RESUMO
Background and Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) followed by lipiodol infusion in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Materials and Methods: Thirty-two patients with advanced HCC and PVTT who received HAIC with regimens of cisplatin, mitomycin-C, and 5-fluorouracil followed by lipiodol infusion were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint was tumor response rate. The modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) was used for assessment of treatment response. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Prognostic factors for survival also were evaluated. Results: The median OS and PFS were 11.9 and 9.5 months, respectively. Seventeen patients (53.1%) achieved objective response, and 23 patients (71.9%) achieved disease control. The length of survival in the responder and disease control groups was longer than in the non-responder and progressive disease groups after two cycles of HAIC (responder vs. non-responder: 16.5 vs. 7.9 months, p = 0.001; disease control vs. progressive disease: 12.3 vs. 5.6 months, p < 0.001) and after completing HAIC (responder vs. non-responder: 15.7 vs. 6.9 months, p = 0.001; disease control vs. progressive disease: 13.6 vs. 6.9 months, p < 0.001). Better survival was associated with Child-Pugh A liver function (p = 0.013), with early response to two HAIC cycles (p = 0.009), and with response (p = 0.02) and disease control (p = 0.001) after completing HAIC treatment. Conclusion: HAIC followed by lipiodol infusion is a safe and feasible treatment for advanced HCC with PVTT. Patients with early response could continue HAIC treatment with expected prolonged survival.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Trombose , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicações , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Óleo Etiodado/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicações , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Veia Porta , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The cost-effectiveness of adding bevacizumab biosimilar with or without chemotherapy (CT) and drug wastage in treating platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PRrOC) was assessed. METHODS: A three-state partitioned-survival model to compare the clinical and economic outcomes in the treatment of patients with PRrOC from a Taiwan healthcare prospective, extrapolated to two years based on data obtained from the JGOG3023 clinical trial. The primary outcomes of the model were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: In the base-case scenario, using vials of bevacizumab biosimilar (Bevbiol) plus chemotherapy, the ICER was (new Taiwan dollar) NT$ 4,555,878 per QALY gained. The incremental cost savings of an incremental 2.02 QALYs were NT$ 1,605,828 if weight-based Bevbiol plus chemotherapy were used, but the ICER remained high at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. If the cost of Bevbiol were reduced to 50% per vial, adding it to CT would be cost-effective at an acceptable WTP threshold of NTD 2,994,200, with an ICER of NT$ 2,975,484. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab biosimilars in mg/kg dosage form with chemotherapy are still not cost-effective in Taiwan, but using weight-based dosing will reduce drug waste and save treatment costs.
Assuntos
Medicamentos Biossimilares , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Humanos , Feminino , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
The purpose of this study was to assess the risks of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism related to gynecological cancers. Population-based retrospective cohort study. We conducted a cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to explore hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism associated with site-specific gynecologic cancers in women from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2018. The examined gynecologic cancers included endometrial (EC), uterine corpus cancer (UC), and ovarian cancer (OC). The incidence and hazard ratios were quantified using Cox proportional hazards models. The incidence of developing gynecological (Gyn) cancers in the hyperthyroid and hypothyroid women was 0.29 and 0.44 per 1000 person-years, which was 0.86 fold lower and 1.13 fold higher than that in the comparison cohort (p < 0.001). Compared with patients aged 20-40 years, patients in older age groups had a lower and higher risk of developing Gyn cancers (for hyperthyroid, 40-65 years: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.82; > 65 years: aHR = 0.94; for hypothyroid, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.26; > 65 years: aHR = 1.38). Compared with the non-hypothyroid women and non-hyperthyroid women beyond 6 years of follow-up, hypothyroid and hyperthyroid women showed decreased risk of Gyn cancers. Medication treatment for hyperthyroid and hypothyroid disease did not showed significant association in subgroup analyses (aHR = 0.99 and 0.80, respectively). Our results show that women with hyperthyroidism have a significantly reduced risk of gynecological cancers, whereas women with hypothyroidism have a slightly increased risk of gynecological cancers suggesting an association between thyroid function level and risk of gynecological cancers.
Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos , Hipertireoidismo , Hipotireoidismo , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/complicações , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/epidemiologia , Hipertireoidismo/complicações , Hipertireoidismo/epidemiologia , Hipotireoidismo/complicações , Hipotireoidismo/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem , AdultoRESUMO
Background: Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is a common complication and an obstacle to treatment, with a high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. There is still no global consensus or standard guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with PVTT. Increasing evidence suggests that more aggressive treatment modalities, including transarterial chemoembolization, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and various combination therapies, may improve the prognosis and prolong the survival of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) patients with PVTT. We aim to comprehensively review and compare the efficacy and safety of these advanced options for aHCC with PVTT. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed and EMBASE for phase II or III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating multimodality treatments for aHCC with PVTT. Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were constructed to retrieve individual patient-level data to strengthen the comparison of the benefits of all multimodality treatments of interest. Each study was pooled in a fixed-effects network meta-analysis (NMA). We also conducted subgroup analyses using risk ratios extracted from each study, including viral etiology, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, macrovascular invasion or portal vein tumor thrombosis, and extrahepatic spread. Multimodality treatments were ranked using SUCRA scores. Results: We identified 15 randomized controlled trials with 16 multimodality regimens that met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 5,236 patients with OS results and 5,160 patients with PFS results were included in the analysis. The hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (HAIC-FO) showed OS and PFS benefits over all the other therapies. In terms of OS, HAIC-FO, nivolumab, and TACE+Len were superior to sorafenib, lenvatinib, and donatinib monotherapies, as well as HAIC-FO+Sor. In terms of PFS, TACE+Len showed better benefits than lenvatinib, donatinib, and tremelimumab+durvalumab. A low heterogeneity (I 2 < 50%) and consistency were observed. The SUCRA score for OS ranked HAIC-FO+sorafenib as the best treatment option among all multimodality treatments in hepatitis B, MVI, or PVTT with EHS and AFP 400 µg/L subgroups. Conclusion: HAIC-FO and HAIC-FO+sorafenib are statistically better options for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with PVTT among the multimodality treatments, and their effective and safe implementation may provide the best outcomes for HCC-PVTT patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare 7 newer immunotherapies and targeted therapies for platinum-resistant relapsed ovarian cancer. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library electronic databases for phase III trials involving platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PRrOC) patients treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapy in combination with chemotherapy. The quality of the included trials was assessed using the GRADE method. The primary outcome of comparison was progression-free survival, and secondary outcomes included overall survival and safety. RESULTS: This analysis included 7 randomized phase III controlled trials, encompassing 2485 PRrOC patients. Combining bevacizumab plus chemotherapy and lurbinectedin demonstrated statistically significant differences in progression-free survival compared to all other regimens of interest. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the overall survival. Nivolumab and mirvetuximab exhibited fewer serious adverse events than the other regimens of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy and lurbinectedin monotherapy has significant efficacy in patients with PRrOC. For patients with PRrOC who have exhausted treatment options, nivolumab and mirvetuximab may be considered as alternatives because of their better safety profiles.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Teorema de Bayes , Bevacizumab , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Metanálise em Rede , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Bevacizumab/uso terapêutico , Bevacizumab/administração & dosagem , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Nivolumabe/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Ciclobutanos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Imunoterapia/métodos , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/métodos , Carbolinas , Compostos Heterocíclicos de 4 ou mais AnéisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several therapies directed at novel targets and also immunotherapies have recently shown promising results in advanced or metastatic TNBC. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these new regimens for advanced or metastatic TNBC (mTNBC). METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched for phase III randomized trials. We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of new targeted and immunotherapy regimens. Trial quality was assessed using the GRADE method. The comparative outcomes were progression-free survival, overall survival, and G3-4 adverse drug events (ADEs). RESULTS: Thirteen phase III randomized controlled trials were identified in the network meta-analysis. Olaparib significantly improved PFS in comparison with the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy 1, atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and pembrolizumab regimens. Sacituzumab yielded a significant improvement in OS over immunotherapies, veliparib, and chemotherapy alone, but no significantly superiority over pembrolizumab, olaparib, and talazoparib. The risk of ≥grade 3 ADEs associated with olaparib was significantly lower than the risks associated with the other regimens. CONCLUSION: For mTNBC, sacituzumab had a better effect on overall survival, with comparatively high risk of SAE, whereas olaparib improved progression-free survival with a lower risk of SAE, particularly in those patients with BRCA mutations.
Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas , Humanos , Metanálise em Rede , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos MonoclonaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of olaparib and niraparib as maintenance therapy for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.Methods: A decision analysis model compared the costs and effectiveness of olaparib and niraparib versus placebo for patients with or without germline BRCA mutations. Resource use and associated costs were estimated from the 2020 National Health Insurance Administration reimbursement price list. Clinical effectiveness was measured in progression-free survival per life-years (PFS-LY) based on the results of clinical trials SOLO2/ENHOT-Ov21 and ENGOT-OV16/NOVA. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated from a single-payer perspective. RESULTS: In the base case, olaparib was the more cost-effective treatment regimen. The ICERs for olaparib and niraparib compared to placebo were NT$1,804,785 and NT$2,340,265 per PFS-LY, respectively. Tornado analysis showed that PFS and the total resource use cost of niraparib regimen for patients without gBRCA were the most sensitive parameters impacting the ICER. The ICERs for both drugs in patients with a gBRCA mutation were lower than in patients without a gBRCA mutation. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that olaparib was more cost-effective than niraparib at the willingness-to-pay threshold of NT$2,602,404 per PFS life-year gained. CONCLUSION: Olaparib was estimated to be less cost and more effective compared to niraparib as maintenance therapy for patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Ovarianas , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Indazóis , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Ftalazinas , Piperazinas , PiperidinasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The rising cost of cancer drug therapy threatens the long-term sustainability of Taiwan National Health Insurance. Cost savings can be achieved through various strategies, e.g., using smaller vial sizes, sharing vials, weight-based dosing, or switching to biosimilars. Here we aimed to examine the cost-effectiveness of a trastuzumab biosimilar combined with docetaxel (TDbiol) for treatment-naïve HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and the financial impact of drug wastage. METHODS: A Markov model with three health states was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab biosimilars plus docetaxel over a 40-month time horizon in patients with HER2+ MBC. Based on the literature and our expert opinion, we assumed similar efficacy between the trastuzumab biosimilar and its reference product. The primary clinical input for the biosimilar was the same as for the reference product in the Catastrophic Patient Database (HV). Health state utilities were derived from the literature, and direct medical costs were obtained from the National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA). RESULTS: In the base-case scenario, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was NTD 811,050 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the model was sensitive to utilities and transition probabilities, but not particularly sensitive to the wastage assumption. In scenario analyses, the ICER was higher when applying the price for trastuzumab reference biologic (branded), than for trastuzumab biosimilar. CONCLUSION: The trastuzumab biosimilar combination regimen is cost-effective and offers significant drug cost savings in Taiwan.
Assuntos
Medicamentos Biossimilares , Neoplasias da Mama , Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Medicamentos Biossimilares/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Docetaxel/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Receptor ErbB-2 , Trastuzumab/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to estimate the cost-utility of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plus cetuximab for patients with previously irradiated recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. METHODS: We constructed a Markov health-state transition model to simulate costs and clinical outcomes of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Model parameters were derived from the published literature and the National Health Insurance Administration reimbursement price list. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and the net monetary benefit were calculated from a health payer perspective. The impact of uncertainty was modeled with one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: In the base-case, SBRT plus cetuximab compared to SBRT alone resulted in an ICER of NT$ 840,455 per QALY gained. In the one-way sensitivity analysis, the utility of progression-free state for patients treated with SBRT plus cetuximab or SBRT alone and the cost of progression-free survival for SBRT+Cet were the most sensitive parameters in the model. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of NT$ 2,252,340 per QALY was 100% for SBRT plus cetuximab but 0% for SBRT alone. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that SBRT+Cet was cost-effective and benefited patients with previously irradiated rSCCHN.
