Number of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) Treatments is Associated with Longer Survival: Analysis of a Large Prospective Cohort of Patients With Unresectable Peritoneal Surface Malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the reasons for stopping pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) delivered for unresectable peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) and to determine survival in a large patient cohort of an experienced PIPAC center. BACKGROUND: PIPAC alone or combined with systemic chemotherapy was developed to palliatively treat unresectable PSM. Safety, tolerance and promising survival results were already reported, but the reasons for stopping treatment remain unclear and the influence of the number of PIPAC procedures on prognosis has not been evaluated. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of PIPAC procedures from a prospectively maintained single institution PSM database was conducted from January 2016 to January 2023. RESULTS: A total of 346 patients underwent 1200 PIPAC treatments in the defined time period. Two-thirds of the patients completed 3 or more PIPAC procedures, and 2 patients had more than 15 treatment procedures. Reasons for PIPAC cessation were disease progression or complication (56%), reorientation to a potential curative procedure (19%), surgical complications of the procedure (13%), death between procedures (8%) and patient request (3%). PSM origin and receiving 3 or more PIPAC treatments were independently correlated with better survival in the overall population, in the group of ultimately unresectable PSM and after propensity score weighting. CONCLUSION: The main reason for stopping PIPAC treatment in palliative management of PSM is disease progression. When 3 or more PIPAC procedures can be delivered in combination to systemic chemotherapy, survival is significantly improved. Its use should be validated by prospective studies.

The 2022 PSOGI International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: HIPEC Technologies.

This manuscript reports the results of an international consensus on technologies of hyperthermic intraperitoneal perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) performed with the following goals: To provide recommendations for the technological parameters to perform HIPEC. To identify the role of heat and its application forms in treating peritoneal metastases. To provide recommendations regarding the correct dosimetry of intraperitoneal chemotherapy drugs and their carrier solutions. To identify for each intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen the best dosimetry and fractionation. To identify areas of future research pertaining to HIPEC technology and regimens. This consensus was performed by the Delphi technique and comprised two rounds of voting. In total, 96 of 102 eligible panelists replied to both Delphi rounds (94.1%) with a consensus of 39/51 questions on HIPEC technical aspects. Among the recommendations that met with the strongest consensus were those concerning the dose of HIPEC drug established in mg/m2, a target temperature of at least 42°C, and the use of at least three temperature probes to pursue hyperthermia. Ninety minutes as the ideal HIPEC duration seemed to make consensus. These results should be considered when designing new clinical trials in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.

The 2022 PSOGI International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Pseudomyxoma Peritonei.

BACKGROUND: The combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) constitutes the established standard of care for pseudomyxoma peritonei patients. However, the role of HIPEC lacks validation through randomized trials, leading to diverse proposed treatment protocols. This consensus seeks to standardize HIPEC regimens and identify research priorities for enhanced clarity. METHODS: The steering committee applied the patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome method to formulate crucial clinical questions. Evaluation of evidence followed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Consensus on HIPEC regimens and research priorities was sought through a two-round Delphi process involving international experts. RESULTS: Out of 90 eligible panelists, 71 (79%) participated in both Delphi rounds, resulting in a consensus on six out of seven questions related to HIPEC regimens. An overwhelming 84% positive consensus favored combining HIPEC with CRS, while a 70% weak positive consensus supported HIPEC after incomplete CRS. Specific HIPEC regimens also gained consensus, with 53% supporting Oxaliplatin 200 mg/m2 and 51% favoring the combination of cisplatin (CDDP) associated with mitomycin-C (MMC). High-dose MMC regimens received an 89% positive recommendation. In terms of research priorities, 61% of panelists highlighted the importance of studies comparing HIPEC regimens post CRS. The preferred regimens for such studies were the combination of CDDP/MMC and high-dose MMC. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus recommends the application of HIPEC following CRS based on the available evidence. The combination of CDDP/MMC and high-dose MMC regimens are endorsed for both current clinical practice and future research efforts.

2022 Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Selected patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer (PM-CRC) can benefit from potentially curative cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), with a median overall survival (OS) of more than 40 months. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this evidence-based consensus were to define the indications for HIPEC, to select the preferred HIPEC regimens, and to define research priorities regarding the use of HIPEC for PM-CRC. METHODS: The consensus steering committee elaborated and formulated pertinent clinical questions according to the PICO (patient, intervention, comparator, outcome) method and assessed the evidence according to the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Standardized evidence tables were presented to an international expert panel to reach a consensus (4-point, weak and strong positive/negative) on HIPEC regimens and research priorities through a two-round Delphi process. The consensus was defined as ≥ 50% agreement for the 4-point consensus grading or ≥ 70% for either of the two combinations. RESULTS: Evidence was weak or very weak for 9/10 clinical questions. In total, 70/90 eligible panelists replied to both Delphi rounds (78%), with a consensus for 10/10 questions on HIPEC regimens. There was strong negative consensus concerning the short duration, high-dose oxaliplatin (OX) protocol (55.7%), and a weak positive vote (53.8-64.3%) in favor of mitomycin-C (MMC)-based HIPEC (preferred choice: Dutch protocol: 35 mg/m2, 90 min, three fractions), both for primary cytoreduction and recurrence. Determining the role of HIPEC after CRS was considered the most important research question, regarded as essential by 85.7% of the panelists. Furthermore, over 90% of experts suggest performing HIPEC after primary and secondary CRS for recurrence > 1 year after the index surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, despite the negative results of PRODIGE 7, HIPEC could be conditionally recommended to patients with PM-CRC after CRS. While more preclinical and clinical data are eagerly awaited to harmonize the procedure further, the MMC-based Dutch protocol remains the preferred regimen after primary and secondary CRS.

Management of the Uninvolved Uterus and Adnexa During Routine Pelvic Peritonectomy in Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Varies by Histology and Menopausal Status: An International Survey of Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: No guidelines exist regarding the management of the uninvolved uterus or adnexa (fallopian tubes and/or ovaries) in patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from non-gynecologic malignancies. It is unclear whether salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy, or both should be performed when a complete pelvic peritonectomy is otherwise warranted. METHODS: A 25-item electronic survey was sent to 225 surgeons worldwide who routinely perform cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Participants were recruited through listservs of expert groups. Individual surgeon approaches to the management of the grossly uninvolved uterus and adnexa in pre- and post-menopausal women with PM from low- and high-grade appendiceal neoplasms, colorectal cancer, and peritoneal mesothelioma were collected using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: A total of 135 complete responses (60% response rate) were obtained from surgeons practicing in 27 countries. Respondents reported a median practice of 10 years (interquartile range [IQR] 6-15 years) and a median performance of 20 (IQR 12-30) CRS/HIPEC operations per year. Rates of salpingo-oophorectomy differed by histology and a woman's menopausal status, ranging from 29 to 42% in pre-menopausal women to 71-77% in post-menopausal women (P < 0.001). Notably, the number of surgeons who would perform a hysterectomy was lower, ranging from 12 to 27% for pre-menopausal women and from 32 to 44% for post-menopausal women, dependent on histology (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons are overall more aggressive with adnexal resection than with hysterectomy in both pre- and post-menopausal women with PM from non-gynecologic malignancies. Further prospective studies are required to determine the best approach to optimize surgical and oncologic outcomes while also accounting for the fertility and hormonal impact.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy to Treat Pseudomyxoma Peritonei of Ovarian Origin: A Retrospective French RENAPE Group Study.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian pseudomyxoma peritonei (OPMP) are rare, without well-defined therapeutic guidelines. We aimed to evaluate cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to treat OPMP. METHODS: Patients from the French National Network for Rare Peritoneal Tumors (RENAPE) database with proven OPMP treated by CRS/HIPEC and with histologically normal appendix and digestive endoscopy were retrospectively included. Clinical and follow-up data were collected. Histopathological and immunohistochemical features were reviewed. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with a median age of 56 years were included. The median Peritoneal Cancer Index was 16. Following CRS, the completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score was CC-0 for 9/15 (60%) patients, CC-1 for 5/15 (33.3%) patients, and CC-2 for 1/15 (6.7%) patients. The median tumor size was 22.5 cm. After pathological review and immunohistochemical studies, tumors were classified as Group 1 (mucinous ovarian epithelial neoplasms) in 3/15 (20%) patients; Group 2 (mucinous neoplasm in ovarian teratoma) in 4/15 (26.7%) patients; Group 3 (mucinous neoplasm probably arising in ovarian teratoma) in 5/15 (33.3%) patients; and Group 4 (non-specific group) in 3/15 (20%) patients. Peritoneal lesions were OPMP pM1a/acellular, pM1b/grade 1 (hypocellular) and pM1b/grade 3 (signet-ring cells) in 13/15 (86.7%), 1/15 (6.7%) and 1/15 (6.7%) patients, respectively. Disease-free survival analysis showed a difference (p = 0.0463) between OPMP with teratoma/likely-teratoma origin (groups 2 and 3; 100% at 1, 5, and 10 years), and other groups (groups 1 and 4; 100%, 66.6%, and 50% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results suggested that a primary therapeutic strategy using complete CRS/HIPEC for patients with OPMP led to favorable long-term outcomes.

Correlation of Morphological Appearance of Peritoneal Lesions at Laparotomy and Disease at Pathological Assessment in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery for Peritoneal Malignancy: Results of Phase I of the PRECINCT Study in 707 Patients.

BACKGROUND: The PRECINCT (Pattern of peritoneal dissemination and REsponse to systemic Chemotherapy IN Common and uncommon peritoneal Tumors) is a prospective, multicenter, observational study. This report from phase I of PRECINCT outlines variations in recording the surgical peritoneal cancer index (sPCI) at experienced peritoneal malignancy centers and the incidence of pathologically confirmed disease in morphologically different peritoneal lesions (PL). METHODS: The sPCI was recorded in a prespecified format that included the morphological appearance of PL. Six prespecified morphological terms were provided. The surgical and pathological findings were compared. RESULTS: From September 2020 to December 2021, 707 patients were enrolled at 10 centers. The morphological details are routinely recorded at two centers, structure bearing the largest nodule, and exact size of the largest tumor deposit in each region at four centers each. The most common morphological terms used were normal peritoneum in 3091 (45.3%), tumor nodules in 2607 (38.2%) and confluent disease in 786 (11.5%) regions. The incidence of pathologically confirmed disease was significantly higher in 'tumor nodules' with a lesion score of 2/3 compared with a lesion score of 1 (63.1% vs. 31.5%; p < 0.001). In patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the incidence of pathologically confirmed disease did not differ significantly from those undergoing upfront surgery [751 (47.7%) and 532 (51.4%) respectively; p = 0.069]. CONCLUSIONS: The sPCI was recorded with heterogeneity at different centers. The incidence of pathologically confirmed disease was 49.2% in 'tumor nodules'. Frozen section could be used more liberally for these lesions to aid clinical decisions. A large-scale study involving pictorial depiction of different morphological appearances and correlation with pathological findings is indicated.

Review of 2022 PSOGI/RENAPE Consensus on HIPEC.

The 2022 PSOGI (Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International) and RENAPE (French Network for Rare Peritoneal Malignancies) consensus on hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was a comprehensive effort aimed at standardizing treatment protocols for various peritoneal malignancies. This initiative is critical due to the wide range of technical variations in HIPEC procedures and the resulting need for standardization to ensure consistent and effective patient care and meaningful audit of multicenter data.

Lower airway microbiota compositions differ between influenza, COVID-19 and bacteria-related acute respiratory distress syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is responsible for 400,000 deaths annually worldwide. Few improvements have been made despite five decades of research, partially because ARDS is a highly heterogeneous syndrome including various types of aetiologies. Lower airway microbiota is involved in chronic inflammatory diseases and recent data suggest that it could also play a role in ARDS. Nevertheless, whether the lower airway microbiota composition varies between the aetiologies of ARDS remain unknown. The aim of this study is to compare lower airway microbiota composition between ARDS aetiologies, i.e. pulmonary ARDS due to influenza, SARS-CoV-2 or bacterial infection. METHODS: Consecutive ARDS patients according to Berlin's classification requiring invasive ventilation with PCR-confirmed influenza or SARS-CoV-2 infections and bacterial infections (> 105 CFU/mL on endotracheal aspirate) were included. Endotracheal aspirate was collected at admission, V3-V4 and ITS2 regions amplified by PCR, deep-sequencing performed on MiSeq sequencer (Illumina®) and data analysed using DADA2 pipeline. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included, 24 COVID-19, 18 influenza, and 11 bacterial CAP-related ARDS. The lower airway bacteriobiota and mycobiota compositions (ß-diversity) were dissimilar between the three groups (p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, respectively). The bacterial α-diversity was significantly lower in the bacterial CAP-related ARDS group compared to the COVID-19 ARDS group (p = 0.04). In contrast, influenza-related ARDS patients had higher lung mycobiota α-diversity than the COVID-19-related ARDS (p = 0 < 01). CONCLUSION: Composition of lower airway microbiota (both microbiota and mycobiota) differs between influenza, COVID-19 and bacterial CAP-related ARDS. Future studies investigating the role of lung microbiota in ARDS pathophysiology should take aetiology into account.

