Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 93
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 30(13): S94-S99, 2024 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561870

RESUMO

The Medicaid Inmate Exclusion Policy (MIEP) prohibits using federal funds for ambulatory care services and medications (including for infectious diseases) for incarcerated persons. More than one quarter of states, including California and Massachusetts, have asked the federal government for authority to waive the MIEP. To improve health outcomes and continuation of care, those states seek to cover transitional care services provided to persons in the period before release from incarceration. The Massachusetts Sheriffs' Association, Massachusetts Department of Correction, Executive Office of Health and Human Services, and University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School have collaborated to improve infectious disease healthcare service provision before and after release from incarceration. They seek to provide stakeholders working at the intersection of criminal justice and healthcare with tools to advance Medicaid policy and improve treatment and prevention of infectious diseases for persons in jails and prisons by removing MIEP barriers through Section 1115 waivers.


Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis , Prisioneiros , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Medicaid , Prisões , Massachusetts/epidemiologia
2.
Med Care ; 62(3): 151-160, 2024 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38180005

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As overdose deaths continue to rise, public health officials need comprehensive surveillance data to design effective prevention, harm reduction, and treatment strategies. Disparities across race and ethnicity groups, as well as trends in substance use, treatment, or overdose deaths, have been examined individually, but reports rarely compare findings across multiple substances or data sources. OBJECTIVE: To provide a broad assessment of the overdose crisis, we describe trends in substance use, treatment, and overdose mortality across racial and ethnic groups for multiple substances. RESEARCH DESIGN: We conducted a longitudinal, cross-sectional analysis comparing trends. SUBJECTS: We identified self-reported use from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, substance use treatment admissions from the Treatment Episode Data Set-Admissions, and overdose deaths from the CDC's Multiple Cause of Death files. MEASURES: We measured rates of substance use, treatment, and deaths involving heroin, methamphetamine, and cocaine among United States adults from 2010 to 2019. RESULTS: Heroin, methamphetamine, and cocaine use increased, though not all changes were statistically significant. Treatment admissions indicating heroin and methamphetamine increased while admissions indicating cocaine decreased. Overdose deaths increased among all groups: methamphetamine (257%-1,115%), heroin (211%-577%), and cocaine (88%-259%). Changes in rates of use, treatment, and death for specific substances varied by racial and ethnic group. CONCLUSIONS: Substance use, treatment, and overdose mortality changed considerably, though not always equivalently. Identifying diverging trends in substance-related measures for specific substances and racial and ethnic groups can inform targeted investment in treatment to reduce disparities and respond to emerging changes in the overdose crisis.


Assuntos
Cocaína , Overdose de Drogas , Metanfetamina , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Heroína , Analgésicos Opioides , Estudos Transversais , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia
3.
J Gen Intern Med ; 39(2): 168-175, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37552419

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospital admissions involving substance use disorders are increasing and represent an opportunity to engage patients in substance use treatment. Addiction medicine consultation services improve access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and patient outcomes. However, as hospitals continue to adopt addiction medicine consultation services it is important to identify where disparities may emerge in the process of care. OBJECTIVE: To describe addiction medicine consultation service use by race and ethnicity as well as substance to identify opportunities to reduce substance use treatment disparities. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using 2016-2021 Electronic Health Record data from a large Midwest safety-net hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized adults aged 18 or older, with one or more substance use disorders. MAIN MEASURES: Consultation orders placed, patient seen by consult provider, and receipt of MOUD by self-reported race. KEY RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2021, we identified 16,895 hospitalized patients with a substance use disorder. Consultation orders were placed for 6344 patients and 2789 were seen by the consult provider. Black patients were less likely (aOR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.53-0.63) to have an addiction medicine consultation order placed and, among patients with a consultation order, were less likely (aOR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.65-0.85) to be seen by the consult provider than White patients. Overall, Black patients with OUD were also less likely to receive MOUD in the hospital (aOR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.50-0.79) compared to White patients. However, there were no differences in MOUD receipt among Black and White patients seen by the consult provider. CONCLUSIONS: Using Electronic Health Record data, we identified racial and ethnic disparities at multiple points in the inpatient addiction medicine consultation process. Addressing these disparities may support more equitable access to MOUD and other substance use treatment in the hospital setting.


