A retrospective observational study examining interhospital transfers from six New Zealand rural hospitals in 2019.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the percentage of patients that were transferred from rural hospitals and who received an investigation or intervention at an urban hospital that was not readily available at the rural hospital. METHODS: A retrospective observational study. DESIGN: Patients were randomly selected and clinical records were reviewed. Patient demographic and clinical information was collected, including any interventions or investigations occurring at the urban referral hospital. These were compared against the resources available at the rural hospitals. SETTING: Six New Zealand (NZ) rural hospitals were included. PARTICIPANTS: Patients that were transferred from a rural hospital to an urban hospital between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 December 2019 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients who received an investigation or intervention that was not available at the rural hospital. RESULTS: There were 584 patients included. Overall 73% of patients received an intervention or investigation that was not available at the rural hospital. Of the six rural hospitals, there was one outlier, where only 37% of patients transferred from that hospital received an investigation or intervention that was not available rurally. Patients were most commonly referred to general medicine (23%) and general surgery (18%). Of the investigations or interventions performed, 43% received a CT scan and 25% underwent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients that are transferred to urban hospitals receive an intervention or investigation that was not available at the rural hospital.

Exploratory survey of procedural sedation and analgesia practice in sample of New Zealand rural hospitals: existing guidelines do not support current rural practice.

AIM: Rural hospitals in New Zealand provide broad generalist clinical services, including procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA). This study was designed to explore patterns of procedural sedation use including indications, equipment, medications, logistical and medical staff support available by rural hospitals, and whether current professional guidelines support rural sedation practice. METHODS: Through the New Zealand Rural Hospital Research Network, 17 rural hospitals were enrolled in an online survey during February 2018. The electronic survey consisted of 31 questions, regarding general information, staffing level and procedural sedation practice. Further questions sought information on clinical documentation and training guidelines. RESULTS: Most participating sites represented larger rural hospitals and were distributed equally throughout New Zealand. All performed procedural sedation. The distance of rural hospitals to their referral hospitals varied, with the closest being 65 km and the furthest at 326 km away. This study found that staffing and equipment available for rural procedural sedation varied, with the majority of rural hospitals having access to only one doctor out of hours, and only half having access to two doctors within daytime hours. A majority of the respondents felt that a minimum safe level for procedural sedation in their rural hospital required only a single doctor. Procedural sedation is frequently performed in rural hospitals in New Zealand, with the majority of respondents performing PSA at least once a week or more. Ketamine is the preferred PSA agent. A wide variety of procedures are undertaken including orthopaedic and injury treatments, abscess incision and drainage, and cardioversions. Patient transfer to another centre for the purpose of PSA is infrequent, occurring a few times a month or less for all hospitals. CONCLUSION: This exploratory survey of rural hospital PSA practice demonstrated that PSA is a commonly performed procedure for a variety of indications. Staffing, equipment and techniques available for rural PSA vary according to institution. There is no current professional framework that suitably defines minimum standards for rural PSA practice, and specific training resources are limited. Providing procedural sedation and analgesia is an essential rural hospital service which is patient and whānau (Māori-language word for extended family) centred, saves patient transfers, and should be supported by a safe, pragmatic and realistic framework of tools, recommendations and training for rural practitioners.

Transition of the medical model of care at Ashburton hospital over 10 years: the perspective of rural generalists.

Rural hospitals in New Zealand face difficult workforce challenges to maintain services and quality outcomes. Ashburton Hospital has undergone a 10-year transition from a secondary specialist to a rural generalist medical model of care. Current senior medical staff (rural hospital medicine fellows) here explore their experience of the process and outcomes of this transition. Key drivers for change included commitment and support from management, senior medical staff and the local community, the new rural hospital medicine qualification and a core group of doctors willing to train in it. Challenges included the need to adapt rapidly to even a single doctor's departure, initial lack of credibility of the new qualification, and choice between a single or two-tier system of medical rostering. While acute and elective surgical services were lost, acute medical and rehabilitation services were maintained or increased. Presentations to the acute assessment unit, including high acuity cases, have more than doubled over the period described. Workforce stability has been enhanced and commitment to training contributes to future workforce sustainability. Long-term shared strategic commitment to transition was a key factor in successfully traversing challenges faced. Rural and provincial communities should consider rural generalism as a medical model to sustain and further develop their local hospital services.

Development of a Rural Inter-professional Simulation Course: an initiative to improve trauma and emergency team management in New Zealand rural hospitals.

BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT New Zealand is a largely rural nation. Despite the regionalisation of trauma services, rural hospitals continue to provide trauma and emergency care. A dedicated rural inter-professional team-based simulation course was designed, as part of a wider strategy of using simulation-based education to address the disparity in experience and training for rural hospital teams providing emergency and trauma care. ASSESSMENT A pre-course questionnaire identified learning needs. Post-course evaluation and a follow-up survey assessed participants' perception of the course, and whether lasting changes in clinical or organisational practice occurred. RESULTS Three courses were provided over 2 years to 60 interprofessional participants from eight rural hospitals. The course employed an interprofessional faculty and used skill workshops and high-fidelity trauma simulations to address learning needs identified in pre-course research. Evaluation showed the course to be an effective learning experience for participants. The post-course survey indicated possible lasting changes in team performance and rural hospital protocols. This educational strategy also allowed the collection of research data for investigating rural team dynamics and interprofessional learning. STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVEMENT Further development of rural interprofessional simulation courses should include more diverse clinical content, including paediatric and medical scenarios. Participant access was sometimes limited by typical rural challenges such as hospital staffing and locum availability. LESSONS Rural simulation-based education is both effective for rural trauma team training and a vehicle for rural research; however, there are challenges to participant access and course sustainability, which echo the rural-urban disparity.

Rural youth in distress? Youth self-harm presentations to a rural hospital over 10 years.

Introduction Despite growing awareness of increasing rates of youth suicide and self-harm in New Zealand, there is still little known about self-harm among rural youth. Aim This study compared: (1) rates of youth self-harm presentations between a rural emergency department (ED) and nationally available rates; and (2) local and national youth suicide rates over the decade from January 2008 to December 2017. Methods Data were requested on all presentations to Ashburton Hospital ED coded for 'self-harm' for patients aged 15-24 years. Comparative data were obtained from the coroner, Ministry of Health and the 2013 census. Analyses were conducted of the effects of age, time, repetition, method, ethnicity and contact with mental health services on corresponding suicide rates. Results Self-harm rates in Ashburton rose in the post-earthquake period (2013-17). During the peri-earthquake period (2008-12), non-Maori rates of self-harm were higher than for Maori (527 vs 116 per 100000 youth respectively), reflecting the national trend. In the post-earthquake period, although non-Maori rates of self-harm stayed stable (595 per 100000), there was a significant increase in Maori rates of self-harm to 1106 per 100000 (Chi-squared = 14.0, P < 0.001). Youth living within the Ashburton township showed higher rates than youth living more rurally. Discussion Youth self-harm behaviours, especially self-poisoning, have increased since the Canterbury earthquakes in the Ashburton rural community. Of most concern was the almost ninefold increase in Maori self-harm presentations in recent years, along with the increasing prevalence among teenagers and females. Possible explanations and further exploratory investigation strategies are discussed.