Orchidopexy for bilateral undescended testes: A multicentre study on its effects on fertility and comparison of two fixation techniques.

To evaluate fertility potential after orchidopexy for bilateral undescended testis and compare two surgical fixation techniques for effect on fertility. Men older than 22 years who had either tunica albuginea orchidopexy (TAO) or "no-touch" technique (NTO) in childhood for bilateral undescended testis (BUDT) were selected. Participants filled out a questionnaire followed by physical examination, had testicular ultrasound, blood sample and semen analysis. Statistical testing was performed using general linear modelling. Sixty-seven out of 166 individuals responded. Forty-nine completed the questionnaire, and nine (18.3%) reported having fathered children. Thirty-six showed up for further examination, 26 had TAO and 10 NTO. Impaired hormonal spermatogenesis regulation (34.6% vs. 20%), higher subfertility rate (46% vs. 20%) and lower means of motile spermatozoa (58.1 × 106 spz vs. 177.9 × 106 spz) were observed in the TAO versus the NTO group; none of these were statistically significant. Four (15.4%) of the TAO and two (20%) of the NTO group have azoospermia. Although the operation technique did not have a significant impact on fertility, unfavourable outcomes were more common after surgery involving the tunica albuginea of the testis. Larger sample sizes are needed to ascertain whether the trends favouring the NTO technique are of any significance.

Productivity of authors in the field of diabetes: bibliographic analysis of trial publications.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether trial publications of glucose lowering drugs are dominated by a small group of highly prolific authors ("supertrialists") and to identify some of their characteristics. DESIGN: Bibliographic analysis of trial publications. DATA SOURCES AND REVIEW METHODS: We searched PubMed for all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) relating to glucose lowering drugs published between 1 January 1993 and 31 December 2013. From these publications we identified the 110 most prolific authors using PubReMiner. The 991 RCTs they published were examined for various characteristics such as author number, commercial sponsorship, company authorship, conflicts of interest, etc. The track record of the top 11 authors was studied in more detail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of articles published by the top 110 and the top 11 authors. RESULTS: 3782 articles from 13,592 authors were identified. The top 110 authors were named in 1227 (32.4%) of all articles, and the top 11 authors in 397 (10.5%) of all articles. The top 110 authors published 991 RCTs for a median of 20 (range 4-77) RCTs per author; the top 11 published 354 RCTs for a median of 42 (36-77) RCTs per author. Of the 110 top authors, 48 were employed by a pharmaceutical company. Of the 991 RCTs, 906 were commercially sponsored. Of 704 articles that could be assessed for conflicts of interest, only 42 (6%) were considered fully independent. Medical writing assistance was acknowledged in 439 (44.3%) of 991 RCTs. CONCLUSION: The past two decades have seen an explosive increase in the number of published clinical trials regarding glucose lowering treatment. Some authors have made a disproportionate contribution to the therapeutic evidence base; one third of the RCT evidence base on glucose lowering drug treatment for diabetes was generated by <: 1% of authors. Of these, 44% were company employees and 56% were academics who work closely with the pharmaceutical companies.