RESUMO
Background: Accurate pre-operative planning is essential for successful high tibial osteotomy (HTO). The lateral tibial spine is a commonly used anatomical landmark for weight-bearing line assessment. However, studies on the mediolateral (M-L) position of the lateral tibial spine on the tibial plateau and its variability are limited. Purpose: This study aimed to (1) analyze the M-L position of the lateral tibial spine on the tibial plateau and its variability, (2) investigate radiologic parameters that affect the position of the lateral tibial spine, and (3) determine whether the lateral tibial spine can be a useful anatomical landmark for weight-bearing line assessment during HTO. Materials and Methods: Radiological evaluation was performed on 200 participants (64% female, mean age 42.3 ± 13.2 years) who had standing anterior-posterior plain knee radiographs with a patellar facing forward orientation. The distances from the medial border of the tibial plateau to the lateral spine peak (dLSP) and lateral spine inflection point (dLSI) were measured using a picture archiving and communication system. The medial-lateral inter-spine distance (dISP) was also measured. All parameters were presented as percentages of the entire tibial plateau width. The relationships between the parameters were also investigated. Results: The mean value of dLSP was 56.9 ± 2.5 (52.4-64.5)%, which was 5% lower than the Fujisawa point (62%). The mean value of dLSI was 67.9 ± 2.2 (63.4-75.8)%, which was approximately 5% higher than the Fujisawa point. The values of the dLSP and dLSI were variable among patients, and the upper and lower 10% groups showed significantly higher and lower dLSP and dLSI, respectively, than the middle 10% group. The mean value of dISP was 16.5 ± 2.4%, and it was positively correlated with dLSP and dLSI. Conclusions: On average, the dLSP and dLSI were located -5% and +5% laterally from the conventional Fujisawa point, and they may be useful landmarks for correction amount adjustment during HTO. However, it should be noted that correction based on the lateral tibial spine can be affected by anatomical variations, especially in patients with small or large inter-spine distances.