Prenatal and infantile diagnosis of craniosynostosis in individuals with RASopathies.

Fetuses with RASopathies can have a wide variety of anomalies including increased nuchal translucency, hydrops fetalis, and structural anomalies (typically cardiac and renal). There are few reports that describe prenatal-onset craniosynostosis in association with a RASopathy diagnosis. We present clinical and molecular characteristics of five individuals with RASopathy and craniosynostosis. Two were diagnosed with craniosynostosis prenatally, 1 was diagnosed as a neonate, and 2 had evidence of craniosynostosis noted as neonates without formal diagnosis until later. Two of these individuals have Noonan syndrome (PTPN11 and KRAS variants) and three individuals have Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome (KRAS variants). Three individuals had single suture synostosis and two had multiple suture involvement. The most common sutures involved were sagittal (n = 3), followed by coronal (n = 3), and lambdoid (n = 2) sutures. This case series confirms craniosynostosis as one of the prenatal findings in individuals with RASopathies and emphasizes the importance of considering a RASopathy diagnosis in fetuses with multiple anomalies in combination with craniosynostosis.

Factors that influence the management recommendations breast surgeons provide to women with pathogenic variants in moderate penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Pathogenic variants in moderate penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes, such as ATM and CHEK2, confer a two- to five-fold increased lifetime risk for breast cancer. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network has guidelines for breast surgeons to utilize when counseling women with pathogenic variants in these genes; however, previous studies indicate that other factors impact breast surgeons' recommendations to patients. This study investigated factors influencing management recommendations presented by breast surgeons to women with pathogenic variants in moderate penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with breast surgeons practicing in Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana. A total of 15 breast surgeons from eight different hospitals participated in five focus groups and three individual interviews. Participants discussed factors they consider when making management recommendations for risk reduction in women with pathogenic variants in moderate penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes. Participants provided risk management recommendations for given scenarios. Patient motivation/opinion, family history, patient current health status, patient personal preference, and patient anxiety level were among the most common factors mentioned. It appeared that how these factors are valued and applied in practice varies. There was no consensus among breast surgeons on which risk-reducing management options they would recommend in each scenario. There are many factors breast surgeons take into consideration when making recommendations for this patient population. This information could inform future research on decision making around treatment for individuals with pathogenic variants in moderate penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes.