Oral N-acetylcysteine improves cone function in retinitis pigmentosa patients in phase I trial.

BACKGROUNDIn retinitis pigmentosa (RP), rod photoreceptors degenerate from 1 of many mutations, after which cones are compromised by oxidative stress. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) reduces oxidative damage and increases cone function/survival in RP models. We tested the safety, tolerability, and visual function effects of oral NAC in RP patients.METHODSSubjects (n = 10 per cohort) received 600 mg (cohort 1), 1200 mg (cohort 2), or 1800 mg (cohort 3) NAC bid for 12 weeks and then tid for 12 weeks. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), macular sensitivity, ellipsoid zone (EZ) width, and aqueous NAC were measured. Linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the rates of changes during the treatment period.RESULTSThere were 9 drug-related gastrointestinal adverse events that resolved spontaneously or with dose reduction (maximum tolerated dose 1800 mg bid). During the 24-week treatment period, mean BCVA significantly improved at 0.4 (95% CI: 0.2-0.6, P < 0.001), 0.5 (95% CI: 0.3-0.7, P < 0.001), and 0.2 (95% CI: 0.02-0.4, P = 0.03) letters/month in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. There was no significant improvement in mean sensitivity over time in cohorts 1 and 2, but there was in cohort 3 (0.15 dB/month, 95% CI: 0.04-0.26). There was no significant change in mean EZ width in any cohort.CONCLUSIONOral NAC is safe and well tolerated in patients with moderately advanced RP and may improve suboptimally functioning macular cones. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial is needed to determine if oral NAC can provide long-term stabilization and/or improvement in visual function in patients with RP.TRIAL REGISTRATIONNCT03063021.FUNDINGMr. and Mrs. Robert Wallace, Mr. and Mrs. Jonathan Wallace, Rami and Eitan Armon, Marc Sumerlin, Cassandra Hanley, and Nacuity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% sterile otic suspension for the topical treatment of ear infections: a review of the literature.

The objective of this article is to review the literature related to ciprofloxacin 0.3% and dexamethasone 0.1% sterile otic suspension. A systematic literature search utilizing Medline was conducted to identify peer-reviewed articles related to safety and efficacy. A total of 47 publications were identified and reviewed herein. The literature supports the use of antibiotic/antiiflammatory combination ear drops in the treatment of both acute otitis externa and acute otitis media in pediatric patients with tympanostomy tubes. Ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone has been demonstrated as safe and effective with regard to clinical cures and microbiological eradication of pathogens in either disease with low treatment failure rates. Additionally, the literature also provides clear evidence for the contribution of dexamethasone when added to ciprofloxacin for the topical treatment of ear infections.

Safety and efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride nasal spray 0.6% in pediatric subjects with allergic rhinitis.

Olopatadine (OLO) nasal spray 0.6% is indicated for treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) in subjects > or = 12 years of age. This study was designed to present the results of two studies that evaluated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of OLO in children with allergic rhinitis (AR). These were multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group studies in subjects 6 to <12 years of age (study 1) and 2 to <6 years of age (study 2) with SAR (study 1) or AR (study 2). In study 1, nasal and ocular symptoms were scored for efficacy, and study 2 included PK analyses. In both studies, subjects were evaluated based on physical/nasal examinations and adverse events (AEs). Overall, 1188 subjects (study 1) and 132 subjects (study 2) were randomized, respectively. OLO (1 or 2 sprays/nostril, b.i.d.) was superior to vehicle in the percent decrease in reflective total nasal symptom scores (p < or = 0.0120). OLO 1 spray/nostril b.i.d. was also superior to vehicle in the percent decreases in reflective total ocular symptom scores (p < or = 0.0084), change from baseline in Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire scores (p < or = 0.0377), Caregiver Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores (p < or = 0.0450), and proportions of subjects reporting improvements in Subject Global Assessments (p = 0.0035). The most frequently reported treatment-related events in the OLO group were bad/bitter taste and epistaxis. In subjects 6 to <12 years of age, OLO was superior to vehicle in the treatment of SAR. In subjects 2 to <12 years of age, OLO had an overall low rate of AEs and low systemic exposure.

