Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Endosc Int Open ; 12(7): E854-E860, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38966318

RESUMO

Background and study aims Risk factors for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Lynch syndrome (LS) include sex, age, smoking, high body mass index (BMI), surveillance interval length, and risk genotype. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) produces a standardized bowel cleanliness rating. A low BBPS score might be a risk factor for missed early lesions. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between BBPS score and adenoma detection (with known risk factors for CRC) and surveillance interval with CRC detection in LS patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study including 366 LS patients with 1,887 colonoscopies under surveillance in Stockholm, Sweden from 1989 to 2021 was conducted. Associations were tested using linear and logistic regression. Results We found no association between BBPS score and number of adenomas detected. A low BBPS score was found to be associated with older age (regression coefficient (coeff) -0.015; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.026 to -0.004; P = 0.007) and obesity (coeff = -0.48; 95% CI: -0.89 to -0.062; P = 0.024). A higher number of detected adenomas was associated with older age (coeff = 0.008; 95% CI 0.004 to 0.012; P < 0.001), male sex (coeff = 0.097; 95% CI 0.008 to 0.19; P = 0.033) and CRC (coeff = 0.28; 95% CI 0.061 to 0.50; P = 0.012). Surveillance interval length was not significant in CRC detection. Conclusions Bowel cleanliness was not associated with adenoma detection and was less likely achieved in patients who were older and had higher BMI. Adenoma detection was associated with older age and male sex. The results indicate the need for better adherence to guidelines and attention to older age groups, men, and patients with obesity.

2.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 32(2): 113-118, 2023 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36134613

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Lynch syndrome is caused by germline mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes, such as the PMS2 gene, and is characterised by a familial accumulation of colorectal cancer. The penetrance of cancer in PMS2 carriers is still not fully elucidated as a colorectal cancer risk has been shown to vary between PMS2 carriers, suggesting the presence of risk modifiers. METHODS: Whole exome sequencing was performed in a Swedish family carrying a PMS2 missense mutation [c.2113G>A, p.(Glu705Lys)]. Thirteen genetic sequence variants were further selected and analysed in a case-control study (724 cases and 711 controls). RESULTS: The most interesting variant was an 18 bp deletion in gene BAG1. BAG1 has been linked to colorectal tumour progression with poor prognosis and is thought to promote colorectal tumour cell survival through increased NF-κB activity. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude the genetic architecture behind the incomplete penetrance of PMS2 is complicated and must be assessed in a genome wide manner using large families and multifactorial analysis.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose , Neoplasias Colorretais , Humanos , Endonuclease PMS2 de Reparo de Erro de Pareamento/genética , Endonuclease PMS2 de Reparo de Erro de Pareamento/metabolismo , Sequenciamento do Exoma , Penetrância , Suécia/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Mutação , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Reparo de Erro de Pareamento de DNA , Proteína 1 Homóloga a MutL/genética
3.
Front Oncol ; 13: 1127707, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36890827

RESUMO

Introduction: Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary cause of colorectal cancer (CRC). In order to detect CRCs amongst LS patients, regular colonoscopies are recommended. However, an international agreement on an optimal surveillance interval has not yet been reached. In addition, few studies have investigated factors that could potentially increase the CRC risk amongst LS patients. Aims: The primary aim was to describe the frequency of CRCs detected during endoscopic surveillance and to estimate the interval from a clean colonoscopy to CRC detection amongst LS patients. The secondary aim was to investigate individual risk factors, including sex, LS genotype, smoking, aspirin use and body mass index (BMI), on CRC risk amongst patients that develop CRC before and during surveillance. Material and methods: Clinical data and colonoscopy findings from 366 LS patients' 1437 surveillance colonoscopies were collected from medical records and patient protocols. Logistic regression and Fisher's exact test were used to investigate associations between individual risk factors and CRC development. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the distribution of TNM stages of CRC detected before surveillance and after index. Results: CRC was detected in 80 patients before surveillance and in 28 patients during surveillance (10 at index and 18 after index). During the surveillance programme, CRC was detected within 24 months in 65% of the patients, and after 24 months within 35% of the patients. CRC was more common amongst men, previous and current smokers, and the odds of developing CRC also increased with an increasing BMI. CRCs were more often detected amongst MLH1 and MSH2 carriers during surveillance, compared to the other genotypes. Conclusions: We found that 35% of the CRC cases detected during surveillance were found after 24 months. MLH1 and MSH2 carriers were at higher risk of developing CRC during surveillance. Additionally, men, current or previous smokers, and patients with a higher BMI were at higher risk of developing CRC. Currently, LS patients are recommended a "one-size-fits-all" surveillance program. The results support the development of a risk-score whereby individual risk factors should be taken into consideration when deciding on an optimal surveillance interval.

4.
Lakartidningen ; 1152018 04 16.
Artigo em Sueco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29664536

RESUMO

Individuals with a history of colorectal or endometrial cancer younger than 50 years of age or with relatives younger than 50 years of age with a history of any of these malignances should be referred to clinical genetics for further diagnostic examinations and genetic counseling. Lynch syndrome is caused by mutations in mismatch repair genes and implicates an increased risk for colorectal cancer as well as endometrial cancer. Routine surveillance for this group of individuals regarding colorectal cancer by means of colonoscopy and endometrial cancer by means of transvaginal ultrasound as well as endometrial biopsies is recommended annually or biennially. Several preventive measures are under development, such as chemoprevention and vaccination. During 2015 we investigated reasons for diagnosis among those registered at Karolinska University Hospital. We found that a substantial part of this group of individuals was diagnosed in conjunction with their diagnosis of cancer; a prerequisite in order to offer at-risk individuals preventive measures is to improve identification of these individuals and offer them presymptomatic genetic testing in order to identify predisposing mutations.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Criança , Colonoscopia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/complicações , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/genética , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Neoplasias do Endométrio/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Endométrio/genética , Feminino , Triagem de Portadores Genéticos , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Suécia/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA