Illness representations of restricting back pain: the older Person's perspective.

OBJECTIVE: Back pain is the most common type of pain reported by older adults, leading to considerable morbidity and cost. Yet little is known about the segment of the population ≥80 years old that can be used to guide care in this age group. Illness representations provide a useful framework to understand older adults' beliefs and perceptions of their back pain. The objective of this study was to understand illness representations of back pain, severe enough to restrict activity (restricting back pain). DESIGN: Qualitative research using semi-structured interviews. SUBJECTS: Twenty-three community-living older adults ≥80 years old with restricting back pain. METHODS: We used an interview guide to stimulate discussion about how older adults understand and perceive living with restricting back pain. Thematic codes were created to categorize the nuances of participants' restricting back pain experiences. RESULTS: Participants reported five important components of illness representation: 1) identity,the label and symptoms individuals assign to the illness; 2) timeline, the individual's perceived clinical course of the illness; 3) cause, the individual's perceived etiology of the illness; 4) consequences,the perceived impact of the illness; and 5) cure control,the perceived degree to which cure or management is possible/likely. CONCLUSIONS: Thematic analysis revealed that restricting back pain in older adults has variable and noteworthy physical, psychological and social consequences.There are several components of the illness representation of restricting back pain, specifically,the perceptions of consequences and control that may offer potential targets for clinical intervention.

The perceived value of a geriatrics-surgery co-management program: Perspectives from three surgical specialties.

BACKGROUND: Geriatrics-surgery co-management (GSCM) programs have improved patient outcomes, but little is known about how they change care and whether their value varies by surgical specialty. We aimed to assess GSCM's effects as perceived by Orthopedic Trauma, Trauma, and Neurosurgery clinicians. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study utilizing electronic survey and virtual interviews at Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, an academic trauma center, in Philadelphia, PA. Participants included physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, social workers, and case managers in the aforementioned specialties. Key measures were perspectives on value of GSCM, its facilitators, specialty most appropriate to manage specified medical issues, and factors affecting use. RESULTS: Of 71 eligible clinicians, 45 (63%) completed the survey and 12 (21%) of 56 purposefully sampled for specialty-role diversity were interviewed. Clinicians across specialties valued GSCM highly and similarly for impact on personal management of older adults (grand mean [standard error, SE] = 4.33 [0.24] out of 5; p = 0.80 for specialty means comparisons), patient care (mean [SE] = 4.47 [0.21]; p = 0.27), patient outcomes (mean [SE] = 4.26 [0.22]; p = 0.51), and specialty overall (mean [SE] = 4.55 [0.23]; p = 0.25) but less so for knowledge growth (mean [SE] = 3.47 [0.29]; p = 0.11). Interviewees across specialties reported that value derived from improved understanding of patient history, management of complex medical conditions, goals of care support, communication with families, and patient discharge facilitation. Interviewees also agreed on program facilitators: aligned stakeholders, shared data-driven goals, champion/administrative support, continuity and availability of geriatricians, and thorough communication. Specialties differed on three issues: (1) who should manage some medical concerns; (2) whether GSCM makes their job easier (significantly easier for Orthopedic Trauma: mean [SE] = 4.75 [0.29] vs. Trauma: mean [SE] = 4.01 [0.19]; p = 0.05); and (3) whether GSCM increases coordination difficulty (more for Neurosurgery: mean [SE] = 2.18 [0.0.58] vs. Orthopedic Trauma: mean [SE] = 0.51 [0.42]; p = 0.03 and Trauma: mean [SE] = 0.89 [0.28]; p = 0.07). Orthopedic Trauma had the most positive impression of GSCM overall. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians across diverse surgical specialties valued GSCM. Hospitals considering implementation or expansion of GSCM should attend to identified facilitators and may need to tailor to specialty.

Making the leap from idea generation to implementation: Ten steps every geriatrics specialist should know.

