Endplate weakening during cage bed preparation significantly reduces endplate load capacity.

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of endplate weakness prior to PLIF or TLIF cage implantation and compare it to the opposite intact endplate of the same vertebral body. In addition, the influence of bone quality on endplate resistance was investigated. METHODS: Twenty-two human lumbar vertebrae were tested in a ramp-to-failure test. One endplate of each vertebral body was tested intact and the other after weakening with a rasp (over an area of 200 mm2). Either a TLIF or PLIF cage was then placed and the compression load was applied across the cage until failure of the endplate. Failure was defined as the first local maximum of the force measurement. Bone quality was assessed by determining the Hounsfield units (HU) on CT images. RESULTS: With an intact endplate and a TLIF cage, the median force to failure was 1276.3N (693.1-1980.6N). Endplate weakening reduced axial endplate resistance to failure by 15% (0-23%). With an intact endplate and a PLIF cage, the median force to failure was 1057.2N (701.2-1735.5N). Endplate weakening reduced axial endplate resistance to failure by 36.6% (7-47.9%). Bone quality correlated linearly with the force at which endplate failure occurred. Intact and weakened endplates showed a strong positive correlation: intact-TLIF: r = 0.964, slope of the regression line (slope) = 11.8, p < 0.001; intact-PLIF: r = 0.909, slope = 11.2, p = 5.5E-05; weakened-TLIF: r = 0.973, slope = 12.5, p < 0.001; weakened-PLIF: r = 0.836, slope = 6, p = 0.003. CONCLUSION: Weakening of the endplate during cage bed preparation significantly reduces the resistance of the endplate to subsidence to failure: endplate load capacity is reduced by 15% with TLIF and 37% with PLIF. Bone quality correlates with the force at which endplate failure occurs.

Interspinous and spinolaminar synthetic vertebropexy of the lumbar spine.

PURPOSE: To develop and test synthetic vertebral stabilization techniques ("vertebropexy") that can be used after decompression surgery and furthermore to compare them with a standard dorsal fusion procedure. METHODS: Twelve spinal segments (Th12/L1: 4, L2/3: 4, L4/5: 4) were tested in a stepwise surgical decompression and stabilization study. Stabilization was achieved with a FiberTape cerclage, which was pulled through the spinous process (interspinous technique) or through one spinous process and around both laminae (spinolaminar technique). The specimens were tested (1) in the native state, after (2) unilateral laminotomy, (3) interspinous vertebropexy and (4) spinolaminar vertebropexy. The segments were loaded in flexion-extension (FE), lateral shear (LS), lateral bending (LB), anterior shear (AS) and axial rotation (AR). RESULTS: Interspinous fixation significantly reduced ROM in FE by 66% (p = 0.003), in LB by 7% (p = 0.006) and in AR by 9% (p = 0.02). Shear movements (LS and AS) were also reduced, although not significantly: in LS reduction by 24% (p = 0.07), in AS reduction by 3% (p = 0.21). Spinolaminar fixation significantly reduced ROM in FE by 68% (p = 0.003), in LS by 28% (p = 0.01), in LB by 10% (p = 0.003) and AR by 8% (p = 0.003). AS was also reduced, although not significantly: reduction by 18% (p = 0.06). Overall, the techniques were largely comparable. The spinolaminar technique differed from interspinous fixation only in that it had a greater effect on shear motion. CONCLUSION: Synthetic vertebropexy is able to reduce lumbar segmental motion, especially in flexion-extension. The spinolaminar technique affects shear forces to a greater extent than the interspinous technique.

Vertebropexy as a semi-rigid ligamentous alternative to lumbar spinal fusion.

PURPOSE: To develop ligamentous vertebral stabilization techniques ("vertebropexy") that can be used after microsurgical decompression (intact posterior structures) and midline decompression (removed posterior structures) and to elaborate their biomechanical characteristics. METHODS: Fifteen spinal segments were biomechanically tested in a stepwise surgical decompression and ligamentous stabilization study. Stabilization was achieved with a gracilis or semitendinosus tendon allograft, which was attached to the spinous process (interspinous vertebropexy) or the laminae (interlaminar vertebropexy) in form of a loop. The specimens were tested (1) in the native state, after (2) microsurgical decompression, (3) interspinous vertebropexy, (4) midline decompression, and (5) interlaminar vertebropexy. In the intact state and after every surgical step, the segments were loaded in flexion-extension (FE), lateral shear (LS), lateral bending (LB), anterior shear (AS) and axial rotation (AR). RESULTS: Interspinous vertebropexy significantly reduced the range of motion (ROM) in all loading scenarios compared to microsurgical decompression: in FE by 70% (p < 0.001), in LS by 22% (p < 0.001), in LB by 8% (p < 0.001) in AS by 12% (p < 0.01) and in AR by 9% (p < 0.001). Interlaminar vertebropexy decreased ROM compared to midline decompression by 70% (p < 0.001) in FE, 18% (p < 0.001) in LS, 11% (p < 0.01) in LB, 7% (p < 0.01) in AS, and 4% (p < 0.01) in AR. Vertebral segment ROM was significantly smaller with the interspinous vertebropexy compared to the interlaminar vertebropexy for all loading scenarios except FE. Both techniques were able to reduce vertebral body segment ROM in FE, LS and LB beyond the native state. CONCLUSION: Vertebropexy is a new concept of semi-rigid spinal stabilization based on ligamentous reinforcement of the spinal segment. It is able to reduce motion, especially in flexion-extension. Studies are needed to evaluate its clinical application.

Residual motion of different posterior instrumentation and interbody fusion constructs.

PURPOSE: To elucidate residual motion of cortical screw (CS) and pedicle screw (PS) constructs with unilateral posterior lumbar interbody fusion (ul-PLIF), bilateral PLIF (bl-PLIF), facet-sparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (fs-TLIF), and facet-resecting TLIF (fr-TLIF). METHODS: A total of 35 human cadaver lumbar segments were instrumented with PS (n = 18) and CS (n = 17). Range of motion (ROM) and relative ROM changes were recorded in flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), axial rotation (AR), lateral shear (LS), anterior shear (AS), and axial compression (AC) in five instrumentational states: without interbody fusion (wo-IF), ul-PLIF, bl-PLIF, fs-TLIF, and fr-TLIF. RESULTS: Whereas FE, LB, AR, and AC noticeably differed between the instrumentational states, AS and LS were less prominently affected. Compared to wo-IF, ul-PLIF caused a significant increase in ROM with PS (FE + 42%, LB + 24%, AR + 34%, and AC + 77%), however, such changes were non-significant with CS. ROM was similar between wo-IF and all other interbody fusion techniques. Insertion of a second PLIF (bl-PLIF) significantly decreased ROM with CS (FE -17%, LB -26%, AR -20%, AC -51%) and PS (FE - 23%, LB - 14%, AR - 20%, AC - 45%,). Facet removal in TLIF significantly increased ROM with CS (FE + 6%, LB + 9%, AR + 17%, AC of + 23%) and PS (FE + 7%, AR + 12%, AC + 13%). CONCLUSION: bl-PLIF and TLIF show similarly low residual motion in both PS and CS constructs, but ul-PLIF results in increased motion. The fs-TLIF technique is able to further decrease motion compared to fr-TLIF in both the CS and PS constructs.

Residual motion of cortical versus pedicle screw constructs after decompression, interbody fusion and cross-link augmentation.

PURPOSE: To compare the residual range of motion (ROM) of cortical screw (CS) versus pedicle screw (PS) instrumented lumbar segments and the additional effect of transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) and cross-link (CL) augmentation. METHODS: ROM of thirty-five human cadaver lumbar segments in flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), lateral shear (LS), anterior shear (AS), axial rotation (AR), and axial compression (AC) was recorded. After instrumenting the segments with PS (n = 17) and CS (n = 18), ROM in relation to the uninstrumented segments was evaluated without and with CL augmentation before and after decompression and TLIF. RESULTS: CS and PS instrumentations both significantly reduced ROM in all loading directions, except AC. In undecompressed segments, a significantly lower relative (and absolute) reduction of motion in LB was found with CS 61% (absolute 3.3°) as compared to PS 71% (4.0°; p = 0.048). FE, AR, AS, LS, and AC values were similar between CS and PS instrumented segments without interbody fusion. After decompression and TLIF insertion, no difference between CS and PS was found in LB and neither in any other loading direction. CL augmentation did not diminish differences in LB between CS and PS in the undecompressed state but led to an additional small AR reduction of 11% (0.15°) in CS and 7% (0.05°) in PS instrumentation. CONCLUSION: Similar residual motion is found with CS and PS instrumentation, except of slightly, but significantly inferior reduction of ROM in LB with CS. Differences between CS and PS in diminish with TLIF but not with CL augmentation.

Biomechanics after spinal decompression and posterior instrumentation.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to elucidate segmental range of motion (ROM) before and after common decompression and fusion procedures on the lumbar spine. METHODS: ROM of fourteen fresh-frozen human cadaver lumbar segments (L1/2: 4, L3/4: 5, L5/S1: 5) was evaluated in six loading directions: flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), lateral shear (LS), anterior shear (AS), axial rotation (AR), and axial compression/distraction (AC). ROM was tested with and without posterior instrumentation under the following conditions: 1) native 2) after unilateral laminotomy, 3) after midline decompression, and 4) after nucleotomy. RESULTS: Median native ROM was FE 6.8°, LB 5.6°, and AR 1.7°, AS 1.8 mm, LS 1.4 mm, AC 0.3 mm. Unilateral laminotomy significantly increased ROM by 6% (FE), 3% (LB), 12% (AR), 11% (AS), and 8% (LS). Midline decompression significantly increased these numbers to 15%, 5%, 21%, 20%, and 19%, respectively. Nucleotomy further increased ROM in all directions, most substantially in AC of 153%. Pedicle screw fixation led to ROM decreases of 82% in FE, 72% in LB, 42% in AR, 31% in AS, and 17% in LS. In instrumented segments, decompression only irrelevantly affected ROM. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of posterior decompression significantly impacts ROM of the lumbar spine. The here performed biomechanical study allows creation of a simplified rule of thumb: Increases in segmental ROM of approximately 10%, 20%, and 50% can be expected after unilateral laminotomy, midline decompression, and nucleotomy, respectively. Instrumentation decreases ROM by approximately 80% in bending moments and accompanied decompression procedures only minorly destabilize the instrumentation construct.

Spine Biomechanics in the Work of Aristotle (384 - 322 BC).

Background: Spine biomechanics is a field of applied research aiming to unravel the biomechanical understanding of the spine and its disorders and to understand the implications of their interventional therapy to improve clinical practice, physical performance and daily living. Its scientific whereabouts can be traced in the work of Aristotle, who discussed physical and biological concepts of spine biomechanics in a series of treatises.Results: The authors searched the Thesaurus Linguae Graecae archive for original texts written in Greek and attributed to Aristotle and selected excerpts of medical and biological treatises that elaborate on spine biomechanics.Discussion: While many of his theories have become outdated, his methodology and rationale remain relevant for contemporary researchers and clinicians. Here, the relevant content of passages of the corpus aristotelicum related to spine biomechanics and discuss their practical implications are presented.

Real-time assessment of anteroposterior stability of spinal segments.

PURPOSE: While anteroposterior instability of spinal segments is regarded as an important biomechanical aspect in the clinical evaluation of lumbar pathologies, the reliability of the available diagnostic tools is limited and an intraoperative method to quantify stability is lacking. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an instrument to measure the anteroposterior stability of a spinal segments in real-time. METHODS: Torsi of five fresh-frozen human cadavers were used for this study. After pedicle screw insertion, a specifically modified reposition tool composed with load and linear sensors was used to measure the segmental anteroposterior motion caused by 100 N anterior and posterior force during 5 loading cycles on either side of the instrumentation by two different operators. The spinal segments were then resected from the torsi and anteroposterior loading with ± 100 N was repeated in an advanced biomechanical spine testing setup as a reference measurement. The Inter-correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for validation of the "intraoperative" device. RESULTS: Inter-operator repeatability of the measurements showed an ICC of 0.93 (p < 0.0001) and the bilateral (left-right) comparison had an ICC of 0.73 (p < 0.0001). The ICC resulting from the comparison to the reference measurement was 0.82 (p < 0.0001) without offset correction, and 0.9 (p < 0.0001) with offset correction. The ICC converged at this value already after two of the five performed loading cycles. CONCLUSION: An accurate and reliable measurement tool is developed and validated for real-time quantification of anteroposterior stability of spinal segments and serves as a basis for future intraoperative use.

Computational model predicts risk of spinal screw loosening in patients.

PURPOSE: Pedicle screw loosening is a frequent complication in lumbar spine fixation, most commonly among patients with poor bone quality. Determining patients at high risk for insufficient implant stability would allow clinicians to adapt the treatment accordingly. The aim of this study was to develop a computational model for quantitative and reliable assessment of the risk of screw loosening. METHODS: A cohort of patient vertebrae with diagnosed screw loosening was juxtaposed to a control group with stable fusion. Imaging data from the two cohorts were used to generate patient-specific biomechanical models of lumbar instrumented vertebral bodies. Single-level finite element models loading the screw in axial or caudo-cranial direction were generated. Further, multi-level models incorporating individualized joint loading were created. RESULTS: The simulation results indicate that there is no association between screw pull-out strength and the manifestation of implant loosening (p = 0.8). For patient models incorporating multiple instrumented vertebrae, CT-values and stress in the bone were significantly different between loose screws and non-loose screws (p = 0.017 and p = 0.029, for CT-values and stress, respectively). However, very high distinction (p = 0.001) and predictability (R2Pseudo = 0.358, AUC = 0.85) were achieved when considering the relationship between local bone strength and the predicted stress (loading factor). Screws surrounded by bone with a loading factor higher than 25% were likely to be loose, while the chances of screw loosening were close to 0 with a loading factor below 15%. CONCLUSION: The use of a biomechanics-based score for risk assessment of implant fixation failure might represent a paradigm shift in addressing screw loosening after spondylodesis surgery.

Cross-links in posterior pedicle screw-rod instrumentation of the spine: a systematic review on mechanical, biomechanical, numerical and clinical studies.

PURPOSE: Dorsal screw-rod instrumentations are used for a variety of spinal disorders. Cross-links (CL) can be added to such constructs, however, no clear recommendations exist. This study aims to provide an overview of the available evidence on the effectiveness of CL, potentially allowing to formulate recommendations on their use. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed on PubMed and 37 original articles were included and grouped into mechanical, biomechanical, finite element and clinical studies. The change in range of motion (ROM) was analyzed in mechanical and biomechanical studies, ROM, stiffness and stress distribution were evaluated in finite element studies and clinical outcome parameters were analyzed in clinical studies. RESULTS: A relative consistent reduction in ROM in axial rotation with CL-augmentation was reported, while minor and less consistent effects were observed in flexion-extension and lateral bending. The use of CLs was clinical beneficial in C1/2 fusion, while the limited clinical studies on other anatomic regions show no significant benefit for CL-augmentation. CONCLUSION: While CL provides some additional axial rotation stability in most situations, lateral bending and flexion-extension are less affected. Based on clinical data, CL-augmentation can only be recommended for C1/2 instrumentations, while for other cases, further clinical studies are needed to allow for evidence-based recommendations.

Biomechanical performance of bicortical versus pericortical bone trajectory (CBT) pedicle screws.

PURPOSE: The cortical bone trajectory (CBT) is an alternative to the traditional pedicle screw trajectory (TT) in posterior spinal instrumentation, enhancing screw contact with cortical bone and therefore increasing fixation strength. Additional to the trajectory, insertion depth (pericortical vs. bicortical placement) could be a relevant factor affecting the fixation strength. However, the potential biomechanical benefit of a bicortical placement of CBT screws is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify the fixation strength of pericortical- versus bicortical-CBT (pCBT versus bCBT) screws in a randomized cadaveric study. METHODS: Pedicle screws were either placed pericortical or bicortical with a CBT in 20 lumbar vertebrae (2 × 20 instrumented pedicles) from four human spine cadavers by using patient-specific templates. Instrumented specimens underwent physiological cyclic loading testing (1'800'000 cycles, 10 Hz), including shear and tension loads as well as bending moments. Translational and angular displacements of the screws were quantified and compared between the two techniques. RESULTS: There was a slight decrease in translational (0.2 mm ± 0.09 vs. 0.24 mm ± 0.11) and angular displacements (0.06° ± 0.05 vs. 0.13° ± 0.11) of bCBT screws when compared with pCBT screws after 1'800'000 cycles. However, the results were non-significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The authors do not recommend placing CBT screws bicortically, as no relevant biomechanical advantage is gained while the potential risk for iatrogenic injury to structures anterior to the spine is increased.

Reducing the kyphosis effect of anterior short thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis correction with an autograft fulcrum effect.

BACKGROUND: Anterior scoliosis correction is a powerful technique with the disadvantage of a kyphotic effect on lumbar and thoracolumbar curves. We aimed to investigate whether a cognizant interposition of a rib graft anteriorly and at the concave side of the scoliotic curve causes significant fulcrum effect to enforce scoliosis correction and to reduce interfusional kyphosis in anterior scoliosis corrections. METHODS: Twenty otherwise comparable patients with lumbar and thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curves undergoing anterior short scoliosis correction with (n = 10) or without (n = 10, matched for age, gender and degree of deformity) fulcrum effect were retrospectively compared by means of radiographic measurements (sagittal and coronal profile, Cobb angles and intersegmental deformity correction angles) to evaluate the effect of this modified surgical technique. RESULTS: The overall amount of scoliosis correction was similar with 74 and 60% of initial curves of 57° and 53° in the case and control group respectively with a mean of 3 fused segments (4 screws). Statistically relevant differences were found for intersegmental coronal cobb angles at the apex of 20° to 3° and 17° to 9° with and without fulcrum, respectively (p < 0.05). Creation of kyphosis in the fused segments was reduced with an interfusional kyphotic sagittal cobb angle of 15° pre-operatively vs. 3° post-operatively compared to the control group (13° pre-operatively vs. 18° post-operatively), (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Interfusional hyperkyphosis associated with anterior scoliosis correction for thoracolumbar/lumbar curves can be reduced with cognizant positioning of the bone autograft at the antero-lateral (concave) site in the intervertebral region to create a fulcrum effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at swissethics: BASEC No.: 2018-00180 .

Intraoperative anteroposterior and oblique fluoroscopic views for detection of mediolateral pedicle screw misplacement in the lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study.

BACKGROUD CONTEXT: Pedicle screws are commonly used for posterior fixation of the lumbar spine. Inaccuracy of screw placement can lead to disastrous complications. PURPOSE: As fluoroscopic assisted pedicle screw instrumentation is the most frequently used technique, the aim of this study was to assess the specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of intraoperative fluoroscopy to detect mediolateral screw malpositioning. We also analyzed whether the addition of an oblique view could improve these parameters. STUDY DESIGN: On 12 human cadavers, 138 pedicle screws were placed intentionally either with 0 to 2 mm (75 screws), with 2 to 4 mm (six medial and 12 lateral screws) and with >4 mm (22 medial and 23 lateral screws) breach of the pedicle from Th12 to L5. METHODS: Three experienced spine surgeons evaluated the screw positioning in fluoroscopic AP views and 4 weeks later in AP views and additional oblique views. The surgeons' interpretation was compared with the effective screw position on postoperative CT scans. RESULTS: Pedicle breaches greater than 2 mm were detected in 68% with AP views and in 67% with additional oblique views (p=.742). The specificity of AP views was 0.86 and 0.93 with additional oblique views (p=<.01). The accuracy was 0.78 with AP views and 0.81 with AP + oblique views (p=.114). There was a substantial inter-reader agreement (Fleiss's kappa: 0.632). CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopic screening of pedicle screw misplacement has a limited sensitivity. Adding an oblique view improves specificity but not sensitivity and accuracy in detecting screw malpositions. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: When in doubt of a screw malpositioning, other modalities than a fluoroscopic assisted pedicle screw instrumentation such as intraoperative CT imaging or an intraoperative exploration of the screw trajectory must be evaluated.

