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CCL5 in pretreatment tumour biopsies was associated with OR. CONCLUSION: Coordinate overexpression of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CCL5 in pretreatment tumours was associated with responsiveness to treatment. Conversely, CCR5-Δ32 polymorphism and CXCR3/CCR5 underexpression influence downregulation of the corresponding receptors in TILs and were associated with likelihood and degree of response.

Transport functions of riboflavin carriers in the rat small intestine and colon: site difference and effects of tricyclic-type drugs.

The present study was aimed at kinetically characterizing the newly found carrier-mediated riboflavin transport system in the rat colon, comparing it with that in the small intestine, and also probing the potential roles of these transport systems in intestinal drug absorption. Riboflavin transport, evaluated by measuring the initial uptake into everted intestinal tissue sacs, was saturable with a Michaelis constant (Km) of 0.13 microM and a maximum transport rate (Jmax) of 0.74 pmol/min/100 mg wet tissue weight (wtw) in the colon. Both the Km and the Jmax were smaller than those (0.57 microM and 4.26 pmol/min/100 mg wtw, respectively) in the small intestine, suggesting that the transport system in the colon has a higher affinity to substrates and a smaller transport capacity than its counterpart in the small intestine. The carrier-mediated riboflavin transport in the colon, similarly to that in the small intestine, was Na+-dependent and inhibited by lumiflavin, a riboflavin analogue with an isoalloxazine ring, but not by D-ribose, which forms the side-chain attached to the isoalloxazine ring in riboflavin. To further clarify the substrate specificities of the transport systems, we examined the effects of several drugs with a tricyclic structure similar to isoalloxazine ring on riboflavin transport. Chlorpromazine, a phenothiazine derivative, was found to inhibit riboflavin transport in both the small intestine and the colon. Methylene blue also was found to be a potent inhibitor in both sites. These results suggest that some tricyclic-type drugs could interfere with intestinal riboflavin absorption by specific carrier-mediated transport systems. These transport systems may play roles in the absorption of tricyclic-type drugs.

Carrier-mediated transport of riboflavin in the rat colon.

Carriers involved in riboflavin transport have generally been presumed to be localized in the upper small intestine. However, using a closed loop technique, we found that in the rat colon the absorption of riboflavin could be significantly reduced by raising the concentration from 0.1 to 200 microM and by adding lumiflavin, an analogue of riboflavin. These results suggest that saturable transport by the carrier that is specific for riboflavin and analogues may also be involved in riboflavin absorption in the colon. At the lower concentration of 0.1 microM, carrier-mediated transport was suggested to prevail, compared with passive transport, both in the colon and the small intestine. Furthermore, carrier-mediated transport in the colon was comparable with that in the small intestine. This study is the first to suggest carrier-mediated riboflavin transport in the colon. Although the riboflavin transport system in the colon needs to be subjected to more detailed investigation of its transport functions and role in riboflavin absorption after oral administration, it would be of interest to explore potential use of this carrier as a system for drug delivery.