Functional stress imaging to predict abnormal coronary fractional flow reserve: the PACIFIC 2 study.

AIMS: The diagnostic performance of non-invasive imaging in patients with prior coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been tested in prospective head-to-head comparative studies. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of qualitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), quantitative positron emission tomography (PET), and qualitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with a prior myocardial infarction (MI) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective clinical study, all patients with prior MI and/or PCI and new symptoms of ischaemic CAD underwent 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT, [15O]H2O PET, and MRI, followed by invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (FFR) in all coronary arteries. All modalities were interpreted by core laboratories. Haemodynamically significant CAD was defined by at least one coronary artery with an FFR ≤0.80. Among the 189 enrolled patients, 63% had significant CAD. Sensitivity was 67% (95% confidence interval 58-76%) for SPECT, 81% (72-87%) for PET, and 66% (56-75%) for MRI. Specificity was 61% (48-72%) for SPECT, 65% (53-76%) for PET, and 62% (49-74%) for MRI. Sensitivity of PET was higher than SPECT (P = 0.016) and MRI (P = 0.014), whereas specificity did not differ among the modalities. Diagnostic accuracy for PET (75%, 68-81%) did not statistically differ from SPECT (65%, 58-72%, P = 0.03) and MRI (64%, 57-72%, P = 0.052). Using FFR < 0.75 as a reference, accuracies increased to 69% (SPECT), 79% (PET), and 71% (MRI). CONCLUSION: In this prospective head-to-head comparative study, SPECT, PET, and MRI did not show a significantly different accuracy for diagnosing FFR defined significant CAD in patients with prior PCI and/or MI. Overall diagnostic performances, however, were discouraging and the additive value of non-invasive imaging in this high-risk population is questionable.

Effect of Coronary Atherosclerosis and Myocardial Ischemia on Plasma Levels of High-Sensitivity Troponin T and NT-proBNP in Patients With Stable Angina.

OBJECTIVE: Circulating levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are predictors of prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed at evaluating the effect of coronary atherosclerosis and myocardial ischemia on cardiac release of hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP in patients with suspected CAD. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP were measured in 378 patients (60.1±0.5 years, 229 males) with stable angina and unknown CAD enrolled in the Evaluation of Integrated Cardiac Imaging (EVINCI) study. All patients underwent stress imaging to detect myocardial ischemia and coronary computed tomographic angiography to assess the presence and characteristics of CAD. An individual computed tomographic angiography score was calculated combining extent, severity, composition, and location of plaques. In the whole population, the median (25-75 percentiles) value of plasma hs-cTnT was 6.17 (4.2-9.1) ng/L and of NT-proBNP was 61.66 (31.2-132.6) ng/L. In a multivariate model, computed tomographic angiography score was an independent predictor of the plasma hs-cTnT (coefficient 0.06, SE 0.02; P=0.0089), whereas ischemia was a predictor of NT-proBNP (coefficient 0.38, SE 0.12; P=0.0015). Hs-cTnT concentrations were significantly increased in patients with CAD with or without myocardial ischemia (P<0.005), whereas only patients with CAD and ischemia showed significantly higher levels of NT-proBNP (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable angina, the presence and extent of coronary atherosclerosis is related with circulating levels of hs-cTnT, also in the absence of ischemia, suggesting an ischemia-independent mechanism of hs-cTnT release. Obstructive CAD causing myocardial ischemia is associated with increased levels of NT-proBNP.

Variability of radiation doses of cardiac diagnostic imaging tests: the RADIO-EVINCI study (RADIationdOse subproject of the EVINCI study).

BACKGROUND: Patients with coronary artery disease can accumulate significant radiation dose through repeated exposures to coronary computed tomographic angiography, myocardial perfusion imaging with single photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography, and to invasive coronary angiography. Aim of the study was to audit radiation doses of coronary computed tomographic angiography, single photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography and invasive coronary angiography in patients enrolled in the prospective, randomized, multi-centre European study-EVINCI (Evaluation of Integrated Cardiac Imaging for the Detection and Characterization of Ischemic Heart Disease). METHODS: We reviewed 1070 tests (476 coronary computed tomographic angiographies, 85 positron emission tomographies, 310 single photon emission computed tomographies, 199 invasive coronary angiographies) performed in 476 patients (mean age 60 ± 9 years, 60% males) enrolled in 12 centers of the EVINCI. The effective doses were calculated in milli-Sievert (mSv) as median, interquartile range (IQR) and coefficient of variation of the mean. RESULTS: Coronary computed tomographic angiography (476 exams in 12 centers) median effective dose was 9.6 mSv (IQR = 13.2 mSv); single photon emission computed tomography (310 exams in 9 centers) effective dose was 9.3 (IQR = 2.8); positron emission tomography (85 in 3 centers) effective dose 1.8 (IQR = 1.6) and invasive coronary angiography (199 in 9 centers) effective dose 7.4 (IQR = 7.3). Inter-institutional variability was highest for invasive coronary angiography (100%) and coronary computed tomographic angiography (54%) and lowest for single photon emission computed tomography (20%). Intra-institutional variability was highest for invasive coronary angiography (121%) and coronary computed tomographic angiography (115%) and lowest for single photon emission computed tomography (14%). CONCLUSION: Coronary computed tomographic angiography and invasive coronary angiography doses vary substantially between and within centers. The variability in nuclear medicine procedures is substantially lower. The findings highlight the need to audit doses, to track cumulative exposures and to standardize doses for imaging techniques. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol is available at https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00979199 ). Information provided on September 16, 2009.

Nuclear Cardiology Practices and Radiation Exposure in the Oceania Region: Results From the IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Study (INCAPS).

BACKGROUND: There is concern about radiation exposure with radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). This sub-study of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Study reports radiation doses from MPI, and use of dose-optimisation protocols in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ), and compares them with data from the rest of the world. METHODS: Data were collected from 7911 MPI studies performed in 308 laboratories worldwide in one week in 2013, including 439 MPI studies from 34 ANZ laboratories. For each laboratory, effective radiation dose (ED) and a quality index (QI) score (out of 8) based on pre-specified "best practices" was determined. RESULTS: In ANZ patients, ED ranged from 0.9-17.9 milliSievert (mSv). Median ED was similar in ANZ compared with the rest of the world (10.0 (IQR: 6.5-11.7) vs. 10.0 (IQR 6.4-12.6, P=0.15), as were mean QI scores (5.5±0.7 vs. 5.4±1.3, P=0.84). Use of stress-only imaging (17.6% vs. 31.8% of labs, P=0.09) and weight-based dosing of technetium-99m (14.7% vs. 30.3%, P=0.07) was lower in ANZ compared with the rest of the world but this difference was not statistically significant. Median ED was significantly lower in metropolitan versus non-metropolitan laboratories (10.1 mSv vs. 11.6 mSv, P<0.01), although mean QI scores were similar (5.4±0.8 vs. 5.5±0.7, P=0.75). CONCLUSION: Across ANZ, there is variability in ED from MPI, and use of radiation safety practices, particularly between metropolitan and non-metropolitan laboratories. Overall, ANZ laboratories have a similar median ED to laboratories in the rest of the world.

Nuclear cardiology practice and associated radiation doses in Europe: results of the IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Study (INCAPS) for the 27 European countries.

PURPOSE: Nuclear cardiology is widely used to diagnose coronary artery disease and to guide patient management, but data on current practices, radiation dose-related best practices, and radiation doses are scarce. To address these issues, the IAEA conducted a worldwide study of nuclear cardiology practice. We present the European subanalysis. METHODS: In March 2013, the IAEA invited laboratories across the world to document all SPECT and PET studies performed in one week. The data included age, gender, weight, radiopharmaceuticals, injected activities, camera type, positioning, hardware and software. Radiation effective dose was calculated for each patient. A quality score was defined for each laboratory as the number followed of eight predefined best practices with a bearing on radiation exposure (range of quality score 0 - 8). The participating European countries were assigned to regions (North, East, South, and West). Comparisons were performed between the four European regions and between Europe and the rest-of-the-world (RoW). RESULTS: Data on 2,381 European patients undergoing nuclear cardiology procedures in 102 laboratories in 27 countries were collected. A cardiac SPECT study was performed in 97.9 % of the patients, and a PET study in 2.1 %. The average effective dose of SPECT was 8.0 ± 3.4 mSv (RoW 11.4 ± 4.3 mSv; P < 0.001) and of PET was 2.6 ± 1.5 mSv (RoW 3.8 ± 2.5 mSv; P < 0.001). The mean effective doses of SPECT and PET differed between European regions (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). The mean quality score was 6.2 ± 1.2, which was higher than the RoW score (5.0 ± 1.1; P < 0.001). Adherence to best practices did not differ significantly among the European regions (range 6 to 6.4; P = 0.73). Of the best practices, stress-only imaging and weight-adjusted dosing were the least commonly used. CONCLUSION: In Europe, the mean effective dose from nuclear cardiology is lower and the average quality score is higher than in the RoW. There is regional variation in effective dose in relation to the best practice quality score. A possible reason for the differences between Europe and the RoW could be the safety culture fostered by actions under the Euratom directives and the implementation of diagnostic reference levels. Stress-only imaging and weight-adjusted activity might be targets for optimization of European nuclear cardiology practice.

