Contemporary experience of mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair technology in patients with mitral annular calcification.

BACKGROUND: Mitral annular calcification (MAC) has been an exclusion for many of the earlier pivotal trials that were instrumental in gaining device approval and indications for mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER). AIMS: To evaluate the impact of MAC on the procedural durability and success of newer generation MitraClip® systems (G3 and G4 systems). METHODS: Data were collected from Northwell TEER registry. Patients that underwent M-TEER with third or fourth generation MitraClip device were included. Patients were divided into -MAC (none-mild) and +MAC (moderate-severe) groups. Procedural success was defined as ≤ grade 2 + mitral regurgitation (MR) postprocedure, and durability was defined as ≤ grade 2 + MR retention at 1 month and 1 year. Univariate analysis compared outcomes between groups. RESULTS: Of 260 M-TEER patients, 160 were -MAC and 100 were +MAC. Procedural success was comparable; however, there were three patients who required conversion to cardiac surgery during the index hospitalization in the +MAC group versus none in the -MAC group (though this was not statistically significant). At 1-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in MR severity. At 1-year follow-up, +MAC had higher moderate-severe MR (22.1% vs. 7.5%; p = 0.002) and higher mean transmitral gradients (5.3 vs. 4.0 mmHg; p = 0.001) with no differences in mortality, New York Heart Association functional class or ejection fraction. CONCLUSION: In selective patients with high burden of MAC, contemporary M-TEER is safe, and procedural success is similar to patients with none-mild MAC. However, a loss of procedural durability was seen in +MAC group at 1-year follow-up. Further studies with longer follow-ups are required to assess newer mTEER devices and their potential clinical implications in patients with a high burden of MAC.

Renal artery duplex ultrasound criteria for the detection of significant in-stent restenosis.

OBJECTIVES: To define velocity criteria by ultrasonography for the detection of hemodynamically significant (>60%) renal artery in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND: The restenosis rate after renal artery stenting ranges between 10% and 20%. While duplex ultrasound criteria have been validated for native renal artery stenosis, there are no uniformly accepted validated criteria for stented renal arteries. METHODS: Vascular laboratory databases from two academic medical centers were retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent renal artery stenting followed by duplex ultrasound evaluation and angiography (CT angiography or catheter angiography) as the gold standard. RESULTS: A cohort of 132 stented renal arteries that had angiographic comparisons was analyzed. Eighty-eight renal arteries demonstrated 0-59% stenosis while 44 renal arteries revealed 60-99% stenosis by angiography. Both the mean peak systolic velocity (PSV) and the renal artery-to-aortic ratio (RAR) were significantly higher in renal arteries with 60-99% restenosis compared with those with 0-59% restenosis (PSV: 382 cm/sec ± 128 vs. 129 cm/sec ± 62, P<0.001; RAR: 5.3 ± 2.4 vs. 2.1 ± 1.0, P <0.001). The optimal PSV and RAR cutoffs for detecting 60-99% ISR were calculated by receiver operator characteristics curve analysis. The velocity criteria that are associated with these results will be discussed. CONCLUSION: Duplex ultrasonography is an accurate technique to identify significant restenosis in stented renal arteries. The PSV and RAR cutoffs for detecting renal artery ISR are higher than those in native, unstented renal arteries. A normal duplex ultrasound after renal artery stenting virtually excludes significant restenosis.

Comparison of six risk scores in patients with triple vessel coronary artery disease undergoing PCI: competing factors influence mortality, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the discriminatory value of differing risk scores for predicting clinical outcomes following PCI in routine practice. BACKGROUND: Various risk scores predict outcomes after PCI. However, these scores consider markedly different factors, from purely anatomical (SYNTAX risk score [SRS]) to purely clinical (ACEF, modified ACEF [ACEFmod], NCDR), while other scores combine both elements (Clinical SYNTAX score [CSS], NY State Risk Score [NYSRS]). METHODS: Patients with triple vessel and/or LM disease with 12 month follow-up were studied from a single center PCI registry. Exclusion criteria included STEMI presentation, prior revascularization and shock. Clinical events at 12 months were compared to baseline risk scores, according to score tertiles and area under receiver-operating-characteristic curves (AUC). RESULTS: We identified 584 eligible patients (69.8±12.3yrs, 405 males). All scores were predictive of mortality, with the SRS being least predictive (AUC=0.66). The most accurate scores for mortality were the CSS and ACEF (AUC=0.76 for both: P = 0.019 and 0.08 vs. SRS, respectively). For TLR, while the SRS trended toward being positively predictive (P = 0.075), several scores trended towards a negative association, which reached significance for the NCDR (P = 0.045). The SRS and CSS were the only scores predictive of MI (both P < 0.05). No score was particularly accurate for predicting MACE (death+MI+TLR), with AUCs ranging from 0.53 (NCDR) to 0.63 (SRS). CONCLUSIONS: Competing factors influence mortality, MI and TLR after PCI. An increasing burden of comorbidities is associated with mortality, whereas anatomical complexity predicts MI. By combining these outcomes to predict MACE, all scores show reduced utility.

Utility of Multidetector Computed Tomographic Angiography as an Alternative to Transesophageal Echocardiogram for Preoperative Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Planning.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of degenerative mitral regurgitation (dMR) and preoperative planning for transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr). TEE is an invasive modality requiring anesthesia and esophageal intubation. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has limited the number of elective invasive procedures. Multi-detector computed tomographic angiography (MDCT) provides high-resolution images and 3D reconstructions to assess complex mitral anatomy. We hypothesized that MDCT would reveal similar information to TEE relevant to TMVr, thus deferring the need for a preoperative TEE in certain situations like during a pandemic. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data on patients who underwent or were evaluated for TMVr for dMR with preoperative MDCT and TEE between 2017 and 2019. Two TEE and 2 MDCT readers, blinded to patient outcome, analyzed: leaflet pathology (flail, degenerative, mixed), leaflet location, mitral valve area (MVA), flail width/gap, anterior-posterior (AP) and commissural diameters, posterior leaflet length, leaflet thickness, presence of mitral valve cleft and degree of mitral annular calcification (MAC). RESULTS: A total of 22 (out of 87) patients had preoperative MDCT. MDCT correctly identified the leaflet pathology in 77% (17/22), flail leaflet in 91% (10/11), MAC degree in 91% (10/11) and the dysfunctional leaflet location in 95% (21/22) of patients. There were no differences in the measurements for MVA, flail width, commissural or AP diameter, posterior leaflet length, and leaflet thickness. MDCT overestimated the measurements of flail gap. CONCLUSIONS: For preoperative TMVr planning, MDCT provided similar measurements to TEE in our study.

Coronary angiographic findings and conventional coronary artery disease risk factors of Indo-Guyanese immigrants with stable angina pectoris and acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) among migrant Indian populations exceeds that of Caucasians. Migrant Indians also suffer from more premature, clinically aggressive and angiographically extensive, (i.e., 3-vessel disease). It is not known whether the extent of angiographic CAD or the conventional CAD risk factors of Indo-Guyanese (IG) immigrants differs from that of Caucasians. METHODS: We reviewed the conventional CAD risk factors and angiographic findings of 198 IG and 191 Caucasians who were consecutively referred for cardiac catheterization with a diagnosis of stable angina pectoris or acute coronary syndrome. RESULTS: Three-vessel CAD was approximately 1.5 times more common among IG than Caucasians (34.8% vs. 24.0%; P = .02). Age (P = .01), male sex (P = .03) and diabetes mellitus (P = .05) were independently associated with an increased likelihood of 3-vessel CAD and there was a trend towards IG ethnicity predicting 3-vessel disease (P = .13). The frequency of diabetes mellitus (51.5% vs. 30.9%; P <.001), hypertension (82.3% vs. 67.0%; P < .001) and dyslipidemia (75.5% vs. 60.2%; P = .001) were significantly greater among IG, however, that of smoking was not. While IG were significantly leaner than Caucasians (27.7 kg/m2 vs. 30.0 kg/m2 ; P < .001), their mean body mass index fell within the ethnic-specific range for obesity. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that IG immigrants presenting for coronary angiography have significantly higher rates of 3-vessel CAD as well as higher rates of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidemia than Caucasians. Aggressive screening, prevention and treatment may be warranted in this cohort.

Mitral Arcade With Anomalous Papillary Muscles: Rare Cause of Mitral Stenosis in a Young Adult.

We present the case of a symptomatic young woman with mitral stenosis and regurgitation due to a congenital mitral arcade. Multimodality imaging with echocardiography and computed tomography were used for diagnosis and surgical planning. The patient underwent successful bioprosthetic valve replacement. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Unstable angina in a patient with anomalous origin of the left main coronary artery from the right sinus of Valsalva.

Anomalous coronary arteries are rare. Although most are not clinically significant, the most clinically important coronary anomaly is origin of the left main coronary artery from the right sinus of Valsalva, which can be associated with sudden death. We present a case of a 37-year-old man with unstable angina who underwent cardiac catheterization and was found to have this type of anomaly, which was later confirmed by coronary computed tomography angiography. Diagnosis and management of patients with this coronary anomaly are discussed.

Sinus of valsalva aneurysms: review of the literature and an update on management.

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SOVA), a congenital or acquired cardiac defect that is present in roughly 0.09% of the general population, often presents as an incidental finding during cardiac imaging. Although an echocardiogram is the standard imaging technique for such findings, cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has been increasingly utilized. If SOVA is diagnosed, CCTA is also a useful test for patients who are at low to intermediate risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) prior to surgical repair. CCTA can accurately rule out CAD, obviating the need for invasive angiography in most cases, which may be more risky in SOVA patients because their coronaries may be more difficult to engage and their aortic root may be more prone to injury. Although surgery has previously been the treatment of choice, transcatheter techniques have added to the spectrum of nonsurgical alternatives for repair. We report here 4 incidental SOVA cases and review the current literature.

Anomalous origin of the three major coronary arteries from a single common ostium.

The prevalence of coronary anomalies is about 1.3% among patients who undergo coronary angiography. Although the majority of coronary artery anomalies are incidental findings and are not clinically significant, the interarterial course between the great vessels of the aberrant artery may be responsible for syncope, angina, arrhythmias or sudden death. There are only a few case reports in the literature that describe the origin of all coronary arteries from a single ostium. This type of anomaly has been seen in only 0.024-0.044% of the population. This is a first case where not only was there a common ostium of the left anterior descending artery and right coronary artery without a left main, but an absent left circumflex artery with blood supply of its territory by a posterolateral/marginal branch from the right posterior descending artery and conal branch.