In ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancers, HER2 mRNA Levels Correlate Better with Clinicopathologic Features and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score than HER2 Immunohistochemistry.

With the approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan for treating advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) low breast cancer (BC), it has become increasingly important to develop more accurate and reliable methods to identify HER2-low BC. In addition, HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) has limitations for quantification of HER2. We explored the relationship between HER2 IHC and mRNA levels and evaluated whether HER2 IHC scores and mRNA levels are associated with clinicopathologic features and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative BCs. A total of 750 BCs sent for Oncotype DX (ODX) testing were included in this study, and 559 with HER2 mRNA levels were available. There were no statistically significant differences between HER2 0 and HER2-low BC in clinicopathologic variables or ODX RS using HER2 IHC. There was a significant difference in median HER2 mRNA values between HER2 0 and HER2-low (8.7 vs 9.3, P < .001); however, the HER2 mRNA distribution had substantial overlap between these 2 groups with a suboptimal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.68). A HER2 mRNA value of 9.2 was generated as the optimal cutoff for distinguishing HER2 0 and HER2-low BC. Comparing ER+ BCs with HER2 mRNA high (>9.2) and low (≤9.2) revealed a statistically significant difference in most clinicopathologic variables and ODX RS. From this large cohort of ER-positive, HER2-negative BC, our results demonstrated that HER2 mRNA levels correlated better with clinicopathologic features and recurrence risk as assessed by ODX RS than HER2 IHC scores. Our findings suggest that HER2 mRNA-detecting methods could potentially serve as a quantitative and reliable method for identifying a biologically meaningful group of HER2-low BC. Further study is needed to determine whether HER2 mRNA levels could be more reliable than IHC for identifying which patients will be most likely to benefit from trastuzumab deruxtecan.

HER2-low breast cancers: Current insights and future directions.

In light of the significant clinical benefits of novel HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugates in advanced HER2-low expressing breast cancers in recent phases I and III clinical trials, particularly trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-Dxd), the new "HER2-low" category in breast cancers (breast cancer with a HER2 IHC score of 1+, or 2+ without gene amplification) has gained increasing attention. In the past year, "HER2-low" breast cancers have been under active investigation by both oncologists and pathologists. In this current review, we update the recent cutting-edge research on HER2-low breast cancers, with a focus on the biology of HER2-low breast cancers, the issues on the identification of HER2-low breast cancers by immunohistochemistry in current practice of pathology, and the future directions in this emerging category in breast cancers.

Performance of HER2 DAKO HercepTest and Ventana 4B5 immunohistochemical assays on detecting HER2 gene-amplification in uterine serous carcinomas.

We compared the performance of two commonly-used HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays in uterine serous carcinomas (USC), correlating with HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). Sixty-five USCs were stained by both HercepTest™ and PATHWAY 4B5 assays. FISH was performed by HER2 IQFISH pharmDx. Consensus HER2 IHC scoring was performed, and HER2 testing results were evaluated using USC-specific criteria. Complete concordance between HercepTest and 4B5 assays was achieved in 44/65 tumors (68%). The overall HER2 IHC/FISH concordance was 94% (45/48) by HercepTest and 91% (42/46) by 4B5. All HER2 IHC 3+ cases with HercepTest (n = 6) and 4B5 (n = 4) were gene-amplified, corresponding to specificities of 100%. For cases with IHC 2+, 41% (7/17) by HercepTest and 42% (8/19) by 4B5 had HER2 gene amplification. The sensitivity for HercepTest and 4B5 were 38% and 25%, respectively, at a cut-off of IHC 3+ (P = 0.50), and were 81% and 75%, respectively, at a cut-off of IHC 2+ (P > 0.99). Among HER2 IHC 0-1+ cases, 3/42 cases by HercepTest and 4/42 cases by 4B5 showed amplified FISH results, corresponding to overall false negative rates of 19% for HercepTest and 25% for 4B5. By using USC-specific IHC scoring criteria, both HercepTest and 4B5 assays showed high specificities (100%) for HER2 gene amplification in IHC 3+ cases, high IHC/FISH concordance, and comparable sensitivity for detecting HER2 gene amplification. The notable false negative rates using IHC 2+ as a cut-off for reflexing FISH analysis may warrant consideration for performing FISH in IHC 1+ cases until more data become available.

Interobserver and Interantibody Reproducibility of HER2 Immunohistochemical Scoring in an Enriched HER2-Low-Expressing Breast Cancer Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the interobserver and interantibody reproducibility of HER2 immunohistochemical scoring in an enriched HER2-low-expressing breast cancer cohort. METHODS: A total of 114 breast cancer specimens were stained by HercepTest (Agilent Dako) and PATHWAY anti-HER2 (4B5) (Ventana) antibody assays and scored by 6 breast pathologists independently using current HER2 guidelines. Level of agreement was evaluated by Cohen κ analysis. RESULTS: Although the interobserver agreement rate for both antibodies achieved substantial agreement, the average rate of agreement for HercepTest was significantly higher than that for the 4B5 clone (74.3% vs 65.1%; P = .002). The overall interantibody agreement rate between the 2 antibodies was 57.8%. Complete interobserver concordance was achieved in 44.7% of cases by HercepTest and 45.6% of cases by 4B5. Absolute agreement rates increased from HER2 0-1+ cases (78.1% by HercepTest and 72.2% by 4B5; moderate agreement) to 2-3+ cases (91.9% by HercepTest and 86.3% by 4B5; almost perfect agreement). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated notable interobserver and interantibody variation on evaluating HER2 immunohistochemistry, especially in cases with scores of 0-1+, although the performance was much more improved among breast-specialized pathologists with the awareness of HER2-low concept. More accurate and reproducible methods are needed for selecting patients who may benefit from the newly approved HER2-targeting agent on HER2-low breast cancers.

HER2 categorical changes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A study of 192 matched breast cancers with the inclusion of HER2-Low category.

Understanding the changes of HER2 expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer (BC) is more important than ever, since it may allow more patients to access the effective therapeutic drugs targeting HER2-low BC. 192 matched pre- and post-NAC BCs were analyzed. HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was re-evaluated with consensus according to the current ASCO/CAP guidelines. Tumors were categorized into HER2-0 (IHC0+), HER2-low (IHC1+ or IHC2+/ISH-) and HER2-positive (IHC3+ or IHC2+/ISH+) subgroups. 55 (28.6 %) patients achieved pathologic complete response (pCR). HER2-low BC accounted for 75/192 (39.1 %) baseline tumors, and 48/133 (36.1 %) residual tumors. In the non-pCR cohort, 53 (39.9 %) patients had HER2 categorical change after NAC, most commonly converting from HER2-low to HER2-0 (20.3 %, n = 27). Among patients with residual tumor, 25.6 % (11/43) of patients with baseline HER2-0 expression experienced a categorical change to HER2-low after NAC, significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the hormone receptor (HR) positive (9/23, 39.1 %) compared to the HR negative tumors (10 %, 2/20). Exploratory analysis failed to reveal a statistically significant difference in disease free survival and overall survival in non-pCR patients with or without HER2 change. Our results suggest that a substantial number of patients may experience HER2 categorical change after NAC, supporting re-testing of HER2 status in post-NAC residual tumors. Retesting HER2 status may be particularly important for evaluating post-NAC HER2-low status, in order to better assess which patients will more likely benefit from therapeutic drugs targeting HER2-low BC.