Assuntos
Medicina do Vício , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Adulto , Humanos , Etnicidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Provedores de Redes de Segurança , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Hospitais
4.
Am J Public Health ; 114(9): 913-922, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39024534

RESUMO

Objectives. To determine mortality risk among those recently released from a Minnesota jail or prison. Methods. Using linked prison, jail, and death records, our retrospective cohort study followed 99 065 people who were released from Minnesota jails and prisons between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021. We explored differences between jail and prison exposures regarding mortality using standardized mortality ratios. Results. Adjusting for age and gender, we estimated that the rate of overdose death for people released from jail was 15.5 times that of the Minnesota general population. Overdose death rates for people released from prison were even higher at 28.3 times the rate of the Minnesota general population. Conclusions. Drug overdose was the leading cause of death for people reentering their communities from both jail and prison in Minnesota-with opioids being the leading cause of overdoses. Overdose death relative to the general population was double the estimates from earlier studies among people leaving prison. Providing seamless access to medications for opioid use disorder during and after incarceration is important to lower the risk of death following release. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(9):913-922. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307723).


Assuntos
Causas de Morte , Overdose de Drogas , Prisioneiros , Humanos , Minnesota/epidemiologia , Overdose de Drogas/mortalidade , Overdose de Drogas/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prisioneiros/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem , Prisões Locais/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Prisões/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Idoso
5.
J Community Health ; 49(3): 448-457, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38066221

RESUMO

COVID-19 disproportionately affects people experiencing homelessness or incarceration. While homelessness or incarceration alone may not impact vaccine effectiveness, medical comorbidities along with social conditions associated with homelessness or incarceration may impact estimated vaccine effectiveness. COVID-19 vaccines reduce rates of hospitalization and death; vaccine effectiveness (VE) against severe outcomes in people experiencing homelessness or incarceration is unknown. We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study evaluating COVID-19 vaccine VE against SARS-CoV-2 related hospitalization (positive SARS-CoV-2 molecular test same week or within 3 weeks prior to hospital admission) among patients who had experienced homelessness or incarceration. We utilized data from 8 health systems in the Minnesota Electronic Health Record Consortium linked to data from Minnesota's immunization information system, Homeless Management Information System, and Department of Corrections. We included patients 18 years and older with a history of experiencing homelessness or incarceration. VE and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) against SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization were estimated for primary series and one booster dose from Cox proportional hazard models as 100*(1-Hazard Ratio) during August 26, 2021, through October 8, 2022 adjusting for patient age, sex, comorbid medical conditions, and race/ethnicity. We included 80,051 individuals who had experienced homelessness or incarceration. Adjusted VE was 52% (95% CI, 41-60%) among those 22 weeks or more since their primary series, 66% (95% CI, 53-75%) among those less than 22 weeks since their primary series, and 69% (95% CI: 60-76%) among those with one booster. VE estimates were consistently lower during the Omicron predominance period compared with the combined Omicron and Delta periods. Despite higher exposure risk, COVID-19 vaccines provided good effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 related hospitalizations in persons who have experienced homelessness or incarceration.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pessoas Mal Alojadas , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Encarceramento , Minnesota/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Eficácia de Vacinas , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Hospitalização
6.
Subst Use Misuse ; 59(4): 558-566, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38037904

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As overdose rates increase for multiple substances, policymakers need to identify geographic patterns of substance-specific deaths. In this study, we describe county-level opioid and psychostimulant overdose patterns and how they correlate with county-level social vulnerability measures. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study, we used nationwide 2016-2018 restricted access Centers for Disease Prevention and Control county-level mortality files for 1,024 counties. We estimated quartiles of opioid and psychostimulant overdose mortality and provided estimates of their association with county-level Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) percentile. RESULTS: There was high opioid and psychostimulant overdose mortality in the Middle Atlantic, South Atlantic, East North Central, and Mountain regions. The Central US had the lowest opioid and psychostimulant overdose mortality rates. Counties with higher SVI scores (i.e. higher social vulnerability) were significantly more likely to experience high opioid and high psychostimulant overdose (high-high) mortality. A 10-percentile increase in SVI score was associated with a 3.1 percentage point increase in the likelihood of being a high-high county (p < 0.001) in unadjusted models and a 1.5 percentage point increase (p < 0.05) in models adjusting for region. CONCLUSION: Our results illustrated the heterogenous geographic distribution of the growing concurrent opioid and psychostimulant overdose crisis. The substantial regional variation we identified highlights the need for local data to guide policymaking and treatment planning. The association of opioid-psychostimulant overdose mortality with social vulnerability demonstrates the critical need in impacted counties for tailored treatment that addresses the complex medical and social needs of people who use both opioids and psychostimulants.


Assuntos
Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central , Overdose de Drogas , Overdose de Opiáceos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Transversais , Overdose de Drogas/prevenção & controle , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/uso terapêutico , Overdose de Opiáceos/tratamento farmacológico
8.
J Aging Soc Policy ; 34(5): 769-787, 2022 Sep 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35786383

RESUMO

The federal Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) program was enacted in the 1980s amid concerns surrounding the quality of nursing home (NH) care. This program is meant to serve as a tool to assist with level of care determinations for NH applicants with serious mental illness (SMI) and was intended to limit the growth in the number of NH residents with SMI. Despite this policy effort, the prevalence of SMI in NHs has continued to increase, and little is known about the mechanisms driving the heterogeneous and suboptimal administration of the PASRR program, absent routine evaluative efforts. We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with state and national stakeholders to identify factors affecting PASRR program administration and NH care for residents with SMI. Stakeholders expressed concern regarding fragmentation, specifically lack of clarity in the value of assessments beyond a regulatory requirement. Additionally, they cited variable program administration as contributing to fragmented communication patterns and inconsistent training across jurisdictions. Given the number of people with SMI currently residing in NHs, policy and practice should take a person-centered approach to assess how PASRR can be better used to support resident needs.


Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Casas de Saúde , Prevalência
9.
Med Care ; 59(3): 238-244, 2021 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33165146

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The fourth wave of the opioid crisis is characterized by increased use and co-use of methamphetamine. How opioid and methamphetamine co-use is associated with health care use, housing instability, social service use, and criminal justice involvement has not been studied and could inform future interventions and partnerships. OBJECTIVES: To estimate service involvement across sectors among people who reported past year opioid and methamphetamine co-use, methamphetamine use, opioid use, or neither opioid nor methamphetamine use. RESEARCH DESIGN: We examined 2015-2018 data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. We used multivariable negative binomial and logistic regression models and predictive margins, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. SUBJECTS: Nonelderly US adults aged 18 or older. MEASURES: Hospital days, emergency department visits, housing instability, social service use, and criminal justice involvement in the past year. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, adults who reported opioid and methamphetamine co-use had 99% more overnight hospital days, 46% more emergency department visits, 2.1 times more housing instability, 1.4 times more social service use, and 3.3 times more criminal justice involvement compared with people with opioid use only. People who used any methamphetamine, with opioids or alone, were significantly more likely be involved with services in 2 or more sectors compared with those who used opioids only (opioids only: 11.6%; methamphetamine only: 19.8%; opioids and methamphetamine: 27.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Multisector service involvement is highest among those who use both opioids and methamphetamine, suggesting that partnerships between health care, housing, social service, and criminal justice agencies are needed to develop, test, and implement interventions to reduce methamphetamine-related morbidity.


Assuntos
Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Anfetaminas/terapia , Metanfetamina , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/terapia , Adulto , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
10.
Med Care ; 59(Suppl 2): S220-S227, 2021 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33710099

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Earlier and more severe onset of chronic health conditions contributes to the increased risk of premature death among adults experiencing homelessness. Trimorbidity, a subset of multimorbidity representing overlap of physical health, mental health, and substance use conditions, disproportionately impacts adults experiencing homelessness. We know of no longitudinal data comparing trimorbidity trends among adults experiencing homelessness. OBJECTIVE: To characterize 19-year trimorbidity trends among adults experiencing homelessness. RESEARCH DESIGN: Repeated longitudinal, statewide survey administered every 3 years. SUBJECTS: Adults living throughout Minnesota experiencing homelessness. MEASURES: Reported diagnoses of chronic health conditions within 3 categories: physical health conditions (hypertension, heart disease, asthma, diabetes); mental health conditions (depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia/other paranoid, and delusional disorders); and substance use conditions (alcohol and illicit substances). RESULTS: A total of 25,552 surveys were completed by adults at 3-year intervals in a total of 7 waves. Participants reported increasing frequency and duration of homelessness, and more nights slept outside/in a car. 77.3% of adults experiencing homelessness in 2018 had one or more chronic health condition in any domain. From 2000 to 2018, bimorbidity and trimorbidity surpassed morbidity within a single domain. This was driven by increases in mental health conditions. In 2018, 31.7% of participants reported bimorbidity and 16.3% of adults reported trimorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Adults experiencing homelessness bear a substantial and growing burden of bimorbidity and trimorbidity. Ensuring accessible, high quality care that includes robust services that can address all 3 categories of health is critical. Such care is best delivered in combination with affordable supportive housing.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica , Comorbidade/tendências , Pessoas Mal Alojadas/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Minnesota , Inquéritos e Questionários
11.
PLoS Med ; 17(5): e1003119, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32421717

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Criminal justice involvement is common among pregnant women with opioid use disorder (OUD). Medications for OUD improve pregnancy-related outcomes, but trends in treatment data among justice-involved pregnant women are limited. We sought to examine trends in medications for OUD among pregnant women referred to treatment by criminal justice agencies and other sources before and after the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a serial, cross-sectional analysis using 1992-2017 data from pregnant women admitted to treatment facilities for OUD using a national survey of substance use treatment facilities in the United States (N = 131,838). We used multiple logistic regression and difference-in-differences methods to assess trends in medications for OUD by referral source. Women in the sample were predominantly aged 18-29 (63.3%), white non-Hispanic, high school graduates, and not employed. Over the study period, 26.3% (95% CI 25.7-27.0) of pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies received medications for OUD, which was significantly less than those with individual referrals (adjusted rate ratio [ARR] 0.45, 95% CI 0.43-0.46; P < 0.001) or those referred from other sources (ARR 0.51, 95% CI 0.50-0.53; P < 0.001). Among pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies, receipt of medications for OUD increased significantly more in states that expanded Medicaid (n = 32) compared with nonexpansion states (n = 18) (adjusted difference-in-differences: 12.0 percentage points, 95% CI 1.0-23.0; P = 0.03). Limitations of this study include encounters that are at treatment centers only and that do not encompass buprenorphine prescribed in ambulatory care settings, prisons, or jails. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women with OUD referred by criminal justice agencies received evidence-based treatment at lower rates than women referred through other sources. Improving access to medications for OUD for pregnant women referred by criminal justice agencies could provide public health benefits to mothers, infants, and communities. Medicaid expansion is a potential mechanism for expanding access to evidence-based treatment for pregnant women in the US.


Assuntos
Medicina Baseada em Evidências/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/terapia , Adulto , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
13.
BMC Womens Health ; 20(1): 150, 2020 07 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32703202

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: National estimates of perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMAD) and serious mental illness (SMI) among delivering women over time, as well as associated outcomes and costs, are lacking. The prevalence of perinatal mood and anxiety disorders and serious mental illness from 2006 to 2015 were estimated as well as associated risk of adverse obstetric outcomes, including severe maternal morbidity and mortality (SMMM), and delivery costs. METHODS: The study was a serial, cross-sectional analysis of National Inpatient Sample data. The prevalence of PMAD and SMI was estimated among delivering women as well as obstetric outcomes, healthcare utilization, and delivery costs using adjusted weighted logistic with predictive margins and generalized linear regression models, respectively. RESULTS: The study included an estimated 39,025,974 delivery hospitalizations from 2006 to 2015 in the U.S. PMAD increased from 18.4 (95% CI 16.4-20.0) to 40.4 (95% CI 39.3-41.6) per 1000 deliveries. SMI also increased among delivering women over time, from 4.2 (95% CI 3.9-4.6) to 8.1 (95% CI 7.9-8.4) per 1000 deliveries. Medicaid covered 72% (95% CI 71.2-72.9) of deliveries complicated by SMI compared to 44% (95% CI 43.1-45.0) and 43.5% (95% CI 42.5-44.5) among PMAD and all other deliveries, respectively. Women with PMAD and SMI experienced higher incidence of SMMM, and increased hospital transfers, lengths of stay, and delivery-related costs compared to other deliveries (P < .001 for all). CONCLUSION: Over the past decade, the prevalence of both PMAD and SMI among delivering women increased substantially across the United States, and affected women had more adverse obstetric outcomes and delivery-related costs compared to other deliveries.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/psicologia , Adulto , Transtornos de Ansiedade/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Mortalidade Materna , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Parto , Assistência Perinatal , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/mortalidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
14.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 1889, 2020 Dec 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33297999

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adults experiencing homelessness have higher rates of disease and premature morbidity compared to the general population. Tobacco use is a primary contributing factor to these disparities; however, less is known regarding e-cigarette use patterns among adults experiencing homelessness and whether e-cigarettes are used in a manner that is narrowing or widening health disparities. This study aimed to describe the 1) prevalence and trends in e-cigarette use, 2) correlates of e-cigarettes use, and 3) rates of chronic health conditions by product use pattern in a community-based sample of adults experiencing homelessness. METHODS: Adults experiencing homelessness in Minnesota were surveyed by self-report in 2015 (n = 3672) and 2018 (n = 4181) regarding e-cigarette and combustible cigarette use, potential correlates of e-cigarette use, and self-reported chronic health conditions (i.e., asthma, hypertension, diabetes, and cancer). RESULTS: Frequency of use increased from 2015 to 2018 for combustible cigarettes (66.9% vs. 72.3%), e-cigarettes (11.4% vs. 14.5%), and dual combustible/e-cigarette use (10.2% vs. 12.9%). The strongest bivariate correlates of past 30-day e-cigarette use were younger age, non-binary gender identification, non-heterosexual orientation, identification as White/Caucasian, greater frequency of lifetime homelessness, substance use, lack of regular place for medical care, mental health diagnosis, criminal justice involvement, and combustible cigarette smoking. Dual users had significantly higher rates of asthma and cancer than both those using combustible cigarettes and those using neither combustible nor e-cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: During a time when cigarette smoking, e-cigarette use, and dual use were decreasing in the general population in Minnesota, rates increased in the homeless population. We observed that the rates of dual use were more than five times greater among homeless adults compared to the general population in 2018. Correlates of e-cigarette use were identified and should be used to identify subpopulations for intervention targeting. Mechanisms of the relationship between dual use and increased risks of health conditions deserve further study.


Assuntos
Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Pessoas Mal Alojadas , Produtos do Tabaco , Vaping , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Minnesota/epidemiologia
15.
Med Care ; 57(3): 187-193, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30664610

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: More than 70 million Americans are enrolled in a high-deductible health plan (HDHP), with high upfront cost-sharing to encourage strategies such as price shopping to mitigate out-of-pocket spending. Recent research suggests HDHP enrollees are reluctant to engage in these consumer strategies, but there is little information on why. OBJECTIVES: To describe associations between HDHP enrollees' attitudes about and intent to engage in consumer strategies. RESEARCH DESIGN: We conducted a nationally representative web survey of 1637 HDHP enrollees that included 2 hypothetical scenarios amenable to consumer strategies. For each scenario, we asked participants whether they would compare price or quality information, discuss cost with a provider, or try to negotiate a service price. We measured participants' ratings of the difficulty of each strategy, its effectiveness at reducing cost or increasing the likelihood of getting care, and how likely participants would be to actually engage in each strategy. RESULTS: Fewer than half of HDHP enrollees intended to engage in any of the surveyed strategies. Enrollees who viewed a consumer strategy as helpful were more likely to engage in that strategy; no associations were found with perceived difficulty of a strategy and intent to engage in it. CONCLUSIONS: HDHP enrollees may not pursue consumer strategies because they believe they are not helpful for getting care or lowering costs. Providers and payers should ensure these strategies are actually helpful to HDHP enrollees and that enrollees understand how they could use these strategies to reduce their out-of-pocket costs.


Assuntos
Atitude , Comportamento de Escolha , Comportamento do Consumidor/economia , Dedutíveis e Cosseguros/economia , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastos em Saúde , Adulto , Comércio/economia , Feminino , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/economia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
16.
Med Care ; 57(2): 123-130, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30461582

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The expansion of Medicaid as part of the Affordable Care Act opened new opportunities to provide health coverage to low-income adults who may be involved in other public sectors. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to describe cross-sector utilization patterns among urban Medicaid expansion enrollees. RESEARCH DESIGN: We merged data from 4 public sectors (health care, human services, housing, and criminal justice) for 98,282 Medicaid expansion enrollees in Hennepin County, MN. We fit a latent class model to indicators of cross-sector involvement. MEASURES: Indicator variables described involvement levels within each sector from March 2011 through December 2014. Demographic and chronic condition indicators were included post hoc to characterize classes. RESULTS: We found 6 archetypes of cross-sector involvement: The "Low Contact" class (33.9%) had little involvement in any public sector; "Primary Care" (26.3%) had moderate, stable health care utilization; "Health and Human Services" (15.3%) had high rates of health care and cash assistance utilization; "Minimal Criminal History" (11.0%) had less serious criminal justice involvement; "Cross-sector" (7.8%) had elevated emergency department use, involvement in all 4 sectors, and the highest prevalence of behavioral health conditions; "Extensive Criminal History" (5.7%) had serious criminal justice involvement. The 3 most expensive classes (Health and Human Services, Cross-sector, and Extensive Criminal History) had the highest rates of behavioral health conditions. Together, they comprised 29% of enrollees and 70% of total public costs. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion enrollees with behavioral health conditions deserve focus due to the high cost-reduction potential across public sectors. Cross-sector collaboration is a plausible path to reduce costs and improve outcomes.


Assuntos
Direito Penal/estatística & dados numéricos , Habitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana , Adulto , Definição da Elegibilidade , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Minnesota , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Governo Estadual , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Estados Unidos
17.
Am J Public Health ; 109(1): 148-154, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30496001

RESUMO

Objectives. To estimate trends in incidence, outcomes, and costs among hospital deliveries related to amphetamines and opioids.Methods. We analyzed 2004-to-2015 data from the National Inpatient Sample, a nationally representative sample of hospital discharges in the United States compiled by the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, by using a repeated cross-sectional design. We estimated the incidence of hospital deliveries related to maternal amphetamine or opioid use with weighted logistic regression. We measured clinical outcomes and costs with weighted multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear models.Results. Amphetamine- and opioid-related deliveries increased disproportionately across rural compared with urban counties in 3 of 4 census regions between 2008 to 2009 and 2014 to 2015. By 2014 to 2015, amphetamine use was identified among approximately 1% of deliveries in the rural West, which was higher than the opioid-use incidence in most regions. Compared with opioid-related and other hospital deliveries, amphetamine-related deliveries were associated with higher incidence of preeclampsia, preterm delivery, and severe maternal morbidity and mortality.Conclusions. Increasing incidence of amphetamine and opioid use among delivering women and associated adverse gestational outcomes indicate that amphetamine and opioid use affecting birth represent worsening public health crises.


Assuntos
Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Anfetaminas/epidemiologia , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde/economia , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Logísticos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Características de Residência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
18.
J Gen Intern Med ; 33(3): 376-383, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29181792

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: While the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) Medicaid expansion has increased insurance coverage, its effects on health outcomes have been mixed. This may be because previous research did not disaggregate mental and physical health or target populations most likely to benefit. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between Medicaid expansion and changes in mental health, physical health, and access to care among low-income childless adults with and without chronic conditions. DESIGN: We used a difference-in-differences analytical framework to assess differential changes in self-reported health outcomes and access to care. We stratified our analyses by chronic condition status. PARTICIPANTS: Childless adults, aged 18-64, with incomes below 138% of the federal poverty level in expansion (n = 69,620) and non-expansion states (n = 57,628). INTERVENTION: Active Medicaid expansion in state of residence. MAIN MEASURES: Self-reported general health; total days in past month with poor health, poor mental health, poor physical health, or health-related activity restrictions; disability; depression; insurance coverage; cost-related barriers; annual check-up; and personal doctor. KEY RESULTS: Medicaid expansion was associated with reductions in poor health days (-1.2 days [95% CI, -1.6,-0.7]) and days limited by poor health (-0.94 days [95% CI, -1.4,-0.43]), but only among adults with chronic conditions. Trends in general health measures appear to be driven by fewer poor mental health days (-1.1 days [95% CI, -1.6,-0.6]). Expansion was also associated with a reduction in depression diagnoses (-3.4 percentage points [95% CI, -6.1,-0.01]) among adults with chronic conditions. Expansion was associated with improvements in access to care for all adults. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion was associated with substantial improvements in mental health and access to care among low-income adults with chronic conditions. These positive trends are likely to be reversed if Medicaid expansion is repealed.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Medicaid/tendências , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Saúde Mental/tendências , Pobreza/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/tendências , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Saúde Mental/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economia , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/tendências , Pobreza/economia , Distribuição Aleatória , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
19.
Ann Behav Med ; 52(4): 309-318, 2018 03 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30084896

RESUMO

Background: Greater purpose in life is associated with lower rates of certain chronic diseases. Whether purpose in life can protect against development of prediabetes or type 2 diabetes is unknown. Purpose: To examine the association between purpose in life and blood glucose control among adults ≥50 years. Methods: We conducted a longitudinal cohort study of 3,907 participants of the Health and Retirement Study who at baseline did not have type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. Baseline purpose in life was measured using the Ryff and Keyes' Scales of Psychological Well-Being and grouped into tertiles (high, medium, and low). We used multivariable linear regression to examine the association between baseline purpose in life and HbA1c over 4 years. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between baseline purpose and incident prediabetes or type 2 diabetes over the same period. Results: After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, body mass index, physical activity, and physical and mental health factors, HbA1c was 0.07 percentage points lower among participants with high purpose than those with low purpose (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.12 to -0.02; p = .011). Participants with high purpose had lower odds of developing prediabetes or type 2 diabetes than those with low purpose (adjusted odds ratio 0.78; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.98; p = .037). Conclusions: Among older adults, greater purpose in life is associated with a lower incidence of prediabetes or type 2 diabetes. Strategies to promote greater purpose in life should be tested as a part of type 2 diabetes prevention efforts.


Assuntos
Glicemia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Hemoglobinas Glicadas , Satisfação Pessoal , Estado Pré-Diabético/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estado Pré-Diabético/sangue , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
20.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 15: E21, 2018 02 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29420168

RESUMO

Our objective was to measure obstetric outcomes and delivery-related health care utilization and costs among pregnant women with multiple chronic conditions. We used 2013-2014 data from the National Inpatient Sample to measure obstetric outcomes and delivery-related health care utilization and costs among women with no chronic conditions, 1 chronic condition, and multiple chronic conditions. Women with multiple chronic conditions were at significantly higher risk than women with 1 chronic condition or no chronic conditions across all outcomes measured. High-value strategies are needed to improve birth outcomes among vulnerable mothers and their infants.


Assuntos
Cesárea , Complicações na Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Cesárea/economia , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Crônica/economia , Doença Crônica/mortalidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Modelos Logísticos , Mortalidade Materna , Múltiplas Afecções Crônicas , Vigilância da População , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/economia , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/economia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/economia , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA