MRI correlates of suicide attempt history in unipolar depression.

BACKGROUND: Suicide represents a major health problem in the United States, and prediction of suicide attempts is difficult. No structural neuroimaging studies have been done to specifically examine findings in patients who have attempted suicide. The objective of this study was to compare MRI findings in unipolar patients with and without a history of a suicide attempt. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis, 20 unipolar subjects with a history of a suicide attempt were matched by age and gender to unipolar subjects without a history of an attempt. Subjects were also matched on parameters such as cardiovascular history, electroconvulsive treatment history, and history of psychosis. Subjects with a history of any neurologic condition were excluded. There were no significant differences in age of onset of depression, number of episodes of depression, and Hamilton Depression scores between the two groups. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were rated using the Coffey and Boyko rating scales. RESULTS: Unipolar patients with a history of a suicide attempt demonstrated significantly more subcortical gray matter hyperintensities compared with patients without such a history. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with abnormal MRI findings may be at higher risk for mood disorders and suicide attempts because of disruption of critical neuroanatomic pathways. Gray matter hyperintensities in the basal ganglia may be especially associated with risk for suicide attempts.

Familial leukoencephalopathy in bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Imaging studies of patients with bipolar disorder demonstrate changes in deep white matter and subcortical gray nuclei that are seen as focal hyperintensities on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The objective of this study was to examine MRIs in a family with a strong history of bipolar disorder to look for possible MRI abnormalities in members with and without affective illness. METHOD: The authors obtained MRIs of 21 members of a family with a strong history of bipolar disorder. Eight of the family members studied had bipolar illness, one had symptoms of bipolar disorder but did not meet full DSM-III-R criteria, two had unipolar disorder, and 10 did not have bipolar disorder. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 21 family members had MRI findings, including six of 10 family members who had no affective disorder and all of those with bipolar disorder. Lesions of both white matter and subcortical gray nuclei were found. CONCLUSIONS: Although the clinical significance of these MRI findings is unknown, the high prevalence of MRI findings in both affected and unaffected family members suggests that MRI findings may potentially serve as a biological marker for bipolar disorder. Recent genetic studies have established a link between familial leukoencephalopathy and chromosome 19. If leukoencephalopathy appears to be related to bipolar disorder, it may allow clearer characterization of the genetics of the disorder.

Efficacy of buspirone in generalized anxiety disorder with coexisting mild depressive symptoms.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the anxiolytic efficacy of buspirone in patients with a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) with coexisting mild depressive symptoms. METHOD: Patients who participated in this multicenter study scored >/= 18 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) and between 12 and 17 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). Following a 7- to 10-day placebo lead-in phase, patients who continued to qualify were randomly assigned to receive either buspirone titrated from 15 to 45 mg/day (N = 80) or placebo (N = 82) for the next 6 weeks. 121 patients completed 6 weeks of treatment. The primary efficacy measure was the HAM-A, taken weekly during the study. RESULTS: Buspirone-treated patients averaged a 12.4-point reduction from their baseline total HAM-A score of 24.9, while their counterparts on placebo averaged a 9.5-point reduction from their mean baseline total HAM-A score of 25.6. This 2.9-point difference in HAM-A reductions between treatment groups was significantly different (p < .03). Buspirone patients decreased their HAM-D scores by an average 5.7 points from their mean baseline total HAM-D score of 15.8, while placebo patients decreased their HAM-D scores by an average 3.5 points from their mean baseline score of 16.3 (p < .05). Overall, the incidence of adverse events was similar for both treatment groups, but buspirone-treated patients reported significantly more nausea, dizziness, somnolence, and sweating than placebo patients. CONCLUSION: Buspirone is superior to placebo in improving anxiety and depressive symptoms in GAD patients who have coexisting depressive symptoms.

A fixed-dose (300 mg) efficacy study of bupropion and placebo in depressed outpatients.

Two hundred twenty-four outpatients with major depression entered a 6-week, five-center, double-blind trial of bupropion 300 mg/day and placebo. A total of 216 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. In the combined center analysis, greater efficacy for bupropion was found on one or more measures (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and Clinical Global Impressions) at treatment Days 21, 28, 35, and 42. Bupropion was well tolerated; only four adverse events were reported at least 5% more often in the bupropion group than in the placebo group. Six bupropion patients versus 5 placebo patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. This study extends earlier findings of efficacy for higher-dose treatment in an inpatient population to lower-dose treatment in an outpatient population.

