Active alcohol consumption is associated with acute-on-chronic liver failure in Hispanic patients.

BACKGROUND: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a severe clinical entity associated with elevated short-term mortality. We aimed to characterize patients with decompensated cirrhosis according to presence of ACLF, their association with active alcohol intake, and long-term survival in Latin America. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of decompensated cirrhotic in three Chilean university centers (2017-2019). ACLF was diagnosed according EASL-CLIF criteria. We assessed survival using competing-risk and time-to-event analyses. We evaluated the time to death using accelerated failure time (AFT) models. RESULTS: We included 320 patients, median age of 65.3±11.7 years old, and 48.4% were women. 92 (28.7%) patients met ACLF criteria (ACLF-1: 29.3%, ACLF-2: 27.1%, and ACLF-3: 43.4%). The most common precipitants were infections (39.1%), and the leading organ failure was kidney (59.8%). Active alcohol consumption was frequent (27.7%), even in patients with a prior diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (16.2%). Ninety-two (28.7%) patients had ACLF (ACLF-1: 8.4%, ACLF-2: 7.8%, and ACLF-3: 12.5%). ACLF patients had a higher MELD-Na score at admission (27 [22-31] versus 16 [12-21], p<0.0001), a higher frequency of alcohol-associated liver disease (36.7% versus 24.9%, p=0.039), and a more frequent active alcohol intake (37.2% versus 23.8%, p=0.019). In a multivariate model, ACLF was associated with higher mortality (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.735, 95%CI: 1.153-2.609; p<0.008). In the AFT models, the presence of ACLF during hospitalization correlated with a shorter time to death: ACLF-1 shortens the time to death by 4.7 times (time ratio [TR] 0.214, 95%CI: 0.075-0.615; p<0.004), ACLF-2 by 4.4 times (TR 0.224, 95%CI: 0.070-0.713; p<0.011), and ACLF-3 by 37 times (TR 0.027, 95%CI: 0.006-0.129; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with decompensated cirrhosis and ACLF exhibited a high frequency ofactive alcohol consumption. Patients with ACLF showed higher mortality and shorter time todeath than those without ACLF.

[National consensus of diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer]. / Consenso nacional de diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas.

Mexican specialists in oncology, oncologic surgery, thoracic surgery, pneumology, pathology, molecular biology, anesthesiology, algology, psychology, nutrition, and rehabilitation (all of them experts in lung cancer treatment) in order to develop the National Consensus on Lung Cancer. The consensus has been developed as an answer to the need of updated Mexican guidelines for the optimal treatment of the disease, as well as to the requirements that such guidelines be established by multidisciplinary panel, depicting the current attention given to cancer lung cases in Mexico. Thus, this paper analyses the epidemiological review, screening, diagnosis, staging, pathology, translational medicine, and the suitable therapies for early, locally advanced, and metastatic disease in the first, second, and third lines of management, as well as rehabilitation and palliative measures.

Clinical validation of the EORTC QLQ-OG25 questionnaire for the evaluation of health-related quality of life in Mexican patients with esophagogastric cancers.

BACKGROUND: Quality of life questionnaires (QLQ) QLQ-STO22 and QLQ-OES18 are currently available to measure Health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with Esophageal (EC) or Gastric cancer (GC). The QLQ-OG25 integrates questions from both questionnaires to be useful for EC, Esophagogastric junction carcinoma (EGJC), and GC. Our aim was to validate the Mexican-Spanish version. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The translation procedure followed European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines. QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25 instruments were completed by patients with EC, EGJC, and GC. Patients were divided into three groups: (1) palliative treatment; (2) treatment with curative intent, and (3) survivors. Reliability and validity tests were performed. RESULTS: One-hundred sixty-three patients were included: 62 women and 101 men (mean age, 54.9 years; range, 22-82 years). Sixty-nine, seventy-three, and twenty-one patients were allocated into groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Questionnaire compliance rates were high and were well accepted. Group 3 patients reported better functional HRQL scores and lower symptom scores than patients in groups 2 and 1. Scales in the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25 distinguished among other clinically distinct groups of patients. Cronbach's α coefficients of all multi-item scales of the QLQ-OG25 instrument were >0.7 (range, 0.7-0.83). Multitrait scaling analysis demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity, even adjusting by location. Test-retest scores were consistent. CONCLUSION: The Mexican-Spanish version of the EORTC QLQ-OG25 questionnaire is reliable and valid for HRQL measurement in patients with esophagogastric cancer and can be used in clinical trials in the Mexican community.