Late selective termination in dichorionic twins: comparing late second and third trimester procedures.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do perinatal outcomes of selective termination performed in the late second versus third trimester differ and what risk factors are associated with subsequent preterm birth? DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of late selective terminations performed in dichorionic twins between 2009 and 2021. Perinatal outcomes were compared between two groups: group A, late second trimester (20.2 to 24.2 weeks, n = 26), and group B, third trimester (≥28.2 weeks, n = 55) selective terminations. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with post-procedure preterm birth. RESULTS: In total, 81 dichorionic twin pregnancies were included. There were no pregnancy losses but 16% (13/81) of cases experienced complications. Group A had a higher median birthweight centile (36.5th versus 15th centile, P = 0.002) and lower rates of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and Caesarean delivery (11.5% versus 32.7%, P = 0.04; and 26.9% versus 61.8%, P = 0.003) than group B. Preterm birth rates were similar (46.2% versus 63.6%, P = 0.15). Multiple regression revealed that reduction of the presenting twin and cervical length ≤35 mm were independently associated with post-procedure preterm birth (odds ratio [OR] 8.7, P = 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5-29.8; OR 3.8, P = 0.015, 95% CI 1.3-11). CONCLUSIONS: Late second trimester selective termination is associated with a higher birthweight centile and lower rates of IUGR and Caesarean delivery, compared with third trimester selective termination. Cervical length 35 mm or less and reduction of the presenting twin are independent risk factors for post-procedural preterm birth. These findings may help determine the optimal time to perform a late selective termination.

Diagnosis and management of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies: A cross-sectional international survey.

OBJECTIVE: To identify current practices in the management of selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: International. POPULATION: Clinicians involved in the management of MCDA twin pregnancies with sFGR. METHODS: A structured, self-administered survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical practices and attitudes to diagnostic criteria and management strategies. RESULTS: Overall, 62.8% (113/180) of clinicians completed the survey; of which, 66.4% (75/113) of the respondents reported that they would use an estimated fetal weight (EFW) of <10th centile for the smaller twin and an inter-twin EFW discordance of >25% for the diagnosis of sFGR. For early-onset type I sFGR, 79.8% (75/94) of respondents expressed that expectant management would be their routine practice. On the other hand, for early-onset type II and type III sFGR, 19.3% (17/88) and 35.7% (30/84) of respondents would manage these pregnancies expectantly, whereas 71.6% (63/88) and 57.1% (48/84) would refer these pregnancies to a fetal intervention centre or would offer fetal intervention for type II and type III cases, respectively. Moreover, 39.0% (16/41) of the respondents would consider fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS) for early-onset type I sFGR, whereas 41.5% (17/41) would offer either FLS or selective feticide, and 12.2% (5/41) would exclusively offer selective feticide. For early-onset type II and type III sFGR cases, 25.9% (21/81) and 31.4% (22/70) would exclusively offer FLS, respectively, whereas 33.3% (27/81) and 32.9% (23/70) would exclusively offer selective feticide. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in clinician practices and attitudes towards the management of early-onset sFGR in MCDA twin pregnancies, especially for type II and type III cases, highlighting the need for high-level evidence to guide management.

Obstetric and Early Neonatal Outcomes Following Second and Third COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women are at higher risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Since the release of the BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech), there has been accumulated data about the three vaccine doses. However, information regarding obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women vaccinated with the third (booster) vaccine is limited and primarily retrospective. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the obstetric and early neonatal outcomes of pregnant women vaccinated during pregnancy with the COVID-19 booster vaccine compared to pregnant women vaccinated only by the first two doses. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of pregnant women who received the BNT162b2 vaccine during pregnancy. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared between pregnant women who received only the first two doses of the vaccine to those who also received the booster dose. RESULTS: Overall, 139 pregnant women were vaccinated during pregnancy with the first two doses of the vaccine and 84 with the third dose. The third dose group received the vaccine earlier during their pregnancy compared to the two doses group (212 vs. 315 weeks, respectively, P < 0.001). No differences in obstetric and early neonatal outcomes between the groups were found except for lower rates of urgent cesarean delivery in the third dose group (adjusted odds ratio 0.21; 95% confidence interval 0.048-0.926, P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the first two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine given in pregnancy, the booster vaccination is safe and not associated with an increased rate of adverse obstetric and early neonatal outcomes.

