Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 12(5): 101905, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38761979

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Gynecological cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema (GC-LEL), a chronic, progressive condition, lacks a standardized treatment. Currently, supraclavicular vascularized lymph node transfer (SC-VLNT) is a favored approach in the treatment of lymphedema, and there is a trend toward combination technology. This study conducts a comparative analysis of three techniques for treating GC-LEL with simultaneous SC-VLNT and liposuction. METHODS: A cohort of 35 patients with GC-LEL was examined, comprising 13 patients who underwent single lymph nodes flap with a skin paddle (SLNF+P), 12 who received single lymph nodes flap without a skin paddle (SLNF), and 10 who accepted dual lymph nodes flap without a skin paddle (DLNF). Patient demographics and outcomes were meticulously documented, covering intra- and postoperative variables. RESULTS: The median limb volume reduction were 56.4% (SLNF+P), 60.8% (SLNF), and 50.5% (DLNF) in stage II, and 54.0% (SLNF+P), 59.8% (SLNF), and 54.4% (DLNF) in stage III. DLNF group procedures entailed longer flap harvesting and transplantation times. The SLNF+P group, on average, had an 8-day postoperative hospitalization, longer than others. All patients noted subjective improvements in Lymphedema Quality of Life scores, with lymphoscintigraphy revealing enhanced lymphatic flow in 29 of the 35 cases. A notable decrease in cellulitis incidence was observed. Additionally, the occurrence of cellulitis decreased significantly, except for DLNF (Stage Ⅱ). The median follow-up time was 16 months (range, 12-36 months), with no reported severe postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: For advanced GC-LEL, SLNF combined with liposuction is a preferred treatment, offering fewer complications, shorter operative time, and hospitalization.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos , Lipectomia , Extremidade Inferior , Linfonodos , Linfedema , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Lipectomia/efeitos adversos , Lipectomia/métodos , Linfedema/cirurgia , Linfedema/etiologia , Linfedema/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfedema/fisiopatologia , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/complicações , Idoso , Adulto , Linfonodos/transplante , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos
2.
J Invest Surg ; 35(7): 1572-1578, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35379071

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A cross-leg flap can be used to treat severely injured lower limbs but associated with complications. Herein, we describe a technique of a parallel cross-leg free flap combined with posterior tibial artery perforator pedicle propeller cable bridge flap for the treatment of lower extremity wounds. METHODS: The artery and veins of the free flap are anastomosed to the contralateral posterior tibial artery and vein, respectively. The vascular pedicle is wrapped with a posterior tibial artery perforator pedicle propeller flap. The legs are allowed to remain in a straight, relaxed position which is maintained with a bandage or Kirschner wire placed at the distal limbs. Pedicle division is performed around 21 days after flap creation, and the posterior artery is re-anastomosed and pedicled flap returned to its original position. RESULTS: From June 2017 to March 2020, 7 patients with lower extremity wounds and tissue loss received reconstruction with this method. The recipient vessels for all flaps were the posterior tibial artery and vein. The average operation time was 5 hours. The average time to ambulation was 4 weeks, and the average follow-up time was 13.7 months. All flaps survived, and limb salvage was successful in all patients. Patients were not uncomfortable with the limbs held in position until pedicle division, and there were no complications. At the final follow-up, the function of all limbs was normal, and the esthetic appearance was acceptable to all patients. CONCLUSIONS: The method described overcomes the disadvantages of traditional cross-leg flaps for the treatment.


Assuntos
Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/irrigação sanguínea , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/cirurgia , Humanos , Perna (Membro)/cirurgia , Extremidade Inferior/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Transplante de Pele/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Pele/métodos , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/etiologia , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/cirurgia , Artérias da Tíbia/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi ; 35(7): 891-895, 2021 Jul 15.
Artigo em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34308599

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of lateral circumflex femoral artery chimeric flap transplantation in repair of complex wounds of foot and ankle. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 20 patients with complex wounds of foot and ankle treated with lateral circumflex femoral artery chimeric flap between June 2017 and June 2020. There were 14 males and 6 females with an average age of 42.8 years (range, 21-65 years). Among them, 8 cases had dorsalis pedis tendon defect with or without bone exposure, 4 cases had partial or total Achilles tendon defect without bone exposure, and 8 cases had deep cavity and bone exposure. The wound area ranged from 10 cm×6 cm to 21 cm×11 cm. The time from injury to operation ranged from 6 to 22 days, with an average of 9.4 days. The lateral femoral circumflex artery flap was used in 6 cases with fascia lata flap, 6 cases with rectus femoris aponeurosis flap, and 8 cases with lateral femoral muscle flap. The flap area ranged from 12.0 cm×6.5 cm to 35.0 cm×7.5 cm. All flap donor sites were sutured directly. The survival, appearance, texture, sensation of the flap, and complications of the donor site were observed. The foot and ankle function was evaluated by Kofoed score. RESULTS: All patients were followed up 8-24 months (mean, 14.2 months). On the 3rd day after operation, 1 case had partial necrosis of 1 flap with fascia lata flap and healed after dressing change; 1 case of chimeric muscle flap developed venous crisis at 12 hours after operation; the chimeric flaps survived successfully in the other 18 patients and the wounds were primary healing. The color and texture of the flaps were good, the flaps recovered protective sensation. Only linear scar remained in the donor site of thigh. There was no sensory disturbance around the incision or walking disturbance. The Kofoed score of the foot and ankle function at last follow-up was 75-96, with an average of 89.8. Among them, 15 cases were excellent, 4 cases were good, and 1 case was qualified. The excellent and good rate was 95.0%. CONCLUSION: The application of lateral circumflex femoral artery chimeric flap can accurately and stereoscopically repair the complex wounds of foot and ankle and achieve satisfactory effectiveness.


Assuntos
Retalho Perfurante , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles , Adulto , Tornozelo/cirurgia , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante de Pele , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/cirurgia , Coxa da Perna , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA