Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma: results from KEYNOTE-045 and KEYNOTE-052 after up to 5 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are a standard therapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). Long-term follow-up is necessary to confirm durability of response and identify further safety concerns. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In KEYNOTE-045, patients with metastatic UC that progressed on platinum-containing chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab or investigator's choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival. In KEYNOTE-052, cisplatin-ineligible patients with metastatic UC received first-line pembrolizumab. The primary endpoint was objective response rate per RECIST version 1.1 by BICR. RESULTS: A total of 542 patients (pembrolizumab, n = 270; chemotherapy, n = 272) were randomly assigned in KEYNOTE-045. The median follow-up was 62.9 months (range 58.6-70.9 months; data cut-off 1 October 2020). At 48 months, overall survival rates were 16.7% for pembrolizumab and 10.1% for chemotherapy; progression-free survival rates were 9.5% and 2.7%, respectively. The median duration of response (DOR) was 29.7 months (range 1.6+ to 60.5+ months) for pembrolizumab and 4.4 months (range 1.4+ to 63.1+ months) for chemotherapy; 36-month DOR rates were 44.4% and 28.3%, respectively. A total of 370 patients were enrolled in KEYNOTE-052. The median follow-up was 56.3 months (range 51.2-65.3 months; data cut-off 26 September 2020). The confirmed objective response rate was 28.9% (95% confidence interval 24.3-33.8), and the median DOR was 33.4 months (range 1.4+ to 60.7+ months); the 36-month DOR rate was 44.8%. Most treatment-related adverse events for pembrolizumab in either study were grade 1 or 2 and manageable, which is consistent with prior reports. CONCLUSION: With ∼5 years of follow-up, pembrolizumab monotherapy continued to demonstrate durable efficacy with no new safety signals in patients with platinum-resistant metastatic UC and as first-line therapy in cisplatin-ineligible patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY AND ID: With ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02256436 (KEYNOTE-045); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02256436 and NCT02335424 (KEYNOTE-052); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02335424.

Randomized phase III KEYNOTE-045 trial of pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine in recurrent advanced urothelial cancer: results of >2 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Novel second-line treatments are needed for patients with advanced urothelial cancer (UC). Interim analysis of the phase III KEYNOTE-045 study showed a superior overall survival (OS) benefit of pembrolizumab, a programmed death 1 inhibitor, versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced UC that progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy. Here we report the long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of KEYNOTE-045. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed UC whose disease progressed after first-line, platinum-containing chemotherapy were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive pembrolizumab [200 mg every 3 weeks (Q3W)] or investigator's choice of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 Q3W), docetaxel (75 mg/m2 Q3W), or vinflunine (320 mg/m2 Q3W). Primary end points were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) by blinded independent central radiology review (BICR). A key secondary end point was objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 by BICR. RESULTS: A total of 542 patients were enrolled (pembrolizumab, n = 270; chemotherapy, n = 272). Median follow-up as of 26 October 2017 was 27.7 months. Median 1- and 2-year OS rates were higher with pembrolizumab (44.2% and 26.9%, respectively) than chemotherapy (29.8% and 14.3%, respectively). PFS rates did not differ between treatment arms; however, 1- and 2-year PFS rates were higher with pembrolizumab. The objective response rate was also higher with pembrolizumab (21.1% versus 11.0%). Median duration of response to pembrolizumab was not reached (range 1.6+ to 30.0+ months) versus chemotherapy (4.4 months; range 1.4+ to 29.9+ months). Pembrolizumab had lower rates of any grade (62.0% versus 90.6%) and grade ≥3 (16.5% versus 50.2%) treatment-related adverse events than chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results (>2 years' follow-up) were consistent with those of previously reported analyses, demonstrating continued clinical benefit of pembrolizumab over chemotherapy for efficacy and safety for treatment of locally advanced/metastatic, platinum-refractory UC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02256436.

Sleep and daily functioning during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

A limited body of evidence suggests that sleep problems are common in prostate cancer patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy, yet little is known about sleep characteristics and the effects of poor sleep on daily functioning in this population. This study assessed sleep in 60 prostate cancer patients taking androgen deprivation therapy with wrist actigraphy and daily diaries for 7 days. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the general version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale were also administered. On average, total sleep time was 5.9 (SD = 1.4) h, and sleep efficiency was 75% (SD = 12.0) as assessed by actigraphy. There was generally poor concordance between actigraphy and daily diary for most sleep metrics. Subjects reported awakening, on average, 2.7 times per night, most commonly for nocturia and hot flashes. Assessment of daily functioning showed that participants had mild daytime sleepiness, which was predicted by total sleep time (F(1,47) = 4.5, P= 0.04) General quality of life was not impaired. This study supports more research on the predictors of poor sleep in order to identify effective interventions.

