InspirE5: a participatory, internationally informed framework for health humanities curricula in health professions education.

BACKGROUND: Reporting on the effect of health humanities teaching in health professions education courses to facilitate sharing and mutual exchange internationally, and the generation of a more interconnected body of evidence surrounding health humanities curricula is needed. This study asked, what could an internationally informed curriculum and evaluation framework for the implementation of health humanities for health professions education look like? METHODS: The participatory action research approach applied was based on three iterative phases 1. Perspective sharing and collaboration building. 2. Evidence gathering 3. Development of an internationally relevant curriculum and evaluation framework for health humanities. Over 2 years, a series of online meetings, virtual workshops and follow up communications resulted in the production of the curriculum framework. RESULTS: Following the perspective sharing and evidence gathering, the InspirE5 model of curriculum design and evaluation framework for health humanities in health professions education was developed. Five principal foci shaped the design of the framework. ENVIRONMENT: Learning and political environment surrounding the program. Expectations: Graduate capabilities that are clearly articulated for all, integrated into core curricula and relevant to graduate destinations and associated professional standards. EXPERIENCE: Learning and teaching experience that supports learners' achievement of the stated graduate capabilities. EVIDENCE: Assessment of learning (formative and/or summative) with feedback for learners around the development of capabilities. Enhancement: Program evaluation of the students and teachers learning experiences and achievement. In all, 11 Graduate Capabilities for Health Humanities were suggested along with a summary of common core content and guiding principles for assessment of health humanities learning. DISCUSSION: Concern about objectifying, reductive biomedical approaches to health professions education has led to a growing expansion of health humanities teaching and learning around the world. The InspirE5 curriculum and evaluation framework provides a foundation for a standardised approach to describe or compare health humanities education in different contexts and across a range of health professions courses and may be adapted around the world to progress health humanities education.

Health Humanities curriculum and evaluation in health professions education: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The articulation of learning goals, processes and outcomes related to health humanities teaching currently lacks comparability of curricula and outcomes, and requires synthesis to provide a basis for developing a curriculum and evaluation framework for health humanities teaching and learning. This scoping review sought to answer how and why the health humanities are used in health professions education. It also sought to explore how health humanities curricula are evaluated and whether the programme evaluation aligns with the desired learning outcomes. METHODS: A focused scoping review of qualitative and mixed-methods studies that included the influence of integrated health humanities curricula in pre-registration health professions education with programme evaluate of outcomes was completed. Studies of students not enrolled in a pre-registration course, with only ad-hoc health humanities learning experiences that were not assessed or evaluated were excluded. Four databases were searched (CINAHL), (ERIC), PubMed, and Medline. RESULTS: The search over a 5 year period, identified 8621 publications. Title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening, resulted in 24 articles selected for inclusion. Learning outcomes, learning activities and evaluation data were extracted from each included publication. DISCUSSION: Reported health humanities curricula focused on developing students' capacity for perspective, reflexivity, self- reflection and person-centred approaches to communication. However, the learning outcomes were not consistently described, identifying a limited capacity to compare health humanities curricula across programmes. A set of clearly stated generic capabilities or outcomes from learning in health humanities would be a helpful next step for benchmarking, clarification and comparison of evaluation strategy.

Medical insurance and healthcare utilization among the middle-aged and elderly in China: evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study 2011, 2013 and 2015.

BACKGROUND: In response to China's rapidly aging population and increasing healthcare service demands, the Chinese government is developing a universal medical insurance system. This study aimed to assess healthcare utilization patterns and analyze the impacts of medical insurance schemes on healthcare utilization among the middle-aged and elderly in China. METHODS: Data was extracted from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study in 2011, 2013 and 2015. Healthcare utilization was measured by outpatient and inpatient service utilization. Univariate analysis was deployed to examine the impacts of different medical insurance schemes on healthcare utilization. The factors associated with healthcare utilization were estimated using a random-effects logistic regression model. RESULTS: During the study period, the number of individuals involved was 17,250, 18,195 and 19,842, respectively. The proportion of individuals who received outpatient service was 18.6, 20.7 and 18.7% and those who used inpatient service was 9.6, 13.8 and 14.3%, respectively. We identified that medical insurance was a major protective factor for improving healthcare utilization but different medical insurance schemes exerted various impacts on the middle-aged and the elderly. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the growing population coverage, the Chinese government should make every effort to bridge the gap among people with different medical insurance schemes. Further evaluation is needed to assess whether the expanded medical insurance schemes could protect the middle-aged and elderly households from catastrophic health expenditure.