Lumbar vertebropexy after unilateral total facetectomy.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Posterior decompression with spinal instrumentation and fusion is associated with well-known complications. Alternatives that include decompression and restoration of native stability of the motion segment without fusion continue to be explored, however, an ideal solution has yet to be identified. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to test two different synthetic lumbar vertebral stabilization techniques that can be used after unilateral total facetectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical cadaveric study. METHODS: Twelve spinal segments were biomechanically tested after unilateral total facetectomy and stabilized with a FiberTape cerclage. The cerclage was pulled through the superior and inferior spinous process (interspinous technique) or through the spinous process and around both laminae (spinolaminar technique). The specimens were tested after (1) unilateral total facetectomy, (2) interspinous vertebropexy and (3) spinolaminar vertebropexy. The segments were loaded in flexion-extension (FE), lateral shear (LS), lateral bending (LB), anterior shear (AS) and axial rotation (AR). RESULTS: Unilateral facetectomy increased native ROM in FE by 10.6% (7.6%-12.6%), in LS by 25.8% (18.7%-28.4%), in LB 7.5% (4.6%-12.7%), in AS 39.4% (22.6%-49.2%), and in AR by 27.2% (15.8%-38.6%). Interspinous vertebropexy significantly reduced ROM after unilateral facetectomy: in FE by 73% (p=.001), in LS by 23% (p=.001), in LB by 13% (p=.003), in AS by 16% (p=.007), and in AR by 20% (p=.001). In FE and LS the ROM was lower than in the baseline/native condition. In AS and AR, the baseline ROM was not reached by 17% and 1%, respectively. Spinolaminar vertebropexy significantly reduced ROM after unilateral facetectomy: in FE by 74% (p=.001), in LS by 24% (p=.001), in LB by 13% (p=.003), in AS by 28% (p=.004), and in AR by 15 % (p=.001). Baseline ROM was not reached by 9% in AR. CONCLUSION: Interspinous vertebropexy seems to sufficiently counteract destabilization after unilateral total facetectomy, and limits range of motion in flexion and extension while avoiding full segmental immobilization. Spinolaminar vertebropexy additionally restores native anteroposterior stability, allowing satisfactory control of shear forces after facetectomy. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Lumbar vertebropexy seems promising to counteract the destabilizating effect of facetectomy by targeted stabilization.

The biomechanical consequence of posterior interventions at the thoracolumbar spine on the passively stabilized flexed posture.

In the flexed end-of-range position (e.g., during slumped sitting), the trunk is passively stabilized. Little is known about the biomechanical consequence of posterior approaches on passive stabilization. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of posterior surgical interventions on local and distant spinal regions. While being fixed at the pelvis, five human torsos were passively flexed. The change in spinal angulation at Th4, Th12, L4 and S1 was measured after level-wise longitudinal incisions of the thoracolumbar fascia, the paraspinal muscles, horizontal incisions of the inter- & supraspinous ligaments (ISL/SSL) and horizontal incision of the thoracolumbar fascia and the paraspinal muscles. Lumbar angulation (Th12-S1) was increased by 0.3° for fascia, 0.5° for muscle and 0.8° for ISL/SSL-incisions per lumbar level. The effect of level-wise incisions at the lumbar spine was 1.4, 3.5 and 2.6 times greater compared to thoracic interventions for fascia, muscle and ISL/SSL respectively. The combined midline interventions at the lumbar spine were associated with 2.2° extension of the thoracic spine. Horizontal incision of the fascia increased spinal angulation by 0.3°, while horizontal muscle incision resulted in a collapse of 4/5 specimens. The thoracolumbar fascia, the paraspinal muscle and the ISL/SSL are important passive stabilizers for the trunk in the flexed end-of-range position. Lumbar interventions needed for approaches to the spine have a larger effect on spinal posture than thoracic interventions and the increase of spinal angulation at the level of the intervention is partially compensated at the neighboring spinal regions.

Biomechanical limitations of partial pediculectomy in endoscopic spine surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Transforaminal endoscopic decompression is an emerging minimally invasive surgical technique in spine surgery. The biomechanical effects and limitations of resections associated with this technique are scarce. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of three different extents of reduction at the craniomedial pedicle (10%, 25%, and 50%) and to compare them with the intact native side. In addition, the influence of bone quality on the resistance of the pedicle after reduction was investigated. STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical cadaveric study. METHODS: Thirty lumbar vertebrae originating from six fresh frozen cadavers were tested under uniaxial compression load in a ramp-to-failure test: (1) the reduced pedicle on one side, and (2) the native pedicle on the other side. Of the 30 lumbar vertebrae, ten were assigned to each reduction group (10%, 25%, and 50%). RESULTS: On the intact side, the median axial compression force to failure was 593 N (442.4-785.8). A reduction of the pedicle by 10% of the cross-sectional area resulted in a decrease of the axial load resistance by 4% to 66% compared to the intact opposite side (p=.046). The median compression force to failure was 381.89 N (range: 336-662.1). A reduction by 25% resulted in a decrease of 7% to 71% (p=.001). The median compression force to failure was 333 N (265.1-397.3). A reduction by 50% resulted in a decrease of 39% to 90% (p<.001). The median compression force to failure was 200.9 N (192.3-283.9). At 10% pedicle reduction, the Hounsfield units (HU) value and the absolute force required to generate a pedicle fracture showed significant correlations (ρ=.872; p=.001). At 25%, a positive correlation between the two variables could still be identified (ρ=.603; p=.065). At 50%, no correlation was found (ρ=-.122; p=.738). CONCLUSION: Resection of the inner, upper part of the pedicle significantly reduces the axial resistance force of the pedicle until a fracture occurs. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The extent of pedicle reduction itself plays only a limited role: once the cortical bone in the pedicle region is compromised, significant loss of resistance to loading must be anticipated.

Vertebropexy as a Ligamentous Stabilization for Degenerative Low-Grade Spondylolisthesis: A Report of 3 Cases.

CASE: Three patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis were treated with vertebropexy, a new surgical technique that replaces rigid fusion with ligamentous stabilization. Clinical outcomes, functional radiographs, and magnetic resonance imaging were used to document the early clinical results of this biomechanically established and promising new surgical method. CONCLUSION: Vertebropexy may be a valuable alternative to rigid fusion in the treatment of low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis.

The Biomechanics of the Transpedicular Endoscopic Approach.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical cadaveric study. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to analyze the effects of an endoscopic transpedicular approach with different drill diameters (6 and 8 mm) to compare them with the intact native side. In addition, the influence of bone quality on the resistance of the pedicle was investigated. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical studies have repeatedly highlighted the benefits of endoscopic transpedicular decompression for down-migrated lumbar disc herniations. However, the biomechanical effects on pedicle stability have not been studied up to now. METHODS: Twenty-four vertebras originating from four fresh-frozen cadavers were tested under uniaxial compression load in a ramp-to-failure test: (1) the tunneled pedicle on one side, and (2) the native pedicle on the other side. Twelve lumbar vertebrae were assigned to a drill diameter of 6 mm and the other 12 to a diameter of 8 mm. RESULTS: The median ratio of sustained force for the operated side compared to the intact contralateral side is equal to 74% (63-88) for both drill diameters combined. An 8 mm transpedicular approach recorded an axial resistance of 77% (60-88) compared to the intact contralateral side ( P =0.002). A 6 mm approach resulted in an axial resistance of 72% (66-84) compared to the intact opposite side ( P =0.01). No significant difference between the two different drill diameters was recorded ( P =1). For all 3 subgroups (intact, 8 mm, 6 mm) the HU-values and the absolute resistance force showed significant correlations (intact: ρ=0.859; P <0.001; 8 mm: ρ=0.902; P <0.001; 6 mm: ρ=0.835; P <0.001). CONCLUSION: Transpedicular approach significantly reduces the axial resistance force of the pedicle, which may lead to pedicle fracture. Bone quality correlated positively with the absolute resistance force of the pedicle, whereas the influence of the drill hole diameter plays only a limited role.

Load distribution on intervertebral cages with and without posterior instrumentation.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF, TLIF) are well-established procedures for spinal fusion. However, little is known about load sharing between cage, dorsal construct, and biological tissue within the instrumented lumbar spine. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to quantify the forces acting on cages under axial compression force with and without posterior instrumentation. STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical cadaveric study. METHODS: Ten lumbar spinal segments were tested under uniaxial compression using load cell instrumented intervertebral cages. The force was increased in 100N increments to 1000N or a force greater than 500N on one load cell. Each specimen was tested after unilateral PLIF (uPLIF), bilateral PLIF (bPLIF) and TLIF each with/without posterior instrumentation. Dorsal instrumentation was performed with 55N of compression per side. RESULTS: Cage insertion resulted in median cage preloads of 16N, 29N and 35N for uPLIF, bPLIF, and TLIF. The addition of compressed dorsal instrumentation increased the median preload to 224N, 328N, and 317N, respectively. With posterior instrumentation, the percentage of the external load acting on the intervertebral cage was less than 25% at 100N (uPLIF: 14.2%; bPLIF: 16%; TLIF: 11%), less than 45% at 500N (uPLIF: 31.8%; bPLIF: 41.1%; TLIF: 37.9%) and less than 50% at 1000N (uPLIF: 40.3%; bPLIF: 49.7%; TLIF: 43.4%). Without posterior instrumentation, the percentage of external load on the cages was significantly higher with values above 50% at 100N (uPLIF: 55.6%; bPLIF: 75.5%; TLIF: 66.8%), 500N (uPLIF: 71.7%; bPLIF: 79.2%; TLIF: 65.4%), and 1000N external load (uPLIF: 73%; bPLIF: 80.5%; TLIF: 66.1%). For absolute loads, preloads and external loads must be added together. CONCLUSIONS: Without posterior instrumentation, the intervertebral cages absorb more than 50% of the axial load and the load distribution is largely independent of the loading amplitude. With posterior instrumentation, the external load acting on the cages is significantly lower and the load distribution becomes load amplitude dependent, with a higher proportion of the load transferred by the cages at high loads. The bPLIF cages tend to absorb more force than the other two cage configurations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Cage instrumentation allows some of the compression force to be transmitted through the cage to the screws below, better distributing and reducing the overall force on the pedicle screws at the end of the construct and on the rods.

Bone density optimized pedicle screw insertion.

Background: Spinal fusion is the most common surgical treatment for the management of degenerative spinal disease. However, complications such as screw loosening lead to painful pseudoarthrosis, and are a common reason for revision. Optimization of screw trajectories to increase implant resistance to mechanical loading is essential. A recent optimization method has shown potential for determining optimal screw position and size based on areas of high bone elastic modulus (E-modulus). Aim: The aim of this biomechanical study was to verify the optimization algorithm for pedicle screw placement in a cadaveric study and to quantify the effect of optimization. The pull-out strength of pedicle screws with an optimized trajectory was compared to that of a traditional trajectory. Methods: Twenty-five lumbar vertebrae were instrumented with pedicle screws (on one side, the pedicle screws were inserted in the traditional way, on the other side, the screws were inserted using an optimized trajectory). Results: An improvement in pull-out strength and pull-out strain energy of the optimized screw trajectory compared to the traditional screw trajectory was only observed for E-modulus values greater than 3500 MPa cm3. For values of 3500 MPa cm3 or less, optimization showed no clear benefit. The median screw length of the optimized pedicle screws was significantly smaller than the median screw length of the traditionally inserted pedicle screws, p < 0.001. Discussion: Optimization of the pedicle screw trajectory is feasible, but seems to apply only to vertebrae with very high E-modulus values. This is likely because screw trajectory optimization resulted in a reduction in screw length and therefore a reduction in the implant-bone interface. Future efforts to predict the optimal pedicle screw trajectory should include screw length as a critical component of potential stability.