[RENAPE network: Towards more equitable access to care and expertise for patients with rare peritoneal cancers]. / Réseau RENAPE : vers une meilleure équité d'accès aux soins et à l'expertise pour les patients atteints de cancers rares du péritoine.

Since its creation in 2010, the progressive structuration of the RENAPE network (Réseau national de prise en charge des tumeurs rares du péritoine) supported by the "Institut national du cancer" and the "Direction générale de l'offre de soins", allowed the optimization of the healthcare system involved in the management of the rare cancers of the peritoneum. In this setting, the RENA-PATH group has also been reinforced, notably by its recognized diagnostic expertise in pathology and its interface with the MESOPATH group. Moreover RENAPE and RENA-PATH led to guidelines diffusion through the integration, in 2019, to the ``Thesaurus National de Cancérologie Digestive'' (TNCD) and to post-university medical education programs. The aim of this article is to highlight the missions of the RENAPE and RENA-PATH, notably the equity in terms of expertise, access to the networks and their improvement in the management of peritoneal diseases.

2022 PSOGI Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a rare and aggressive primary peritoneal disease, with recommended treatment, in eligible patients, of a combination of complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). As treatment is multimodal, there is a wide heterogeneity of HIPEC protocols precluding clear comparisons. Standardization at an international level is required. METHODS: The Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) designated a steering committee to produce consensus recommendations for HIPEC regimens, adapted to each etiology. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used, based on a systematic review focused on main outcomes related to HIPEC regimens in DMPM patients and on the patient, intervention, comparator, and outcome (PICO) method to elaborate main questions. An opinion survey was added. Furthermore, a Delphi process was performed with voting from a panel of international experts. RESULTS: Eleven questions were elaborated, including two for future research requirements and three to assess the HIPEC regimen preference of the panel. The level of evidence underlying questions was globally low. Overall, 75 (86%) and 67 (77%) of the 87 invited experts completed the vote at the first and second round, respectively. HIPEC following complete CRS was strongly supported by 88% of voters with no need to plan comparative studies with CRS alone for 61.2% of voters. Bi-drug regimens appeared to be preferred to mono-drug ones and cisplatin was globally favored. The opinion survey confirmed the combination of cisplatin and doxorubicin as the recommended regimen. CONCLUSION: International consensus confirmed the indication of HIPEC following complete CRS in DMPM patients and recommended cisplatin-doxorubicin as the first-line HIPEC regimen.

The 2022 PSOGI International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Methodology.

BACKGROUND: A group of experts from the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) and the BIG-RENAPE group carried out a consensus among surgeons experienced in treating peritoneal malignancies from around the world to derive recommendations on indications of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), choice and details of HIPEC regimens, and areas for future research. This manuscript describes the methodology of achieving this consensus and the degree of participation of experts. METHODS: The Delphi technique was used and the questionnaire comprised three categories: evidence-based recommendations using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system with the PICO (patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome) method, an opinion survey, and research recommendations. A consensus was achieved if any one option had >50% of votes, or positive or negative recommendations combined had > 70% of votes. RESULTS: Of the 145 experts solicited, 71.1% in round I and 72.2% in round II took the survey. Participation was highest among surgeons treating both gastrointestinal and gynecological malignancies. Of 113 questions, after round I, a consensus was achieved for 72 (63.7%) questions, and after the second round, consensus was achieved for another 22 (19.4%) questions, making a total of 94 (83.1%) questions for which a consensus was achieved. CONCLUSION: This consensus was carried out using a thorough review of literature and robust rating of evidence, and included key experts and opinion leaders from across the world. The results could guide clinicians on the use of HIPEC, both in their day-to-day clinical practice and in designing clinical trials.

Comparison of Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy Protocols for the Curative-Intent Management of Peritoneal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer, Regarding Morphological Response, Pathological Response, and Long-Term Outcomes: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Selected patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM) could be offered a curative-intent strategy based on complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS), potentially combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and perioperative systemic chemotherapy. The impact of different neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NACT) regimens remains unclear due to a lack of comparative data. METHODS: Consecutive CRPM patients from a monocentric database who were treated with complete CRS after single-line NACT were included in this study. Chemotherapy regimens were tailored as a doublet drug (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) with/without targeted therapy (anti-epidermal growth factor receptor/bevacizumab) and triplet-drug combination (FOLFIRINOX). Morphological response (MR) was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, and pathological response (PR) was assessed using the Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS). Long-term oncologic outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 388 patients, including 127, 202, and 59 patients in the doublet, doublet + targeted, and triplet groups, respectively. MR rates were higher in the triplet (68.0%) and doublet + targeted groups (64.2%) when compared with the doublet group (42.4%, p = 0.003). Complete and major PRs were observed in 13.6% and 32.0% of patients, respectively. Higher MR rates were observed after doublet + targeted or triplet regimens, while no difference was observed for PR rates. In multivariate analysis, FOLFIRINOX was independently associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.25-0.96; p = 0.037). FOLFIRINOX also resulted in a higher rate of severe postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, a FOLFIRINOX regimen as NACT seemed to result in better long-term outcomes for CRPM patients after complete CRS/HIPEC, although with higher morbidity. Prospective studies are needed, including groups without NACT and those with FOLFIRINOX + bevacizumab.

Influence of Extraperitoneal Metastases on the Curative-Intent Management of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Selected patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis (CRPM) and extraperitoneal disease could be treated radically with a multimodal approach combining complete cytoreductive surgery, thermoablation, radiotherapy, and systemic and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The impact of extraperitoneal metastatic sites (EPMS) in this setting remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with CRPM undergoing complete cytoreduction in 2005-2018 were grouped in: peritoneal disease only (PDO), one EPMS (1 + EPMS), two or more EPMS (2 + EPMS). A retrospective analysis compared overall survival (OS) and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Of 433 patients, 109 had 1 + EPMS and 31 had 2 + EPMS. Overall, 101 patients had liver metastasis, 19 lung metastasis, and 30 retroperitoneal lymph node (RLN) invasion. The median OS was 56.9 months. There was no significant OS difference between PDO and 1 + EPMS groups (64.6 and 57.9 months, respectively), whereas OS was lower in the 2 + EPMS group (29.4 months, p = 0.005). In multivariate analysis, 2 + EPMS [hazard ratio (HR) 2.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33-6.12, p = 0.007], Sugarbaker's Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) > 15 (HR 3.86, 95% CI 2.04-7.32, p < 0.001), poorly differentiated tumors (HR 2.62, 95% CI 1.21-5.66, p = 0.015), and BRAF mutation (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.11-3.99, p = 0.024) were independent poor prognostic factors, while adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.20-0.56, p < 0.001). Patients with liver resection did not show higher severe complication rates. CONCLUSION: In patients with CRPM selected for a radical surgical approach, limited extraperitoneal disease involving one site, notably the liver, does not seem to significantly impair postoperative results. RLN invasion appeared as a poor prognostic factor in this population.

Avelumab in patients with gestational trophoblastic tumors with resistance to polychemotherapy: Cohort B of the TROPHIMMUN phase 2 trial.

