Influence of pre-operative oral carbohydrate loading vs. standard fasting on tumor proliferation and clinical outcome in breast cancer patients ─ a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting results have been reported on the influence of carbohydrates in breast cancer. OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of pre-operative per-oral carbohydrate load on proliferation in breast tumors. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University hospital with primary and secondary care functions in South-West Norway. PATIENTS: Sixty-one patients with operable breast cancer from a population-based cohort. INTERVENTION: Per-oral carbohydrate load (preOp™) 18 and 2-4 h before surgery (n = 26) or standard pre-operative fasting with free consumption of tap water (n = 35). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was post-operative tumor proliferation measured by the mitotic activity index (MAI). The secondary outcomes were changes in the levels of serum insulin, insulin-c-peptide, glucose, IGF-1, and IGFBP3; patients' well-being, and clinical outcome over a median follow-up of 88 months (range 33-97 months). RESULTS: In the estrogen receptor (ER) positive subgroup (n = 50), high proliferation (MAI ≥ 10) occurred more often in the carbohydrate group (CH) than in the fasting group (p = 0.038). The CH group was more frequently progesterone receptor (PR) negative (p = 0.014). The CH group had a significant increase in insulin (+ 24.31 mIE/L, 95% CI 15.34 mIE/L to 33.27 mIE/L) and insulin c-peptide (+ 1.39 nM, 95% CI 1.03 nM to 1.77 nM), but reduced IGFBP3 levels (- 0.26 nM; 95% CI - 0.46 nM to - 0.051 nM) compared to the fasting group. CH-intervention ER-positive patients had poorer relapse-free survival (73%) than the fasting group (100%; p = 0.012; HR = 9.3, 95% CI, 1.1 to 77.7). In the ER-positive patients, only tumor size (p = 0.021; HR = 6.07, 95% CI 1.31 to 28.03) and the CH/fasting subgrouping (p = 0.040; HR = 9.30, 95% CI 1.11 to 77.82) had independent prognostic value. The adverse clinical outcome of carbohydrate loading occurred only in T2 patients with relapse-free survival of 100% in the fasting group vs. 33% in the CH group (p = 0.015; HR = inf). The CH group reported less pain on days 5 and 6 than the control group (p <  0.001) but otherwise exhibited no factors related to well-being. LIMITATION: Only applicable to T2 tumors in patients with ER-positive breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative carbohydrate load increases proliferation and PR-negativity in ER-positive patients and worsens clinical outcome in ER-positive T2 patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CliniTrials.gov; NCT03886389. Retrospectively registered March 22, 2019.

Metabolic consequences of perioperative oral carbohydrates in breast cancer patients - an explorative study.

BACKGROUND: The metabolic consequences of preoperative carbohydrate load in breast cancer patients are not known. The present explorative study investigated the systemic and tumor metabolic changes after preoperative per-oral carbohydrate load and their influence on tumor characteristics and survival. METHODS: The study setting was on university hospital level with primary and secondary care functions in south-west Norway. Serum and tumor tissue were sampled from a population-based cohort of 60 patients with operable breast cancer who were randomized to either per-oral carbohydrate load (preOp™; n = 25) or standard pre-operative fasting (n = 35) before surgery. Magnetic resonance (MR) metabolomics was performed on serum samples from all patients and high-resolution magic angle spinning (HR-MAS) MR analysis on 13 tumor samples available from the fasting group and 16 tumor samples from the carbohydrate group. RESULTS: Fourteen of 28 metabolites were differently expressed between fasting and carbohydrate groups. Partial least squares discriminant analysis showed a significant difference in the metabolic profile between the fasting and carbohydrate groups, compatible with the endocrine effects of insulin (i.e., increased serum-lactate and pyruvate and decreased ketone bodies and amino acids in the carbohydrate group). Among ER-positive tumors (n = 18), glutathione was significantly elevated in the carbohydrate group compared to the fasting group (p = 0.002), with a positive correlation between preoperative S-insulin levels and the glutathione content in tumors (r = 0.680; p = 0.002). In all tumors (n = 29), glutamate was increased in tumors with high proliferation (t-test; p = 0.009), independent of intervention group. Moreover, there was a positive correlation between tumor size and proliferation markers in the carbohydrate group only. Patients with ER-positive / T2 tumors and high tumor glutathione (≥1.09), high S-lactate (≥56.9), and high S-pyruvate (≥12.5) had inferior clinical outcomes regarding relapse-free survival, breast cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. Moreover, Integrated Pathway Analysis (IPA) in serum revealed activation of five major anabolic metabolic networks contributing to proliferation and growth. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative carbohydrate load increases systemic levels of lactate and pyruvate and tumor levels of glutathione and glutamate in ER-positive patients. These biological changes may contribute to the inferior clinical outcomes observed in luminal T2 breast cancer patients. TRIAL OF REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03886389. Retrospectively registered March 22, 2019.

In vitro cultivation of adherent cells on microscope slides for downstream applications.

In vitro studies with cultured cells are often conducted as an important part of basic research. Adherent cells are typically cultivated in flasks or trays, for which cell staining and subsequent visualization become impractical. We here present a simple step-by-step method for growing adherent cells directly on glass microscope slides, using low-cost equipment readily available in most laboratories. Most parameters such as type of microscope slide (e.g. surface coating), cell seeding concentrations and incubation times can be adjusted according to cell line characteristics and experimental aims, reflecting the methods' flexibility. Through our experiments, microscope slides proved to provide an acceptable surface for cell adhesion and growth of the tested cell lines, as well as being robust and functional with respect to downstream procedures. The method can potentially be combined with different techniques for visualization of experimental effects, such as histological staining methods, fluorescent staining, and immunochemistry. In our method development we have successfully cultivated three different cell lines directly on microscope slides - Atlantic salmon kidney cells (ASK), rainbow trout gill cells (RTgill-W1), and human cancerous lung cells (A549) - and subjected them to various experimental treatments. Finally, as proof-of-concept we provide examples of successful histological staining of the fixed cells. Experimental design in short:•Cultivate cells and calculate cell concentration•Seed a small volume of growth medium with an appropriate number of cells on microscope slide in an area confined by hydrophobic marker•Let cells adhere over night before adding more growth medium or directly conducting experiments and fixing cells for downstream applications.

Assessing the prognostic value of PAX2 and PTEN in endometrial carcinogenesis.

In order to avoid the consequences of over- and under-treatment of endometrial hyperplasia, diagnostic accuracy and progression risk assessment must be improved. The aim of this study was to assess whether PAX2 or PTEN expression could predict progression-free survival in endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC). Immunohistochemistry for detection of PAX2 and PTEN was performed on 348 endometrial samples; 75 proliferative endometrium (PE), 36 EIN and 237 EEC. Cases classified as PTEN null (1 or more glands negatively stained) were more prevalent in EEC than in PE and EIN (64% EEC vs 11% PE/EIN). A progressive decrease in PAX2 expression was observed from PE to EIN to EEC. Long-term clinical follow-up (6-310 months, median: 126) was available for 62 PE cases, all 36 EIN cases and 178 EEC cases. No patients with PE demonstrated progression to EIN or EEC. Progression of disease was observed in 10 (28%) EIN patients. These patients had significantly lower PAX2 expression than those that regressed (P = 0.005). Progression-free survival analysis revealed that EIN patients with a high-risk PAX2 expression score (H-score ≤75) had a higher probability of progression of disease in comparison to those with a low-risk score (H-score >75). PAX2 expression was not prognostic in EEC nor was PTEN status of prognostic value in either EIN or EEC. PAX2 expression analysis by means of H-score has prognostic potential for the identification of high-risk progression cases in EIN but needs to be validated in a larger cohort.