OPTIMAL DESIGNS FOR SPLINE WAVELET REGRESSION MODELS.

In this article we investigate the optimal design problem for some wavelet regression models. Wavelets are very flexible in modeling complex relations, and optimal designs are appealing as a means of increasing the experimental precision. In contrast to the designs for the Haar wavelet regression model (Herzberg and Traves 1994; Oyet and Wiens 2000), the I-optimal designs we construct are different from the D-optimal designs. We also obtain c-optimal designs. Optimal (D- and I-) quadratic spline wavelet designs are constructed, both analytically and numerically. A case study shows that a significant saving of resources may be realized by employing an optimal design. We also construct model robust designs, to address response misspecification arising from fitting an incomplete set of wavelets.

Model-robust designs for nonlinear quantile regression.

We construct robust designs for nonlinear quantile regression, in the presence of both a possibly misspecified nonlinear quantile function and heteroscedasticity of an unknown form. The asymptotic mean-squared error of the quantile estimate is evaluated and maximized over a neighbourhood of the fitted quantile regression model. This maximum depends on the scale function and on the design. We entertain two methods to find designs that minimize the maximum loss. The first is local - we minimize for given values of the parameters and the scale function, using a sequential approach, whereby each new design point minimizes the subsequent loss, given the current design. The second is adaptive - at each stage, the maximized loss is evaluated at quantile estimates of the parameters, and a kernel estimate of scale, and then the next design point is obtained as in the sequential method. In the context of a Michaelis-Menten response model for an estrogen/hormone study, and a variety of scale functions, we demonstrate that the adaptive approach performs as well, in large study sizes, as if the parameter values and scale function were known beforehand and the sequential method applied. When the sequential method uses an incorrectly specified scale function, the adaptive method yields an, often substantial, improvement. The performance of the adaptive designs for smaller study sizes is assessed and seen to still be very favourable, especially so since the prior information required to design sequentially is rarely available.