Hamstring injuries in the national football league: An epidemiological study.

Background: While numerous studies have evaluated National Football League injuries, there is limited literature evaluating hamstring injuries sustained in games. Our primary aim is to analyze the effect of player position on the relative incidence of hamstring injuries in the National Football League. Our secondary aims are to analyze the effects of field surface, week of the season, and short rest weeks. Methods: Official National Football League game books containing injury data from the 2013-2016 regular seasons were used. Data were analyzed to determine the incidence of hamstring injuries by field surface, rest, and week of the season. Field surface was considered either turf or grass. Short rest was considered four days. Relative incidence of hamstring injuries by position was performed with standardized incidence ratios. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Seventy-eight qualifying hamstring injuries were identified and included in our analysis. Linebackers had the highest relative incidence per play with a standardized incidence ratio of 2.02 (CI: 1.14-2.91), followed by Defensive Backs (1.62; 95% CI: 1.14-1.62). Offensive linemen and defensive linemen had standardized incidence ratios significantly less than 1. Fifty-seven percent of hamstring injuries occurred on turf fields (p = 0.082). There was no significant difference between the proportion of hamstring injuries that occurred on short rest and the proportion of games played on short rest (p = 0.959). Hamstring injuries were not more likely to occur than the pooled group of all other types of injuries on short rest (p = 0.861). With a 17-week season, the mean week of hamstring injury was 8.05 (95% CI: 7.06-9.04), while the median week was 7.5. Conclusions: Linebackers and Defensive Backs have the highest relative incidence of hamstring injuries compared to other position groups, while offensive and defensive linemen have the lowest. Field surface and a short rest period did not show significance.

Corrigendum to "Relative frequency of avascular necrosis of the hip as indication for primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in the USA vs. India" [J. Orthop. 36C (2023) 1-6].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.12.002.].

Relative frequency of avascular necrosis of the hip as indication for primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in the USA vs. India.

Introduction: Background: Primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed for a variety of pathologies. Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common indication for THA in the United States of America (USA). The study aims to establish the incidence of indications for THA in the USA as compared to India and to assess whether Avascular Necrosis (AVN) of the Hip is a more frequent indication for THA in India than in the USA. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample database (USA) and two Indian databases (one national and one regional) were analyzed to identify all patients who underwent primary THA within the databases. The relative frequencies of each indication for THA were determined. The patients' demographics and risk factors for AVN of the hip were recorded and assessed. The data were then compared across the patients in the USA and the patients in India. Results: 225,061 primary THA patients were identified in the USA database and 20,288 in the Indian database. The proportion of primary THA performed for AVN in the American database (5.97%) was significantly lower than the proportion of THA performed for AVN in the Indian database (51.8%). Conclusion: The relative frequency of AVN as an indication for THA is significantly higher in India than in the USA. It is important to recognize the differences in relative indications for THA between world populations, as outcomes after THA among Eastern populations of the world may not be equivalent to ones seen in their Western counterparts.

Relative frequency of primary total hip arthroplasty for avascular necrosis in the United States as compared to a regional center: A data review.

Background: The relative frequencies of indications for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) are not well-established. This study aims to establish the incidence of THA performed for Avascular Necrosis of the hip (AVN), as well as the other most common indications for THA in the United States, as compared to the incidences at a high-volume tertiary referral center in Miami, Florida. We hypothesize that the relative incidence of AVN and each other indication for THA will vary significantly between the United States as a whole and the tertiary referral center. Methods: A query of the 2016-2017 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and a tertiary referral center adult reconstruction registry was completed. The relative frequencies of each indication for THA, demographics, and behavioral risk factors were analyzed. Results: 225,061 primary THA patients in the National Inpatient Sample database and 447 in the Miami tertiary referral center database were included in the final analysis. The proportion of primary THA for AVN in the NIS database (5.97%) was significantly lower than the same proportion in the tertiary referral center database (22.2%), p < .001. There was no significant difference in the incidence of primary THA for osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, or hip dysplasia between the two populations. Conclusion: The incidence of THA for AVN is significantly different between a tertiary referral center and the greater United States. Patient demographics, race, and behavioral risk factors are associated with the disparity. Orthopaedic surgeons should recognize the differences in THA indication between populations when counseling patients on treatments, outcomes, and the most current literature.