Exploring Sociodemographic Factors in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis in a Northern California Patient Population.

BACKGROUND: Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) that has previously been associated with younger age and Black patients. However, the role of demographic and socioeconomic factors in AFRS severity remains to be fully elucidated. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether demographic and socioeconomic factors are associated with incidence of AFRS, as well as with disease severity in Northern California. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of adult patients with AFRS and CRS from 2010 to 2019. AFRS was determined by the Bent and Kuhn criteria, and severity was assessed by radiographic evidence of cranioorbital invasion and other clinical parameters. Chi-square and t-test were used to assess demographic and socioeconomic differences between AFRS and CRS cohorts, and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for severe AFRS. RESULTS: Black patients represented 26.2% (55/210 patients) of the AFRS group and 4.9% (842/17,300 patients) of the CRS group, with pairwise comparison of race/ethnicity categories showing that the AFRS group had significantly higher proportions of Black race/ethnicity compared with other race/ethnicities (p < 0.01). AFRS and CRS groups differed significantly by age, with mean ages of 48.7 and 51.0 years, respectively (p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in gender, Medicaid status, comorbidities, and socioeconomic status measures. Multivariate logistic regression showed that Black patients had higher odds of having severe AFRS (adjusted odds ratio = 2.29; 95% confidence interval: 1.18-4.45). CONCLUSION: AFRS has a unique predilection for Black patients, and severe disease is also more likely in this population.

Changes in Service Use After Participation in an Intensive Outpatient Program Among Adults With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Intensive outpatient programs (IOPs) have been shown to reduce posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in veteran populations. The aim of this study was to examine the association between IOP participation and inpatient psychiatric and mental health-related emergency department (ED) encounters among patients with PTSD. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study among 258 adults with PTSD who participated in the IOP at Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018. The authors compared changes in inpatient psychiatric hospitalizations and mental health-related ED encounters from the year before vs after the first IOP engagement. Bivariate analyses comparing ED and inpatient utilization pre- and post-IOP engagement, stratified by sociodemographic variables were conducted using paired t-tests and McNemar's test. Conditional multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the odds of psychiatric utilization. RESULTS: Participants were more likely to have ≥ 1 inpatient psychiatric encounter (28.7% vs 15.9%; p < 0.01) and ≥ 1 mental health-related ED encounter (24.8% vs 18.2%; p = 0.04) pre-IOP vs post-IOP. The authors' multivariable analysis demonstrated that patients experienced a 56% reduction in the odds of inpatient psychiatric encounters (adjusted odds ratio = 0.42, 95% confidence interval: 0.26-0.68, p < 0.01) and a 35% reduction in mental health-related ED encounters (adjusted odds ratio = 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.40-1.00, p = 0.05) post-IOP vs pre-IOP. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated a significant reduction in inpatient psychiatric hospitalizations and mental health-related ED visits among patients with PTSD in the year following participation in an IOP. CONCLUSION: These findings support the use of IOPs for patients with PTSD to reduce the likelihood of intensive service use.

Evaluation of an Embedded Health Psychologist Intervention for Obstetric Patients With Adverse Childhood Experiences.

BACKGROUND: Screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and resilience in pregnancy is a promising practice for mitigating ACEs-related health complications. Yet, the best follow-up for pregnant patients with high ACEs and/or low resilience has not been established. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates referrals to and participation in an embedded health psychologist (EHP) intervention for pregnant patients with ACEs and/or low resilience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in 3 Kaiser Permanente Northern California medical centers with ACEs who had also received resilience screening during standard prenatal care and who were participating in an EHP intervention were included (N = 910). The authors used multivariable logistic regression to examine whether ACEs (0, 1-2, 3+) and resilience (high vs low) were associated with referrals to and participation in EHP intervention. They also evaluated the impact of EHP intervention through clinician (N = 53) and patient (N = 51) surveys. RESULTS: Patients with 3+ vs 0 ACEs were more likely to receive an EHP referral (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.93-4.33) and were more likely to participate in EHP intervention (aOR = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.87-4.36). Those with low vs high resilience were also more likely to receive an EHP referral (aOR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.32-2.62) and participate in EHP (aOR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.19-2.44). When ACEs and resilience were combined, those with high ACEs and low resilience had the greatest odds of referrals and participation. Patients and clinicians reported positive experiences with EHP intervention. CONCLUSION: Patients with higher ACEs and lower resilience scores were more likely to be referred to and participate in EHP intervention, suggesting that at-risk patients can be successfully linked with a health psychologist when accessible within obstetric care.