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin in advanced carcinoma of the urothelium: an active and tolerable outpatient regimen.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicity and efficacy of an outpatient regimen of paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelium. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received paclitaxel 150 to 225 mg/m2 over 3 hours followed by carboplatin (targeted area under the concentration-time curve [AUC], 6 mg/mL x min) every 3 weeks. During phase I accrual, 16 patients were treated; 17 additional patients were enrolled at the phase II dose. The median age was 70 years (range, 47 to 82). The median serum creatinine concentration was 1.1 mg/dL (range, 0.7 to 2.7) and the median estimated creatinine clearance was 52 mL/min (range, 24 to 110). RESULTS: During phase I accrual, the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of the regimen was not defined. Phase II accrual occurred at the paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 dose level. A total of 156 cycles were administered. The median number of cycles received was five (range, one to eight). Sensorimotor neuropathy was the principal nonhematologic toxicity. Significant granulocytopenia was common, but significant thrombocytopenia was not. Objective responses were demonstrated at all dose levels. At the phase II dose (paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 followed by carboplatin at AUC 6 mg/mL x min), the objective response rate was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28% to 72%). CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel plus carboplatin is an active and tolerable outpatient treatment for patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelium. The ability to administer this combination over multiple cycles even to patients with advanced age and abnormal renal function makes it well suited for this patient population. Confirmatory trials of this regimen are ongoing.

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase I trial of protracted venous infusion fluorouracil plus weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer: a regimen with unexpected early toxicity.

PURPOSE: We performed a phase I trial of protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) plus weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of gemcitabine that could be safely administered. We also sought to identify the toxicities associated with this treatment protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer were treated with planned doses of radiation (59.4 Gy) and PVI of 5-FU (200 mg/m(2)/d) with gemcitabine doses of 50 to 100 mg/m(2)/wk. RESULTS: Two of three patients at the 100-mg/m(2)/wk dose level experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), as did three of four at the 50-mg/m(2)/wk dose level. One patient experienced a mucocutaneous reaction described as a Stevens-Johnson syndrome that was attributed to chemotherapy. Three patients developed gastric or duodenal ulcers with severe bleeding requiring transfusion. One patient developed severe thrombocytopenia lasting longer than 4 weeks. Three of the five episodes of DLT developed at radiation doses < or = 36 Gy. CONCLUSION: Based on this experience, we cannot recommend further investigation of regimens incorporating gemcitabine into regimens of radiation with PVI 5-FU. The mechanism of this synergistic toxicity remains to be determined.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin in bladder cancer: recent developments.

Paclitaxel demonstrates significant single-agent activity in advanced urothelial carcinoma. Paclitaxel/carboplatin is an active and tolerable outpatient chemotherapy treatment regimen for these patients. This regimen has been studied in several phase II trials with response rates ranging from 14 to 65%. Paclitaxel/carboplatin may be considered in patients with advanced urothelial cancer and renal insufficiency, and a recent Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) phase II trial investigates this regimen specifically in this patient population. Ongoing ECOG trials are comparing paclitaxel/carboplatin with M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin) in both the advanced disease and adjuvant settings.

Review and outlook for the role of paclitaxel in urothelial carcinoma.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) is an active agent in the treatment of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. The lack of nephrotoxicity and the ability to administer this agent to select patients with renal insufficiency provide potential advantages over the standard cisplatin-based regimens in this patient population. Paclitaxel-based combination regimens have recently been developed and reported. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin is an active and tolerable outpatient regimen for patients with advanced urothelial cancer. Ongoing cooperative group trials will help to further define the activity and toxicity of this regimen in previously untreated patients, patients with prior treatment, and patients with abnormal renal function. A cooperative group trial will compare paclitaxel plus carboplatin with the cisplatin-based regimen cisplatin/ methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin (MVAC). The role of paclitaxel in the early disease and combined-modality settings in urothelial cancer remains to be determined.

Phase I trial of paclitaxel/carboplatin in advanced carcinoma of the urothelium.

We performed a phase I trial of 3-hour paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) (dose levels of 150, 175, 200, and 225 mg/m2) plus carboplatin dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve of 6. Sixteen patients were treated. Dose-limiting neuropathy was demonstrated in one patient each at the 175 and 200 mg/m2 dose levels. Grade 3 to 4 granulocytopenia was common; grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia was uncommon. The maximum tolerated dose of the regimen was not reached. Two complete and seven partial responses were demonstrated. We conclude that paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 plus carboplatin dosed to an area under the concentration-time curve of 6 can be administered to patients with advanced carcinoma of the urothelium. The regimen has encouraging preliminary activity. Phase II accrual is ongoing.

Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy and impact of adjuvant therapy for ampullary carcinomas.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical outcomes and potential impact of adjuvant chemoradiation in patients undergoing surgical resection of ampullary carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1988 and 1997, 39 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinomas. Clinical and pathologic factors, adjuvant therapy records, and disease status were obtained from chart review. Thirteen (33%) patients received adjuvant chemoradiation. Radiation therapy was delivered to the surgical bed and regional nodes to a median dose of 4,860 cGy with concurrent bolus or continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil. Outcomes measures included locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Univariate analysis was used to assess the impact of various patient- and tumor-related factors and the use of adjuvant therapy. Twenty (51%) patients with tumor invasion into the pancreas (T3) or node-positive disease were classified in a "high-risk" subgroup. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 45 months for survivors, overall 3-year survival was 55%. Survival was significantly worse for patients with positive nodes (23% vs. 73%, p < 0.001) and high-risk status (30% vs. 80%, p = 0.002). Disease-free survival was 54% at 3 years. There were 3 postoperative deaths, and these patients (all high risk) are excluded from further analysis on adjuvant therapy. In univariate analysis, the use of adjuvant chemoradiation had no clear impact on local-regional control or overall survival. However, by controlling for risk status in multivariate analysis, the use of adjuvant therapy reached statistical significance for overall survival (p = 0. 03). Among the high-risk patients, 7 (77%) of 9 patients receiving adjuvant therapy remained disease-free during follow-up compared with only 1 (14%) of 7 patients not receiving adjuvant therapy (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Despite the relatively favorable prognosis of ampullary carcinomas compared with other pancreaticobiliary tumors, patients with nodal metastases or T3 disease are at high risk for disease relapse. The use of adjuvant chemoradiation may improve long-term disease control in these patients.

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Adjuvant therapy is clearly of great benefit for certain patients with colorectal carcinoma. Validation of new prognostic markers to further define which patients are at highest risk of recurrence will be important. Future investigation for adjuvant therapy includes incorporation of achievements made in the advanced disease setting, including biochemical modulation of 5-FU, identification of new active agents, and incorporation of immunotherapy strategies into adjuvant treatment programs. Further improvements in the treatment of these patients, even if small, may translate into important benefits, given the large number of patients presenting annually with this common cancer. As our therapeutic options broaden and improve, investigators will need to focus on quality of life and pharmacoeconomic parameters to determine which adjuvant approaches are optimal for the individual patient with colorectal cancer, as well as for society in general.

High-dose cytarabine neurotoxicity: MR findings during the acute phase.

The authors report an acute cerebral and cerebellar syndrome in a patient treated with high-dose cytarabine. Diffuse high-intensity lesions in the central white matter on T2-weighted MR completely reversed with resolution of the clinical syndrome. Although the autopsy revealed cerebellar injury, the cerebral cortex was grossly and microscopically normal, consistent with a reversible process.

Recent developments in chemotherapy for bladder cancer.

Invasive bladder cancer is a chemotherapy-sensitive neoplasm. Historically, the development of cisplatin (Platinol)-based chemotherapy regimens has represented an important advance for patients with metastatic disease. More recently, investigations of new agents, such as gemcitabine (Gemzar) and paclitaxel (Taxol), have resulted in further options for these patients. Randomized trials comparing new regimens with cisplatin-based therapies have been initiated. The role of chemotherapy in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings is an area that is undergoing active investigation. The application of prognostic biological markers to risk-stratify patients has resulted in new avenues of investigation in these ongoing early disease trials.

A pilot trial of 5-FU, leucovorin, and cisplatin with or without adriamycin in advanced cancer.

In a pilot trial, we treated patients with solid tumors with 5-FU (5-fluorouracil), leucovorin (LV), and cisplatin (FLP) with Adriamycin in selected patients (FLAP). 5-FU/LV were administered weekly for 6 weeks, with cisplatin at two dose levels (and Adriamycin in some patients) at weeks 1 and 4. Nine patients received FLP; 11 received FLAP.FLP was able to be administered with a cisplatin dose of 75 mg/m2; the maximum-tolerated dose of FLAP included a cisplatin dose of 60 mg/m2. Significant toxicities included granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea. Preliminary activity was demonstrated with FLAP in patients with adenocarcinomas of the stomach and gastroesophageal (GE) junction. Ongoing trials of FLAP are underway in patients with gastric and GE junction carcinomas in the neoadjuvant and advanced disease settings.

A phase II trial and pharmacokinetic analysis of 96-hour infusional paclitaxel in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the activity and toxicity of 96-hour infusional paclitaxel in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Twelve patients were enrolled in this study. The first patient received a total dose of 140 mg/m2 over 96 hours resulting in grade 4 neutropenia, neutropenic fever, and grade 3 stomatitis. Subsequent patients received a total dose of 120 mg/m2 over 96 hours. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia occurred in four of these patients. No significant thrombocytopenia was observed. Grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities in the group treated at 120 mg/m2 over 96 hours included nausea/vomiting in one patient, stomatitis in one patient, and diarrhea in two patients. One patient experienced a possible pulmonary hypersensitivity reaction. None of the 12 patients achieved an objective response. Two patients had stable disease and ten had progressive disease. Pharmacokinetic parameters including maximum plasma concentration and area under the concentration time curve were significantly higher in patients with grade 3 to 4 neutropenia than patients who experienced less toxicity. The authors conclude that further study of 96-hour infusional paclitaxel in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma is not warranted.

A phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and interferon alpha 2A (IFN-alpha 2a) in metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a Penn Cancer Clinical Trials Group (PCCTG) trial.

A phase II study was performed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, and inteferon alpha-2a in metastatic pancreatic carcinoma. Twenty-three patients were entered in this study. Four patients withdrew before receiving treatment and one patient was nonevaluable for response because of treatment-related toxicity. The most common significant toxicity was nausea and vomiting. Treatment-related hospitalization was significant. Of 18 evaluable patients, 4 maintained stable disease and 14 had disease progression. None had an objective clinical response. We conclude that this biochemically modulated 5-FU regimen is ineffective treatment for advanced pancreatic carcinoma, with significant toxicity even in highly selected patients with an ambulatory performance status.

A phase II study of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, adriamycin, and cisplatin (FLAP) for metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. A Penn Cancer Clinical Trial Group and Roswell Park Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Trial.

A Phase II study was performed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, Adriamycin, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy (FLAP) in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric and gastroesophageal (GE) junction adenocarcinoma. Forty-two consecutive patients were enrolled to received FLAP in this multi-institutional trial. Response, toxicity, and survival data were noted. Fifteen of 42 (36%) patients demonstrated objective responses, with two complete responses (5%) and 13 partial responses (31%). The median time to disease progression was 17 weeks, and the overall survival duration was 30 weeks. Myelosuppression was significant, requiring dose modifications, but there were no treatment-related deaths. FLAP is an active regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric and GE junction adenocarcinoma. We are presently using this regimen in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with gastric and GE junction cancers.

Phase II trial of toremifene in androgen-independent prostate cancer: a Penn cancer clinical trials group trial.

Toremifene has antiestrogenic and estrogenic properties in vitro and in vivo. In addition, it may have antiangiogenesis and antimicrotubule properties at higher doses. Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of this agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. We performed a phase II trial of toremifene in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). Patients with an increasing prostate-specific antigen level despite castrate testosterone levels and antiandrogen withdrawal were eligible. Patients could not have received prior salvage hormonal therapy or chemotherapy. Patients received toremifene at 300 mg/m2/d orally (maximum dose 640 mg/d). Fifteen patients were treated. Patients received treatment for a median of 13 weeks (range, 4-30 weeks). The median age was 72 years (range, 58-80 years). The median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0. The treatment was well tolerated and toxicity was mild. Two patients had grade III hepatic toxicity; one had grade III hyperglycemia. There were no treatment-related deaths. No objective responses were demonstrated. In summary, toremifene is not effective therapy for AIPC at the dose and schedule evaluated in this trial.

Combined radiation and chemotherapy in posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

The optimal treatment for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder which has progressed despite a reduction in immunosuppression has not been defined. We report on two patients with stage I posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder who developed progressive disease despite a reduction in the level of immunosuppression. Both patients were treated with combined short course CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiation therapy. In both patients, a rapid response was obtained followed by complete remission. Combined modality therapy can be utilized successfully in progressive limited stage posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

Aortic dissection in a patient receiving chemotherapy for Hodgkin's disease--a case report.

Cancer chemotherapy is associated with a wide range of vascular toxicities, which may be related to endothelial cell damage by these agents. The authors describe a patient with Hodgkin's disease who developed an atypical aortic dissection while receiving MOPP/ABV chemotherapy (nitrogen mustard, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone, doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vinblastine). They would place aortic dissection on the list of potential vascular complications associated with antineoplastic agents.