Stability improvement of a liquid enzyme product.

The shelf-life of a previously developed two-part liquid-liquid enzyme ceruminolytic product was improved maintaining the same final reconstituted composition and re-formulating the liquid enzyme portion as a drug granulate by a double wet granulation process. The critical steps for the preparation of the granulate were studied (mixing/granulating times and drying) determining the proteolytic activity, the residual ethanol, and the moisture content of the granulates. The original liquid-liquid formulation had been proven effective as a ceruminolytic agent, but only had stability of greater than 75% enzyme activity for up to 18 months and up to 1 day at room temperature after combining the two parts. The resulting improved product was proven to be stable for up to 24 months at 30 degrees C, and up to 3 days at room temperature after combining the two parts. Therefore, maintaining the enzyme in a granulated form until reconstitution afforded an improvement in stability compared with the original two-part liquid-liquid formulation.

Quantitation of free and total N-acetylcysteine amide and its metabolite N-acetylcysteine in human plasma using derivatization and electrospray LC-MS/MS.

Studies of N-acetylcysteine amide (NACA) in nonclinical models have demonstrated various antioxidant, anti-apoptotic, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects, and it is currently being developed as a treatment for retinitis pigmentosa. Sensitive LC-MS/MS methods were developed and validated to quantitate reduced and total NACA and its major metabolite, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), in human plasma to support clinical studies involving NACA. To trap and stabilize reduced NACA and NAC at the time of collection, whole blood was immediately treated with 2-chloro-1-methylpyridinium iodide (CMPI) to convert free thiols to 1-methylpyridinyl thioether derivatives. Plasma was harvested and frozen until samples were assayed using protein precipitation and an LC-MS/MS separation based on hydrophilic-interaction chromatography (HILIC). To process NACA and NAC present as disulfides, an intermediate portion of the extract was further subjected to reduction with tris(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine; the released thiols were then reacted with CMPI, extracted, and analyzed as before, to measure total thiols. The method for NACA and NAC, whether free/reduced or total, covered a range from 50 ng/mL to 50 µg/mL in human plasma and required a single 25 µL plasma sample. Up to 180 samples could be assayed in a single session. The inter-run mean bias and precision (%CV) were within ±5% for the free thiol method and within ±8.5% for the total thiol method. Benchtop, freeze/thaw, and long-term stability were evaluated and acceptable. The NAC/NACA method applied to a clinical study demonstrated incurred sample reproducibility of 95.5% for NAC and 99.1% for NACA.

Effect of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone or dexamethasone alone on acute Streptococcus pneumoniae rhinosinusitis in mice.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether intranasal ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone or dexamethasone alone affects the course of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in mice. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study in mice. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Three groups of 10 C57Bl/6 mice were infected with Streptococcus pneumoniae, and then 1 day later randomized to treatment with placebo, ciprofloxacin plus dexamethasone, or dexamethasone. The mice were killed 3 or 10 days after treatment was begun. RESULTS: The placebo-treated mice became infected and developed an inflammatory cell infiltration in their sinuses. None of the treatments significantly affected the course of the illness. CONCLUSION: The lack of topical, intranasal efficacy of ciprofloxacin and dexamethasone could be attributed to subpotent dosage, rapid nasal clearance, or inability of the drops to reach the site of infection. Treatment with dexamethasone neither improved nor worsened the bacterial infection.

A single topical agent is clinically equivalent to the combination of topical and oral antibiotic treatment for otitis externa.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate clinical equivalence (statistical noninferiority) of topical ciprofloxacin and hydrocortisone (CHC, Cipro HC) and topical neomycin/polymyxin b/hydrocortisone (NPH, Cortisporin) with systemic amoxicillin (AMX, Amoxil), for treatment of acute otitis externa (AOE). DESIGN: Randomized, active-control, observer-blind, multicenter trial. PATIENTS: Altogether, 206 patients were enrolled (CHC, 106; NPH + AMX, 100). Patients were > or =1 year of age, had AOE >2 days with at least mild symptoms, and gave informed consent. All were evaluable for safety, and 151 were evaluable for efficacy. INTERVENTIONS: Ciprofloxacin and hydrocortisone 3 drops twice daily for 7 days (adults and children) or NPH 4 drops (adults) or 2 drops (children) with AMX 250 mg (adults and children) 3 times daily for 10 days, as directed in approved product labeling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy variable was response to therapy 7 days after treatment ended (test of cure). Secondary variables included time to end of pain, symptom scores (otalgia and tenderness) and microbiological eradication. Noninferiority was declared if the lower confidence limit around the measurement difference was above -10 (nearer zero). RESULTS: Response to therapy was higher for CHC (95.71% vs 89.83%) but was statistically noninferior (lower confidence limit, -4.98) to NPH + AMX. Median time to end of pain was 6 days for both groups. Noninferiority was declared for symptom scores at all measurement periods and for microbiological eradication. No serious adverse events related to treatment were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Ciprofloxacin and hydrocortisone is clinically equivalent to NPH + AMX for the treatment of AOE in adults and children. However, low systemic exposure, absence of ototoxicity, and less frequent dosing clearly favor Cipro HC.

Pharmacokinetics of CIPRODEX otic in pediatric and adolescent patients.

OBJECTIVE: Describe the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin and dexamethasone after administration of CIPRODEX Otic Suspension (CIP/DEX) into the middle ears of children. DESIGN: Open-label, single-dose, pharmacokinetic studies, administering four drops of CIP/DEX instilled into each middle ear through the tympanostomy tubes immediately following tube placement. Blood was collected for 6h and analyzed for ciprofloxacin and dexamethasone concentrations using a validated liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method. SETTING: The study was conducted through a referral pediatric otolaryngology practice with actual surgical procedures performed in an ambulatory care center. PATIENTS: Twenty-five randomly selected patients, 1-14 years of age (mean age, 5 years), receiving tympanostomy tubes. RESULTS: Peak ciprofloxacin plasma levels were observed at about 1h, with a mean C(max) of 1.33+/-0.96 ng/mL (range <0.5-3.45 ng/mL) and an estimated half-life of 3.0+/-1.2h. Peak dexamethasone plasma levels were observed within 2h with a mean C(max) of 0.90+/-1.04 ng/mL (range <0.05-5.10 ng/mL) and an estimated half-life of 3.9+/-2.9h. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrated low systemic exposure of ciprofloxacin and dexamethasone following topical otic administration in pediatric patients.

Pooled analysis of two clinical trials comparing the clinical outcomes of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone otic suspension and polymyxin B/neomycin/hydrocortisone otic suspension for the treatment of acute otitis externa in adults and children.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcome of patients receiving topical ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% (CD) otic suspension with that of those receiving polymyxin B/neomycin/ hydrocortisone (PNH) otic suspension for the treatment of acute otitis externa (AOE). METHODS: Data from 2 institutional review board-approved, multicenter, observer-masked, parallel-group, randomized, noninferiority clinical trials conducted at 76 institutions across the United States between April 1998 and July 1999 were pooled together for this analysis. Patients > or =1 year of age diagnosed with AOE were considered for inclusion in the studies. Patients with AOE >4 weeks' duration, a perforated tympanic membrane, chronic suppurative otitis media, or use of either antibiotics or steroids within the previous 7 days were excluded from the studies. Patients were randomly assigned to receive CD or PNH for 7 days. CD was administered as 3 drops in children and 4 drops in patients > or =12 years of age BID. PNH was administered as 3 drops in children and 4 drops in patients > or =12 years of age TID. The clinical investigators were blinded to treatment assignment. Due to the different dosing regimens, patients were not blinded, but they also were not directly informed of their treatment assignments. Otic inflammation, tenderness, edema, and discharge were clinically assessed on days 3, 8, and 18 of the studies. Otic inflammation and edema were evaluated using a 4-point scale (none = 0; mild = 1; moderate = 2; and severe = 3). Otic tenderness and discharge were rated on a binomial scale (absent = 0 and present = 1). The clinical assessments were aggregated into a 9-point composite clinical scale (range, 0-8) to compare baseline severity between groups. For the final outcomes assessment in this study, the aggregated clinical scores were dichotomized into cured (0) versus noncured (>0) and analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier survival technique. A log-rank test was used to compare the cure curves between treatment groups. Kaplan-Meier summary statistics provide the mean and median times to cure, and the mean times to cure for the 25th and 75th patient quartiles. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring patients for adverse events at each visit. RESULTS: Data from 1072 patients (1242 ears) were included in the analysis (CD, 537 patients; PNH, 535 patients). Baseline AOE severity and demographic characteristics were similar between the 2 treatment groups. The mean patient age was 21.7 and 22.0 years in the CD and PNH groups, respectively. Both groups were similar with respect to sex, with 50.7% and 53.5% females in the CD and PNH groups, respectively. The racial composition was predominately white (88.6% vs 84.9% in the CD and PNH groups, respectively). The log-rank test revealed a significant difference in the AOE cure curves between the CD and PNH groups (P = 0.038). The proportions cured in the AOE at-risk groups at the day-3, -8, and -18 assessments in the CD and PNH treatment groups were 0.14 and 0.10, 0.75 and 0.72, and 0.98 and 0.97, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier summary statistics indicated that the mean time to cure was 0.6 day less with CD compared with PNH (9.7 vs 10.3 days). Treatment-related adverse event rates were similar between the 2 groups and occurred in 3.8% of the patients. The most common adverse events included otic pruritus (2.1%), otic congestion (0.6%), otic debris (0.5%), otic pain (0.3%), superimposed ear infection (0.3%), and erythema (0.1%). CONCLUSION: These data from 2 previous studies suggest that time to cure was significantly less with CD compared with PNH in patients with AOE.

An assessment of the onset and duration of action of olopatadine nasal spray.

OBJECTIVE: Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) is a highly prevalent disease. This study was conducted to evaluate the onset and duration of action of three concentrations of olopatadine nasal spray. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled study, conducted in an environmental exposure chamber in patients with SAR. A total of 320 patients were exposed to ragweed allergen in the chamber and randomized to olopatadine nasal spray 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, or placebo nasal spray. Symptoms (sneezing, runny, itchy, and stuffy nose) were self-assessed during a 12-hour study period. RESULTS: All concentrations of olopatadine nasal spray provided clinically meaningful reductions in total nasal symptom scores at 30 minutes compared to the placebo. Olopatadine nasal spray 0.6% was significantly more effective (P < 0.05) than placebo nasal spray at all time-points starting at 90 minutes post-dose and continuing over 12 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Olopatadine nasal spray 0.6% demonstrated a fast onset of action and maintained an effect for at least 12 hours after dosing.

A comparison of ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone with neomycin/polymyxin/hydrocortisone for otitis externa pain.

Ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% (CIP/DEX) and neomycin 0.35%(polymyxin B 10,000 IU/mL/hydrocortisone 1.0% (NPH) were compared for relief of pain in patients with acute otitis externa. Patients received 7 d of treatment with CIP/DEX twice daily or NPH 3 times daily. Ear pain was assessed by patients/caregivers twice daily and by the study investigator on days 3, 8, and 18 (4-point scale). Higher percentages of CIP/DEX-treated patients had relief of severe pain over time (P=.0013) and relief of significant pain (moderate or severe pain) over time (P=.0456), compared with NPH-treated patients. The percentage of CIP/DEXtreated patients with severe pain decreased rapidly within the first 12 h; this contrasted with an increase in pain among NPH-treated patients. CIP/DEX-treated patients had significantly less inflammation (P=.0043) and edema (P=.0148) than NPH-treated patients. Overall, these results support greater pain relief attained over the first 3 d in patients with acute otitis externa treated with CIP/DEX compared with NPH and a rapid reduction in severe pain after initiation of treatment.

Effect of topical dexamethasone versus rimexolone on middle ear inflammation in experimental otitis media with effusion.

