Ethnic/Racial diversity and posttraumatic distress in the acute care medical setting.

Recent commentary has advocated for epidemiological investigation as a foundational science for understanding disparities in the delivery of mental health care and for the development of early trauma-focused interventions. Few acute care investigations have examined the diversity of ethnic/racial heritages or compared variations in early posttraumatic distress in representative samples of injured trauma survivors. Hospitalized injury survivors at two United States level I trauma centers were randomly approached in order to document linguistic and ethnic/racial diversity. Approximately 12% of patients approached were non-English speaking with 16 languages represented. English speaking, inpatients were screened for posttraumatic stress disorder, peritraumatic dissociative, and depressive symptoms. For 269 English speaking study participants, ethnic/racial group status was clearly categorized into one group for 72%, two groups for 25%, and three groups for 3% of participants. Regression analyses that adjusted for relevant clinical and demographic characteristics revealed that relative to whites, patients from American Indian, African American, Hispanic, and Asian heritages demonstrated significant elevations in one or more posttraumatic symptom clusters. A remarkable diversity of heritages was identified, and posttraumatic distress was elevated in ethnic/racial minority patients. Policy-relevant clinical investigations that combine evidence-based treatments, bilingual/bicultural care-management strategies, and support for trauma center organizational capacity building may be required in order to enhance the quality of mental health care for diverse injured trauma survivors.

Strengthening the patient-provider relationship in the aftermath of physical trauma through an understanding of the nature and severity of posttraumatic concerns.

Few investigations have focused on patients' concerns in the immediate aftermath of physical trauma. A population-based sample of 120 hospitalized injury survivors was recruited and followed over the course of the year after injury. Open-ended, semi-structured items were developed to elicit up to three concerns related to the injury from each hospitalized inpatient. Concern narratives were coded into content domains, and concern severity was assessed. Patients most frequently expressed physical health concerns (68%), followed by work and finance (59%), social (44%), psychological (25%), medical (8%), and legal (5%) concerns. The expression of three severe concerns immediately after the trauma was associated with higher PTSD symptoms levels over the course of the year. Greater initial concern severity independently predicted persistent PTSD symptoms 12 months after the injury (Adjusted Relative Risk = 1.71, 95% Confidence Interval = 1.05, 2.78). Early posttraumatic concerns can be readily elicited and reliably interpreted. Psychological concerns constitute a minority of total concerns after physical trauma, and the presence of greater numbers of severe concerns predicts worsening symptomatic course. Incorporation of posttraumatic concern assessments has the potential to simultaneously strengthen the posttraumatic patient-provider relationship and to link patient-centered evaluation with individual and community-level PTSD and functional outcome evaluations.

A randomized effectiveness trial of stepped collaborative care for acutely injured trauma survivors.

CONTEXT: Although posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol abuse frequently occur among acutely injured trauma survivors, few real-world interventions have targeted these disorders. OBJECTIVE: We tested the effectiveness of a multifaceted collaborative care (CC) intervention for PTSD and alcohol abuse. DESIGN: Randomized effectiveness trial. PARTICIPANTS: We recruited a population-based sample of 120 male and female injured surgical inpatients 18 or older at a level I trauma center. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to the CC intervention (n = 59) or the usual care (UC) control condition (n = 61). The CC patients received stepped care that consisted of (1) continuous postinjury case management, (2) motivational interviews targeting alcohol abuse/dependence, and (3) evidence-based pharmacotherapy and/or cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with persistent PTSD at 3 months after injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We used the PTSD symptomatic criteria (PTSD Checklist) at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after injury, and alcohol abuse/dependence (Composite International Diagnostic Interview) at baseline and 6 and 12 months after injury. RESULTS: Random-coefficient regression analyses demonstrated that over time, CC patients were significantly less symptomatic compared with UC patients with regard to PTSD (P =.01) and alcohol abuse/dependence (P =.048). The CC group demonstrated no difference (-0.07%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.2% to 4.3%) in the adjusted rates of change in PTSD from baseline to 12 months, whereas the UC group had a 6% increase (95% CI, 3.1%-9.3%) during the year. The CC group showed on average a decrease in the rate of alcohol abuse/dependence of -24.2% (95% CI, -19.9% to -28.6%), whereas the UC group had on average a 12.9% increase (95% CI, 8.2%-17.7%) during the year. CONCLUSIONS: Early mental health care interventions can be feasibly and effectively delivered from trauma centers. Future investigations that refine routine acute care treatment procedures may improve the quality of mental health care for Americans injured in the wake of individual and mass trauma.

Psychometric properties and utility of the problem severity summary for adults with serious mental illness.

OBJECTIVE: The authors studied the psychometric properties and utility of the Problem Severity Summary (PSS), a 13-item instrument that assesses symptom severity and functioning among adults with severe and persistent mental illness. METHODS: Case managers rated the PSS among more than 1,000 adults with severe and persistent mental illness who were receiving services at either mainstream community mental health centers or specialty community mental health centers (serving various minority groups) in one county in Washington State. A subsample of clients was used to assess the concurrent validity of the PSS with the Psychiatric Symptom Assessment Scale. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was adequate for ten of the 13 PSS items. Four meaningful factors were derived, each with adequate internal consistency: community functioning, negative social behavior, affective distress, and psychotic disturbance. The PSS demonstrated adequate concurrent and predictive validity. Sensitivity of the PSS factors to change showed that scores on three of the four scales changed significantly over one year. Discriminant validity indicated that the PSS is generally unbiased in terms of demographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The PSS is a brief, easily administered instrument that shows psychometric promise for use in clinical contexts, such as treatment planning, concurrent review of care, and guidance for level-of-care decisions, as well as for quality management purposes.

Intersection of Stress, Social Disadvantage, and Life Course Processes: Reframing Trauma and Mental Health.

This paper describes the intersection of converging lines of research on the social structural, psychosocial, and physiological factors involved in the production of stress and implications for the field of mental health. Of particular interest are the stress sensitization consequences stemming from exposure to adversity over the life course. Contemporary stress sensitization theory provides important clinical utility in articulating mechanisms through which these multiple levels exert influence on mental health. Stress sensitization models (a) extend understanding of neurobiological and functional contexts within which extreme stressors operate and (b) make clear how these can influence psychologically traumatic outcomes. The value of interventions that are sensitive to current contexts as well as life course profiles of cumulative stress are illustrated through recent treatment innovations.

Enhancing the population impact of collaborative care interventions: mixed method development and implementation of stepped care targeting posttraumatic stress disorder and related comorbidities after acute trauma.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to develop and implement a stepped collaborative care intervention targeting posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and related comorbidities to enhance the population impact of early trauma-focused interventions. METHOD: We describe the design and implementation of the Trauma Survivors Outcomes and Support study. An interdisciplinary treatment development team was composed of trauma surgical, clinical psychiatric and mental health services "change agents" who spanned the boundaries between frontline trauma center clinical care and acute care policy. Mixed method clinical epidemiologic and clinical ethnographic studies informed the development of PTSD screening and intervention procedures. RESULTS: Two hundred seven acutely injured trauma survivors with high early PTSD symptom levels were randomized into the study. The stepped collaborative care model integrated care management (i.e., posttraumatic concern elicitation and amelioration, motivational interviewing and behavioral activation) with cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy targeting PTSD. The model was feasibly implemented by frontline acute care masters in social work and nurse practioner providers. CONCLUSIONS: Stepped care protocols targeting PTSD may enhance the population impact of early interventions developed for survivors of individual and mass trauma by extending the reach of collaborative care interventions to acute care medical settings and other nonspecialty posttraumatic contexts.

"Disturbing phenomenology" in the pain and engagement narratives of Cambodian American survivors of the Killing Fields.

In the clinical literature on trauma, the atrocity survivor's attempt to engage others around the experience of chronic, intractable pain is often viewed as an instance of "help-seeking," logotherapeutic "coherence-making," or-more darkly-"patient malingering." In this article, I challenge the utility of these rubrics through a close examination of the pain and engagement narratives of two survivors of the Cambodian Killing Fields. I demonstrate that survivor narratives can obtain a strategic multivocality, oscillating between phenomenological account and political critique, between clinical description and moral exhortation. This discursive oscillation, speaking "on and to several different levels of experience at the same time" [Levin DM (1998) Int J Philos Stud 6(3):345-392], radically disturbs the audience's conventional sensibilities and distancing-making moves (for example, crafting totalizing accounts of the meaning of suffering or counterfactually speculating about the survivor's experiences of pain). This disturbance allows the survivor's narrative to function hermeneutically, enabling the audience to glimpse the moral significance of strategic multivocality for the survivor's efforts to engage others while tracing its performative responsibilities and possibilities for ourselves. Reading pain and engagement narratives this way forces us into a place of equivocation and ambiguity that makes possible new configurations of sense, meaning, and response. It is, thus, as disturbing phenomenology that the women's narratives derive their greatest practical power and urgency.

Statistical and consensus-based strategies for grouping consumers in mental health level-of-care schemes.

Mental health Level-of-Care schemes differ in the emphasis placed on statistically based versus consensus-based strategies for delineating consumer groups. Statistical strategies define groups on the basis of empirical distinctions within the caseload. Consensus strategies group consumers according to an a priori framework of consumer characteristics determined by experts to differentiate the appropriate types and intensities of service. This article compares the performance of two grouping strategies-one statistical and one consensus-on three criteria: programmatic relevance, measurement adequacy, and homogeneity of consumer groups. It explores the advantages of integrating elements of each strategy.

Posttraumatic distress, alcohol disorders, and recurrent trauma across level 1 trauma centers.

BACKGROUND: Injured survivors of individual and mass trauma receive their initial evaluation in acute care. Few investigations have comprehensively screened for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and related comorbidities across sites. METHODS: This investigation included 269 randomly selected injury survivors hospitalized at two level 1 trauma centers. All patients were screened for PTSD, depressive, and peritraumatic dissociative symptoms during their surgical inpatient admission. Prior traumatic life events and alcohol abuse/dependence also were assessed. RESULTS: In this study, 58% of the patients demonstrated high levels of immediate posttraumatic distress or alcohol abuse/dependence. Regression analyses identified greater prior trauma, female gender, nonwhite ethnicity, and site as significant independent predictors for high levels of posttraumatic distress. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of posttraumatic distress, recurrent trauma, and alcohol abuse/dependence were present in more than half of acute care inpatients. Early mental health screening and intervention procedures that target both PTSD and alcohol use should be developed for acute care settings.