Treatment results in localized primary gastric lymphoma: data of patients registered within the German multicenter study (GIT NHL 02/96).

PURPOSE: In the prospective study 02/96 on primary GI lymphoma, we have collected data on histology, clinical features, and treatment results. In particular, in stages I and II localized primary gastric lymphoma (PGL), our objectives were to reduce treatment intensity and to confirm our hypothesis from study 01/92, which maintained that an organ-preserving approach is not inferior to primary surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy were stratified for histologic grade, stage, and whether surgery had been carried out or not (as decided by each participating center). Patients with aggressive PGL received six cycles of CHOP-14 (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) followed by involved-field radiotherapy (40 Gy). Patients with indolent PGL (including patients experiencing treatment failure with antibiotic therapy for Helicobacter pylori) were treated with extended-field radiotherapy. The volume depended on stage. The irradiation dose was 30 Gy, followed by a boost of 10 Gy (the latter omitted after complete resection) to the tumor region. RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-seven patients were accrued. Of these patients, 393 with localized PGL were treated with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy only or additional surgery between December 1996 and December 2003. The survival rate at 42 months for patients treated with surgery was 86% compared with 91.0% for patients without surgery. CONCLUSION: In this nonrandomized study (02/96), we reproduced the previous results of study 01/92 showing no disadvantage for an organ-preserving treatment. Therefore, primary stomach resection should be questioned.

Accelerated radiochemotherapy in pancreatic cancer is not necessarily related to a pathologic pancreatic function decline in the early period.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the functional effects of ionizing radiation in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer in the early period after accelerated radiochemotherapy (ART). METHODS AND MATERIALS: To analyze the exocrine component, the amino acid consumption test and fecal elastase 1 were performed in 13 patients immediately before and 4-8 weeks after ART. Pancreatic duct morphology was evaluated before therapy. Weight loss and clinical steatorrhea were recorded. Endocrine parameters were examined according to standardized criteria. RESULTS: The relative change of the amino acid consumption test results and the median elastase concentration was 41.2% and 56.4%, respectively. Five patients still had normal test results after ART and 5 patients developed pathologic values. The median relative weight loss of the total body weight was 7.7% +/- 4.5%. No steatorrhea occurred. Of the 5 patients with normal values, 3 had a mean organ dose of <40 Gy. Of the 5 patients with pathologic values, 4 had a mean organ dose of >41 Gy. The endocrine function measurements remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Although a nominal reduction of exocrine function parameters occurred in most patients, ART was not necessarily related to a pathologic level in the early period. Diabetes was not established. The functional impairment that was existent in the patient population presumably contributed to the weight loss. Pancreatic enzyme preparations may also play a role in maintaining an anabolic state during and after radiochemotherapy.

Conformal therapy for pancreatic cancer: variation of organ position due to gastrointestinal distention--implications for treatment planning.

PURPOSE: To quantify nonrespiratory organ motion in the pancreatic region and its effect on clinical target volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional translations of the geometric centers of the volumes of interest--pancreatic head, body, and tail; left and right kidney; and the superior mesenteric artery--were measured in 20 patients by analyzing three spiral computed tomographic (CT) protocols performed at static exhalation and representing differential gastrointestinal distention. Wilcoxon test for paired differences was applied to determine statistical significance (P <.05). Spearman rank correlation coefficients were calculated between combinations of statistically significant translations. With the assumption that the organ positions were represented by a three-dimensional Gaussian distribution that occurs during treatment, clinical target volume expansions were calculated to account for organ motion and a typical setup error. RESULTS: Significant translations of the volume of interest were observed. The most mobile parts of the target organs were the pancreatic tail (P =.001) and the superior mesenteric artery (P =.01). Larger variations from the mean in the planning CT protocol in which negative contrast material was used usually resulted in a slightly larger clinical target volume expansion. CONCLUSION: Our data may provide a basis for further studies of organ motion and ways of modifying treatment margins.