Adjusting Drain Fluid Amylase for Drain Volume Does Not Improve Pancreatic Fistula Prediction.

INTRODUCTION: Drain fluid amylase (DFA) levels have been used to predict clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) and guide postoperative drain management. Optimal DFA cutoff thresholds vary between studies, thereby prompting investigation of an alternative assessment technique. As DFA measurements could, in theory, be distorted by variations in ascites fluid production, we hypothesized that adjusting DFA for volume corrected drain fluid amylase (vDFA) would improve CR-POPF predictive models. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients, who underwent pancreatoduodenectomies (PD) and distal pancreatectomies (DP) between 2013 and 2019, was performed. DFAs and vDFAs were measured on postoperative day (POD) 3. Clinicopathologic variables were compared between cohorts by univariable and multivariable analyses and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Patients developing a CR-POPF were more likely to be male and have elevated DFA, vDFA, and body mass index (BMI). vDFA use did not contribute to a superior CR-POPF predictive model compared to DFA-a finding consistent on subanalysis of surgery type PD versus DP. In CR-POPF predictive models, DFA, vDFA, and male sex significantly improved CR-POPF predictive models when considering both surgery subtypes, while only DFA and vDFA significantly improved models when cohorts were segregated by surgery type. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative DFA remains a preferred method of predicting CR-POPF as the proposed vDFA assessment technique only adds complexity without increased discriminability.

Are Lymph Node Metastases Associated With Survival in Black Patients With Pancreatic Cancer?

INTRODUCTION: Despite aggressive surgical care and systemic therapy, patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have a poor prognosis. Recent studies show that racial disparities in outcome also exist. We sought to investigate the association lymph node (LN) metastases had with survival between Black and White patients with PDAC after resection. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 226 PDAC patients who underwent resection at a single institution from 2010 to 2018 was performed with attention to LN metastasis and patient race. The number of patients who received chemotherapy was also evaluated. RESULTS: One Hundred Seventy Five (77.4%) PDAC patients were White and 51 (22.6%) were Black. 130 (59.3%) patients had LN metastasis (LN+). LN+ and LN- groups were similar in race (P = 0.93), sex (P = 0.10) and age at the time of diagnosis (P = 0.45). Patients with LN + disease were more likely to present with larger tumors (3.4 versus 2.8 cm, P = 0.02) and higher T status (P = 0.001). White and Black patients had similar rates of LN metastasis (59% versus 58.8%, P = 1.0). The median survival for LN- Black and White patients were similar (43.2 versus 30.2 mo, P = 0.82). LN + Black patients trended towards receiving more systemic therapy than White LN + patients (55% versus 42%, P = 0.10). The median survival for LN + Black patients was significantly less than LN + White patients (17.5 versus 24.6 mo, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Black LN + PDAC patients have an inferior survival rate after resection when compared to their White counterparts. Our disparity in outcome cannot be solely explained by a difference in systemic treatment. Further investigation is warranted to determine racial differences in tumor biology or response to chemotherapy.

Racial and socioeconomic disparity associates with differences in cardiac DNA methylation among men with end-stage heart failure.

Heart failure (HF) is a multifactorial syndrome that remains a leading cause of worldwide morbidity. Despite its high prevalence, only half of patients with HF respond to guideline-directed medical management, prompting therapeutic efforts to confront the molecular underpinnings of its heterogeneity. In the current study, we examined epigenetics as a yet unexplored source of heterogeneity among patients with end-stage HF. Specifically, a multicohort-based study was designed to quantify cardiac genome-wide cytosine-p-guanine (CpG) methylation of cardiac biopsies from male patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. In both pilot (n = 11) and testing (n = 31) cohorts, unsupervised multidimensional scaling of genome-wide myocardial DNA methylation exhibited a bimodal distribution of CpG methylation found largely to occur in the promoter regions of metabolic genes. Among the available patient attributes, only categorical self-identified patient race could delineate this methylation signature, with African American (AA) and Caucasian American (CA) samples clustering separately. Because race is a social construct, and thus a poor proxy of human physiology, extensive review of medical records was conducted, but ultimately failed to identify covariates of race at the time of LVAD surgery. By contrast, retrospective analysis exposed a higher all-cause mortality among AA (56.3%) relative to CA (16.7%) patients at 2 yr following LVAD placement (P = 0.03). Geocoding-based approximation of patient demographics uncovered disparities in income levels among AA relative to CA patients. Although additional studies are needed, the current analysis implicates cardiac DNA methylation as a previously unrecognized indicator of socioeconomic disparity in human heart failure outcomes.NEW & NOTEWORTHY A bimodal signature of cardiac DNA methylation in heart failure corresponds with racial differences in all-cause mortality following mechanical circulatory support. Racial differences in promoter methylation disproportionately affect metabolic signaling pathways. Socioeconomic factors are associated with racial differences in the cardiac methylome among men with end-stage heart failure.

Barriers to Advancement in Academic Medicine: the Perception Gap Between Majority Men and Other Faculty.

BACKGROUND: According to the American Association of Medical Colleges, women comprise 26% of full professors and 19% of medical school department chairs. African American and Latino faculty comprise 4.6% of full professors and 6.9% of department chairs. OBJECTIVE: Because of the lack of representation of women and racial/ethnic minority faculty at the highest levels of academic medicine, this study examines the perceptions of barriers to advancement by men and women academic medical school faculty of differing races and ethnicities to explore potential differences in perceptions by demographic group. DESIGN: Semi-structured one-on-one interviews were conducted between July and September 2017. PARTICIPANTS: In order to give all faculty a chance to participate, faculty of all ranks and specialties were recruited from one southeastern medical school to participate in the study. APPROACH: Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by 3 members of the research team using an inductive approach to thematic analysis. Participants were organized into 4 groups for analysis-underrepresented in medicine (URiM) women, majority women, URiM men, majority men. KEY RESULTS: Sixty-four faculty consented to participate in the study (56.2% women, 34.4% URiM). Subthemes were grouped under three main themes: Perceptions of Barriers to Advancement of Women Faculty, Perceptions of Barriers to Advancement of African American and Latino Faculty, and Perceptions of the Institutional Climate for Diversity. Majority men tended to voice distinctly different perspectives than the other three demographic groups, with the most notable differences between majority men and URiM women. Majority  men tended to suggest that the advancement of women and URiM faculty was acceptable or getting better, the lack of URiM faculty in leadership was due mainly to pipeline issues, and women choose not to advance to leadership positions. CONCLUSION: We found that participant gender and race/ethnicity shaped perspectives of medical school faculty advancement in distinct ways.

Bias and stereotyping among research and clinical professionals: Perspectives on minority recruitment for oncology clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, extensive attention has been paid to the possibility that bias among health care professionals contributes to health disparities. In its 2003 report, the Institute of Medicine concluded that bias against racial minorities may affect communication or care offered. However, to the authors' knowledge, the role of bias within the context of recruitment of racial and ethnic minorities to cancer clinical trials has not been explored to date. Therefore, the authors assessed the experiences of clinical and research personnel related to factors influencing the recruitment of racial and ethnic minorities for cancer clinical trials. METHODS: A total of 91 qualitative interviews were conducted at 5 US cancer centers among 4 stakeholder groups: 1) cancer center leaders; 2) principal investigators; 3) referring clinicians; and 4) research staff. Data analysis was conducted using a content analysis approach to generate themes from the transcribed interviews. RESULTS: Five prominent themes emerged: 1) recruitment interactions with potential minority participants were perceived to be challenging; 2) potential minority participants were not perceived to be ideal study candidates; 3) a combination of clinic-level barriers and negative perceptions of minority study participants led to providers withholding clinical trial opportunities from potential minority participants; 4) when clinical trial recruitment practices were tailored to minority patients, addressing research misconceptions to build trust was a common strategy; 5) for some respondents, race was perceived as irrelevant when screening and recruiting potential minority participants for clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Not only did some respondents view racial and ethnic minorities as less promising participants, some respondents reported withholding trial opportunities from minorities based on these perceptions. Some providers endorsed using tailored recruitment strategies whereas others eschewed race as a factor in trial recruitment. The presence of bias and stereotyping among clinical and research professionals recruiting for cancer clinical trials should be considered when designing interventions to increase minority enrollment.

Benchmarking Accomplishments of Leaders in American Surgery and Justification for Enhancing Diversity and Inclusion.

OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively assess the level of achievement and demographics of national surgical society presidents. BACKGROUND: Data on the accomplishments needed to rise to positions of national surgical leadership is scarce and merit alone does not always yield such opportunities. Recognizing the shortcomings of sex and ethnic diversity within academic surgical leadership, the American College of Surgeon (ACS), American Surgical Association (ASA), Association of Women Surgeons (AWS), and the Society of Black Academic Surgeons (SBAS) partnered to address these challenges by performing a comprehensive assessment of their presidents over the last 16 years. METHODS: ACS, ASA, AWS, and SBAS presidents' CVs, at the time of their presidential term, were assessed for demographics and scholastic achievements. Regression analyses controlling for age were performed to determine relative differences across societies. RESULTS: A total of 62 of the 64 presidents' CVs were received and assessed (97% response rate). There was a large discrepancy in the average age in years of ACS (70) and ASA (66) presidents compared to the AWS (51) and SBAS (53) presidents. For the ACS and ASA cohort, 87% were male and 83% were White, collectively. After controlling for age (52), the AWS and SBAS presidents' scholastic achievements were comparable to the ACS (and ASA) cohort in 9 and 12 of the 15 accessed metrics, respectively. CONCLUSION: The ACS and ASA presidents' CVs displayed unsurpassed scholastic achievement, and although not equivalent, both the AWS and the SBAS presidents had comparable attainment. These findings further substantiate that women and ethnic minority surgeons are deserving of additional national leadership consideration as organized medicine pursues a more diverse and reflective physician workforce.