A pilot study of mirtazapine in post-traumatic stress disorder.

Recently, studies of pharmacotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been focused on serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), despite a number of treatment-limiting side-effects. Mirtazapine, a novel drug with both noradrenergic and serotonergic properties, may be effective in individuals who demonstrate intolerance to side-effects of and a limited response to SSRIs. Six outpatients with severe, chronic PTSD were treated with mirtazapine, up to 45 mg/day for 8 weeks. Efficacy assessments and side-effect monitoring were performed at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8. Fifty percent of the sample demonstrated improvement of 50% or more from baseline using a global rating. In addition, improvements were noted on both interviewer-administered and self-rated scales of PTSD and of depression. The drug was well tolerated with few significant side-effects. Mirtazapine was associated with clinical improvement in 50% of subjects with severe, chronic PTSD, suggesting a need for further investigation in double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.

Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder with nefazodone.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are useful in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but have a number of side-effects which limit their acceptability. A newer serotonergic compound, nefazodone, has a different side-effect profile, thus making it a potentially promising compound to study. Seventeen private practice patients with PTSD were treated with nefazodone up to 600 mg/day for a maximum total treatment period of 12 weeks. All subjects were civilians, and were monitored for efficacy and side-effects at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12. Nefazodone was associated with statistically significant improvement in mean scores on all six rating scales used to assess change from baseline in PTSD symptoms. Additionally, statistically significant improvement from baseline were seen for the intrusive, avoidant/numbing, and hyperarousal clusters on a global PTSD scale. Early improvements in nightmares and general sleep disturbance were observed. Overall, there was a 43% response rate at endpoint, or 60% in treatment completers, by observer rating. Side-effects (assessed on the Medication Effects Scale) were generally benign. Nefazodone was associated with clinical improvement in this population, and now needs to be studied in double-blind, placebo controlled, protocols.

Analysis of suicidality in pooled data from 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled aripiprazole adjunctive therapy trials in major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of adjunctive aripiprazole versus adjunctive placebo treatment on suicidality in patients with major depressive disorder. METHOD: Data were pooled from 2 identical aripiprazole augmentation studies. Patients with DSM-IV-TR-diagnosed major depressive disorder with an inadequate response to 8 weeks of prospective antidepressant treatment were randomly assigned to adjunctive placebo or adjunctive aripiprazole (2-20 mg/d) treatment for 6 weeks. Adverse events related to suicidality were identified in the adverse event database using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities-preferred term. Treatment-emergent suicidal ideation was defined using item 10 (suicidality) of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and item 18 (suicidality) of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS). RESULTS: In total, 737 patients were included in the safety database (aripiprazole n = 371; placebo n = 366). No suicides were reported. There were no treatment-emergent, suicide-related adverse events in the aripiprazole group; 2 patients in the placebo group had ≥ 1 adverse event related to suicide (both suicidal ideation). More placebo than aripiprazole patients > 25 years old experienced a 2-point (P < .01) or 1-point (P < .05) worsening of MADRS item 10 scores. For this age group, 2-point improvement in MADRS item 10 scores and 1-point improvement of IDS item 18 scores were significantly more common in aripiprazole patients than placebo patients (both P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis demonstrated that adjunctive aripiprazole treatment in patients with depression with a history of an inadequate response to antidepressant medication is associated with a decreased rate of suicidality in a group of subjects not at significant risk. Prospective trials directly assessing suicidality are needed to further understand the benefits of an adjunctive antipsychotic in an at-risk population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00095823 and NCT00095758.

Adjunctive use of olanzapine in mood disorders: five case reports.

Olanzapine has emerged as an atypical antipsychotic with few side effects and potentially superior efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia. To our knowledge there have been few published reports of olanzapine in the treatment of mood disorders. We report on the adjunctive use of this medication in three subjects with mania and two with depression. Response occurred rapidly and patients tolerated the medication. Olanzapine offers promise in the treatment of mood disorders.

Dimensions of self-rated mood in depressed, manic, and normal subjects.

Self-rated scales allow the comparison of subjective mood across the spectrum of manic, depressive, and euthymic states. This study examined the self-reported mood of manic, depressed, and normal subjects using a 23-item research instrument based on the Carroll-Klein model of bipolar disorder. The Multiple Visual Analog Scale (MVAS) measures the following dimensions: consummatory reward (seven items), incentive reward (two items), psychomotor speed (seven items), and central pain (seven items). The MVAS was completed by 31 manic inpatients, 43 depressed inpatients, and 29 normal volunteer subjects. Total scores, average item scores, and total dimension scores were obtained. Subjects also completed a global mood VAS and the Carroll Depression Scale (CDS). Groups were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Bonferroni-Dunn methods. In a separate post hoc analysis, the group of manic patients was divided at the median CDS score into "pure" and "dysphoric" manic subgroups. We found excellent congruence of average 23-item total MVAS scores with global VAS and CDS scores. Dimension scores on the MVAS conformed to the predictions of the Carroll-Klein model. Depressed patients differed significantly from both manic and normal subjects on each dimension. MVAS dimension scores of normal subjects did not differ significantly from those of manic patients. On the dimension of central pain, normal subjects had significantly less inhibited scores than the "pure" subgroup of manics. The results confirmed that the dimensions of the Carroll-Klein model are bipolar and orthogonal. By the MVAS technique, the self-reported mood of normal subjects is similar to the self-reported mood of manic patients on all dimensions of the Carroll-Klein model of bipolar disorder. The positive scores of both groups are clearly distinguished from the negative scores of depressed patients. Average MVAS scores of normal subjects approximated the conventional zero score only on the dimension of central pain. Normal subjects exhibit megalothymic (hyperthymia) on most dimensions of subjective mood. The negative MVAS scores of depressed patients are even more deviant from normal than the conventional scoring system would suggest.

Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). New self-rating scale.

BACKGROUND: Of available self-rated social phobia scales, none assesses the spectrum of fear, avoidance, and physiological symptoms, all of which are clinically important. Because of this limitation, we developed the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). AIMS: To establish psychometric validation of the SPIN. METHOD: Subjects from three clinical trials and two control groups were given the 17-item, self-rated SPIN. Validity was assessed against several established measures of social anxiety, global assessments of severity and improvement, and scales assessing physical health and disability. RESULTS: Good test-retest reliability, internal consistency, convergent and divergent validity were obtained. A SPIN score of 19 distinguished between social phobia subjects and controls. The SPIN was responsive to change in symptoms over time and reflected different responses to active drugs v. placebo. Factorial analysis identified five factors. CONCLUSIONS: The SPIN demonstrates solid psychometric properties and shows promise as a measurement for the screening of, and treatment response to, social phobia.

Comparison of bupropion and trazodone for the treatment of major depression.

Bupropion and trazodone were compared in a two-center, double-blind clinical trial of outpatients with moderate to severe major depression. After a 1-week placebo lead-in, 124 patients were randomly assigned to receive either bupropion (N = 63) or trazodone (N = 61) for 6 weeks; data from 111 patients were used in the efficacy analysis. Dosing ranged from 225 to 450 mg/day for bupropion and 150 to 400 mg/day for trazodone. The overall efficacy for each of the two drugs was similar; although improvement in the trazodone treatment group was significantly greater on day 7 because of the effects on sleep. At the end of treatment, 58% of the bupropion-treated patients and 46% of the trazodone-treated patients were considered much or very much improved. Weight measurements at the time of discontinuation indicated a 2.5-lb mean weight loss for the bupropion treatment group and a 1.2-lb mean weight gain for the trazodone treatment group. The adverse experience profiles for bupropion and trazodone were consistent with their known pharmacologic profiles (i.e., activating versus sedating). Anorexia and anxiety were reported significantly more often for the bupropion treatment group, whereas somnolence, appetite increase, and edema were reported significantly more often for the trazodone treatment group.

Treatment of social phobia with gabapentin: a placebo-controlled study.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin in relieving the symptoms of social phobia. Sixty-nine patients were randomly assigned to receive double-blind treatment with either gabapentin (dosed flexibly between 900 and 3,600 mg daily in three divided doses) or placebo for 14 weeks. A significant reduction (p < 0.05) in the symptoms of social phobia was observed among patients on gabapentin compared with those on placebo as evaluated by clinician- and patient-rated scales. Results were similar for the intent-to-treat and week-2 completer populations. Adverse events were consistent with the known side effect profile of gabapentin. Dizziness (p = 0.05), dry mouth (p = 0.05), somnolence, nausea, flatulence, and decreased libido occurred at a higher frequency among patients receiving gabapentin than among those receiving placebo. No serious adverse events or deaths were reported. On the basis of these limited data, it seems that gabapentin offers a favorable risk-benefit ratio for the treatment of patients with social phobia. Further studies are required to confirm this effect and to determine whether a dose-response relationship exists.