Current worldwide nuclear cardiology practices and radiation exposure: results from the 65 country IAEA Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Cross-Sectional Study (INCAPS).

AIMS: To characterize patient radiation doses from nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and the use of radiation-optimizing 'best practices' worldwide, and to evaluate the relationship between laboratory use of best practices and patient radiation dose. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted an observational cross-sectional study of protocols used for all 7911 MPI studies performed in 308 nuclear cardiology laboratories in 65 countries for a single week in March-April 2013. Eight 'best practices' relating to radiation exposure were identified a priori by an expert committee, and a radiation-related quality index (QI) devised indicating the number of best practices used by a laboratory. Patient radiation effective dose (ED) ranged between 0.8 and 35.6 mSv (median 10.0 mSv). Average laboratory ED ranged from 2.2 to 24.4 mSv (median 10.4 mSv); only 91 (30%) laboratories achieved the median ED ≤ 9 mSv recommended by guidelines. Laboratory QIs ranged from 2 to 8 (median 5). Both ED and QI differed significantly between laboratories, countries, and world regions. The lowest median ED (8.0 mSv), in Europe, coincided with high best-practice adherence (mean laboratory QI 6.2). The highest doses (median 12.1 mSv) and low QI (4.9) occurred in Latin America. In hierarchical regression modelling, patients undergoing MPI at laboratories following more 'best practices' had lower EDs. CONCLUSION: Marked worldwide variation exists in radiation safety practices pertaining to MPI, with targeted EDs currently achieved in a minority of laboratories. The significant relationship between best-practice implementation and lower doses indicates numerous opportunities to reduce radiation exposure from MPI globally.

The diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio and perfusion imaging in patients with prior coronary artery disease.

AIMS: In chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients with documented coronary artery disease (CAD), ischaemia detection by myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and an invasive approach are viable diagnostic strategies. We compared the diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with prior CAD [previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and/or myocardial infarction (MI)]. METHODS AND RESULTS: This PACIFIC-2 sub-study evaluated 189 CCS patients with prior CAD for inclusion. Patients underwent SPECT, PET, and CMR followed by invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements of all major coronary arteries (N = 567), except for vessels with a sub-total or chronic total occlusion. Quantitative flow ratio computation was attempted in 488 (86%) vessels with measured FFR available (FFR ≤0.80 defined haemodynamically significant CAD). Quantitative flow ratio analysis was successful in 334 (68%) vessels among 166 patients and demonstrated a higher accuracy (84%) and sensitivity (72%) compared with SPECT (66%, P < 0.001 and 46%, P = 0.001), PET (65%, P < 0.001 and 58%, P = 0.032), and CMR (72%, P < 0.001 and 33%, P < 0.001). The specificity of QFR (87%) was similar to that of CMR (83%, P = 0.123) but higher than that of SPECT (71%, P < 0.001) and PET (67%, P < 0.001). Lastly, QFR exhibited a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.89) than SPECT (0.57, P < 0.001), PET (0.66, P < 0.001), and CMR (0.60, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: QFR correlated better with FFR in patients with prior CAD than MPI, as reflected in the higher diagnostic performance measures for detecting FFR-defined, vessel-specific, significant CAD.

Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Europe 2007: a survey of the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology.