Gut Microbiota Promotes Tumor Growth in Mice by Modulating Immune Response.

We studied the effects of gut microbiome depletion by oral antibiotics on tumor growth in subcutaneous and liver metastases models of pancreatic cancer, colon cancer, and melanoma. Gut microbiome depletion significantly reduced tumor burden in all the models tested. However, depletion of gut microbiome did not reduce tumor growth in Rag1-knockout mice, which lack mature T and B cells. Flow cytometry analyses demonstrated that gut microbiome depletion led to significant increase in interferon gamma-producing T cells with corresponding decrease in interleukin 17A and interleukin 10-producing T cells. Our results suggest that gut microbiome modulation could emerge as a novel immunotherapeutic strategy.

Pre-clinical evaluation of Minnelide as a therapy for acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need for novel and effective treatment options for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Triptolide, a diterpenoid tri-epoxide compound isolated from the herb Tripterygium wilfordii and its water-soluble pro-drug-Minnelide have shown promising anti-cancer activity. A recent clinical trial for patients with solid tumors confirmed the safety and efficacy at biologically equivalent doses of 0.2 mg/kg/day and lower. METHODS: Cell viability of multiple AML cell lines as well as patient apheresis samples were evaluated by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) based assay. Apoptosis was evaluated by estimating the amount of cleaved caspase. AML cell line (THP1-Luc) was implanted in immunocompromised mice and treated with indicated doses of Minnelide. Leukemic burden before and after treatment was evaluated by imaging in an In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS). RESULTS: In the current study, we show that Minnelide, at doses below maximum tolerated dose (MTD) demonstrates leukemic clearance of both primary AML blasts and luciferase expressing THP-1 cells in mice. In vitro, multiple primary AML apheresis samples and AML cell lines (THP-1, KG1, Kasumi-1, HL-60) were sensitive to triptolide mediated cell death and apoptosis in low doses. Treatment with triptolide led to a significant decrease in the colony forming ability of AML cell lines as well as in the expression of stem cell markers. Additionally, it resulted in the cell cycle arrest in the G1/S phase with significant downregulation of c-Myc, a major transcriptional regulator mediating cancer cell growth and stemness. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that Minnelide, with confirmed safety and activity in the clinic, exerts a potent anti-leukemic effect in multiple models of AML at doses easily achievable in patients.

Correction to: Pre-clinical evaluation of Minnelide as a therapy for acute myeloid leukemia.

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors found an error in Figure 3. The middle panel of Figure 3a was inadvertently duplicated.

Training Needs of Clinical and Research Professionals to Optimize Minority Recruitment and Retention in Cancer Clinical Trials.

The study of disparities in minority recruitment to cancer clinical trials has focused primarily on inquiries among minority patient populations. However, clinical trial recruitment is complex and requires a broader appreciation of the multiple factors that influence minority participation. One area that has received little attention is minority recruitment training for professionals who assume various roles in the clinical trial recruitment process. Therefore, we assessed the perspectives of cancer center clinical and research personnel on their training and education needs toward minority recruitment for cancer clinical trials. Ninety-one qualitative interviews were conducted at five U.S. cancer centers among four stakeholder groups: cancer center leaders, principal investigators, referring clinicians, and research staff. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Qualitative analyses focused on response data related to training for minority recruitment for cancer clinical trials. Four prominent themes were identified: (1) Research personnel are not currently being trained to focus on recruitment and retention of minority populations; (2) Training for minority recruitment and retention provides for a specific focus on factors influencing minority research participation; (3) Training on cultural awareness may help to bridge cultural gaps between potential minority participants and research professionals; (4) Views differ regarding the importance of research personnel training designed to focus on recruitment of minority populations. There is a lack of systematic training for minority recruitment. Many stakeholders acknowledged the benefits of minority recruitment training and welcomed training that focuses on increasing cultural awareness to increase the participation of minorities in cancer clinical trials.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Eliminates Racial Disparities in Postoperative Length of Stay After Colorectal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on racial disparities in postoperative length of stay (pLOS) after colorectal surgery. BACKGROUND: Racial disparities in surgical outcomes exist. We hypothesized that ERAS would reduce disparities in pLOS between black and white patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing ERAS in 2015 were 1:1 matched by race/ethnicity, age, sex, and procedure to a pre-ERAS group from 2010 to 2014. After stratification by race/ethnicity, expected pLOS was calculated using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Risk Calculator. Primary outcome was the observed pLOS and observed-to-expected difference in pLOS. Secondary outcomes were National Surgical Quality Improvement Project postoperative complications including 30-day readmissions and mortality. Adjusted sensitivity analyses on pLOS were also performed. RESULTS: Of 420 patients (210 ERAS and 210 pre-ERAS) examined, 28.3% were black. Black and white patients were similar in age, body mass index, sex, American Anesthesia Association class, and minimally invasive approaches. Within the pre-ERAS group, black patients stayed a mean of 2.7 days longer than expected compared with white patients (P < 0.05). Overall, ERAS patients had a significantly shorter pLOS (5.7 vs 8 days) and observed-to-expected difference (-0.7 vs 1.4 days) compared with pre-ERAS patients (P < 0.01). In the ERAS group, disparities in pLOS were reduced with no differences in readmissions or mortality between black and white patients. On sensitivity analyses, race/ethnicity remained a significant predictor of pLOS among pre-ERAS patients, but not for ERAS patients. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS eliminated racial differences in pLOS between black and white patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Reduced pLOS occurred without increases in mortality, readmissions, and most postoperative complications. ERAS may provide a practical approach to reducing disparities in surgical outcomes.

Racial disparities in length-of-stay persist even with no postoperative complications.

BACKGROUND: To determine the contribution of race to postoperative length-of-stay in elective colorectal surgery without complications. METHODS: The 2012-2013 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Colectomy-Targeted Database was queried for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery without complications. After stratifying by race, univariate/bivariate comparisons were made. On adjusted comparison, predictors of postoperative length-of-stay were identified along with incident rate ratios and Least Squares Means for predicted length-of-stays. RESULTS: Of 28,480 elective colorectal surgeries, 19,898 patients had no postoperative complications. Patients stratified to white (84%), black (8%), Hispanic (3%), and Asian (3%). Overall mean postoperative length-of-stay was 4.8 d, with black patients having the longest at 5.3 d (P < 0.05). After covariate adjustment, black race increased postoperative length-of-stay by 9%, 7%, and 6% compared to white, Hispanic, and Asian patients, respectively (P < 0.05). No statistical difference existed in postoperative length-of-stay for Hispanic and Asian patients versus white patients. Adjusted postoperative length-of-stay was 5.1 d for black patients compared to 4.7, 4.8, and 4.8 d for white, Hispanic, and Asian patients, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Black patients have significantly longer postoperative length-of-stay after elective colorectal surgery even if no postoperative complications occur. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanism(s) for these disparities.

Disposition of the Dietary Mutagen 2-Amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline in Healthy and Pancreatic Cancer Compromised Humans.

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the U.S. Once diagnosed, prognosis is poor with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Exposure to carcinogenic heterocyclic amines (HCAs) derived from cooked meat has been shown to be positively associated with pancreatic cancer risk. To evaluate the processes that determine the carcinogenic potential of HCAs for human pancreas, 14-carbon labeled 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (MeIQx), a putative human carcinogenic HCA found in well-done cooked meat, was administered at a dietary relevant dose to human volunteers diagnosed with pancreatic cancer undergoing partial pancreatectomy and healthy control volunteers. After (14)C-MeIQx exposure, blood and urine were collected for pharmacokinetic and metabolite analysis. MeIQx-DNA adducts levels were quantified by accelerator mass spectrometry from pancreatic tissue excised during surgery from the cancer patient group. Pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma revealed a rapid distribution of MeIQx with a plasma elimination half-life of approximately 3.5 h in 50% of the cancer patients and all of the control volunteers. In 2 of the 4 cancer patients, very low levels of MeIQx were detected in plasma and urine suggesting low absorption from the gut into the plasma. Urinary metabolite analysis revealed five MeIQx metabolites with 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline-8-carboxylic acid being the most abundant accounting for 25%-50% of the recovered 14-carbon/mL urine. There was no discernible difference in metabolite levels between the cancer patient volunteers and the control group. MeIQx-DNA adduct analysis of pancreas and duodenum tissue revealed adduct levels indistinguishable from background levels. Although other meat-derived HCA mutagens have been shown to bind DNA in pancreatic tissue, indicating that exposure to HCAs from cooked meat cannot be discounted as a risk factor for pancreatic cancer, the results from this current study show that exposure to a single dietary dose of MeIQx does not readily form measurable DNA adducts under the conditions of the experiment.