Vaginal delivery rate by near delivery sonographic weight estimation and maternal stature among nulliparous women.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the risk for cesarean delivery among term nulliparous women, categorized by maternal stature and recent sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW). METHODS: A retrospective study including singleton deliveries of nulliparous women between 2011 and 2020, with sonographic EFW within 1 week of delivery. We categorized maternal height into five groups: ≤150, 151-155, 156-160, 161-165, and ≥166 cm. Fetal weight estimation was categorized into five groups as well: ≤2500 g, 2501-2999, 3000-3499, 3500-3999, and ≥4000 g. RESULTS: Overall, 13 107 deliveries were included. The cesarean delivery rate was inversely correlated with maternal height, ranging from 41.0% in group 1 to 13.1% in group 5. The vaginal delivery rate ranged from 33.3% in maternal height group 1 with EFW of ≥4000 g to 85% in maternal height group 5 with EFW of ≤2500 g. In weight categories above 2500 g, maternal height correlated significantly with vaginal delivery rate, except in weight category ≥4000 g in which vaginal delivery rate ranged around 30% in maternal height categories 1-3 and increased significantly in groups 4-5 to 50-60%. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, EFW was independently associated with CD for EFW categories 3500-3999 and ≥4000 g [aOR 95% CI 1.49 (1.08-2.06) and 4.39 (2.97-6.50), respectively]. Maternal height was negatively associated with CD [aOR 95% CI 0.67 (0.64-0.70)] for each increase in maternal height group. CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean delivery rate was inversely correlated with maternal height, ranging from 41.0% among women ≤150 cm to 13.1% among women ≥166 cm. Maternal height and EFW of ≥3500 g are independently associated with CD rates among term nulliparous women.

Perinatal Outcome following the Suspension of Intrapartum Oxygen Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether the suspension of intrapartum maternal oxygen supplementation for nonreassuring fetal heart rate is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study, including all individuals that underwent labor in a single tertiary medical center. On April 16, 2020, the routine use of intrapartum oxygen for category II and III fetal heart rate tracings was suspended. The study group included individuals with singleton pregnancies that underwent labor during the 7 months between April 16, 2020, and November 14, 2020. The control group included individuals that underwent labor during the 7 months before April 16, 2020. Exclusion criteria included elective cesarean section, multifetal pregnancy, fetal death, and maternal oxygen saturation <95% during delivery. The primary outcome was defined as the rate of composite neonatal outcome, consisting of arterial cord pH <7.1, mechanical ventilation, respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3/4, and neonatal death. The secondary outcome was the rate of cesarean and operative delivery. RESULTS: The study group included 4,932 individuals, compared with 4,906 individuals in the control group. The suspension of intrapartum oxygen treatment was associated with a significant increase in the rate of composite neonatal outcome (187 [3.8%] vs. 120 [2.4%], p < 0.001), including the rate of abnormal cord arterial pH <7.1 (119 [2.4%] vs. 56 [1.1%], p < 0.01). A higher rate of cesarean section due to nonreassuring fetal heart rate was noted in the study group (320 [6.5%] vs. 268 [5.5%], p = 0.03).A logistic regression analysis revealed that the suspension of intrapartum oxygen treatment was independently associated with the composite neonatal outcome (adjusted odds ratio = 1.55 [95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.96]) while adjusting for suspected chorioamnionitis, intrauterine growth restriction, and recent coronavirus disease 2019 exposure. CONCLUSION: Suspension of intrapartum oxygen treatment for nonreassuring fetal heart rate was associated with higher rates of adverse neonatal outcomes and urgent cesarean section due to fetal heart rate. KEY POINTS: · The available data on intrapartum maternal oxygen supplementation are equivocal.. · Suspension of maternal oxygen for nonreassuring fetal heart rate during labor was associated with adverse neonatal outcomes.. · Oxygen treatment might still be important and relevant during labor..

Intrauterine Blood Transfusion for Parvo B19-Induced Fetal Anemia: Neuroimaging Findings and Long-Term Neurological Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate the neuroimaging findings and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of fetuses and children following intrauterine blood transfusion (IUT) for parvo B19 infection-induced anemia compared to those with RBC alloimmunization. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including women who underwent an IUT due to fetal anemia between 2006 and 2019 in a tertiary, university-affiliated medical center. The cohort was divided into two groups: a study group - fetuses affected by congenital parvo B19 infection; and a control group - fetuses affected by RBC alloimmunization. Retrospective data such as antenatal sonographic evaluations, fetal brain MRI results, and short-term fetal and neonatal outcomes were collected. All children underwent a neurodevelopmental evaluation after birth using a Vineland questionnaire. Primary outcome was defined as the presence or absence of neurodevelopmental delay. Secondary outcome was defined as the presence of abnormal fetal neuroimaging findings such as cerebellar hypoplasia, polymicrogyria, intracranial hemorrhage, or severe ventriculomegaly. RESULTS: Overall, 71 fetuses requiring at least one IUT were included in the study. Of these, 18 were affected by parvo B19 infection and 53 by RBC alloimmunization with various associated antibodies. Fetuses in the parvo B19 group presented at an earlier gestational age (22.91 ± 3.36 weeks vs. 27.37 ± 4.67 weeks, p = 0.002) and were more affected by hydrops (93.33% vs. 16.98%, p < 0.001). Three fetuses out of the 18 (16.67%) fetuses in the parvo B19 group died in utero following the IUT. Abnormal neuroimaging findings were detected in 4/15 (26.7%) of the parvo B19 survivors versus 2/53 (3.8%) of fetuses affected by RBC alloimmunization (p = 0.005). There was no difference in long-term neurodevelopmental delay rates between the children in the study and control groups, as assessed at the average age of 3.65 and 6.53 years, accordingly. CONCLUSION: Fetal anemia due to parvo B19, treated with IUT, might be associated with increased rates of abnormal neurosonographic findings. The correlation between those findings and long-term adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes requires further investigation.

Selective reduction in complicated monochorionic pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of different techniques.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the perinatal outcomes of complicated monochorionic pregnancies after selective reduction by radiofrequency ablation, bipolar cord coagulation, and interstitial laser. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, from the inception of the database up to April 26, 2021. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies comparing at least 2 selective reduction techniques among complicated monochorionic pregnancies and presenting data on perinatal outcomes, including gestational age at procedure, gestational age at delivery, procedure to delivery interval, preterm premature rupture of membranes, preterm birth, survival rate, and birthweight, were eligible. METHODS: The random-effects model was used to pool the mean differences or odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 value. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies with 734 cases of fetal reduction met the inclusion criteria, of which 9 studies with 674 fetuses were eligible for quantitative synthesis. In 8 studies that compared radiofrequency ablation with bipolar cord coagulation, radiofrequency ablation was associated with increased procedure to delivery interval (days) (mean difference, 13.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.90-24.94; P=.02; I2=0.0%), decreased preterm birth (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.85; P=.01; I2=3.0%), and decreased preterm premature rupture of membranes (odds ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.73; P=.001; I2=0.0%). Radiofrequency ablation and bipolar cord coagulation had comparable survival rates (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.35; P=.49; I2=0.0%). In 3 studies that compared radiofrequency ablation with interstitial laser, there was no significant difference in gestational age at delivery (P=.07) or survival (P=.15). In 3 studies that compared bipolar cord coagulation with interstitial laser, bipolar cord coagulation was associated with a higher survival rate (odds ratio, 3.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-9.10; P=.03; I2=0.0%), but the gestational age at delivery was comparable between groups (P=.16). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that radiofrequency ablation has a greater procedure to delivery interval and decreased preterm premature rupture of membranes and preterm birth than bipolar cord coagulation. Although there was no difference in gestational age at delivery for either bipolar cord coagulation, radiofrequency ablation, or interstitial laser, survival was higher with bipolar cord coagulation than with interstitial laser.