PURPOSE: This is the second of a series of surveys designed to assess myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) practice in Europe. METHODS: Data were collected from 258 centres in 18 countries. The number of MPS studies per million population (pmp) was estimated assuming that the nonresponding centres performed either no studies (lower estimate) or the same number as the responding centres (upper estimate). RESULTS: The responding centres served 24% of the population of their countries. The total number of noncardiac nuclear medicine studies was between 2,160 and 8,000 studies pmp. The total number of MPS studies was between 529 and 2,293 pmp. The median number of MPS studies per centre was 571 per year with 57% performing fewer than 500 studies per year and 23% of centres performing fewer than 250 studies per year. There was significant variation between countries, with higher numbers of MPS studies (lower limit of estimate above the mid-range of all countries combined) in Austria, Denmark, Hungary, Portugal and Slovenia, and lower numbers (upper limit of estimate below the mid-range of all countries) in Finland, Norway, Spain and Switzerland. The ratio of MPS to coronary angiography to revascularization procedures was 0.9 to 2.2 to 1. Pharmacological stress was used in 57% and technetium-99m-labelled tracers in 88% of studies. ECG gating was performed in 74% of studies and attenuation correction in 22%. CONCLUSION: MPS utilization in Europe remains low compared with coronary angiography although there has been a 21% increase in the number of studies pmp in centres that reported in both 2005 and 2007. Pharmacological agents continue to be the predominant form of stress. Despite the widespread use of technetium-99m-labelled tracers, ECG gating is not universally performed. As in the 2005 survey, imaging aids such as attenuation and motion correction and prone imaging are not commonly used.

Effect of body mass index on the efficacy, side effect profile, and plasma concentration of fixed-dose regadenoson for myocardial perfusion imaging.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the effect of body mass index (BMI) on the actions of fixed-dose regadenoson. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of BMI on the efficacy, side effects, and plasma concentration of regadenoson for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI). METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 2,015 subjects from the ADVANCE MPI trials. Initial adenosine MPI was followed by randomization to regadenoson (400-µg bolus injection) or adenosine (6-minute infusion) MPI. Subjects were classified according to BMI into six categories from underweight (<20 kg/m(2)) to extremely obese (≥40 kg/m(2)). PK modeling was used to predict the effect of BMI on plasma regadenoson concentration (PRC). Adenosine-regadenoson agreement rates for the presence and extent of reversibility were similar across BMI categories (P > .05). The incidence of side effects was also similar across BMIs (P ≥ .06). Subjects were less likely to feel very or extremely uncomfortable after regadenoson vs adenosine in all groups with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2), but this trend was not statistically significant in subjects with BMI 20-24 kg/m(2) (P > .05). PRC was inversely related to BMI with 19% higher PRC in the underweight and 36% lower PRC in the extremely obese compared with a normal weight subject. CONCLUSIONS: BMI does not alter the efficacy of regadenoson MPI despite lower PRC in high BMI subjects, or its side effect profile despite higher PRC in low BMI subjects. Regadenoson is better tolerated than adenosine but this benefit seems to lose statistical significance in subjects with BMI < 25 kg/m(2).

Worldwide Variation in the Use of Nuclear Cardiology Camera Technology, Reconstruction Software, and Imaging Protocols.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe worldwide variations in the use of myocardial perfusion imaging hardware, software, and imaging protocols and their impact on radiation effective dose (ED). BACKGROUND: Concerns about long-term effects of ionizing radiation have prompted efforts to identify strategies for dose optimization in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Studies have increasingly shown opportunities for dose reduction using newer technologies and optimized protocols. METHODS: Data were submitted voluntarily to the INCAPS (International Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Study) registry, a multinational, cross-sectional study comprising 7,911 imaging studies from 308 labs in 65 countries. The study compared regional use of camera technologies, advanced post-processing software, and protocol characteristics and analyzed the influence of each factor on ED. RESULTS: Cadmium-zinc-telluride and positron emission tomography (PET) cameras were used in 10% (regional range 0% to 26%) and 6% (regional range 0% to 17%) of studies worldwide. Attenuation correction was used in 26% of cases (range 10% to 57%), and advanced post-processing software was used in 38% of cases (range 26% to 64%). Stress-first single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging comprised nearly 20% of cases from all world regions, except North America, where it was used in just 7% of cases. Factors associated with lower ED and odds ratio for achieving radiation dose ≤9 mSv included use of cadmium-zinc-telluride, PET, advanced post-processing software, and stress- or rest-only imaging. Overall, 39% of all studies (97% PET and 35% SPECT) were ≤9 mSv, while just 6% of all studies (32% PET and 4% SPECT) achieved a dose ≤3 mSv. CONCLUSIONS: Newer-technology cameras, advanced software, and stress-only protocols were associated with reduced ED, but worldwide adoption of these practices was generally low and varied significantly between regions. The implementation of dose-optimizing technologies and protocols offers an opportunity to reduce patient radiation exposure across all world regions.

Worldwide Diagnostic Reference Levels for Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Findings From INCAPS.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to establish worldwide and regional diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and achievable administered activities (AAAs) for single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). BACKGROUND: Reference levels serve as radiation dose benchmarks to compare individual laboratories against aggregated data, helping to identify sites in greatest need of dose reduction interventions. DRLs for SPECT MPI have previously been derived from national or regional registries. To date there have been no multiregional reports of DRLs for SPECT MPI from a single standardized dataset. METHODS: Data were submitted voluntarily to the INCAPS (International Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear Cardiology Protocols Study), a cross-sectional, multinational registry of MPI protocols. A total of 7,103 studies were included. DRLs and AAAs were calculated by protocol for each world region and for aggregated worldwide data. RESULTS: The aggregated worldwide DRLs for rest-stress or stress-rest studies employing technetium Tc 99m-labeled radiopharmaceuticals were 11.2 mCi (first dose) and 32.0 mCi (second dose) for 1-day protocols, and 23.0 mCi (first dose) and 24.0 mCi (second dose) for multiday protocols. Corresponding AAAs were 10.1 mCi (first dose) and 28.0 mCi (second dose) for 1-day protocols, and 17.8 mCi (first dose) and 18.7 mCi (second dose) for multiday protocols. For stress-only technetium Tc 99m studies, the worldwide DRL and AAA were 18.0 mCi and 12.5 mCi, respectively. Stress-first imaging was used in 26% to 92% of regional studies except in North America where it was used in just 7% of cases. Significant differences in DRLs and AAAs were observed between regions. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports reference levels for SPECT MPI for each major world region from one of the largest international registries of clinical MPI studies. Regional DRLs may be useful in establishing or revising guidelines or simply comparing individual laboratory protocols to regional trends. Organizations should continue to focus on establishing standardized reporting methods to improve the validity and comparability of regional DRLs.

Anatomical and functional coronary imaging to predict long-term outcome in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the EVINCI-outcome study.

AIMS: To investigate the prognostic relevance of coronary anatomy, coronary function, and early revascularization in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: From March 2009 to June 2012, 430 patients with suspected CAD (61 ± 9 years, 62% men) underwent coronary anatomical imaging by computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and coronary functional imaging followed by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) if at least one non-invasive test was abnormal. Obstructive CAD was documented by ICA in 119 patients and 90 were revascularized within 90 days of enrolment. Core laboratory analysis showed that 134 patients had obstructive CAD by CTCA (>50% stenosis in major coronary vessels) and 79 significant ischaemia by functional imaging [>10% left ventricular (LV) myocardium]. Over mean follow-up of 4.4 years, major adverse events (AEs) (all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or hospital admission for unstable angina or heart failure) or AEs plus late revascularization (LR) occurred in 40 (9.3%) and 58 (13.5%) patients, respectively. Obstructive CAD at CTCA was the only independent imaging predictor of AEs [hazard ratio (HR) 3.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-9.30; P = 0.033] and AEs plus LR (HR 4.3, 95% CI 1.56-11.81; P = 0.005). Patients with CAD in whom early revascularization was performed in the presence of ischaemia and deferred in its absence had fewer AEs, similar to patients without CAD (HR 2.0, 95% CI 0.71-5.51; P = 0.195). CONCLUSION: Obstructive CAD imaged by CTCA is an independent predictor of clinical outcome. Early management of CAD targeted to the combined anatomical and functional disease phenotype improves clinical outcome.

Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Europe 2005: a survey of the European Council on Nuclear Cardiology.

PURPOSE: We have conducted a survey of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in 2005 in Europe with the intention of initiating a regular series of surveys to track usage of the technique. METHODS: Information was obtained from 234 centres in 18 counties. The returning centres served 27% of the population of their countries, and estimates of the numbers of MPS per million of population (pmp) were made assuming that the population not reported either performed no studies (lower estimate) or the same number pmp as the reporting centres (upper estimate). RESULTS: Estimates of MPS for the countries surveyed ranged from a lower limit of 373 pmp to an upper limit of 1,388 pmp. There were marked variations between countries with higher numbers (lower limit of estimate above the mid range of all countries combined) in Austria, Greece, Hungary, The Netherlands, Sweden and Slovenia, and lower numbers (upper limit of estimate below the mid range of all countries) in Finland, Germany and Poland. The ratio of MPS to coronary angiography to revascularisation procedures was 0.6 to 1.5 to 1. The median number of studies per centre was 496, with 32% of centres performing fewer than 250 studies in the year. The median waiting time for routine studies was 21 days and for urgent studies 3.4 days. Fifty-three percent of studies used pharmacological stress, with roughly equal numbers of adenosine and dipyridamole. Eighty-two percent of studies used (99m)Tc-based tracers. Tomographic acquisition was almost universal with 65% of studies being ECG-gated and 20% attenuation-corrected. Eighteen percent of studies were reported from hard copy alone, and 60% of studies were reported without viewing the rotating planar data. CONCLUSION: We conclude that relatively low numbers of MPS studies are being performed in the surveyed centres, particularly when compared with coronary angiography and revascularisation. The use of (99m)Tc-based tracers is high, but ECG-gated studies are less common. Some reporting practices are not ideal. These data will serve as a valuable baseline for future surveys, which are likely to be more complete.

Adenosine single-photon emission computed tomography-derived transient ischemic dilatation and ejection fraction reserve fail to predict multivessel coronary artery disease.

Next to myocardial perfusion, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) also allows for the assessment of nonperfusion parameters such as transient ischemic dilatation (TID) and a reduction of ejection fraction (EF) with stress imaging. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of TID and EF reserve for the detection of significant multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). A total of 206 patients with suspected stable CAD prospectively underwent gated stress-rest Tc-tetrofosmin SPECT and invasive coronary angiography with routine fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements, irrespective of imaging results. Left ventricular volumes, TID, and EF reserve were assessed and compared with FFR-defined severity of CAD. According to FFR, 92 (45%) patients had significant CAD, whereas 25 (12%) showed 2-vessel disease (VD) and 22 (11%) showed 3-VD. With an increasing extent of CAD, TID values and EF reserve did not change significantly (P=0.07 and 0.42 for trend, respectively). Conversely, absolute left ventricular volumes and EF differed significantly among groups of CAD severity (P<0.01 for all trends). SPECT-derived TID and EF reserve did not differ between patients with high-risk CAD (3-VD) and low risk or no significant CAD. Therefore, the present results advocate exerting caution when using these ancillary findings in clinical practice.

Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) computation from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) datasets (FFRCT) has emerged as a promising noninvasive test to assess hemodynamic severity of coronary artery disease (CAD), but has not yet been compared with traditional functional imaging. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FFRCT and compare it with coronary CTA, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and positron emission tomography (PET) for ischemia diagnosis. METHODS: This subanalysis involved 208 prospectively included patients with suspected stable CAD, who underwent 256-slice coronary CTA, 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT, [15O]H2O PET, and routine 3-vessel invasive FFR measurements. FFRCT values were retrospectively derived from the coronary CTA images. Images from each modality were interpreted by core laboratories, and their diagnostic performances were compared using invasively measured FFR ≤0.80 as the reference standard. RESULTS: In total, 505 of 612 (83%) vessels could be evaluated with FFRCT. FFRCT showed a diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 87%, 90%, and 86% on a per-vessel basis and 78%, 96%, and 63% on a per-patient basis, respectively. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) for identification of ischemia-causing lesions was significantly greater for FFRCT (0.94 and 0.92) in comparison with coronary CTA (0.83 and 0.81; p < 0.01 for both) and SPECT (0.70 and 0.75; p < 0.01 for both), on a per-vessel and -patient level, respectively. FFRCT also outperformed PET on a per-vessel basis (AUC 0.87; p < 0.01), but not on a per-patient basis (AUC 0.91; p = 0.56). In the intention-to-diagnose analysis, PET showed the highest per-patient and -vessel AUC followed by FFRCT (0.86 vs. 0.83; p = 0.157; and 0.90 vs. 0.79; p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, FFRCT showed higher diagnostic performance than standard coronary CTA, SPECT, and PET for vessel-specific ischemia, provided coronary CTA images were evaluable by FFRCT, whereas PET had a favorable performance in per-patient and intention-to-diagnose analysis. Still, in patients in whom 3-vessel FFRCT could be analyzed, FFRCT holds clinical potential to provide anatomic and hemodynamic significance of coronary lesions.

Comparison of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for assessment of global and regional myocardial function and infarction in patients with low to intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) has the potential to assess both coronary anatomy and ventricular function in a single study. We examined the agreement between CCT and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) for the assessment of global and regional ventricular function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Research CCT was performed in 52 patients with a low to intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease referred for MPS. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular end-systolic volume, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and myocardial wall motion and thickening were compared between techniques. In addition, myocardial contrast attenuation on CCT was compared with radiotracer uptake on MPS. LVEF values agreed well (mean difference, 4.1%; SD, 15.13%), but CCT left ventricular end-diastolic volume was greater compared with MPS (mean difference, 46.0 mL; SD, 33.34 mL) (P < .001). There was moderate agreement for segmental myocardial motion and thickening, with kappa values of 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.63) and 0.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.53), respectively. Seventeen patients had hypoattenuation in at least 1 myocardial segment on CCT. Three of four patients with concomitant abnormalities of wall motion and thickening on CCT had infarction in the same territory on MPS. CONCLUSIONS: There was good agreement for LVEF between CCT and MPS but myocardial volumes differed, and these modalities cannot be used interchangeably. Mild abnormalities of regional function are detected more commonly by CCT than by MPS. Myocardial hypoattenuation on CCT is highly specific for myocardial infarction when associated with reduction of systolic wall thickening and regional wall motion abnormality.

Sixty-four-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis of functionally significant coronary stenoses in patients with a low to intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTA) was proposed as a method for investigating possible coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients who present with chest pain but with a low to intermediate likelihood of CAD. Sixty-four-channel CTA was compared prospectively with (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) (as the gold standard in the detection of flow-limiting stenoses) for the detection of functionally significant CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-two consecutive symptomatic patients with a low to intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease, and who were referred for MPS, also underwent CTA. The CTA datasets were analyzed by two experienced observers who were blinded to the MPS data, and coronary artery segments were reported as < 50%, 50% to 69%, 70% to 99% stenoses, or occluded. The MPS images were similarly analyzed for inducible perfusion abnormalities, and coronary territories were identified. At the patient level, agreement between CTA and MPS for CTA lesions at >/= 50% was 87% (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 84%; positive predictive value, 50%; negative predictive value, 100%). For CTA lesions, agreement at >/= 70% was 96% (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 98%; positive predictive value, 86%; negative predictive value, 98%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a low to intermediate likelihood of CAD, there is good correlation between MPS and CTA for the detection of functionally significant coronary artery stenoses when CTA detects a narrowing of >/= 70% severity. Computed tomography coronary angiography stenoses of 70% should be used to determine functional significance, and not 50%, as is the usual practice at present.

Side effect profile and tolerability of adenosine myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with mild asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Adenosine may cause bronchoconstriction in subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Recent evidence suggests that this effect may be dependent on the severity of disease. This study investigates the tolerability of adenosine stress in patients with mild asthma or COPD undergoing myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this case-control study patients with known or suspected mild asthma or COPD were pretreated with an inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonist and adenosine titrated up to the maximal dose of 140 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) over a period of 6 minutes. The occurrence of side effects and test tolerability were compared between the airway disease group and 72 control subjects. Of 1261 patients, 124 had known or suspected airway disease; of these, 72 (58%) were suitable for adenosine stress. The proportion of tests completed as per protocol in the asthma/COPD group was similar to that of control subjects (93% vs 100%, P = .06). Dyspnea (n = 38 [53%] in asthma/COPD group vs n = 25 [35%] in control group, P = .03) and chest pain (n = 14 [19%] in asthma/COPD group vs n = 16 [22%] in control group, P = .7) were the most common side effects, and these were mostly mild and well tolerated. Bronchospasm occurred in 5 patients with asthma/COPD but reverted shortly after discontinuation of the adenosine infusion. Aminophylline was not required in any case. CONCLUSIONS: A stepwise 6-minute adenosine infusion with prophylactic beta(2)-adrenergic agonist is safe and well tolerated in patients with mild asthma or COPD.