Assuntos
Cetuximab/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/economia , Cetuximab/economia , Terapia Combinada , Análise Custo-Benefício , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/economia , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Radiocirurgia/economia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/economiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy and safety of combinations of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors as second-line treatment in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library electronic databases for phase II/III randomized trials evaluating CDK4/6 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors plus fulvestrant. We compared the results with a network meta-analysis. Study quality was assessed following the GRADE approach. Outcomes of interest were progression-free survival, overall response rate, overall survival and G3-4 adverse drug events (ADEs). RESULTS: Eight RCTs were identified in the network meta-analysis. PFS was significantly improved by treatment with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant and ribociclib plus fulvestrant compared to pictilisib plus fulvestrant. The ORR following treatment with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, ribociclib plus fulvestrant, palbociclib plus fulvestrant, buparlisib plus fulvestrant, and alpelisib plus fulvestrant significantly differed from that observed following treatment with placebo plus fulvestrant. In terms of OS, compared with placebo plus fulvestrant, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, ribociclib plus fulvestrant, and buparlisib plus fulvestrant had a significant difference. The risks of ADEs were similar among three CDK4/6 inhibitors. CONCLUSION: As second-line treatment, three CDK4/6 inhibitors showed superior clinical efficacy compared to other PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors with comparable safety profiles.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Pós-Menopausa , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Quinase 4 Dependente de Ciclina/antagonistas & inibidores , Quinase 6 Dependente de Ciclina/antagonistas & inibidores , Feminino , Humanos , Metástase Neoplásica , Inibidores de Fosfoinositídeo-3 Quinase/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-akt/antagonistas & inibidores , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Taxa de Sobrevida , Serina-Treonina Quinases TOR/antagonistas & inibidores , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Objective: To evaluate the association between radiation exposure from repeated nuclear medicine (NM) examinations and the subsequent risk of neoplasm in pediatric patients. Methods: From 2000 to 2017, participants under 18 years of age who underwent NM scanning were identified using the Health and Welfare Data Science Center (HWDC) dataset, which was extracted from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Both the exposed cohort and unexposed subjects were followed up with until the presence of any malignancy arose, including malignant brain, lymphoid and hematopoietic tumors and benign brain or other central nervous tumors. Results: There were 35,292 patients in the exposed cohort and 141,152 matched subjects in the non-exposed group. The exposed cohort had an overall higher IR (IR: incidence rate, per 100,000 person-years) of any malignancy and benign central nervous tumor than the non-exposed group [IR, 16.9 vs. 1.54; adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 10.9; 95% CI, 6.53-18.2]. Further stratifying the number of NM examinations into 1-2, 3-4, and 5 or more times revealed that the IR of pediatric neoplasms increased gradually with the increased frequency of NM examinations (IR, 11.5; adjusted HR, 7.5; 95% CI, 4.29-13.1; IR, 25.8; adjusted HR, 15.9; 95% CI, 7.00-36.1; IR, 93.8; adjusted HR, 56.4; 95% CI, 28.8-110.3). Conclusion: NM examination is significantly associated with a higher risk of pediatric neoplasms, according to our population-based data. Thorough radiation protection and dose reduction in pediatric NM procedures should be an issue of concern.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: We assessed the efficacy and safety of different modalities using the network meta-analysis for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein invasion. The interested modalities included stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), three-dimensional radiotherapy (3D-RT) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) or TACE, TACE plus sorafenib, and use of SBRT, HAIC, sorafenib, and TACE alone. METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane Library electronic databases were systematically searched for eligible studies published up to June 2017. We used network meta-analysis to compare the disease control rate (DCR) and severe adverse events for the eight interested regimens included in this analysis. Study quality was assessed following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations method. RESULTS: Fifteen studies published between 2010 and 2016 involving a total of 2,359 patients were enrolled in this network meta-analysis. With indirect comparison of DCR and overall safety, the pooled results showed that RT plus HAIC was the most effective regimen in treating advanced HCC with portal vein tumor thrombosis, followed by RT plus TACE. HAIC alone and sorafenib combined with HAIC appeared least effective intervention regimens. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred less in the patients who received SBRT alone compared with other interested regimens. CONCLUSION: 3D-RT combined with HAIC or TACE showed more favorable treatment responses compared with other regimens in advanced HCC patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis.
RESUMO
The abscopal effect is defined as the clearance of distant tumors after applying localized irradiation to a particular tumor site. It has been proposed that a mechanism for the abscopal effect might be the activation of the immune system, which leads to immunogenic tumor cell death. Here, we describe a woman with advanced breast cancer that received modified ablative radiation therapy that targeted her primary breast tumor. She experienced an apparent regression of metastatic mass in the thoracic spine. This case supported the hypothesis that the abscopal effect might be attributable to an activation of the systemic immune response.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Ablação/métodos , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Neoplasias Ósseas/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/radioterapia , Idoso , Neoplasias Ósseas/sangue , Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/sangue , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/sangue , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/secundário , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Feminino , Humanos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
To improve the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment, it is desirable to identify the physical properties of urinary calculi could offer direct correlation with their fragilities during ESWL and thus could be used to guide treatment procedures for more effective stone fragmentation. Thirty stone specimens removed surgically were compressed by an axial testing system to measure the compressive strength and trace the stress-strain curve. Image analysis software SigmaScan (Jandel Co.) was used to calculate the area under the stress-strain curve, the modulus of toughness, for each stone. The values of compressive strength measured were similar to those reported by other researchers. The modulus of toughness of urinary calculi correlates with clinical representation of the stone fragility during ESWL. The modulus of toughness could be an index to evaluate the physical property of urinary calculi that could be used to guide treatment procedures for more effective stone fragmentation.