CONCLUSION: The lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced chinchilla otitis media (OM) model was proven useful in screening anti-inflammatory agents for topical use. Both 1% rimexolone and 1% dexamethasone are effective in reducing the volume of middle ear effusion and mucosal thickness compared with control groups. Topical corticosteroid therapy was efficacious in reducing middle ear mucosal inflammation. OBJECTIVE: OM is one of the most common diseases in the pediatric population. Our previous studies have shown that treatment with systemic antibiotics and corticosteroids was more efficacious than antibiotics alone. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of topically applied corticosteroids on the outcome of OM. The long-term goal of this study was to develop a better method of OM treatment by demonstrating effectiveness of topically applied anti-inflammatory agents, such as corticosteroids, avoiding systemic side effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three experimental groups were studied in chinchillas. OM with effusion was induced in all groups by injecting LPS. Group 1 consisted of controls in three subgroups as follows. Control-LPS alone, vehicle of dexamethasone (control-dexa), vehicle of rimexolone (control-rimex). Group 2 was treated with dexamethasone and included subgroups of separate concentrations of dexamethasone: 0.1% and 1% suspensions. Group 3 was treated with rimexolone and included subgroups of separate concentrations of rimexolone: 0.1% and 1% suspensions. A total of 58 animals were used: 18 for controls and 40 for experimental groups. All test substances (saline, control-dexa, control-rimex, dexamethasone and rimexolone, 200 microl) were injected at -2, 48 and 60 h; LPS was injected at 0 h. Animals were monitored by daily otomicroscopy. After 4 days, samples of middle ear effusion (MEE) were collected for analysis and temporal bones were harvested for histopathological studies. RESULTS: At the end of 4 days, only in five ears (3/20 with 1% dexamethasone, 1/20 with 1% rimexolone, and 1/20 with 0.1% rimexolone) had the fluid diminished to the point of being unobservable. The volume of MEE, thickness of mucoperiosteum, and the degree of inflammation of middle ear mucosa with 1% dexamethasone and 1% rimexolone was significantly less compared with other groups.

Optimal duration of allergic rhinitis clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines have been published by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) for the conduct of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) studies. These guidelines have differences regarding the duration of such trials: the FDA suggests 2 weeks for SAR and 4 weeks for PAR but the EMEA suggests 2 to 4 weeks for SAR and 6 to 12 weeks for PAR trials. In the interest of global harmonization, it would be desirable to have a uniform duration of such trials so that investigators, internationally, would be able to readily compare results for various types of treatments based on a single standard. Therefore, we performed an evidence-based review to answer the clinical question, What is the optimal duration for SAR and PAR clinical trials? METHODS: We performed a MEDLINE search of the published literature from 1995 to the present. We used appropriate search terms, such as allergic rhinitis, seasonal allergic rhinitis, perennial allergic rhinitis, SAR, and PAR, to identify pertinent articles. These articles were reviewed and graded according to the evidence quality. RESULTS: After an initial screening of more than 300 articles, 138 articles were analyzed thoroughly. No study specifically addressed the question of the optimal duration of SAR or PAR clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the current FDA (draft) guidelines calling for a study length of 2 weeks for the assessment of drug efficacy for SAR and 4 weeks for the study of drug efficacy in PAR are appropriate and that longer study periods are not likely to add meaningfully to the assessment of drug efficacy.

Efficacy and safety of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus neomycin/polymyxin B/hydrocortisone for otitis externa.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% (CIP/DEX) otic suspension with that of neomycin 0.35%/polymyxin B 10,000 IU/mL/hydrocortisone 1.0% (N/P/H) otic suspension in patients with acute otitis externa (AOE). STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, observer-masked, parallel-group, multicenter study. Patients were randomized to 7 days treatment with either CIP/DEX 3-4 drops twice daily or N/P/H 3-4 drops three times daily. POPULATION: Patients of either sex and older than 1 year, with a clinical diagnosis of mild, moderate, or severe AOE and intact tympanic membranes were recruited to participate. OUTCOMES MEASURED: Signs and symptoms of AOE, including ear inflammation, tenderness, edema and discharge (assessed on Days 3, 8 [End-of-Therapy] and 18 [Test-of-Cure]); microbiologic eradication (presumed or documented); and frequency of adverse events. RESULTS: Patients enrolled numbered 468. In culture-positive patients who met the inclusion criteria (N = 396), clinical cure rates at Day 18 were significantly higher with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H (90.9% vs. 83.9%; p = 0.0375), as were microbiologic eradication rates (94.7% vs. 86.0%; p = 0.0057). In addition, the clinical response was significantly better with CIP/DEX than with N/P/H at Days 3 and 18 (p = 0.0279 and p = 0.0321, respectively), as was the reduction in ear inflammation at Day 18 (p = 0.0268). Both preparations were well tolerated in pediatric and adult patients. CONCLUSIONS: 7 days treatment with CIP/DEX otic suspension administered twice daily is clinically and microbiologically superior to N/P/H otic suspension administered 3 times daily in the treatment of mild to severe AOE, and is equally well tolerated.

Topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone is superior to ciprofloxacin alone in pediatric patients with acute otitis media and otorrhea through tympanostomy tubes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether topical administration of a corticosteroid improves resolution of acute tympanostomy tube otorrhea when combined with topical antibiotic drops. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, patient-masked, parallel-group, multicenter trial of topical otic ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus topical ciprofloxacin alone in 201 children aged 6 months to 12 years with acute otitis media with tympanostomy tubes (AOMT) of less than or equal to 3 weeks' duration and visible otorrhea. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized to receive three drops of either ciprofloxacin 0.3%/dexamethasone 0.1% or ciprofloxacin 0.3% into the affected ear or ears twice daily for 7 days. Clinical signs and symptoms of AOMT were evaluated on days 1 (baseline), 3, 8 (end-of-therapy), and 14 (test-of-cure), and twice-daily assessments of otorrhea were recorded in patient diaries. RESULTS: The mean time to cessation of otorrhea in the microbiologically culture-positive patient population (n = 167) was significantly shorter with topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone than with ciprofloxacin alone (4.22 vs. 5.31 days; P =.004). This resulted in significantly better clinical responses on days 3 and 8 (P <.0001 and P =.0499, respectively). However, there were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in either the clinical response or the microbial eradication rate by day 14. CONCLUSIONS: Topical otic treatment with ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone is superior to treatment with ciprofloxacin alone and results in a faster clinical resolution in children with AOMT. The contribution of the corticosteroid in achieving a 20% reduction (1.1 day) in time to cessation of otorrhea is clinically meaningful and represents an important advance over single-agent antibiotic therapy.

Randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of Cerumenex and Murine earwax removal products.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of 2 ceruminolytic products, Cerumenex Eardrops (Purdue Frederick Company, Norwalk, Conn) and Murine Ear Drops (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill), in subjects with partial or complete occlusion of the ear canal due to cerumen. DESIGN: Randomized, subject- and observer-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. SETTING: Corporate research clinic. PARTICIPANTS: From among 230 volunteers screened, 74 subjects (age, 22-66 [mean, 45] years) were enrolled in the study. Participants had baseline occlusion levels of mild (n = 10), moderate (n = 26), or complete (n = 38) impairment of tympanic membrane visualization. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: Cerumenex (10% triethanolamine polypeptide oleate-condensate), Murine (6.5% carbamide peroxide), and a placebo, BSS Sterile Irrigating Solution (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Ft Worth, Tex). The test medication was instilled into 1 occluded ear for up to two 15-minute applications. Following the treatment, the subject's ear was irrigated with 50 mL of lukewarm water delivered at low pressure via a WaterPik irrigator equipped with a Grossan irrigator tip. Main Outcome Measure The degree of occlusion, measured against a previously established 4-point scale, was assessed and recorded at baseline and after each instillation and irrigation procedure. RESULTS: Neither Cerumenex nor Murine was superior to saline placebo. By the end of treatment, 29.2%, 15.4%, and 41.7% of subjects treated with Cerumenex, Murine, and placebo, respectively, experienced resolution of cerumen occlusion. These values were not statistically significantly different from one another. CONCLUSION: The currently marketed ceruminolytic products, Cerumenex and Murine, are no more effective than a saline placebo in removing earwax.

Topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone otic suspension is superior to ofloxacin otic solution in the treatment of granulation tissue in children with acute otitis media with otorrhea through tympanostomy tubes.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone otic suspension (CIP/DEX) to ofloxacin otic solution (OFL) for treatment of granulation tissue in children with AOMT. STUDY DESIGN: 599 children aged >/=6 months to 12 years with AOMT of up to 3 weeks' duration were enrolled. Patients received either CIP/DEX 4 drops twice daily for 7 days or OFL 5 drops twice daily for 10 days. Granulation tissue severity was graded at clinic visits on days 1, 3, 11, and 18. RESULTS: Granulation tissue was present in 90 of 599 AOMT patients (15.0%) at baseline. CIP/DEX treatment was superior to OFL for reduction of granulation tissue at the day 11 visit (81.3% compared with 56.1%, P = 0.0067) and the day 18 visit (91.7% compared with 73.2%, P = 0.0223). Both topical otic preparations are safe and well tolerated in pediatric patients. CONCLUSION: CIP/DEX was superior to OFL in the treatment of granulation tissue in children with AOMT.

Effect of ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus ciprofloxacin/hydrocortisone on lipopolysaccharide-induced experimental otitis media.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus topical ciprofloxacin/hydrocortisone on the outcome of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)­induced otitis media with effusion in chinchillas. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized experimental animal study. SETTING: Jerry L. Pettis Veteran's Medical Center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Otitis media with effusion was induced in 5 groups of chinchillas, 6 per group, by injecting 0.3 mL (1 mg/mL) of Salmonella enteric LPS into the superior bullae of each chinchilla with a venting needle in place. Each group was treated with 0.2 mL of test substance at ­2, 24, 48, and 72 hours relative to the 0-hour LPS induction. Group 1 was treated with vehicle control. Groups 2 to 5 received 0.3% ciprofloxacin with either 0.1% dexamethasone (group 2), 1% dexamethasone (group 3), 0.1% hydrocortisone (group 4), or 1% hydrocortisone (group 5). The outcome of each treatment was measured by the amount of middle ear effusion present and mucosal thickness at 120 hours posttreatment. RESULTS: Ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone 1% significantly (P = .0150) reduced middle ear effusion compared with control. Ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone 1% significantly reduced the mucosal thickness when compared with vehicle control (P = .0005), ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone 0.1% (P = .0240), and ciprofloxacin/hydrocortisone 0.1% (P = 1.00). Results also showed a dose-response effect between the ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that treatment with a combination of topical ciprofloxacin and corticosteroid decreased the middle ear effusion when compared with the control group and that ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone suspension reduced the severity of LPS-induced experimental otitis media more than ciprofloxacin/hydrocortisone did.

Olopatadine nasal spray for the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Olopatadine hydrochloride nasal spray (Patanase Nasal Spray, Alcon Laboratories, TX, USA) was approved by the US FDA in 2008, and is indicated for the relief of symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), also referred to as allergic rhinosinusitis. Olopatadine is an antihistamine with selective H1-receptor antagonist activity. Clinical trials of olopatadine nasal spray have demonstrated safety and efficacy in the treatment of SAR patients. With an onset of action of 30 min, olopatadine nasal spray has also been shown to improve quality of life, ability to perform work and the conduct of usual activities in SAR patients.

Olopatadine nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis in patients aged 6 years and older.

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Allergic rhinitis is an IgE-mediated condition that produces inflammation of the mucosa of the nose, paranasal sinuses and, frequently, of the ocular conjunctiva. Allergic rhinitis causes a significant disease burden in terms of quality of life, lost productivity and medical treatment costs. One of the newest treatments approved by the FDA is Patanase (olopatadine hydrochloride) Nasal Spray, 665 microg/spray (OLO). Olopatadine is an antihistamine with selective H(1)-receptor antagonist activity. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: This review details the basic and clinical research on the olopatadine molecule and OLO nasal spray from 1996 to the present day. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: The reader will gain a better understanding of the pharmacology of OLO nasal spray, the clinical trial data that have established the efficacy of OLO nasal spray and the overall role of OLO nasal spray in the management of allergic rhinitis. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Olopatadine nasal spray is one of the newest treatments approved by the FDA for the management of allergic rhinitis. OLO has a rapid onset of action, efficacy comparable to intranasal steroid sprays and is approved for seasonal allergic rhinitis in patients aged > or = 6 years.