PURPOSE: There is a need for innovative treatments in women with gestational trophoblastic tumors (GTT) resistant to chemotherapy. The TROPHIMMUN trial assessed the efficacy of avelumab in patients with resistance to single-agent chemotherapy (cohort A), or to polychemotherapy (cohort B). Cohort B outcomes are reported here. METHODS: In the cohort B of this phase 2 multicenter trial (NCT03135769), women with GTT progressing after polychemotherapy received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks until human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) normalization, followed by 3 consolidation cycles. The primary endpoint was the rate of hCG normalization enabling treatment discontinuation (2-stage Simon design). RESULTS: Between February 2017 and August 2020, 7 patients were enrolled. Median age was 37 years (range: 29-47); disease stage was I or III in 42.9% and 57.1%; FIGO score was 9-10 in 28.6%, 11 in 28.6%, and 16 in 14.3%, respectively. Median follow-up was 18.2 months. One patient (14.3%) experienced hCG normalization enabling treatment discontinuation. However, resistance to avelumab was observed in the remaining 6 patients (85.7%). The cohort B was stopped for futility. Grade 1-2 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 57.1%, most commonly fatigue (42.9%), nausea, diarrhea, infusion-related reaction, muscle pains, dry eyes (each 14.3%). The median resistance-free survival was 1.4 months (95% CI 0.7-5.3). CONCLUSIONS: Although avelumab is active in patients with single-agent chemotherapy-resistant GTT (cohort A), it was associated with limited efficacy in patients with resistance to polychemotherapy (cohort B). The prognosis of patients with polychemotherapy resistance remains poor, and innovative immunotherapy-based therapeutic combinations are needed.

Non-resectable Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma Treated with Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) Plus Systemic Chemotherapy Could Lead to Secondary Complete Cytoreductive Surgery: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is an aggressive primary peritoneal neoplasia. At diagnosis, few patients are eligible for a recommended cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Among neoadjuvant strategies, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) combined with systemic chemotherapy has been recently proposed. This study evaluated this strategy in a cohort of DMPM patients. METHODS: Patients with DMPM and primary or recurrent non-resectable diseases who received at least one PIPAC procedure in alternation with systemic chemotherapy were included in this retrospective study to analyze oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 26 DMPM patients were treated with at least one PIPAC, including 20 patients with no previous CRS. Of 22 patients (85%) who had symptoms, 9 had perceptible ascites. Overall, 79 PIPAC procedures were performed, with half of the patients receiving three PIPAC procedures or more. Among eight patients (31%), 10 adverse events (13% of procedures) were reported, including two severe complications, both corresponding to digestive perforations. Improvement of symptoms was reported for 32% of the patients, whereas control of ascites was noted in 46%. All but one procedure among 14 patients (54%) secondarily treated by CRS-HIPEC were considered complete resections. After a median follow-up period of 29.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.6-not reached [NR]), the median overall survival period was 12 months (95% CI 11.1-NR). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better among the patients who underwent resection than among those who did not (33.5 vs 7.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.18; 95% CI 0.06-0.755; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with initially non-resectable DMPM, PIPAC is feasible for treatment with neoadjuvant intent and could facilitate complete secondary resection.

Assessment of postoperative pain after pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the treatment of peritoneal metastasis.

PURPOSE: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new surgical technique, for the treatment of initially unresectable peritoneal metastasis (PM). Our objective was to assess postoperative pain and morbidity. METHODS: Between July 2016 and September 2020, data from 100 consecutive PIPAC procedures with oxaliplatin (PIPAC Ox) or doxorubicin-cisplatin (PIPAC C/D) in 49 patients with PM (all etiologies) were analyzed. Pain was self-assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) of 0-10. RESULTS: The median PIPAC procedures per patient were 2 [1-3]. Patients indicated greatest pain at 4 pm on the day of the procedure (D0) and on postoperative D1 at 8 am and 4 pm. Postprocedural moderate-to-severe pain (VAS 4-10) was more frequent with PIPAC Ox than with PIPAC C/D, respectively 14 (36.8%) vs 7 (13.5%); p = 0.010. Hospitalization was longer for patients with moderate-to-severe pain than for others (median 4 days [3-7] vs 3 days [2-4], p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis identified oxaliplatin as a factor associated with greater pain (OR [95% CI], 2.95 [1.10-7.89]. Opiate administration was similar after PIPAC Ox and PIPAC C/D procedures, p = 0.477. CONCLUSION: PIPAC was well-tolerated, and pain was well-controlled in the majority of patients. Pain was greatest at 4 pm on D0 and 8 am and 4 pm on D1. PIPAC Ox is associated with greater pain than PIPAC C/D, independently of opiate treatment. Moderate-to-severe pain was associated with longer hospital stays.