Fetal and neonatal brain injury in twins complicated by twin anemia polycythemia sequence.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of fetal and neonatal brain lesions and define risk factors for such lesions in pregnancies complicated by Twin Anemia Polycythemia Sequence (TAPS). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of monochorionic twin pregnancies which were diagnosed with TAPS in a single tertiary medical center between 2013 and 2021. Pregnancies were followed with fetal brain neurosonogram every 2 weeks and fetal brain MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) was performed when indicated at 28-32 weeks of gestation; post-natal brain imaging included neonatal brain ultrasound. Pregnancies with pre- and post-natal brain lesions were compared to those without such findings. RESULTS: Overall, 23 monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies were diagnosed with TAPS over the study period resulting in perinatal survival of 91.3% (42/46). In 6/23 (26%) pregnancies and 7/46 (15.2%) fetuses pre- or post-natal brain lesions were detected, of whom five were the polycythemic twins and two were the anemic twins. Brain findings included intra-cerebral hemorrhage and ischemic lesions and were diagnosed prenatally in 6/7 (85.7%) cases. No risk factors for severe brain lesions were identified. CONCLUSIONS: TAPS may place the fetuses and neonates at increased risk for cerebral injuries. Incorporation of fetal brain imaging protocols may enhance precise prenatal diagnosis and allow for accurate parental counseling and post-natal care.

Vaginal birth after cesarean in women with no prior vaginal delivery carrying a large for gestational age baby.

BACKGROUND: To study the factors associated with successful labor after cesarean (LAC) among women with no prior vaginal delivery, delivering a large for gestational age (LGA) baby. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study at two tertiary medical centers in Israel, including all women undergoing LAC with no prior vaginal delivery during 2010-2020, delivering a singleton LGA newborn. Factors associated with successful vaginal delivery were examined by a multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 323/505 (64.0%) had a successful LAC. Arrest of labor as the indication for previous CD was less common in the LAC success group [39 (12.1%) vs. 58 (31.9%), P < .001]. The rate of epidural analgesia was higher in the LAC success group [249 (77.1%) vs. 122 (67.0%), P = .014]. The rate of weight centile ≥97th was lower in the LAC success group [64 (19.8%) vs. 51 (28.0%), P = .035], as well as the rate of higher LAC birthweight than previous cesarean birthweight [264 (81.7%) vs. 162 (89.0%), P = .030]. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, maternal height (aOR [95% CI]:1.09 (1.01, 1.17), P = .014) and epidural anesthesia (aOR [95% CI]:3.68 (1.31, 10.32), P = .013) were the only independent factors associated with LAC success. CONCLUSIONS: Among primiparous women undergoing LAC carrying LGA newborns, the vaginal delivery rate is acceptable; however, uterine rupture risk is increased. Epidural administration is a modifiable factor and should be taken into consideration during LAC management.

Labor induction in twin pregnancies: Does the perinatal outcome differ according to chorionicity?

OBJECTIVE: To compare perinatal outcomes following induction of labor in dichorionic versus monochorionic twin pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study analyzing all women with twin pregnancies who underwent induction of labor in a single university-affiliated tertiary medical center. The cohort included 290 women who were divided into 2 groups according to chorionicity: (1) dichorionic twin pregnancies (n = 203); (2) monochorionic twin pregnancies (n = 87). Induction of labor methods included oxytocin infusion, extra-amniotic balloon catheter and artificial amniotomy. Primary outcome was defined as mode of delivery. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal adverse events. RESULTS: Primary outcome did not differ between groups, with vaginal delivery rate of 92.1% in the dichorionic group and 94.2% in the monochorionic group. Women with dichorionic twins delivered later compared to monochorionic twins (38.00 weeks vs. 36.43 weeks, respectively, p < 0.001). While no differences were observed in Apgar scores or umbilical cord pH measurements, dichorionic twins were less frequently admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit compared to monochorionic twins (2.4% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.01 for 1st twin; and 6.9% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.089 for 2nd twin). Multivariate logistic regression adjusting outcomes to potential confounders, found gestational age at delivery to be the only variable significantly associated with neonatal intensive care unit admission rates (odds ratio 0.236, 95% confidence interval 0.152-0.366, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Labor induction might be considered for both di- and monochorionic uncomplicated twin pregnancies with excellent vaginal delivery rates. The higher rates of neonatal adverse outcomes among monochorionic twins are presumably related to earlier gestation age at delivery.

Experience of 300 cases of prenatal fetoscopic open spina bifida repair: report of the International Fetoscopic Neural Tube Defect Repair Consortium.