The impact of minimally-invasive esophagectomy operative duration on post-operative outcomes.

Background: Esophagectomy, an esophageal cancer treatment mainstay, is a highly morbid procedure. Prolonged operative time, only partially predetermined by case complexity, may be uniquely harmful to minimally-invasive esophagectomy (MIE) patients for numerous reasons, including anastomotic leak, tenuous conduit perfusion and protracted single-lung ventilation, but the impact is unknown. This multi-center retrospective cohort study sought to characterize the relationship between MIE operative time and post-operative outcomes. Methods: We abstracted multi-center data on esophageal cancer patients who underwent MIE from 2010 to 2021. Predictor variables included age, sex, comorbidities, body mass index, prior cardiothoracic surgery, stage, and neoadjuvant therapy. Outcomes included complications, readmissions, and mortality. Association analysis evaluated the relationship between predictor variables and operative time. Multivariate logistic regression characterized the influence of potential predictor variables and operative time on post-operative outcomes. Subgroup analysis evaluated the association between MIE >4 h vs. ≤4 h and complications, readmissions and survival. Results: For the 297 esophageal cancer patients who underwent MIE between 2010 and 2021, the median operative duration was 4.8 h [IQR: 3.7-6.3]. For patients with anastomotic leak (5.1%) and 1-year mortality, operative duration was elevated above the median at 6.3 h [IQR: 4.8-8.6], p = 0.008) and 5.3 h [IQR: 4.4-6.8], p = 0.04), respectively. In multivariate logistic regression, each additional hour of operative time increased the odds of anastomotic leak and 1-year mortality by 39% and 19%, respectively. Conclusions: Esophageal cancer is a poor prognosis disease, even with optimal treatment. Operative efficiency, a modifiable surgical variable, may be an important target to improve MIE patient outcomes.

Differences in outcomes by race/ethnicity after thoracic surgery in a large integrated health system.

Background: Disparities exist throughout surgery. We aimed to assess for racial/ethnic disparities among outcomes in a large thoracic surgery patient population. Methods: We reviewed all thoracic surgery patients treated at our integrated health system from January 1, 2016-December 31, 2020. Post-operative outcomes including length of stay (LOS), 30-day return to the emergency department (30d-ED), 30-day readmission, 30- and 90-day outpatient appointments, and 30- and 90-day mortality were compared by race/ethnicity. Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression were performed. Our multivariable models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, surgery type, neighborhood deprivation index, insurance, and home region. Results: Of 2730 included patients, 59.4 % were non-Hispanic White, 15.0 % were Asian, 11.9 % were Hispanic, 9.6 % were Black, and 4.1 % were Other. Median (Q1-Q3) LOS (in hours) was shortest among non-Hispanic White (37.3 (29.2-76.1)) and Other (36.5 (29.3-75.4)) patients followed by Hispanic (46.8 (29.9-78.1)) patients with Asian (51.3 (30.7-81.9)) and Black (53.7 (30.6-101.6)) patients experiencing the longest LOS (p < 0.01). 30d-ED rates were highest among Hispanic patients (21.3 %), followed by Black (19.2 %), non-Hispanic White (18.1 %), Asian (13.4 %), and Other (8.0 %) patients (p < 0.01). On multivariable analysis, Hispanic ethnicity (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.43 (95 % CI 1.03-1.97)) and Medicaid insurance (OR 2.37 (95 % CI 1.48-3.81)) were associated with higher 30d-ED rates. No racial/ethnic disparities were found among other outcomes. Conclusions: Despite parity across multiple surgical outcomes, disparities remain related to patient encounters within our system. Health systems must track such disparities in addition to standard clinical outcomes. Key message: While our large integrated health system has been able to demonstrate parity across many major surgical outcomes among our thoracic surgery patients, race/ethnicity disparities persist including in the number of post-operative return trips to the emergency department. Tracking outcome disparities to a granular level such as return visits to the emergency department and number of follow up appointments is critical as health systems strive to achieve equitable care.