An International Registry of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Appendiceal Goblet Cell Carcinoma Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Peritoneal carcinomatosis from appendiceal goblet cell carcinoma (A-GCC) is a rare and aggressive form of appendiceal tumor. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intra peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was reported as an interesting alternative regarding survival compared to surgery without HIPEC and/or systemic chemotherapy. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of CRS and HIPEC for patients presenting A-GCC through an international registry. METHODS: A prospective multicenter international database was retrospectively searched to identify all patients with A-GCC tumor and peritoneal metastases who underwent CRS and HIPEC through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI). The post-operative complications, long-term results, and principal prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: The analysis included 83 patients. After a median follow-up of 47 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 34.6 months. The 3- and 5-year OS was 48.5% and 35.7%, respectively. Patients who underwent complete macroscopic CRS had a significantly better survival than those treated with incomplete CRS. The 5-year OS was 44% and 0% for patients who underwent complete, and incomplete CRS, respectively (HR 9.65, p < 0.001). Lymph node involvement and preoperative chemotherapy were also predictive of a worse prognosis. There were 3 postoperative deaths, and 30% of the patients had major complications. CONCLUSION: CRS and HIPEC may increase long-term survival in selected patients with peritoneal metastases of A-GCC origin, especially when complete CRS is achieved. Ideally, randomized control trials or more retrospective data are needed to confirm CRS and HIPEC as the gold standard in this pathology.

What is the effectiveness and safety of mirtazapine versus escitalopram in alleviating cancer-associated poly-symptomatology (the MIR-P study)? A mixed-method randomized controlled trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Advanced cancer patients often experience multiple symptoms at a same time. This might lead to polypharmacy and increase adverse events representing major threats to the quality of health care, especially in palliative care situations. Mirtazapine, an antidepressant agent, has been suggested as a potential relevant drug to alleviate multiple cancer-related symptoms at a same time. Therefore, the present study aims to assess the effectiveness of mirtazapine in alleviating multiple symptoms at a same time in advanced cancer patients suffering from a major depressive episode compared to a group receiving escitalopram, another antidepressant agent. METHODS: Multicentre, prospective, randomized, controlled trial in 12 palliative care services in France. The study will be based on a mixed-method methodology using parallel groups, of oral mirtazapine compared with oral escitalopram, with a 56 day follow-up. The primary outcome will be an improvement of the Global health Status (issued from the EORTC-QLQ-C30) on day 56. 418 participants will be clinically followed-up on day 7 and 56 and will have a telephonic assessment on days 14 and 28. A sub-sample of participants will be invited to take part in semi-structured qualitative interviews at baseline and day 56. For the qualitative part, purposeful sampling will be used. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence for the pharmaceutics management of poly-symptomatology in advanced cancer patients. This could lead to important changes in the management of those patients by using a single molecule to alleviate multiple symptoms at a same time, potentially improving medication adherence, symptoms' control, and reducing the risk of medications adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration: NCT04763135 . Registered 18 March 2021.

HIPEC Methodology and Regimens: The Need for an Expert Consensus.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is performed with a wide variation in methodology, drugs, and other elements vital to the procedure. Adoption of a limited number of regimens could increase the collective experience of peritoneal oncologists, make comparison between studies more meaningful, and lead to a greater acceptance of results from randomized trials. This study aimed to determine the possibility of standardizing HIPEC methodology and regimens and to identify the best method of performing such a standardization. METHODS: A critical review of preclinical and clinical studies evaluating the pharmacokinetic aspects of different HIPEC drugs and drug regimens, the impact of hyperthermia, and the efficacy of various HIPEC regimens as well as studies comparing different regimens was performed. RESULTS: The preclinical and clinical data were limited, and studies comparing different regimens were scarce. Many of the regimens were neither supported by preclinical rationale or data nor validated by a dose-escalating formal phase 1 trial. All the regimens were based on pharmacokinetic data and did not take chemosensitivity of peritoneal metastases into account. Personalized medicine approaches such as patient-derived tumor organoids could offer a solution to this problem, although clinical validation is likely to be challenging. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from randomized trials, more translational research and phases 1 and 2 studies are needed. While waiting for better preclinical and clinical evidence, the best way to minimize heterogeneity is by an expert consensus that aims to identify and define a limited number of regimens for each indication and primary site. The choice of regimen then can be tailored to the patient profile and its expected toxicity and the methodology according regional factors.