Phase 1 Open-Label, Multicenter Study of First-in-Class RORγ Agonist LYC-55716 (Cintirorgon): Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Evidence of Antitumor Activity.

PURPOSE: Transcription factor retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor γ (RORγ) regulates type 17 effector T-cell differentiation and function and is key to immune cell regulation. Synthetic RORγ agonists modulate immune cell gene expression to increase effector T-cell activity and decrease immune suppression. A phase 1 study evaluated the safety and tolerability of LYC-55716 (cintirorgon), a first-in-class, oral, small-molecule RORγ agonist in adults with relapsed/refractory metastatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received 28-day treatment cycles of oral LYC-55716; dose and dosing regimen were determined according to pharmacokinetic profile and safety. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and objective tumor response rate. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities occurred among the 32 enrolled patients who received LYC-55716 150 mg BID to 450 mg BID. Treatment-related adverse events (AE) were primarily grade 1-2 and included diarrhea (n = 11), fatigue (n = 7), anemia (n = 4), decreased appetite (n = 4), and nausea (n = 4). Grade 3 AEs were anemia (n = 2), elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase (n = 1), and hypophosphatemia (n = 1). Pharmacokinetic concentrations achieved levels expected for target gene regulation. Pharmacodynamic results indicated RORγ pathway engagement. Two patients (NSCLC and sarcomatoid breast cancer) had confirmed partial responses; 11 had disease stabilization for 2 to 12 months (6 received >4 months of treatment). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the safety and tolerability of LYC-55716 and selection of 450 mg BID dose for a phase 2a study assessing LYC-55716 clinical activity, safety, and biomarkers in patients with NSCLC, head and neck, gastroesophageal, renal cell, urothelial, and ovarian cancers.

Randomized phase 2b study of pralatrexate versus erlotinib in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after failure of prior platinum-based therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Pralatrexate, a folate analogue targeting dihydrofolate reductase, has antitumor activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This randomized phase 2b trial was designed to further evaluate pralatrexate activity in NSCLC by estimating overall survival (OS) relative to erlotinib in patients with relapsed/refractory disease. METHODS: In 43 centers across 6 countries, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous pralatrexate 190 mg/m on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, or oral erlotinib 150 mg/day. The primary objective was to estimate OS in all patients and prespecified subgroups using relative comparisons of hazard ratios (HRs). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, response rate, and safety. Key eligibility criteria included: (1) ≥1 prior platinum-based therapy, (2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1, and 3) a smoking history of 100 cigarettes or more. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were randomized. A trend toward improvement in OS favoring pralatrexate was observed with an HR of 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-1.14) in the intent-to-treat population. This favorable survival result was seen in most prespecified subgroups for pralatrexate. The largest reduction in the risk of death was observed in patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma (n = 107; HR = 0.65; 95% confidence interval: 0.42-1.0). The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse event in the pralatrexate arm was mucositis (23%). Discontinuation of pralatrexate for any grade of mucositis was 21%. CONCLUSIONS: Pralatrexate demonstrated a trend toward improved survival relative to erlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC. Future studies should include a mucositis management plan to improve tolerability and maximize treatment benefit.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irofulven and capecitabine administered every 2 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose, dose limiting toxicities (DLT), safety and pharmacokinetics of irofulven combined with capecitabine in advanced solid tumor patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Irofulven was given i.v. over 30 min on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks; capecitabine was given orally twice daily, day 1 to 15. Dose levels (DL) were: irofulven (mg/kg)/capecitabine (mg/m2/day): DL1: 0.3/1,700; DL2: 0.4/1,700; DL3: 0.4/2,000; DL4: 0.5/2,000. RESULTS: Between May 2002 and March 2004, 37 patients were treated and 36 evaluable for MTD. DLT occurred in 1/6 evaluable patients in DL1 (grade 3 thrombocytopenia); 1/6 in DL3 (grade 3 thrombocytopenia); 2/7 in DL4 (grade 3 febrile neutropenia, grade 3 thrombocytopenia). DL4 was defined as the MTD and DL3 was established as the recommended dose (RD). DLTs occurred in 1 of 14 additional patients treated at DL3. No treatment-related deaths or grade 4 non-hematological toxicity occurred, and grade 3 toxicities were infrequent. Antitumor activity was observed; two partial responses were noted in thyroid carcinoma (DL1, DL4); one unconfirmed partial response was observed in a patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, (DL3); 12 patients had disease stabilization >3 months; of eight patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), one patient had PSA normalization and four short-term stabilizations of PSA occurred. Capecitabine and irofulven pharmacokinetics results did not suggest drug-drug interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Irofulven with capecitabine was adequately tolerated and evidence of antitumor activity was observed. The recommended dose is irofulven 0.4 mg/kg and capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2/day.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irofulven and cisplatin administered in a 30-min infusion every two weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: To determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose, safety and pharmacokinetics of irofulven combined with cisplatin in advanced solid tumor patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cisplatin and irofulven were given sequentially i.v. over 30 min on day 1 and 15 every 4 weeks. Four dose levels (DL) were explored: irofulven (mg/kg)/cisplatin (mg/m2): DL1: 0.3/30; DL2: 0.4/30; DL3: 0.4/40; DL4: 0.5/40. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) included dosing omission and delay > 1 week. MTD was the DL with DLT in 2/2 or > or = 2/6 patients during cycle 1-2. RESULTS: Between March 2002 and April 2003, 33 patients were treated. DLT occurred in 1/6 patients in DL1 (hypomagnesemia, hypocalcemia); 1/6 in DL2 (thrombocytopenia); 2 heavily pretreated patients out of 6 patients in DL3 (neutropenic infection, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis); 2/3 in DL4 (asthenia, blurred vision). Three DLT occurred in 12 additional patients treated at DL2. No toxic deaths occurred; grade 4 toxicity and grade 3 non-hematological toxicity were infrequent. Six patients reported grade 1-2 visual events. Antitumor activity was observed over a broad spectrum of tumor types in all DLs: 1 partial response in bulky sarcoma (DL1); 1 clinical response in endometrial carcinoma (DL1); 2 partial responses not confirmed due to discontinuation (ovarian DL2, renal DL4); 8 stabilizations > 3 months; PSA response: 3/9 prostate cancer patients. Irofulven showed rapid elimination and high interpatient variability. Platinum and irofulven pharmacokinetics did not suggest drug-drug interactions. CONCLUSION: Irofulven with cisplatin was adequately tolerated and substantial evidence of antitumor activity was observed. The recommended dose is irofulven 0.4 mg/kg and cisplatin 30 mg/m2.

A phase II study of irofulven in women with recurrent and heavily pretreated ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of a novel illudin S derivative, irofulven (MGI-114), in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who had received extensive prior chemotherapy. METHODS: The trial was an open label phase II study. Patients initially enrolled in this study were treated every 14 days with a dose of 24 mg/m2. Unexpected retinal toxicity associated with this dose and schedule lead to modification of the dosing to 0.55 mg/kg on the same schedule with a maximum individual dose of 50 mg. Dose reductions were permitted based on both hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities. RESULTS: Seventy-four women were accrued and stratified into two cohorts including 58 women with platinum-resistant disease and 16 with platinum-sensitive disease. Non-hematologic toxicities included nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. Thirty-one women had between one and six visual symptoms, most were Grade 1 and 2 in nature. The majority of visual toxicities resolved either during treatment or post-treatment with irofulven. There was one partial response in each cohort with 19 (33%) and 8 (50%) of women having stable disease in the platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Irofulven at 24 mg/m2 on every 14-day schedule is associated with significant retinal toxicity in this patient population. Dosing at 0.55 mg/kg has persistent retinal toxicity, yet demonstrated only limited anti-tumor activity in a population of women who had received extensive prior chemotherapy.