BACKGROUND: The multicenter randomized controlled trial Management of Myelomeningocele Study demonstrated that prenatal repair of open spina bifida by hysterotomy, compared with postnatal repair, decreases the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunting and increases the chances of independent ambulation. However, the hysterotomy approach is associated with risks that are inherent to the uterine incision. Fetal surgeons from around the world embarked on fetoscopic open spina bifida repair aiming to reduce maternal and fetal/neonatal risks while preserving the neurologic benefits of in utero surgery to the child. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report the main obstetrical, perinatal, and neurosurgical outcomes in the first 12 months of life of children undergoing prenatal fetoscopic repair of open spina bifida included in an international registry and to compare these with the results reported in the Management of Myelomeningocele Study and in a subsequent large cohort of patients who received an open fetal surgery repair. STUDY DESIGN: All known centers performing fetoscopic spina bifida repair were contacted and invited to participate in a Fetoscopic Myelomeningocele Repair Consortium and enroll their patients in a registry. Patient data entered into this fetoscopic registry were analyzed for this report. Fisher exact test was performed for comparison of categorical variables in the registry with both the Management of Myelomeningocele Study and a post-Management of Myelomeningocele Study cohort. Binary logistic regression analyses were used to assess the registry data for predictors of preterm birth at <30 weeks' gestation, preterm premature rupture of membranes, and need for postnatal cerebrospinal fluid diversion in the fetoscopic registry. RESULTS: There were 300 patients in the fetoscopic registry, 78 in the Management of Myelomeningocele Study, and 100 in the post-Management of Myelomeningocele Study cohort. The 3 data sets showed similar anatomic levels of the spinal lesion, mean gestational age at delivery, distribution of motor function compared with upper anatomic level of the lesion in the neonates, and perinatal death. In the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (26.16±1.6 weeks) and post-Management of Myelomeningocele Study cohort (23.3 [20.2-25.6] weeks), compared with the fetoscopic registry group (23.6±1.4 weeks), the gestational age at surgery was lower (comparing fetoscopic repair group with the Management of Myelomeningocele Study; P<.01). After open fetal surgery, all patients were delivered by cesarean delivery, whereas in the fetoscopic registry approximately one-third were delivered vaginally (P<.01). At cesarean delivery, areas of dehiscence or thinning in the scar were observed in 34% of cases in the Management of Myelomeningocele Study, in 49% in the post-Management of Myelomeningocele Study cohort, and in 0% in the fetoscopic registry (P<.01 for both comparisons). At 12 months of age, there was no significant difference in the number of patients requiring treatment for hydrocephalus between those in the fetoscopic registry and the Management of Myelomeningocele Study. CONCLUSION: Prenatal and postnatal outcomes up to 12 months of age after prenatal fetoscopic and open fetal surgery repair of open spina bifida are similar. Fetoscopic repair allows for having a vaginal delivery and eliminates the risk of uterine scar dehiscence, therefore protecting subsequent pregnancies of unnecessary maternal and fetal risks.

Abnormal nuchal translucency followed by normal microarray analysis is associated with placental pathology-related complications.

OBJECTIVE: Identify placental pathology-related complications, labor and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by pathological nuchal translucency (NT) with normal microarray analysis. METHODS: A retrospective study in which all women with singleton pregnancy who demonstrated NT above 3 mm and a normal microarray analysis were matched to women with normal NT and a normal microarray analysis (2013-2019) in a single tertiary academic center. The following placental pathology-related parameters were measured: preeclampsia, oligohydramnios, suspected intrauterine growth restriction, abnormal Doppler studies or small for gestational age (SGA) neonates. The primary outcome was defined as a composite of complications related to placental pathology including preeclampsia and SGA neonate. Secondary outcomes were labor complications and neonatal morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 185 women were included in the study: of them, 47 presented an abnormal NT (study group) and 138 presented normal NT (controls). Groups did not significantly differ in baseline characteristics. Regarding primary outcome, all placental-related complications frequencies were higher in the study group, with a composite rate of 17.02% versus 6.52% in controls (p = 0.042%). Secondary outcomes did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal NT measurement presented in pregnancies with normal fetal microarray analysis is associated with higher rates of placental-related complications.

