RESUMO
AIMS: Post-mortem imaging is a potential alternative to traditional medicolegal autopsy. We investigate the reduction in number of invasive autopsies required by use of post-mortem CT ± coronary angiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 120 adult deaths referred to the Coroner were investigated by CT, with coronary angiography employed only for the second series of 60 cases, in order to determine the added value of angiography. The confidence of imaging cause of death was classified as definite (no autopsy), probable, possible or unascertained. Invasive autopsy was not required in 38% of cases without coronary angiography and 70% of cases with angiography. Full autopsy, including brain dissection, was required in only 9% of cases. There was complete agreement between autopsy and radiological causes of death in the cases with a 'probable' imaging cause of death, indicating that cases for which imaging provides an accurate cause of death without autopsy were identified correctly. In two patients, CT demonstrated unsuspected fractures, not detected at subsequent autopsy. CONCLUSIONS: A two-thirds reduction in the number of invasive coronial autopsies can be achieved by use of post-mortem CT plus coronary angiography. At the same time, use of post-mortem CT may improve accuracy of diagnosis, particularly for traumatic deaths.
Assuntos
Autopsia/métodos , Angiografia Coronária , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Causas de Morte , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Public objection to autopsy has led to a search for minimally invasive alternatives. Imaging has potential, but its accuracy is unknown. We aimed to identify the accuracy of post-mortem CT and MRI compared with full autopsy in a large series of adult deaths. METHODS: This study was undertaken at two UK centres in Manchester and Oxford between April, 2006, and November, 2008. We used whole-body CT and MRI followed by full autopsy to investigate a series of adult deaths that were reported to the coroner. CT and MRI scans were reported independently, each by two radiologists who were masked to the autopsy findings. All four radiologists then produced a consensus report based on both techniques, recorded their confidence in cause of death, and identified whether autopsy was needed. FINDINGS: We assessed 182 unselected cases. The major discrepancy rate between cause of death identified by radiology and autopsy was 32% (95% CI 26-40) for CT, 43% (36-50) for MRI, and 30% (24-37) for the consensus radiology report; 10% (3-17) lower for CT than for MRI. Radiologists indicated that autopsy was not needed in 62 (34%; 95% CI 28-41) of 182 cases for CT reports, 76 (42%; 35-49) of 182 cases for MRI reports, and 88 (48%; 41-56) of 182 cases for consensus reports. Of these cases, the major discrepancy rate compared with autopsy was 16% (95% CI 9-27), 21% (13-32), and 16% (10-25), respectively, which is significantly lower (p<0·0001) than for cases with no definite cause of death. The most common imaging errors in identification of cause of death were ischaemic heart disease (n=27), pulmonary embolism (11), pneumonia (13), and intra-abdominal lesions (16). INTERPRETATION: We found that, compared with traditional autopsy, CT was a more accurate imaging technique than MRI for providing a cause of death. The error rate when radiologists provided a confident cause of death was similar to that for clinical death certificates, and could therefore be acceptable for medicolegal purposes. However, common causes of sudden death are frequently missed on CT and MRI, and, unless these weaknesses are addressed, systematic errors in mortality statistics would result if imaging were to replace conventional autopsy. FUNDING: Policy Research Programme, Department of Health, UK.
Assuntos
Autopsia/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto , Causas de Morte , Humanos , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnósticoRESUMO
Post mortem computed tomography (PMCT) is widely used in England and Wales to supplement or replace traditional invasive Coroner's autopsy. Using PMCT and coronary angiography, the cause of death can be determined without invasive examination in approximately 70% of cases, assuming a typical Coroner's autopsy case mix. Coroner's autopsy services continued during the COVID-19 pandemic and have identified deaths resulting from COVID-19 undiagnosed in life. In some areas of England, PMCT was used to replace traditional autopsy due to concerns over infection risk to mortuary staff associated with invasive autopsy. Health and safety concerns also resulted in changes to post mortem scanning protocols. PMCT has been used to identify potential COVID-19 deaths and assist in the selection of cases for viral studies. There is typically bilateral ground-glass opacities and consolidation within the lungs on CT; although these changes are not specific for COVID-19, the diagnosis can be confirmed with post mortem nose and throat swabs.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stage 1 seminoma is frequently cured by radical orchiectomy; however, the management strategies after this diagnosis vary in terms of the use of adjuvant treatment and the nature of the follow-up protocols. We analyzed stage 1 seminomas treated in the Thames Valley Cancer Network for outcomes to determine whether any factors are predictive of recurrence. We also studied relapses to determine the optimal follow-up schedule and protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from centers within the Thames Valley Cancer Network for a 12-year period from 2004 to 2016. We identified 501 patients with stage 1 seminoma. RESULTS: Relapses occurred in 6.2% of the patients receiving adjuvant treatment and 6.1% of those who did not. The only statistically significant predictive factor identified for relapse was rete testis invasion, and the risk was greater when only stromal rete invasion was included, rather than pagetoid as well. A trend was seen toward an increased risk with increased tumor size, but the difference was not statistically significant. Recurrences developed within the first 2 years after surgery in nearly 75% of cases and were identified through surveillance computed tomography scans in 54.8% of the patients. All relapses were treated curatively. CONCLUSION: Active surveillance leads to excellent outcomes for stage 1 seminoma; however, adjuvant treatment should be reserved for those with high-risk disease. Follow-up schedules should include computed tomography imaging during the first 3 years, long-term measurement of tumor markers, and mechanisms for patients to be seen promptly should symptoms of tumor recurrence occur.
Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Seminoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Testiculares/cirurgia , Conduta Expectante/métodos , Adulto , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Humanos , Masculino , Orquiectomia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Análise de Sobrevida , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamento farmacológico , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Carga TumoralRESUMO
AIMS: Aiming to reduce the numbers of high risk autopsies, we use a minimally invasive approach. HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive coronial referrals, mainly intravenous drug abusers, have full autopsy only if external examination, toxicology and/or postmortem CT scan do not provide the cause of death. In this study, we review and validate this protocol. METHODS AND RESULTS: 62 HIV/HCV-positive subjects were investigated. All had external examination, 59 toxicology and 24 CT. In 42/62, this minimally invasive approach provided a cause of death. Invasive autopsy was required in 20/62, CT/toxicology being inconclusive, giving a potential rather than definite cause of death. Autopsy findings provided the cause of death in 6/20; in the remainder, a negative autopsy allowed more weight to be given to toxicological results previously regarded as inconclusive. In order to validate selection of cases for invasive autopsy using history, external examination and toxicology, a separate group of 57 non-infectious full autopsies were analysed. These were consecutive cases in which there was a history that suggested drug abuse. A review pathologist, provided only with clinical summary, external findings and toxicology, formulated a cause of death. This formulation was compared with the original cause of death, based on full autopsy. The review pathologist correctly identified a drug-related death or requirement for full autopsy in 56/57 cases. In one case, diagnosed as cocaine toxicity by the review pathologist, autopsy additionally revealed subarachnoid haemorrhage and Berry aneurysm. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of minimally invasive techniques in high risk autopsies, which result in a two-thirds reduction in full postmortems.
Assuntos
Autopsia/métodos , Causas de Morte , Patologia Legal/métodos , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Patologia Legal/legislação & jurisprudência , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/mortalidade , Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Hepatite C Crônica/diagnóstico , Hepatite C Crônica/mortalidade , Hepatite C Crônica/transmissão , Homicídio , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/virologia , Suicídio , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
AIM: To determine retrospectively the sensitivity and specificity of the double contrast barium enema (DCBE) as performed in one institution for the detection of colorectal carcinoma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eight hundred and eighty barium enema reports were reviewed of consecutive adult patients who underwent DCBE and also had hospital case notes with a minimum follow up of two years, a later diagnostic colonoscopy, or operative and histological findings. RESULTS: Seventy-four true positive cases of colorectal carcinoma diagnosed at DCBE were confirmed at surgery and histological examination. There were four false positive diagnoses of carcinoma at DCBE. Eight false negative cases at DCBE were demonstrated within a two-year follow-up period. The sensitivity of the DCBE for detecting colorectal carcinoma was therefore 90.2% and the specificity was 99.5%. CONCLUSION: DCBE is a sensitive and highly specific investigation for the detection of colorectal carcinoma.