Pilot Assessment of Platelet Thrombus Area and Contractile Force in Pediatric Congenital Heart Surgery Patients Using a Microfluidic Device.

OBJECTIVES: This work was designed to evaluate maximum platelet contractile force and thrombus area before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in pediatric patients having congenital heart disease (CHD) surgery using a microfluidic device. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was designed. SETTING: The work took place at an academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty pediatric CHD patients ≤8 years of age with expected CPB time >30 minutes were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Blood was collected at baseline and post-CPB. Maximum platelet contractile force and thrombus area were evaluated in vitro using a microfluidic device (ATLAS PST). Post-CPB samples were supplemented with recombinant von Willebrand factor (rVWF) to explore the impact on contractile force and thrombus area. At baseline, the maximum thrombus area was 0.06 (0.05, 0.07), and the maximum force was 123.3 nN (68.4, 299.5). Linear mixed-effects regression models showed that the maximum thrombus area was larger post-CPB and post-CPB + rVWF compared with pre-CPB (estimated coefficient [Est] = 0.04, p = 0.002; Est = 0.09, p < 0.001, respectively). The maximum thrombus area was also larger post-CPB + rVWF compared with post-CPB (Est = 0.04, p = 0.001). Force was higher post-CPB + rVWF compared with pre-CPB (Est = 173.32, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric CHD patients, microfluidic testing demonstrated that platelet thrombus area increased slightly after CPB, while platelet contractile force did not change. In vitro addition of rVWF further increased thrombus area, suggesting augmentation of primary hemostasis. Microfluidic assessment of platelet contractile force and thrombus area in pediatric CHD patients appears feasible and can demonstrate changes after CPB. Further studies are needed to determine its accuracy, clinical utility, and normal values for pediatric patients.

The Impact of Nasal Intubation on Feeding Outcomes in Neonates Requiring Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial.

Neonates who require surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD) frequently have difficulty with oral feeds post-operatively and may require a feeding tube at hospital discharge. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of oral or nasal intubation route on feeding method at hospital discharge. This was a non-blinded randomized control trial of 62 neonates who underwent surgery for CHD between 2018 and 2021. Infants in the nasal (25 patients) and oral (37 patients) groups were similar in terms of pre-operative risk factors for feeding difficulties including completed weeks of gestational age at birth (39 vs 38 weeks), birthweight (3530 vs 3100 g), pre-operative PO intake (92% vs 81%), and rate of pre-operative intubation (22% vs 28%). Surgical risk factors were also similar including Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery category (3.9 vs 4.1), shunt placement (32% vs 41%), cardiopulmonary bypass time (181 vs 177 min), and cross-clamp time (111 vs 105 min). 96% of nasally intubated patients took full oral feeds by discharge as compared with 78% of orally intubated infants (p = 0.05). Nasally intubated infants reach full oral feeds an average of 3 days earlier than their orally intubated peers. In this cohort of patients, nasally intubated infants reach oral feeds more quickly and are less likely to require supplemental tube feeding in comparison to orally intubated peers. Intubation route is a potential modifiable risk factor for oral aversion and appears safe in neonates. The study was approved by the University of Virginia Institutional Review Board for Health Sciences Research and was retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05378685) on May 18, 2022.

Pediatric Pulmonary Artery Rehabilitation: A Review of Our Experience and a Novel Approach Using Bronchial Blockers.

Recent advances in the field of pediatric interventional cardiology have resulted in therapies for patients in need of augmented pulmonary artery (PA) flow. Catheter-based PA rehabilitation can be performed safely but not without the potential risk of pulmonary hemorrhage. When severe, this bleeding has the ability to contaminate the bronchi and trachea, and possibly occlude the endotracheal tube. This can result in a critical inability to ventilate and oxygenate these patients. Herein, we review our institutional experience with pulmonary hemorrhage associated with these procedures and the feasibility of predicting this outcome. The secondary aim was to discuss our novel anesthetic approach to a select group of these patients, involving the use of bronchial blockers to preemptively prevent contamination of bilateral bronchi and occlusion of the endotracheal tube.

Pregnancy complications and loss: an observational survey comparing anesthesiologists and obstetrician-gynecologists.

OBJECTIVE: While there is increasing information regarding the occupational risks to pregnant physicians, there is inconsistent and limited subspecialty data. Physicians may be at increased risk for pregnancy complications due to occupational exposure, long work hours, nightshifts, and physical/mental demands. Additionally, little is known regarding the education physicians receive pertaining to pregnancy risks respective to their specialties as well as departmental/institutional support for pregnancy loss or complication. Therefore, a survey was developed and distributed across multiple academic sites to ascertain if there is an inherent occupation-associated risk of pregnancy complication(s) and/or pregnancy loss for anesthesiologists (ANES) when compared to obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYN). METHODS: A specialty-specific survey was distributed electronically to attending ANES and OB/GYN, via departmental listservs at six participating academic medical centers. Responses were collected from March to October 2022 and included demographic information, practice characteristics, education about pregnancy risks and details of pregnancy complications and loss. The primary comparison between specialty groups was the occurrence of at least one pregnancy complication and/or loss. Logistic regression was used to evaluate specialty outcome associations. Additionally, complication rates and types between specialties were compared using univariate and multivariable models. RESULTS: The survey was distributed to 556 anesthesiology and 662 obstetrics-gynecology faculty members with 224 ANES and 168 OB/GYN respondents, yielding an overall 32.2% response rate. Of the survey respondents, 103 ANES and 116 OB/GYN reported at least one pregnancy. Demographics were similar between the two cohorts. ANES had higher gravidity and parity relative to OB/GYN and tended to be earlier in their career at first pregnancy (p = .008, <.001, and .043, respectively). The rate of any pregnancy complication, including loss, was similar between specialties (65.1% (67/103) vs. 65.5% (76/116), p = .942). Of the respondents reporting at least one pregnancy, 56.7% of ANES and 53.9% of OB/GYN experienced a complication while at work. Obstetrician-gynecologists had higher use of reproductive assistance (28% (47/116) vs. 11% (20/103), p < .001). There were no notable differences between cohorts for complications, prematurity, and neonatal intensive care admission. Forty-one percent (161/392) of total respondents recalled learning about occupational risks to pregnancy, and ANES were more likely than OB/GYN to have recalled learning about these risks (121/224 (54%) and 40/168 (23.8%), respectively, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: ANES and OB/GYN had similar risks for pregnancy complications and loss. Anesthesiologists were more likely to recall receiving education regarding occupational risk to pregnancy, though fewer than half of all survey respondents recalled learning about these risks. Our survey results are similar to the previously identified higher rate of pregnancy complications and loss in female physicians while uncovering areas of potential knowledge gaps for which institutions and practices could strive to improve upon. More research is needed to examine the relationship between occupation and pregnancy risk pertaining to female physicians with the goal being to identify modifiable risk factors.