Fetal and neonatal brain lesions following laser ablation for twin-to-twin-transfusion-syndrome as detected by pre- and post-natal brain imaging.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of and risk factors for fetal and neonatal brain lesions following laser ablation for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 83 women with monochorionic twin pregnancies who underwent ablation for TTTS at a single tertiary hospital. Post-laser survivors were followed-up with fetal neurosonogram every 2 weeks and fetal brain MRI at 28-32 weeks of gestation; post-natal brain imaging included neurosonogram. Cases with pre- and post-natal brain lesions were compared to those without. RESULTS: 153 fetuses survived the immediate post-laser period and underwent brain imaging. Of these, 17 (11.11%) exhibited brain lesions on prenatal imaging studies, and 36 (32.4%) on post-natal ultrasound. Later gestational age (GA) at the time of ablation (23.0 vs. 21.4 weeks, p = 0.0244), post-laser twin-anemia-polycythemia-sequence (TAPS) (29.41% vs. 9.56%, p = 0.035) and birthweight discordancy (30% vs. 9%, p = 0.0025) were associated with prenatal brain lesions. Earlier GA at delivery (31.0 weeks vs. 32.2, p = 0.0002) and post-laser TAPS (25% vs. 9.33%, p = 0.038) were associated with post-natal brain lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of ablation for TTTS are at risk for brain lesions, which can be detected prenatally. Incorporation of neurosonogram and fetal brain MRI into the routine surveillance of such pregnancies should be considered.

Vaginal delivery in SARS-CoV-2-infected pregnant women in Israel: a multicenter prospective analysis.

KEY MESSAGE: Among SARS-CoV-2-infected mothers, vaginal delivery rates were high and associated with favorable outcomes with no cases of neonatal COVID-19. PURPOSE: To investigate the mode of delivery and its impact on immediate neonatal outcome in SARS-CoV-2-infected women. METHODS: A prospective study following pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 who delivered between March 15th and July 4th in seven university affiliated hospitals in Israel. RESULTS: A total of 52 women with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 delivered in the participating centers during the study period. The median gestational age at the time of delivery was 38 weeks, with 16 (30.8%) cases complicated by spontaneous preterm birth. Forty-three women (82.7%) underwent a trial of labor. The remaining 9 women underwent pre-labor cesarean delivery mostly due to obstetric indications, whereas one woman with a critical COVID-19 course underwent urgent cesarean delivery due to maternal deterioration. Among those who underwent a trial of labor (n = 43), 39 (90.7%) delivered vaginally, whereas 4 (9.3%) cases resulted in cesarean delivery. Neonatal RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swabs tested negative in all cases, and none of the infants developed pneumonia. No maternal and neonatal deaths were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study among SARS-CoV-2-infected mothers, vaginal delivery rates were high and associated with favorable outcomes with no cases of neonatal COVID-19. Our findings underscore that delivery management among SARS-CoV-2-infected mothers should be based on obstetric indications and may potentially reduce the high rates of cesarean delivery previously reported in this setting.

Do Serial Sonographic Assessments of Fetuses with Isolated Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Help Us Predict Survival?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the ability of serial prenatal sonographic measurements, and specifically changes in the observed-to-expected lung-to-head ratio (O/E LHR) throughout gestation and to predict survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). METHODS: Retrospective study of CDH fetuses evaluated prenatally and treated postnatally in a single tertiary center, 2008-2020. Sonographic evaluations included side of herniation, liver involvement, and O/E LHR. All data were calculated to assess ability to predict survival. RESULTS: Overall, 94 fetuses were evaluated prenatally and delivered in our medical center. Among them, 75 had isolated CDH and 19 nonisolated. CDH was categorized as left (n = 76; 80.8%), right (n = 16; 17.0%), or bilateral (n = 2; 2.2%). Overall perinatal survival rate was 57% for all live-born infants, 68% in isolated CDH, and 40% in nonisolated (excluding 2 cases that underwent fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion and did not survive). The O/E LHR was lower in cases with perinatal death compared to survivors. In cases with multiple evaluations, the minimal O/E LHR was the most accurate predictor of survival and need for perinatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. This remained significant when excluding twin pregnancies or when evaluating only isolated left CDH. In addition to disease severity, the side of herniation and liver position was associated with preoperative mortality. CONCLUSION: O/E LHR is associated with perinatal survival. In cases with multiple evaluations, the minimal O/E LHR is the most accurate and significant predictor of perinatal mortality and need for ECMO support.

Pregnancy outcome after multifetal pregnancy reduction of triplets to twins versus reduction to singletons.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does fetal reduction of triplet pregnancies to singleton result in superior obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared with triplets reduced to twins? DESIGN: A historical cohort study including 285 trichorionic and dichorionic triplet pregnancies that underwent abdominal fetal reduction at 11-14 weeks in a single tertiary referral centre. The study population comprised two groups: reduction to twins (n = 223) and singletons (n = 62). Main outcome measures were rates of pregnancy complications, preterm delivery and neonatal outcomes. Non-parametric statistical methods were employed. RESULTS: Triplet pregnancies reduced to twins delivered earlier (36 versus 39 weeks, P < 0.001) with higher prevalence of Caesarean section (71.1% versus 32.2%, P < 0.001) compared with triplets reduced to singletons. Preterm delivery rates were significantly higher in twins compared with singletons prior to 37 weeks (56.9% versus 13.6%, P < 0.001), 34 weeks (20.2% versus 3.4%, P = 0.002) and 32 weeks (9.6% versus 0%, P = 0.01). No significant difference was found in the rate of pregnancy loss before 24 weeks (1.3% in twins versus 4.8% in singletons, P = 0.12) or in the rate of intrauterine fetal death after 24 weeks (0.4% versus 0%, P = 1.0). Both groups had comparable obstetrical complications and neonatal outcomes, except for higher rates of neonatal intensive care unit admission in twins (31.9% versus 6.8%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of triplets to singletons rather than twins resulted in superior obstetric outcomes without increasing the procedure-related complications. However, because the rate of extreme prematurity in pregnancies reduced to twins was low, the overall outcome of those pregnancies was favourable. Therefore, the option of reduction to singletons should be considered in cases where the risk of prematurity seems exceptionally high.

Esophageal atresia in twins compared to singletons: In utero manifestation and characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: Esophageal atresia with/without tracheo-esophageal fistula (EA/TEF) is more common among twins. The detection of polyhydramnios might be altered in twins, leading to EA/TEF underdiagnosis, prenatally. The aim of the study was to compare the prenatal manifestation of EA/TEF between twins and singletons. METHODS: A 12-year study of EA/TEF cases was performed at a tertiary center. Cases exhibiting (a) small/absent stomach or (b) polyhydramnios were considered "suspected"; cases with (c) esophageal pouch were considered "detected." We compared the rate and timing of appearance of these signs between the groups. RESULTS: There were 76 cases of EA/TEF, of which 17 were a co-twin. All twin pairs were EA/TEF discordant. The prevalence of EA/TEF at our center was 1:750 for twins (1:319 monochorionic and 1:1133 dichorionic) and 1:2399 for singletons. The rate of small/absent stomach, polyhydramnios and pouch in twins vs singletons was 23.5%, 47.1%, 29.4% and 39.7%, 72.4%,34.5%, respectively (P = .2, P = .09 and P = .7). Esophageal pouch was detected earlier in twins (P = .03). Twins were scanned more frequently (×1.8 times, P = .01). CONCLUSION: EA/TEF is more prevalent in twins. Despite lower rate of polyhydramnios, twins were similarly detected prenatally as singletons, and this was accomplished earlier in pregnancy; perhaps reflecting more frequent scans.

Retinopathy of prematurity in discordant twins: is the small twin at increased risk?

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of birth weight (BW) independent of gestational age (GA) on Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in preterm discordant twins. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 45 preterm twin pairs born at < 34 weeks of gestation with BW discordance of ≥ 20%. The twin pairs were divided into two groups based on BW - small or large. Rates of ROP, stage, treatment, and prognosis were compared between the two groups. Other neonatal outcomes related to prematurity were also compared between groups. RESULTS: The mean gestation age at delivery was 31.1 weeks of gestation. The rate of ROP was significantly higher among the smaller twins compared to the larger twins (8.9% vs 0% respectively, p = 0.04). All smaller twins with ROP had stage 2 disease, and all cases of ROP had resolved without treatment. Regarding neonatal morbidities, the smaller twins had longer hospitalization length (53.8 vs 39.4 days respectively, p < 0.01) and a higher rate of hypoglycemia (55.6% vs 24.4% respectively, p = 0.003), whereas the larger twins were more commonly affected by respiratory distress syndrome (59.1% vs 26.7% respectively, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The rate of ROP was higher among the small twins in preterm discordant twins. This may indicate that low BW rather than early GA is the main factor contributing to the development of ROP.

Which way is better to deliver the very heavy baby: mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal outcome.

PURPOSE: Currently there are no existing data regarding the maternal and neonatal outcomes for nulliparous women delivering neonates with birthweight above 4500 g. We aim to evaluate birth outcome among these subset of parturients. METHODS: A retrospective study of nulliparous delivering a singleton fetus weighing ≥ 4500 g in two tertiary medical centers between 2007 and 2018. Women who chose to undergo a trial of labor (TOL) were compared to those who underwent elective cesarean delivery (CD). RESULTS: Overall, 121 women were included. Seventy eight (65.4%) women elected a TOL while 43 (34.6%) had elective CD. Of women who chose TOL, 46 (59%) delivered with unassisted vaginal delivery, 28 (36%) by intrapartum CD, and 4 (5%) by assisted vaginal delivery, reaching TOL success rate of 64% (50/78). The rates of shoulder dystocia and anal sphincter injury in vaginal deliveries were 5/50 (10%) and 2/50 (4%) respectively. Successful TOL was negatively associated with the presence of gestational diabetes [5 (18%) vs. 0 (0%), OR 0.8 (95% CI 0.7-0.9), p = 0.005], and was positively associated with maternal height (median 170 cm vs. 165 cm, p = 0.002), epidural analgesia [42 (84%) vs. 16 (57%), OR 3.5 (95% CI 1.2-9.8), p = 0.009] and spontaneous onset of labor (38 (76%) vs. 10 (36%), OR 5.7 (95% CI 2.1-15.6), p = 0.001. Neonates born after TOL were more commonly complicated by meconium aspiration syndrome as compared to no TOL (9 (11%) vs. 0 (0%), OR 1.1 (95% CI 1.04-1.22, p = 0.02). Only maternal height was independently associated with successful TOL (aOR 6.9 (95% CI 1.03-46.3, p = 0.04). Maternal and neonatal adverse composite outcomes were associated with gestational hypertensive disorders (10 (50%) vs. 5 (5%). OR 19.2 (5.5-67.4), p < 0.001) and with delivery before 40 weeks (9 (57%) vs, 86 (82%), OR 3.5 (95% CI 1.2-10.6, p = 0.02), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Trial of vaginal delivery in nulliparous with fetuses ≥ 4500 g was associated with a high failure rate, with only two thirds of parturients achieving successful vaginal delivery. Nevertheless, neonatal outcomes mostly did not differ according to the mode of delivery. Maternal height was the only factor associated with successful vaginal delivery.

Does antenatal steroids treatment in twin pregnancies prior to late preterm birth reduce neonatal morbidity? Evidence from a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) administration during the late-preterm (LPT) period in twin pregnancies is associated with decreased rate of neonatal morbidity. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including a total of 290 women with twin pregnancies resulting in live births of 580 neonates who delivered during LPT period between 2016 and 2018 at a tertiary medical center. Patients were allocated into two groups according to ACS exposure. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups. Primary outcome was neonatal composite respiratory morbidity, defined as the occurrence of at least one of the followings: RDS, TTN, O2 requirement, CPAP use or mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Patients exposed to ACS were older and more commonly complicated by gestational diabetes compared to the non-exposed group. Moreover, women exposed to ACS delivered earlier (35.6 vs. 36.3 weeks, P < 0.001) and more frequently by cesarean section (76.4% vs. 54.1%, P = 0.002) compared to the non-exposed group. The rate of composite respiratory morbidity did not differ between the groups. Nevertheless, neonates exposed to ACS had higher rates of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and hypoglycemia compared to neonates without prior ACS exposure (27.8% vs. 11.7%, P = 0.001; 49.3% vs. 27.1%, P < 0.001, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that gestational age at delivery was the sole independent risk factor for NICU admission, whereas late-preterm ACS exposure was the only risk factor for hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION: LPT-ACS administration in twin pregnancies complicated by LPT birth in our study did not reduce neonatal respiratory morbidity but was associated with higher rates of hypoglycaemia.