This is an exciting time in Geriatrics, with numerous opportunities in health care for Geriatrics specialists to innovate and lead. Geriatrics specialists should know how to implement innovative care models to lead healthcare changes in their organizations and effectively facilitate change management. We highlight a 10-step framework that Geriatrics specialists can leverage to quickly move their ideas from development to implementation at a system level. This framework adapts concepts from business management to provide a step-by-step guide to move from idea generation to implementation. We provide different practical examples that a Geriatrician can correlate to in their practice, including value proposition and business canvas model. Though small components of the business canvas model may vary based on organization and program/idea-specific needs, the outlined skills will establish Geriatrics specialists as leaders of change, a resource for education, and valued consultants to a health system that is in dire need of direction to improve the quality of care, and health outcomes, for older adults.

Geriatrics: Moving forward with 2020 vision.

Geriatricians have long debated the parameters, positioning, and prospects of their specialty. The year 2020 started full of promise as many organizations anticipated assessing themselves using perfect, or 2020, vision. While challenging on several levels, the momentous combination of events in 2020-the COVID-19 pandemic, Racial Justice Movement, and the November elections-provided Geriatric Medicine several opportunities to firmly secure a position in the mainstream. As we reflect on the new perspectives, programs, and partnerships initiated in 2020, five broader lessons emerge that can help safeguard the future of Geriatrics: the field could employ more intentional "direct to consumer" marketing strategies, expand the scope of what it means to be a patient advocate, pursue new strategic partnerships, take the opportunity to address racial injustice, and leverage existing skillsets to expand scope of care for patients. Given the interdisciplinary nature of Geriatrics, it is fitting that many of these lessons build upon this collaborative philosophy and are derived from domains outside of health care. So in an unexpected way, the events of 2020 may actually help Geriatrics see, with 2020 vision, how to remain mainstream. With this new clarity, Geriatrics holds renewed promise to truly become specialists in whole-person care and it is our hope that, with insight from the lessons shared here, the specialty brings this vision to fruition in the current decade and beyond.

Home is where the heart is: living arrangements for older adults.

Beginning January 1, 2011 the first of the baby boomers will turn 65 years of age. One of the biggest challenges they will encounter is deciding where they wish to live. Faced with uncertainty regarding their health, longevity, expenses, and need for supportive services, many older adults are overwhelmed with selecting long-term care options. Today, there are a variety of living arrangements available to seniors. These range from independent living to home care or day care, congregate housing, assisted living or nursing facilities. With the number of adults 65 years of age and older projected to exceed 80 million by 2030, there also is a growing concern over the availability of these housing options. Furthermore, as the Institute of Medicine report, "Retooling for an Aging America," notes there will be an additional need for qualified professionals to care for older adults. Pharmacists are uniquely qualified and positioned to provide these services. This article describes various types of living arrangements available to the older adults and the issues associated with transitioning from one setting to another setting. Opportunities for pharmacists to consult in the emerging continuum of care marketplace also will be discussed.

Functional Outcomes After Hip Fracture in Independent Community-Dwelling Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine predictors of new activities of daily living (ADLs) disability and worsened mobility disability and secondarily increased daily care hours received, in previously independent hip fracture patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic hospital with ambulatory follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling adults 65 years or older independent in ADLs undergoing hip fracture surgery in 2015 (n = 184). MEASUREMENTS: Baseline, 3- and 6-month ADLs, mobility, and daily care hours received were ascertained by telephone survey and chart review. Comorbidities, medications, and characteristics of hospitalization were extracted from patient charts. Models for each outcome used logistic regression with a backward elimination strategy, adjusting a priori for age, sex, and race. RESULTS: Predictors of new ADL disability at 3 months were dementia (odds ratio [OR] = 11.81; P = .001) and in-hospital delirium (OR = 4.20; P = .002), and at 6 months were age (OR = 1.04; P = .014), dementia (OR = 9.91; P = .001), in-hospital delirium (OR = 3.00; P = .031) and preadmission opiates (OR = 7.72; P = .003). Predictors of worsened mobility at 3 months were in-hospital delirium (OR = 4.48; P = .001) and number of medications (OR = 1.13; P = .003), and at 6 months were age (OR = 1.06; P = .001), preadmission opiates (OR = 7.23; P = .005), in-hospital delirium (OR = 3.10; P = .019), and number of medications (OR = 1.13; P = .013). Predictors of increased daily care hours received at 3 and 6 months were age (3 months: OR = 1.07; P = .014; 6 months: OR = 1.06; P = .017) and number of medications (3 months: OR = 1.13; P = .004; 6 months: OR = 1.22; P = .013). The proportion of patients with ADL disability and care hours received did not change from 3 to 6 months, yet there were significant improvements in mobility. CONCLUSION: Age, dementia, in-hospital delirium, number of medications, and preadmission opiate use were predictors of poor outcomes in independent older adults following hip fracture. Further investigation is needed to identify factors associated with improved mobility measures from 3 to 6 months to ultimately optimize recovery.

Range and severity of symptoms over time among older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms are a central component of health status; however, little is known about the full range and trajectory of symptoms experienced by persons with chronic diseases other than cancer. METHODS: Observational cohort study with interviews performed at least every 4 months for up to 2 years among community-dwelling persons 60 years or older with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or heart failure (HF). Seven symptoms rated as absent, mild, moderate, or severe were assessed at each interview. RESULTS: Among the 79 participants with COPD, at least 50% reported shortness of breath, physical discomfort, fatigue, and problems with appetite and anxiety. Among the 59 participants with HF, at least 50% reported physical discomfort, fatigue, and problems with appetite at both their initial and final interviews. Both disease-specific and non-disease-specific symptoms increased in severity over time. The prevalence of individual symptoms did not differ according to whether the participants lived or died. CONCLUSIONS: As a potentially modifiable contributor to poor health status, the high symptom burden among older persons with COPD and HF represents a large unmet need for improved symptom assessment and treatment. This need may not be met by current disease management guidelines, which focus on a small number of symptoms except for patients at the end of life.

The association of symptoms with health outcomes in chronically ill adults.

Persons with chronic disease experience multiple symptoms. Understanding the association between these symptoms and health outcomes would facilitate a targeted approach to symptom assessment and treatment. Our objectives were to determine the association of a range of symptoms with quality of life, self-rated health, and functional status among chronically ill adults, and to assess methods for evaluating the independent associations of symptoms that may be interrelated. We consecutively enrolled 226 cognitively intact, community-dwelling adults, aged 60 years or older with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, or cancer. Seven symptoms (physical discomfort, pain, fatigue, problems with appetite, feelings of depression, anxiety, and shortness of breath) assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale were examined for their association with self-rated quality of life, self-rated health, and functional status. Principal component analysis and logistic regression revealed similar results. The latter demonstrated that physical discomfort was associated with lower self-rated health (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.9; 95% confidence interval 1.2-2.9) and functional disability (adjusted OR 1.8; 95% confidence interval 1.2-2.7). Feelings of depression were associated with poorer quality of life (adjusted OR 1.7; 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.6), and shortness of breath was associated with lower self-rated health (adjusted OR 1.5; 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.0). The association between a range of symptoms and quality of life, self-rated health, and functional status differed across outcomes, but only three symptoms-physical discomfort, feelings of depression, and shortness of breath-maintained their associations when multiple symptoms were examined concurrently. These findings suggest that interventions targeting these symptoms could improve several health-related outcomes.

Symptom assessment in community-dwelling older adults with advanced chronic disease.

Brief symptom instruments are designed to assess symptoms while maintaining low respondent burden, but they may omit important information. Our objective was to determine whether a representative brief symptom instrument effectively captures the full symptom experience of older adults with advanced diseases. In this cross-sectional study, we interviewed 90 community-dwelling adults with cancer, congestive heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease regarding the presence of symptoms in the prior 24 hours. Participants rated the intensity and bothersome nature of 15 symptoms--10 symptoms were included in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) plus 5 supplemental symptoms. Participants reported similar proportions of ESAS and supplemental symptoms. Intensity and "bothersomeness" ratings frequently differed. Brief symptom instruments only provide a limited assessment of the respondent's symptom experience. The benefit obtained from incorporating both the intensity and bothersome nature of a longer list of symptoms may outweigh the potential increase in respondent burden.

The burden of symptoms among community-dwelling older persons with advanced chronic disease.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the frequency and range of symptoms experienced by community-dwelling older persons with advanced chronic disease who are not enrolled in hospice. The objectives of our study were to determine (1) the prevalence of a range of symptoms among older persons with advanced chronic disease and (2) whether the prevalence of symptoms is similar across diagnoses. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of the symptoms reported by 226 community-dwelling persons 60 years or older with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cancer, or congestive heart failure (CHF). Symptoms were assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. RESULTS: Virtually all participants (86%) experienced at least 1 symptom that rated moderate or severe, and most (69%) experienced 2 or more symptoms. The symptoms reported by the greatest proportion of participants were limited activity (61%), fatigue (47%), and physical discomfort (38%). Participants with COPD had a higher unadjusted mean +/- SD number of moderate or severe symptoms (3.3 +/- 2.1) than did participants with cancer (2.6 +/- 1.8; P = .03) or CHF (2.0 +/- 1.7; P<.001). After we adjusted for sociodemographic factors, compared with participants with CHF, participants with cancer experienced 38% (95% confidence interval, 9%-75%) more moderate or severe symptoms and participants with COPD experienced 71% (95% confidence interval, 37%-114%) more moderate or severe symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Most community-dwelling older persons with advanced COPD, cancer, or CHF experienced multiple moderate or severe symptoms. The clinical care of community-dwelling older persons with advanced chronic illnesses would be enhanced by the identification and alleviation of the range of symptoms they experience.

Restructuring care for older adults undergoing surgery: preliminary data from the Co-Management of Older Operative Patients En Route Across Treatment Environments (CO-OPERATE) model of care.

Surgery is common in older adults, so geriatric and surgical providers need to develop expertise in the care of older adults undergoing surgery. The Co-management of Older Operative Patients En Route Across Treatment Environments (CO-OPERATE) program is a clinical and educational collaboration between geriatrics and several surgical specialties at Veterans Affairs Health Care Connecticut. Individuals in CO-OPERATE are co-managed during the pre-, peri-, and postoperative periods. General surgery, urology, vascular surgery, orthopedics, cardiothoracic surgery and neurosurgery all participate in the program, with geriatrics expertise provided by a geriatrician, geriatric nurse practitioner and a geriatric clinical pharmacist. In the initial 3 years, there were 211 CO-OPERATE participants; 31% were evaluated preoperatively, and 62% of the individuals seen preoperatively were seen in clinic. There was a median of three recommendations per consultation. At discharge, 56% returned to the community. Individuals seen preoperatively were more likely to return to the community (63%) than those seen after surgery (50%, P = .10). Geriatrics co-management with a variety of surgical specialties is feasible and may be associated with higher rates of discharge back to the community.

Progressive tremor, truncal ataxia, and acute mental status changes after use of bupropion.

An 84-year-old male with stage III chronic kidney disease and a history of multiple psychiatric and medical disorders presented to the emergency department (ED) with new onset proximal leg weakness with tremor upon standing, truncal ataxia, and myoclonic jerks of the upper extremity that had progressively worsened over three weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging and head computed tomography showed no acute change from baseline. After admission, the patient reported visual hallucinations, vertigo, and slurred speech, and displayed nocturnal agitation/delirium. These symptoms were managed with risperidone. Prior to admission, the most recent medication change was the initiation of bupropion 100 mg extended-release twice daily. Bupropion was titrated to 150 mg twice daily over the three weeks prior to the ED visit. Gradual tapering of the bupropion dose was started after admission. Symptoms of agitation, delirium, speech, and motor disturbances decreased 36 to 48 hours after bupropion dose was lowered to 75 mg daily, and risperidone was changed to quetiapine. The patient was discharged to short-term rehabilitation with return of mental status to baseline. Bupropion and quetiapine were discontinued at discharge from the rehabilitation center. Case reports exist for acute psychotic and parkinsonian symptoms after administration of bupropion and bupropion extended-release, but none exist for the combination of focal neurologic deficits and psychotic symptoms found in this patient's presentation. Limited pharmacokinetic data in the elderly and those with renal impairment suggest that this patient population may have reduced clearance of bupropion. Dose adjustment should be considered in such patients and signs of toxicity closely monitored. Adverse reactions to bupropion should be considered if a patient presents with acute neurologic or psychotic symptoms after initiation or dose modification of bupropion.