Does the universal medical insurance system reduce catastrophic health expenditure among middle-aged and elderly households in China? A longitudinal analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Chinese government has made great progress in establishing the universal medical insurance system. This study aimed to analyze whether the universal medical insurance system protected middle-aged and elderly households from catastrophic health expenditure (CHE). METHODS: The data were obtained from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. We used household as our unit of analysis and CHE was measured as out-of-pocket expenditures ≥ 40% of nonfood household expenditures. Univariate analysis was deployed to examine the impacts of different medical insurance schemes on CHE, and the factors associated with CHE were estimated using a random-effects logit regression model. RESULTS: We identified 10,005, 10,370, and 11,567 households in 2011, 2013, and 2015, respectively, and found 12.9% (2011), 26.6% (2013) and 27.9% (2015) of the households experienced CHE. When compared with no insurance, households enrolled in New Rural Cooperative Medical Insurance Scheme (P = 0.023) were associated with a lower incidence of CHE, but other insurance schemes were not significant. Households with members older than 65 years (P < 0.001), members with chronic diseases (P < 0.001), members with poor self-reported health conditions (P < 0.001), and members receiving health care (P < 0.001) had a higher risk of CHE. Large household size (P < 0.001) and high household income per capita (P < 0.001) were major protective factors to CHE incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Despite China's great stride in the medical insurance coverage, it fell short to provide financial protection against medical expenditure burden. To reduce the risk of CHE, an integrated poverty and elderly-oriented medical insurance system could be put in place to address these problems.

The impact of physicians' knowledge on outpatient antibiotic use: Evidence from China's county hospitals.

We designed this study to explore how factors, especially knowledge, influence the use and prescriptions of antibiotics among physicians in China's county hospitals.A questionnaire was designed to evaluate the knowledge levels of physicians. The rates of antibiotic prescriptions were collected through on-the-spot investigations. The percentage of encounters with antibiotics prescribed and the percentage of encounters with antibiotics combination prescribed were used to measure antibiotics use. Univariate analysis and the generalized linear model were applied to analyze the knowledge levels among physicians as well as their antibiotic prescriptions.A total of 334 physicians in 60 county hospitals filled out the questionnaires, and 385,529 prescriptions were collected. The mean score of the questionnaire was a pass (62.8). The physicians in the eastern region of China demonstrated higher levels of knowledge than other regions (P = .08). Physicians with a higher score prescribed less antibiotics (P < .01) and less antibiotics combination (P = .07).The knowledge gap of Chinese physicians is evident and those with a higher degree of knowledge always prescribe fewer antibiotics. Targeted training and courses to educate physicians about the risks of over-prescription of antibiotics should be conducted to improve the practice of antibiotic prescriptions.

Burden of visual impairment associated with eye diseases: exploratory survey of 298 Chinese patients.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the economic burden, prevalence of catastrophic healthcare expenditure (CHE) and the quality of life (QoL) of Chinese patients with visual impairment (VI) associated with eye diseases. DESIGN: A questionnaire survey from March to May 2016 by structured face-to-face interviews of patients with VI. PARTICIPANTS: 302 patients who were diagnosed with moderate VI or worse in both eyes (visual acuity <6/18) were included, and 298 patients (98.7%) who completed the survey questionnaires were eligible for the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The economic burden was estimated by calculating participants' direct costs covered in 2015 and the definition of CHE was out-of-pocket (OOP) costs exceeding 30% of annual household income. QoL was weighed by health utility value using time-trade-off valuation techniques. RESULTS: Annual average direct costs per patient caused by VI were US$6988.6±US$10 834.3, and 70.3% were direct medical costs of which only 26.9% were reimbursable by medical insurance. 32.2% of households that suffered from CHE, in particular, were less wealthy patients with VI living in rural areas and without medical insurance. The health utility value was rated at 0.65 on average, and patients with VI aged 51-57, living alone and insured by commercial medical insurance had relatively less QoL. CONCLUSION: Our study explored the economic burden and QoL of VI associated with patients with eye diseases in China, indicating a substantial economic burden and poor QoL. Preferential medical insurance policies should be designed in relation to people with VI to further reduce the health inequalities, avoid CHE and promote QoL.