Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 131(6): 969-971, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37879999

RESUMO

Standardised and universal perioperative endpoint reporting are the cornerstone for outcomes assessment, reliable clinical trials, and health services research. The Outcome4medicine initiative recently reported consensus recommendations on how to assess the quality of surgical interventions, proposing a framework for surgical outcome assessment and quality improvement after medical interventions. In the same field, the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine - Core Outcome Measures for Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (StEP-COMPAC) group recently proposed standardised and valid measures of mortality and morbidity, derived from a three-stage Delphi process. Here a core group of the Outcome4medicine conference discusses how these two initiatives are aligned and emphasises the importance of standardised outcome assessment by integrating the perspectives of different stakeholders.


Assuntos
Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Assistência Perioperatória , Humanos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Técnica Delphi , Resultado do Tratamento , Projetos de Pesquisa
2.
Nat Med ; 29(4): 811-822, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37069361

RESUMO

Postoperative complications represent a major public health burden worldwide. Without standardized, clinically relevant and universally applied endpoints, the evaluation of surgical interventions remains ill-defined and inconsistent, opening the door for biased interpretations and hampering patient-centered health care delivery. We conducted a Jury-based consensus conference incorporating the perspectives of different stakeholders, who based their recommendations on the work of nine panels of experts. The recommendations cover the selection of postoperative outcomes from the perspective of patients and other stakeholders, comparison and interpretation of outcomes, consideration of cultural and demographic factors, and strategies to deal with unwarranted outcomes. With the recommendations developed exclusively by the Jury, we provide a framework for surgical outcome assessment and quality improvement after medical interventions, that integrates the main stakeholders' perspectives.


Assuntos
Pacientes , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA